Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well put. And you're right. I shouldn't "gloss" over the object but my rules regarding the natural worlds are fairly grounded: simplest answer generally applies. I will, however, embrace any future discovery connected with the monolith.I get that, and agree generally regarding the (un)impressive-ness of geological anomalies. It's however not fruitful, scientifically, to lump terrestrially distinct phenomenon together with generalities. The astrophysical events that explain the craters didn't provoke the discussion because those are understood and expected. Whereas, the feature described as the Phobos monolith cannot be accounted for with the same explanation. I don't see a pyramid (which, is a naturally occurring feature . . . under the 'right' conditions). Asteroids and comets impacting a rock like structure can produce (and often do) many shapes depending on the elemental composition, angle of impact, shearing, etc.
However, what I see is an isolated towering rectangular protrusion, that seems to be fairly well formed for an image captured at a distance. I wouldn't ascribe any technological capability to it. BUT a rule of thumb in the physical & natural sciences is nature REPEATS itself. And I see no other similar objects, hence being anomalous. I said all that to say all anomalies are not created equal . . . or are equal I should say. In which case there could be several explanations for this. Perhaps there are many more buried deeper, and THIS one is just tall enough to pierce the surface.
If the photo is genuine, I wouldn't be too quick to glossed over it, because the greater question, how or what event took place that resulted in its' existence, isn't easily explained away by the same things that produce the impact craters. That thing is bizarre.
JG
It changes how we view the lands we fight over.
It changes how we view God/a God.
It changes how we view energy.
It changes how we view the galaxy/universe.
It changes how we think of our world.
It changes how we view ourselves.
Shall I go on?
D-Nice 1 (The Nice One)
I have been unable to find the transcript some of you were eluding too but the story is interesting non the less.
![]()
![]()
![]()
Blunt is well-known for his battle with ...
![]()
if buzz troubles you with his support for president obama then john podesta will make the hair on the back of your neck stand up.Wow! Buzz is a serious Obama man. Why does that trouble me though?
But wait doesn't some moons have some kind of "atmospheres"? Scientists believe that one of Saturn's moons(I think its Saturn)that has frozen methane on it has evidence that there maybe water underneath - ergo some form of microscopic life in itThe difference is, you're comparing apples to oranges though. A moon isn't terra formed through millions of years geo thermal and atmospheric dynamism. Not to mention the strong planetary gravitation that imparts its' on influences to that mix.
Moons are barren with little to no planet-like atmospheric conditions from which to produce 'similar' natural structures. This is why such features are 'curious'.
JG
But wait doesn't some moons have some kind of "atmospheres"? Scientists believe that one of Saturn's moons(I think its Saturn)that has frozen methane on it has evidence that there maybe water underneath - ergo some form of microscopic life in it![]()
If you haven't heard of Joseph P. Farrell, you should check out some of his work. He's written a number of books related to modern and ancient physics, theorizing about a cosmic war and alternate history. Here's a sample of his work:
thanx for the assist.Titan has complete atmosphere, never heard of there being frozen methane on it though.
You may be thinking of Europa one of Jupiter's moons, it doesn't have much of an atmosphere, but some believe that it has a ocean underneath it's ice frozen surface.
Why didn't they try to land that Mars rover closer to it so it could get better pictures???
Remember the flack over when it went off line for a long time,then suddenly started working again? Just before that happened, a shadow of a hand was seen descending upon it.
thought aldrin was on that sticky icky but here go the pics to the monolith he was talkin about[/QUOTE]
people can not see what is not in there paradigm or understanding. things like this upset the apple cart and people hate to have there reality questioned. i liken them to sleep walkers. it is just as dangerous to try and wake a sheep-walker as it is to try and wake up a sleep walker because they both can get violent at the point of revelation or awakening.
Apple cider?
It changes how we view the lands we fight over.
It changes how we view God/a God.
It changes how we view energy.
It changes how we view the galaxy/universe.
It changes how we think of our world.
It changes how we view ourselves.
Shall I go on?
D-Nice 1 (The Nice One)
What about the perfectly straight wall on the Iapetus equtor region?
Asked my Astronomy Professor about this a couple years ago before I even thought of it as a conspiracy,and he told me,"Nasa never reveals the totality of what they know". He worked at NASA.
I got to wondering...anyway:
[flash]http://www.youtube.com/watch/v/pt3WExpXSwg[/flash]
you know i often wondered about that myself. that line stood out like a sore thumb the first time i saw it. it would seem to me that a couple of the moons in our solar system have some strangeness about them. one of which is our own moon.
The fact that one side of our moon faces a direction in which we NEVER see unless we physically leave earth and inspect it is evidence enough for me.
Call it Sci-Fi,Call me high,a weirdo or a conspiracy theorist all you want,but this evidence suggests exactly where you think im going with this sentence.
If you haven't heard of Joseph P. Farrell, you should check out some of his work. He's written a number of books related to modern and ancient physics, theorizing about a cosmic war and alternate history. Here's a sample of his work:
nobody want to touch this one huh? is it too uncomfortable to know that obama has a disclosure advocate so close in his administration? i think this is why obama keeps talking about this new renewable energy source we need to find. i think he knows about something waiting in the wings as far as technology is concerned.
Hmmmm. That's an angle I haven't viewed from. Let me think on that for a minute.![]()
Yeah I have heard it (been awhile though). Speculation pertaining to whether or not the moon is a natural satellite or was towed here billions of years ago (because some tests have determined the moon is much older than Earth) has been a hotly contested theory even before Lear brought it up. But Lear has said a bunch of off the wall shit that it is hard to take what he says into consideration sometimes.
bro it only makes sense. he keeps selling the people a vision of an oil independent nation who's new found energy will fuel the economy and catapult the u.s. into a world leader in green technology. it may be a reach but i dont think so. john podesta carries a lot of baggage and stigma by being associated with the disclosure movement as well as being behind the clinton inquiries into ufo and ufo technologies. look at it this way... obama already had an uphill battle just on his own background and history, so why add john podesta? why add another potential liability? i believe if we do make an energy find then it has the greatest chance of happening under this administration.
I forgot he was involved in the "Disclosure" project/movement. Didn't Podesta also do the (in country) legal work to have the two American reporters released just this week in North Korea?
Points noted but wouldn't a person have to be very small minded to think that the earth is the ONLY planet with intelligent life on it. I mean for those who believe in God if he/she or it created everything, to think that out of the vast galaxy with billions of stars on it, he/she or it picked one tiny little morsel called earth and put intelligent earth on it. Just seems like we are not using our brain capacity.![]()