If you do nothing and I do even a little more (look active), I win the round. Hopkins didn't even fight 6 rounds in those fights, if he had, he would have won. If a fighter takes off at least the first half of the fight, he gives his opponent a huge headstart.
And I think it was a combination of poor matchup and strategy. After getting "robbed" in the first one, why wasn't he more aggressive in the rematch? Bernard needed those losses because he had gotten lazy and used to getting by on his bullshit. We haven't seen him pull that shit (to that degree) since.
Fights aren't judged based on the whole fight, they're judged round by round and he lost two tight fights he could have won.
Dave I've study those fights more than anything in high school. In each fight, Hopkins takes over in the 7th round. There was no match up problem, just a strategy problem. If it were a match up problem than Taylor should have been able to get his shit off. I have no argument with him losing the rounds were he is doing nothing, but making Jermaine miss. That's why I say it should be a tie each time. I have no clue why Hopkins wasn't more active in the second fight, just like I have no clue why Taylor never got his condition straighten out or at least saved some thing in the tank for those later rounds, but for whatever reason those fights played out very much the same... Talyor chasing an old man for six rounds and missing and then B-Hop out boxing him for the last 6 rounds to the point of embarrassment. I think Taylors whole career was fucked up because of that. He has had a chip on his shoulder ever since and has always been trying to go back to what he looked like before Hopkins.