Charles Oakley: Ewing "never put us on his back like he should have"

Ewing never even played with a real number 2. I don't think the Knicks had another solid 20 point a night scorer any of Pat's years. Spree and Houston better be 3rd options on a championship level team.
 
Ewing never even played with a real number 2. I don't think the Knicks had another solid 20 point a night scorer any of Pat's years. Spree and Houston better be 3rd options on a championship level team.
Starks 19 was the highest... Houston and spree 17/18 ish
 
You can't make somebody what they not. They played in the Magic and Bird, Bad Boy and Bull era those teams were better. When they had they chance Starks goes like 0 for 17 in the game 7 that won't Ewing fault.
Oakley outta line.
excellent pont
 
Oakley preceded Dennis Rodman on how to have nba success by diving impossible to save loose balls and tracking down a rebound while being the 6th option on the offensive end.

The legend of Oakley's play is more impressive than the reality of him being a non athletic, non jumping but slow power forward.
 
He's DEAD wrong because Oak used to get TORCHED BY HORACE GRANT.... Not to mention... Ewing has nothing to do with Charles Smith missing a bunny lay up... For all the dunks and loses, Ewing used to abuse the Bulls bigs... The problem was Grant would have his way with Oakley. Oak had 1 offensive move... A set shot... In a league where power forwards are jumping through the gym, this mf got nothing but a set shot... No post moves... No jump hooks... Just a set shot...

THIS IS WHY I HATED CHARLES OAKLEY... HE WAS A BUM THEN... AND HE'S STILL A BUM

FUCK HIM ... JOHN STARKS... AND CHARLES SMITH

:lol:

First thing that came to mind was..I think it was Robin Harris's joke about Bird only having a jump shot.

But the funny thing is you're 100% on point.
I still remember Oak with that set shot..I don't think he DID have another go-to move.
 
always love Ewing when I was a Knicks fan...Oakley wrong for this

fucking Knicks everything about them is clown shoes :smh:
 


I might not be able to watch this damn documentary fam...

Thanks but your boy @playahaitian is trying to change the subject to lakers bulls in a new thread. You might want to see him bro.

giphy.gif
 
He shouldn't have said it, but isn't he kind of right?

If Patrick Ewing was born in the 80s or 90s instead of the 60s no one would have a problem with Oak's comment and would be praising him for throwing a younger generation under the bus for white folks enjoyment. Oak simply said what we've known for sometime, his era wasnt as "tough" as projected.
 
Oakley preceded Dennis Rodman on how to have nba success by diving impossible to save loose balls and tracking down a rebound while being the 6th option on the offensive end.

The legend of Oakley's play is more impressive than the reality of him being a non athletic, non jumping but slow power forward.

Oakley also has more career rebounds than Rodman and his 35 in one game is more than Rodman ever posted in a game. Oak was never a star but he wasnt a bum. He was an enforcer and an effective low post presence.
 
idk, Oak and Harper and Childs may be dealing in some revisionist history. They never would have gotten where they did without Ewing. And then, if you really feel the guy is unreliable in the big spots, you don't go to him. I can remember Ewing stepping up at times. Remind me again who else stepped up?
 
Oakley also has more career rebounds than Rodman and his 35 in one game is more than Rodman ever posted in a game. Oak was never a star but he wasnt a bum. He was an enforcer and an effective low post presence.
I know all about that. We also had Mason and X at one time too.

Rodman performed his rebounding in his role. He could score and did when he was with Detroit. Oak was the man in college but he played with Jordan and became kinda bitter. I didn't like him much when I literally ran into him outside of the garden.


Bottom line, he could've done more to help Ewing instead of now gossiping years later.
 
idk, Oak and Harper and Childs may be dealing in some revisionist history. They never would have gotten where they did without Ewing. And then, if you really feel the guy is unreliable in the big spots, you don't go to him. I can remember Ewing stepping up at times. Remind me again who else stepped up?
Didn’t Larry johnson do a 4 point play to lead y’all into the finals?

Didn’t pat miss a point blank finger roll?
 
Aw man...fuck you!

:hmm:



:lol:

But seriously, Patrick always gave it his all every night. I also liked the fact that he challenged every dunk. Yes, he got yammed on a few times, but at least he tried to go for the block. Most guys would be afraid of getting posterized, and they wouldn't even try to play defense.

Oh yeah, and Fuck Oakley for his comments!:angry:
that's that old Georgetown Hoya mentality. hoyas used to mug anybody who came into the paint
 
The attention tour continues. Nothing but a bitch. Like Canibus to LL, I'm officially an ex-fan.


Oakley says he still talks to Jordan, his former teammate, about the series. The former Knicks power forward won’t pin it on Smith, who blew all those last-second putbacks in the critical Game 5 heartbreaker, which would have given the Knicks a 3-2 series lead as they tried to keep the Bulls from their first three-peat.

“Patrick, at the end of the game, he’d get double-teamed,’’ Oakley told The Post. “He’d shoot fadeaways on double-teams and that hurt us as a team.”

“My thing with [Jordan] is, ‘It’s not like you beat us by 20,’ ” Oakley added. “Most games went down to two, three possessions. Y’all made shots. We didn’t. The best player won. Michael was a better player than Patrick hands down.”

Ewing averaged 25.8 points and 11.2 rebounds and shot 53 percent in the six-game series — all in line with his regular-season numbers. In the series-turning Game 5, Ewing had 33 points on 12-of-23 shooting and nine rebounds.

In the documentary, Ewing says, “It was extremely physical. It wasn’t really a foul until you drew blood.”

Asked about the remark, Oakley sniffed, “A lot of guys who talk now didn’t say that stuff when they played basketball.’’

Oakley, then in his defensive prime, also believed Phil Jackson outmaneuvered then-Knicks coach Pat Riley.

“Pat Riley never adjusted to the situation,’’ Oakley said. “At halftime we did the same thing. They trapped us full-court. We never did nothing like that to trap them and make them think about the game.

“We didn’t make shots and played into their hands. With defense, they played a zone and built a wall. They knew Patrick wasn’t going to pass out of the double team. Phil watched a lot of film. We watched a lot of film, but we were playing checkers and they were playing chess.”

During the broadcast, it’s mentioned the Knicks were similar in style to “The Bad Boys’’ of Detroit, who used to batter Jordan’s Bulls before they finally broke through.

“Everyone says Detroit was more physical,’’ Oakley said. “I don’t think so. Detroit just played more dirty than us. We didn’t play dirty basketball.’’

Jeff Van Gundy, then a Knicks assistant to Riley, told The Post the 1993 team was the best team he’d ever been part of. The Knicks won 60 games that season and Riley told “Garden Glory” the Knicks had built “a championship team.’’

It’s why Oakley is still frustrated it didn’t go the Knicks’ way.

“We should’ve beaten them and we didn’t beat them,’’ Oakley said. “The Bulls got a lot of calls. I tell that to Michael to this day. The league’s best player will get all the calls when he needed to. But Michael made shots. It wasn’t like he was getting to the rim and dunking on us. He had a couple of dunks. But that was only two dunks he had in the half-court offense.

“I took the ball from Michael in that series and they called a foul and I didn’t even touch him,” Oakley added. “The one thing I didn’t like about Phil’s Bulls is they complained about the officials, about physicality. We were playing hard. If you complained to me, you’re soft.

“Phil Jackson always planted stories in the paper when they lost: ‘Look at the fouls.’ Pat Riley was a psychologist, but Phil was the doctor. They played mind games with one another.”

Jordan’s trek to Atlantic City after a Game 1 Bulls loss turned into a firestorm. But ultimately it motivated Jordan.

“When you’re off, you can do whatever you want to do,’’ Oakley said.
“Danny Ainge said [he and Jordan] played golf 36 holes before a playoff game. I never thought he’d do that, but he’s incredible. When things go your way, you can take a chance of doing things. A lot of guys can’t do that. They don’t have that drive. Patrick would never do it like that — because he doesn’t have it inside of him.”

Ewing was fourth in the MVP voting in 1993, but in recent months Oakley has aimed darts at “The Big Fella” as much as feuding partner James Dolan, the Knicks owner. Oakley recently called Ewing “one of the most difficult guys I’ve played with.’’

As for failing to topple the Bulls in 1993, Oakley put it simply in his inimitable way.

“The Bulls had Michael and we had Patrick,’’ Oakley said. “It’s like seeing Beyoncé and going to see someone trying to be Beyoncé. If Beyoncé is in town, everyone’s going to see Beyoncé. If Michael and Patrick are in town, everyone is going to see Michael. They had ‘The Show.’ We tried to stop them and we couldn’t stop them.”
 
Oakley also has more career rebounds than Rodman and his 35 in one game is more than Rodman ever posted in a game. Oak was never a star but he wasnt a bum. He was an enforcer and an effective low post presence.

Never even had within ten rebounds of that with the Knicks.

Never had a 30 point game.

Never even had a four block game!

Never averaged a block every other game!

Had a half dozen seasons with the Knicks where he didn't even get double digit rebounds!

This clown has a lot of fucking nerve.
 
wow he carried tht resentment for Ewing a long time...

thts even more bitch made...

probably ran across tht man hundreds of times n never said shit n then pick an off day in 2020 to voice this shit ..

fuck ass shit here bro ... u can feel how u feel but tell tht man to his face back in the day ...fuck ass ni99a...
I think it's because Oak didn't feel so angry until this past year.
He's had shit to say about a couple of his old teammates recently. He felt that more of them should've spoken up when Dolan had him thrown out of the Garden. He felt betrayed by all of them, specifically those who still worked or associated with Dolan.
EDIT: I just read PlayaHaitian's post. Sums it up perfectly.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top