Make a Contribution to Remove NSFW Ads

CDC says that STD epidemic in America is “out of control”

Road rage: 48 percent of black women have herpes

me: do you have proof that every black women took an std test and 48 percent got herpes?

roadrage: you don’t believe in inventions and discoveries cause I can’t prove 48 percent black women have herpes

bgol onlooker: wtf roadrage is dumber than we thought he was

summary of the back and forth
 
tallblacknyc said:
I never said science is dumb..I said this survey you pulled out your ass is bullshit.. you just prove how ignorant you are by saying all that stuff about inventions , discoveries, etc is cgi.. you never heard me say that.. you telling on yourself about how your brain works when somebody prove your comments are inaccurate
Click to expand...
You are right, they are lying for reasons, no need to try falsifying or debunking it with actual evidence, because as long as we have very expert people like you calling it bullshit, well that's all I need to know!
Case officially
DEBUNKED-678x381.png
 
RoadRage said:
You are right, they are lying for reasons, no need to try falsifying or debunking it with actual evidence, because as long as we have very expert people like you calling it bullshit, well that's all I need to know!
Case officially
DEBUNKED-678x381.png
Click to expand...
I hope you don’t operate heavy machinery or drive cause you definitely would be a liability to the public..seriously you have to be receiving a monthly check
 
RoadRage said:
Nope, heard it from a very expert guy, we are good, them bastards are lying to us for "reasons"! But its all a trick to scare us!
Click to expand...
Show that post where someone said we good.. I’ll wait

someone saying 48 percent black women don’t have herpes dosent mean there are no stds out there

or is that how your slow brain works

Roadrage: not 48 percent means we good( drools on his shirt due to brain malfunction)
 
RoadRage said:
Since you have no way of determining the percentage of black women infected with herpes, but know it's not 49% how can anyone say we are not good?
Click to expand...
I got tens of thousands of post on here.. show a post where you hear me scream raw or say there are not girls burning..I’ll wait
 
tallblacknyc said:
I got tens of thousands of post on here.. show a post where you hear me scream raw or say there are not girls burning..I’ll wait
Click to expand...
Not saying you said it, I am saying without a number, and if it's OK to assume what is right and what's wrong without real evidence, why not get slap-happy by declaring all of it is wrong or fake? I mean how do you draw the line between when science is lying and when it's telling the truth?
 
RoadRage said:
Not saying you said it, I am saying without a number, and if it's OK to assume what is right and what's wrong without real evidence, why not get slap-happy by declaring all of it is wrong or fake? I mean how do you draw the line between when science is lying and when it's telling the truth?
Click to expand...
just cause I don’t agree with this survey that dosent mean I denounced science..you getting weird.. if I don’t eat at a certain restaurant does that mean I’m anti food?
 
tallblacknyc said:
just cause I don’t agree with this survey that dosent mean I denounced science..you getting weird.. if I don’t eat at a certain restaurant does that mean I’m anti food?
Click to expand...
Again, there is nothing wrong with disagreeing with anything, it's part of the scientific method, but that's only the start. The meat and potatoes is falsifying a claim, by showing where and how they are wrong, this is where most people fail and give up at.
I basically walked you through how to properly do it, and listed the sources where you could formally challenge them, but like I said before you won't e the first, last or the hundredth, plenty of doctors, professors, scholars and even regular people challenged it, but yet it's still undefeated. Remember all it takes is for them to lose just one time, and it's debunked forcing them to pull it down.
So claiming something is fake is very easy, properly falsifying it is a different story. But hey if you want to try, I got your back!
 
Even if you fail, I will give you mad props, because most guys talk shit, without trying to do shit, yet they expect educated folks to believe in them.
 
RoadRage said:
Even if you fail, I will give you mad props, because most guys talk shit, without trying to do shit, yet they expect educated folks to believe in them.
Click to expand...
Nig I don’t give a fuck about this survey..this was your bible I destroyed..you have to go find a new religion to cling on.. like I said you brought this shit on here I didn’t go seek it.. idc about this fraudulent info you do..that’s why you was repeating various times..that’s why you been defending it for 4 pages.. when people believe in something they will fight for it even if it’s proving wrong.. that’s why you couldn’t let go.. you like so what every black women hasn’t been tested and 48 percent were proven to have herpes I’m going to go with false survey and not hardcore evidence..praise fraudulent stat jesus
 
tallblacknyc said:
Nig I don’t give a fuck about this survey..this was your bible I destroyed..you have to go find a new religion to cling on.. like I said you brought this shit on here I didn’t go seek it.. idc about this fraudulent info you do..that’s why you was repeating various times..that’s why you been defending it for 4 pages.. when people believe in something they will fight for it even if it’s proving wrong.. that’s why you couldn’t let go.. you like so what every black women hasn’t been tested and 48 percent were proven to have herpes I’m going to go with false survey and not hardcore evidence..praise fraudulent stat jesus
Click to expand...
The bible is closed book dogma with no evidence, this is literally the opposite!
Matter of fact you calling it fraudulent without evidence is exactly what the bible and Trump do, ironic ain't it
 
But that's all folks, I'm bored, let me go and feed my pet pig, but feel free to tap dance to this, while you are thinking up actual evidence to support your claim of them being frudulent.
R.749f0a40c64bd47f2cb8d3693f434d4d



:dance::dance::dance::dance::dance:​
 
RoadRage said:
The bible is closed book dogma with no evidence, this is literally the opposite!
Matter of fact you calling it fraudulent without evidence is exactly what the bible and Trump do, ironic ain't it
Click to expand...
White fraudulent stat Jesus won’t save your gullible ass
 
Tito_Jackson said:
I assure you, this is real. I have access to early data that will be released to the public soon. It's way worst when you stratify the data.

This is also coupled with the increased promiscuity of women. Social media has given all women access to sex. Particularly older unmarried women. A few years ago, a 40, 50, or 60 year old woman would be a sexless old maid. Now? All she has to do is create a profile on any social media site or dating site and she could be having sex that day. As a result, the STD rates for older women are rising faster than some segments of younger women.

STDs don't care if a woman is fine or ugly. I personally know of at least one chick that has been posted on this site that has a lifetime membership at the clinic/ pharmacy. And evertime she's posted, the Raw committee is there. Lol!!

Be safe out there. Find condoms that work for you and use them.
Click to expand...

Good points and sound advice.

The wide variety of social media and dating / hook-up apps has definitely skyrocketed numbers and stats.

Especially when people are choosing to fuck everyone in sight and partners are being shared amongst those who are unaware or oblivious. Also, alot of people who did not date or frequent long-term relationships are out there getting action when they weren’t many years back.

It’s wild. Definitely need to careful in these sheets and streets!

RAW. Really aware whenfuckingaround.

:thumbsup:
 
One of the big differences is adult content creating. Porn used to be only a certain amount of the demographic participating. Technology was only accessible to a certain group demographic. Now!!! That demographic has not only widen but has been completely obliterated with the accessibility to smart phones, more accessible cameras, editing apps, and social media. Everyone now has the ability to make porn. At one point you had amateur porn rising and taking over. It’s now the standard in which porn is made. Anyone can pick up their phone and record themselves fucking to be posted on Twitter, Onlyfans, etc.! Not only are they just fucking but fucking raw. It’s rare that you see a condom being used.

Also, add in the fact like someone said earlier, that social media has opened the doors for all this sexual liberation. While it was taboo before, it is now the norm. Everything is sex unlike ever before. IG, Twitter, Onlyfans, Tumblr(not as much now), Reddit, and so on is nothing but sexual content.
 
tallblacknyc said:
Where did you get your data from and how many people were tested? It’s 330 million people in america.. half of them are females.. that’s 165 million of them.. let’s say 33 percent of them are between 14-49.. that’s about 55 million females… I believe they say it’s 40 million black people in America ..so 50 percent is 20 million female.. 33 percent of that is a lil under 7 million.. according to the data you posted I’m supposed to believe at least 3 million black women have herpes? And yet the cac female who gives out blowjobs like nigs give daps has less herpes percentage wise and number wise? Fuck outta here.. im a numbers guy.. you can’t throw out random numbers cause I’m going to calculate the shit to see what kinda nonsense they push.. they said 48 percent.. which means in your family half of them got bumps..so if you have a daughter and a wife according to them numbers one of them chicks got it..or do you think you are lucky and live in a non herpe home? Make it make sense sway
Click to expand...
Bruh, you know and I know them numbers are skewed. Shit don't be half as bad as they make it out to be. Frankly, now statistical analysis in fool proof. They take a segment of the population. Sometimes its 100 people, sometimes it is a 1000 people and they say this is what the whole population looks like. Bruh, you smell bullshit because it is bullshit. In most cases, and the academe world knows, a small segment of society can't represent the whole.
 
scullydog said:
Bruh, you know and I know them numbers are skewed. Shit don't be half as bad as they make it out to be. Frankly, now statistical analysis in fool proof. They take a segment of the population. Sometimes its 100 people, sometimes it is a 1000 people and they say this is what the whole population looks like. Bruh, you smell bullshit because it is bullshit. In most cases, and the academe world knows, a small segment of society can't represent the whole.
Click to expand...
Kool, everyone is entitled to an opinion, even Richard Findman said that a hypothesis is a guess or a statement. But the next part, that most leave out is testing your hypothesis, one way to do it is by challenging the people who made the statement by asking for a citation on their study, and specifical information on the people who they tested. If they are not able to supply the information then the study will be debunked and discarded.
Put it this way, even in a jr level class in college if you were to conduct a study on people without clearly defining who your subject are, your paper would get a F, it's like writing a term paper without properly citing your quotes.
If you've never been to college this may all be new to you, but yeah you cannot, at that level, just pull stats out your ass without being fully transparent with your data.
So I am not calling you a liar, nor am I discouraging you or anyone to challenge this CDC report all I am saying is get off of your asses and do the work, to find out if the numbers are right or not, because, without the actual work, you are no different than Trump declaring himself the victor and that all reports of him losing is fake news, without any evidence to back him up.
Like I said before I would actually help direct you or anyone, where to find the raw data (to my best ability) so you can investigate and sort out if there is any fuckery going on.
 
RoadRage said:
Kool, everyone is entitled to an opinion, even Richard Findman said that a hypothesis is a guess or a statement. But the next part, that most leave out is testing your hypothesis, one way to do it is by challenging the people who made the statement by asking for a citation on their study, and specifical information on the people who they tested. If they are not able to supply the information then the study will be debunked and discarded.
Put it this way, even in a jr level class in college if you were to conduct a study on people without clearly defining who your subject are, your paper would get a F, it's like writing a term paper without properly citing your quotes.
If you've never been to college this may all be new to you, but yeah you cannot, at that level, just pull stats out your ass without being fully transparent with your data.
So I am not calling you a liar, nor am I discouraging you or anyone to challenge this CDC report all I am saying is get off of your asses and do the work, to find out if the numbers are right or not, because, without the actual work, you are no different than Trump declaring himself the victor and that all reports of him losing is fake news, without any evidence to back him up.
Like I said before I would actually help direct you or anyone, where to find the raw data (to my best ability) so you can investigate and sort out if there is any fuckery going on.
Click to expand...
I don't have to get off my ass and do shit. Everyone who has taken a stats class knows that shit is probable. The word is probable. It is likely, still that shit don't make it so. I had an argument with one of you dudes several years ago. The dumb ass was saying black people headed everything under the status of crime in the united states. Come to find out, we didn't lead not one single category. They argued because there are less African-Americans in the united states they are more criminal due to population. Again, bullshit number manipulations and off centered talking points. Again, how are you going to say that 50% of a population has herpies when you haven't tested the whole group. Thus, this is non factual argument. It is riddled with incongruent information. Europeans and their numbers. Until Europeans get off their lazy asses and test the whole u.s. population for herpies then that argument will always be specious. Frankly, all of their argument are based on bullshit and nothing. We have been Wizard of Oz. Nothing is truly real with them except killing. They are very good at that.
 
scullydog said:
I don't have to get off my ass and do shit. Everyone who has taken a stats class knows that shit is probable. The word is probable. It is likely, still that shit don't make it so. I had an argument with one of you dudes several years ago. The dumb ass was saying black people headed everything under the status of crime in the united states. Come to find out, we didn't lead not one single category. They argued because there are less African-Americans in the united states they are more criminal due to population. Again, bullshit number manipulations and off centered talking points. Again, how are you going to say that 50% of a population has herpies when you haven't tested the whole group. Thus, this is non factual argument. It is riddled with incongruent information. Europeans and their numbers. Until Europeans get off their lazy asses and test the whole u.s. population for herpies then that argument will always be specious. Frankly, all of their argument are based on bullshit and nothing. We have been Wizard of Oz. Nothing is truly real with them except killing. They are very good at that.
Click to expand...
How are you going to say that 50% don't have herpes without testing anyone? Drops mic!
 
Not only are they responsible to show they have a large enough sample size they also have to calculate the margin of error, but this is gold for you because if they fail to do it correctly you got them, checkmate!
 
RoadRage said:
Good question, that is answered in statistics 101.
Click to expand...

Still is probable. The whole point is probability. I watched the video as well. Also, the video is discussing a know quantity. The output determines the answer. You can't test 100, 1000 women and come up with the true amount of women who has herpes. It is the probable amount. Again, rethink your shit.
 
scullydog said:
Still is probable. The whole point is probability. I watched the video as well. Also, the video is discussing a know quantity. The output determines the answer. You can't test 100, 1000 women and come up with the true amount of women who has herpes. It is the probable amount. Again, rethink your shit.
Click to expand...
Everything in real science is probable, this is the difference between pseudo-science dogma and actual science, and this is why there is also a calculated margin of error. Meaning nothing is set in stone, and nothing to stop you or anyone else from conducting another study has a lower margin of error.
But to hand wave it away without knowing how the process works is some Donald Trump/flat earth level of ignorance!
 
PASS

@PASScertified
·
19h

We are calling for a 7-day production hold, and asking for everyone to retest beginning December 12.


passcertified.org
PASS Calls for Production Hold After Reports of Increase in STIs — PASS Certified
PASS is calling a seven-day production hold on adult content after a reported increase in STIs among adult performers and content creators. All producers and performers should abstain from non-solo...




Ana Fuckin Foxxx Retweeted

FjPHYCrUAAE_aGH






KAIIA EVE

@Kaiia_Eve
·
19h

performers & content creators: we are now in a 7 day production hold announced by
@PASScertified
due to way too many positive chlamydia tests that means no shooting ANY CONTENT OR SCENES besides SOLO content please do your part and respect the production hold.
https://twitter.com/Kaiia_Eve/status/1599841512409661440/photo/1
 

Make a Contribution to Remove NSFW Ads
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

B
50% of Black Teen Girls have an STD NEW CDC STUDY
2 3 4
Replies
106
Views
2K
Doo Rag
Doo Rag
V
Houston, we have a problem
2
Replies
40
Views
871
DANGEROUSBLACKMAN
D
BCSD2012
What's more fucked up? The pic they use or the article?
Replies
33
Views
929
EATUGOOD1
E
lightbright
U.S. Chlamydia Infections Hit All-Time High..other stds at their highest too..puke...
Replies
7
Views
278
GAMETHEORY
GAMETHEORY
buck_ya_bitch
"DOWN LOW" WHITE SENATOR ARRESTED LOOKING FOR GAY SEX IN MAN'S ROOM....
Replies
7
Views
272
Brother Blues
Brother Blues
Back
Top