Breaking: U.S. airstrike kills an Iranian General in major escalation towards war with Iran
- Thread starter Spectrum
- Start date
Good article...I didn't know both Bush and Obama had dude under the gun before. But let him bounce.
Mr. Trump’s decision to kill General Suleimani was one that Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama had rejected, fearing it would lead to war.
Iranian General Traveled With Impunity, Until U.S. Drones Found Him
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/worl...s-drones-found-him/ar-BBYAiJy?ocid=spartanntp
WASHINGTON — One night in January 2007, American Special Operations commandos tracked a notorious adversary driving in a convoy from Iran into northern Iraq: Maj. Gen. Qassim Suleimani, Iran’s top security and intelligence commander.
But the Americans held their fire, and General Suleimani slipped away into the darkness
“To avoid a firefight, and the contentious politics that would follow, I decided that we should monitor the caravan, not strike immediately,” Gen. Stanley A. McChrystal, the head of the secretive Joint Special Operations Command, recalled in an article last year.
But early Friday, an American MQ-9 Reaper drone from General McChrystal’s former command — operating under President Trump’s orders — fired missiles into a convoy carrying General Suleimani as it was leaving Baghdad’s international airport. What remained unclear is why Mr. Trump chose this moment to strike the top military leader of Iran, after two presidents before him opted not to do so, out of concern that killing the general could incite a wider war with Iran.
National security experts and even officials at the Pentagon said there was nothing new about Iranian behavior in recent months or even weeks; General Suleimani has been accused of prodding Shiite militias into attacking Americans for more than a decade. American officials have also blamed him, for more than a decade, of working with organizations in other countries, like Hezbollah in Lebanon and Israel as well as the Houthis in Yemen, to attack American allies and interests.
Senior Trump administration officials, including Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, repeatedly said on Friday that new attacks under General Suleimani’s leadership were imminent.
But one Defense Department official, speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss internal planning, said that there was nothing new in the threat presented by the Iranian general.
And critics of the strike questioned whether its timing was meant to influence public opinion as Mr. Trump faces impeachment.
On Thursday night, around the time of the strike on General Suleimani, a Special Operations unit based in the United States boarded transport aircraft bound for the Middle East, one Defense Department official said. The deployment of the elite Army Rangers marks the latest group of troops sent to the region. Earlier this week, the Pentagon readied 4,000 paratroopers based at Fort Bragg, N.C., for a similar security mission to Kuwait, 750 of which have already deployed.
Tracking General Suleimani’s location had long been a priority for the American and Israeli spy services and militaries, especially when he was in Iraq.
General Suleimani often traveled with an air of impunity, as if he felt he was untouchable, officials said. One former senior American commander recalled parking his military jet next to General Suleimani’s plane at the Erbil airport in northern Iraq.
Current and former American commanders and intelligence officials said that Friday morning’s attack drew specifically upon a combination of information from secret informants, electronic intercepts, reconnaissance aircraft and other surveillance tools.
The highly classified mission to locate and strike General Suleimani was set in motion after the death of an American contractor last Friday, according to senior American officials. The military’s Special Operations Command spent the next several days looking for an opportunity to strike. An option provided, and eventually approved, was dependent on General Suleimani’s arrival at Baghdad International Airport. If he was met by Iraqi officials, one American official said, the strike would be called off. But, the official said, it was a “clean party,” and the strike was approved.
Mr. Trump’s decision to kill General Suleimani was one that Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama had rejected, fearing it would lead to war.
General McChrystal praised Mr. Trump’s decision to do so.
“The targeting was appropriate given Suleimani’s very public role in orchestrating Iranian attacks on the U.S. and our allies,” he said in an email.
But the general added a somber warning: “We can’t consider this as an isolated action. As with all such actions it will impact the dynamics of the region, and Iran will likely feel compelled to respond in kind.
“There is the potential for a stair-step escalation of attacks, and we must think several moves ahead to determine how far we will take this — and what the new level of conflict we are prepared to engage in,” he said.
American military officials said they were aware that Iran or its proxy forces potentially could respond violently, and were taking steps to protect American personnel in the Middle East and elsewhere around the world. They declined to provide details.
“I can only hope that embassies and consulates across the region were put on heightened alert in the last 48 hours or more,” said Barbara A. Leaf, a former United States ambassador to the United Arab Emirates who is now with the Washington Institute for Near East Policy.
“That said, I would be surprised to see the Iranians respond quickly to this,” she said. “Once the regime has recovered from its initial shock, it will take its time plotting reprisals. And reprisals there will be, most likely in Iraq first. But our gulf partners should worry as well — assassinations, strikes on shipping and energy infrastructure.”
In the end, General Suleimani’s brazenness may have been his undoing. Unlike terrorist leaders like Osama bin Laden and Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, General Suleimani often operated in the open.
“Suleimani was treated like royalty, and was not particularly hard to find,” said Marc Polymeropoulos, a former senior C.I.A. operations officer with extensive counterterrorism experience overseas who retired last year. “Suleimani absolutely felt untouchable, particularly in Iraq. He took selfies of himself on the battlefield and openly taunted the U.S., because he felt safe in doing so.”
General Suleimani wanted to show that he could be anywhere and everywhere, the American official said, adding that he knew he could be a target but was obsessed with his image and could prove he had his hand in everything.
A senior American official said that the administration’s hope was that the killing of General Suleimani would force Iran to back down after months of assertive behavior, much as Tehran backed down from rapidly escalating hostilities during the oil tanker wars of the 1980s.
The officials said there was worry among the president’s senior advisers that Mr. Trump has indicated so many times that he did not want a war with Iran that Tehran had become persuaded the United States would not act forcibly.
But the official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, acknowledged that the killing of Mr. Suleimani was a huge risk for Mr. Trump and could just as likely prompt an outsize reaction from both Iran and Iraq.
“Iran has a lot of levers to pull too,” warned Derek Chollet, who served as an assistant secretary of defense in the Obama administration. “So much for ending ‘endless wars.’ ”
Mr. Trump’s decision to kill General Suleimani was one that Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama had rejected, fearing it would lead to war.
Iranian General Traveled With Impunity, Until U.S. Drones Found Him
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/worl...s-drones-found-him/ar-BBYAiJy?ocid=spartanntp
WASHINGTON — One night in January 2007, American Special Operations commandos tracked a notorious adversary driving in a convoy from Iran into northern Iraq: Maj. Gen. Qassim Suleimani, Iran’s top security and intelligence commander.
But the Americans held their fire, and General Suleimani slipped away into the darkness
“To avoid a firefight, and the contentious politics that would follow, I decided that we should monitor the caravan, not strike immediately,” Gen. Stanley A. McChrystal, the head of the secretive Joint Special Operations Command, recalled in an article last year.
But early Friday, an American MQ-9 Reaper drone from General McChrystal’s former command — operating under President Trump’s orders — fired missiles into a convoy carrying General Suleimani as it was leaving Baghdad’s international airport. What remained unclear is why Mr. Trump chose this moment to strike the top military leader of Iran, after two presidents before him opted not to do so, out of concern that killing the general could incite a wider war with Iran.
National security experts and even officials at the Pentagon said there was nothing new about Iranian behavior in recent months or even weeks; General Suleimani has been accused of prodding Shiite militias into attacking Americans for more than a decade. American officials have also blamed him, for more than a decade, of working with organizations in other countries, like Hezbollah in Lebanon and Israel as well as the Houthis in Yemen, to attack American allies and interests.
Senior Trump administration officials, including Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, repeatedly said on Friday that new attacks under General Suleimani’s leadership were imminent.
But one Defense Department official, speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss internal planning, said that there was nothing new in the threat presented by the Iranian general.
And critics of the strike questioned whether its timing was meant to influence public opinion as Mr. Trump faces impeachment.
On Thursday night, around the time of the strike on General Suleimani, a Special Operations unit based in the United States boarded transport aircraft bound for the Middle East, one Defense Department official said. The deployment of the elite Army Rangers marks the latest group of troops sent to the region. Earlier this week, the Pentagon readied 4,000 paratroopers based at Fort Bragg, N.C., for a similar security mission to Kuwait, 750 of which have already deployed.
Tracking General Suleimani’s location had long been a priority for the American and Israeli spy services and militaries, especially when he was in Iraq.
General Suleimani often traveled with an air of impunity, as if he felt he was untouchable, officials said. One former senior American commander recalled parking his military jet next to General Suleimani’s plane at the Erbil airport in northern Iraq.
Current and former American commanders and intelligence officials said that Friday morning’s attack drew specifically upon a combination of information from secret informants, electronic intercepts, reconnaissance aircraft and other surveillance tools.
The highly classified mission to locate and strike General Suleimani was set in motion after the death of an American contractor last Friday, according to senior American officials. The military’s Special Operations Command spent the next several days looking for an opportunity to strike. An option provided, and eventually approved, was dependent on General Suleimani’s arrival at Baghdad International Airport. If he was met by Iraqi officials, one American official said, the strike would be called off. But, the official said, it was a “clean party,” and the strike was approved.
Mr. Trump’s decision to kill General Suleimani was one that Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama had rejected, fearing it would lead to war.
General McChrystal praised Mr. Trump’s decision to do so.
“The targeting was appropriate given Suleimani’s very public role in orchestrating Iranian attacks on the U.S. and our allies,” he said in an email.
But the general added a somber warning: “We can’t consider this as an isolated action. As with all such actions it will impact the dynamics of the region, and Iran will likely feel compelled to respond in kind.
“There is the potential for a stair-step escalation of attacks, and we must think several moves ahead to determine how far we will take this — and what the new level of conflict we are prepared to engage in,” he said.
American military officials said they were aware that Iran or its proxy forces potentially could respond violently, and were taking steps to protect American personnel in the Middle East and elsewhere around the world. They declined to provide details.
“I can only hope that embassies and consulates across the region were put on heightened alert in the last 48 hours or more,” said Barbara A. Leaf, a former United States ambassador to the United Arab Emirates who is now with the Washington Institute for Near East Policy.
“That said, I would be surprised to see the Iranians respond quickly to this,” she said. “Once the regime has recovered from its initial shock, it will take its time plotting reprisals. And reprisals there will be, most likely in Iraq first. But our gulf partners should worry as well — assassinations, strikes on shipping and energy infrastructure.”
In the end, General Suleimani’s brazenness may have been his undoing. Unlike terrorist leaders like Osama bin Laden and Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, General Suleimani often operated in the open.
“Suleimani was treated like royalty, and was not particularly hard to find,” said Marc Polymeropoulos, a former senior C.I.A. operations officer with extensive counterterrorism experience overseas who retired last year. “Suleimani absolutely felt untouchable, particularly in Iraq. He took selfies of himself on the battlefield and openly taunted the U.S., because he felt safe in doing so.”
General Suleimani wanted to show that he could be anywhere and everywhere, the American official said, adding that he knew he could be a target but was obsessed with his image and could prove he had his hand in everything.
A senior American official said that the administration’s hope was that the killing of General Suleimani would force Iran to back down after months of assertive behavior, much as Tehran backed down from rapidly escalating hostilities during the oil tanker wars of the 1980s.
The officials said there was worry among the president’s senior advisers that Mr. Trump has indicated so many times that he did not want a war with Iran that Tehran had become persuaded the United States would not act forcibly.
But the official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, acknowledged that the killing of Mr. Suleimani was a huge risk for Mr. Trump and could just as likely prompt an outsize reaction from both Iran and Iraq.
“Iran has a lot of levers to pull too,” warned Derek Chollet, who served as an assistant secretary of defense in the Obama administration. “So much for ending ‘endless wars.’ ”
no doubt...
the war profiteers are drooling like a muthafucka right now...
USA got a lot of military personel and american diplomats
in that area.... feeling all kinds of nervy right now...
Last edited:
Does anyone know an how many 82nd Air Born soldiers are now headed to Iraq & what is their mission? I think I've read numbers ranging from 800 to 5,000
Objective? Remember the news reports around 2001-03 with the Afhganistan/Iraq shit? I must admit that I only been following this shit on BGOL. I haven't witnessed the CNN and Fox news spin with my own eyes, but I bet the shit is funny as hell. Trump bust his cherry and caught his first body.Should I get supplies for the bunker now? Do you think waiting until the morning is cutting it too close?
ADOS is about to get upgraded to Iranian bot status.
Should I get supplies for the bunker now? Do you think waiting until the morning is cutting it too close?
Man I hate when I go to my moms house and she watching CNN, I know they ain’t Fox but still....
I know many folks in here been stop fu king with them
It's crazy with CNN. Trump has turned them into Fox-lite. A bunch of emotional asses who can't even pretend to hide their bias but claim to be an objective new source. CNN has took a hard fall since they let themselves be trolled by Trump.
They haven't realized that being so emotional plays into Trump's "fake news" bullshit. Hiding opinions as 'analysis' and spamming the CNN homepage with it isn't a good look. Go to Reuters and then take a look at Fox and CNN for comparison's sake. Problem is most our country gets news from either Fox or CNN.
These new attacks happened (or just reported) an hour ago. Obviously there is a spy in the Iranian/militia ranks in Iraq. You’d think they would know that and not be cruising the streets of Iraq on a Friday night.
So 45 is conducting drone strikes on Iranians in Iraq, while Iran, China and Russia are conducting military exercises (working together as always) the Saudi are funding the insurgents who are Saudi, Iranian and Iraq. The British just basically told 45 go fuck yourself we don’t want anything to do with this. The rest of Europe thinks we are a joke now and probably will leave 45 blowing in the wind. The MAGA crowd thinks he knows what he is doing till they find out their sons and daughters are going to fight a war for him that we can’t win, and to top it off this shit going to make gas prices go up and make MF’s rich.
How many years have Iran/US been fighting a proxy war in Iraq? Funny that trump, the man who loves to talk about how he destroyed ISIS, is now gloating about having killed one of the people who actually did help to defeat ISIS. Amazing that it "suddenly" became a problem in an election year. This is just like the shit with the aid for Ukraine...
Amazing that it "suddenly" became a problem in an election year. This is just like the shit with the aid for Ukraine...
The Fonk Bomb has been released, just watch your asses and noses for the fallout.
naw that shit probably don’t be like that but I’m sure folks gonna get picked off aroubd that region
History and facts aren't on your side. The election isn't until November, if we're in a major conflict he will win easily.
Important To Remember: No Wartime President Has Been Defeated For Reelection!
An interesting point to remember with 80 days left to the Presidential election, and just two days to August 20, precisely five months to the inauguration! NEVER has a President in wartime been def…www.theprogressiveprofessor.com
Witness the following:
James Madison, the War of 1812, reelected in 1812
Abraham Lincoln, the Civil War, reelected in 1864
Woodrow Wilson, World War I, not at war but nearing it, reelected in 1916
Franklin D. Roosevelt, World War II, not at war but nearing it, reelected in 1940, and then at war, reelected in 1944.
Lyndon B. Johnson, using the Vietnam War issue through the Gulf of Tonkin, elected in 1964
Richard Nixon, Vietnam War, reelected in 1972
George W. Bush, Iraq and Afghanistan Wars, reelected in 2004
That's not a very convincing list.
The war of 1812 was over 200 years ago.
Lincoln didn't have to worry about Democrat states in the electoral college.
Wilson would have never survived reelection had he gotten us into WW1 in his first term.
FDR had led us through the great depression and had already been elected to an unprecedented third term before pearl harbor.
LBJ just took over for a president that had been assassinated the previous year
Nixon didn't finish his second term plus the Vietnam War had been going on before he even got into office.
As the article pointed out, George HW Bush lost
George W Bush had 9/11
Trump doesn't have any of the contributing factors they had. He would need to have a bunch of Americans to die in a huge terrorist/Iran attack to get reelected.
Similar threads
