BRITTANY RENNER SAYS SHE ONLY GETS 2500 MONTH CHILD SUPPORT. ...THAT FOOL GOT OFF EASY

Bitches stay out here thinking getting knocked up by somebody who they believe to be rich is like a job. It's not

That bitch doesn't even have enough money to pay for daycare. She got to have her mama watching the kid. That's funny. I don't feel bad for these hoes out here. I don't feel bad at all
 
30 thousand a year for a child and she should be out working for it or doing whatever she does to provide for her child also.

Instagram model?I hope she turns it into something that can really help her besides looking for another rich husband to take care of her.
 
Screen-Shot-2021-11-04-at-9-12-58-PM.png
 
That's enough for a mortgage, car payment, decent insurance and health insurance, she can handle the rest.

Est..
$1450 Mortgage
$400 car payment
$150 car insurance
$300 medical insurance
$200 toward light bill


Numbers aren't exact but these hoes is trippin' if they think they having a child is the fucking MegaPower Balls in their mouf' :smh:
 
Dudes here are celebrating like he actually won something.
So, a multimillionaire will pony up less per year (based on his annual income) than the average father for his own child.
But, isn't this supposed to be about the quality of life for the boy, and not his mother...? :confused:

And wasn't it announced this "winner" just knocked up his current "girlfriend" recently?
:puzzled:
 
Last edited:
Dudes here are celebrating like he actually won something.
So, a multimillionaire will pony up less per year (based on his annual income) than the average father for his own child.
But, isn't this supposed to be about the quality of life for the boy, and not his mother...? :confused:

And wasn't it announced this "winner" just knocked up his current "girlfriend" recently?
:puzzled:
Some bgol simp will seed her up and pay the extra CP
 
Some bgol simp will seed her up and pay the extra CP
Possibly.
But as I pointed out, it's not about her.
It's about the quality of life Washington's child will have.
The boy won't live in a mansion, or have servants or a new car every year. (Clearly, he doesn't need any of that to be raised properly).
But dudes are celebrating the fact that this child will literally live well BELOW a level of financial stability his father is capable of providing for him.
That's kind of sad, really... :smh:
 
Possibly.
But as I pointed out, it's not about her.
It's about the quality of life Washington's child will have.
The boy won't live in a mansion, or have servants or a new car every year. (Clearly, he doesn't need any of that to be raised properly).
But dudes are celebrating the fact that this child will literally live well BELOW a level of financial stability his father is capable of providing for him.
That's kind of sad, really... :smh:

A child getting 2,500 a month in child support is going to live well above other kids.
 
There's absolutely no guarantee of that...:smh:

That is on her though not the father. He provided what he is supposed to. The average salary in America is around 50k. In the state of Texas the non custodial parent would get hit up for 20% on Child Support. That would mean a person would have to pay around 800 a month in support. She is getting 3X that amount a month. If Brittney makes 50k a year in income that would bring her total yearly income to 80k which is well above the average persons pay. If she can't manage that she is a fucking idiot which we already know. Women like her think they gone live like the non custodial lives and it dont work like that.
 
That is on her though not the father. He provided what he is supposed to. The average salary in America is around 50k. In the state of Texas the non custodial parent would get hit up for 20% on Child Support. That would mean a person would have to pay around 800 a month in support. She is getting 3X that amount a month. If Brittney makes 50k a year in income that would bring her total yearly income to 80k which is well above the average persons pay. If she can't manage that she is a fucking idiot which we already know. Women like her think they gone live like the non custodial lives and it dont work like that.
Again, there's no absolute guarantee $2,500 will mean the boys life will be automatically be better than the average child...
Presumably, yes.
But there's still no guarantee.
 
Possibly.
But as I pointed out, it's not about her.
It's about the quality of life Washington's child will have.
The boy won't live in a mansion, or have servants or a new car every year. (Clearly, he doesn't need any of that to be raised properly).
But dudes are celebrating the fact that this child will literally live well BELOW a level of financial stability his father is capable of providing for him.
That's kind of sad, really... :smh:

Nah this ain't it. If that mother cannot make sure her child lives well off 30K a year om child support plus what she will provide then there is a big problem. If she matches his 30k annually that child should live just fine. I'm hoping he'll be there physically. Fuck the money
 
Back
Top