BREAKING: Obama Talks to Muslim World

QueEx

Rising Star
Super Moderator
President Barack Obama just gave and interview with Al-Arabiya TV reaching out to the Muslim world. Obama mentioned that he had appointed former Senator Mitchell as a special envoy to the region; and that he was serious about trying to bring about peace to the region.
 
<font size="5"><center>President Obama Does First Formal TV Interview
as President with Al-Arabiya</font size></center>



spacer.gif

January 26, 2009

As special envoy to the Middle East, George Mitchell heads off to the region to begin work on negotiating a cease fire between Israel and the Palestinians, President Obama has sat for his first formal TV interview with the Arabic cable TV network Al-Arabiya, ABC News has learned.

The interview was taped this evening and is set to air at 11 pm ET, as Mitchell is in the air and on his way to the region.

Based in Dubai, Al-Arabiya estimates that it has a potential audience exceeding 23 million in the Gulf region.

http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2009/01/president-ob-10.html
 
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/rueFzxwXaxM&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/rueFzxwXaxM&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
 
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/rueFzxwXaxM&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/rueFzxwXaxM&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

Beautiful. I hope this bears fruit.
 
<font size="3">
A side note to this story:</font size>

On January 19, 2009 (two days before the inauguration) a U.S. naval ship seized in the Red Sea (which abuts the Sinai/smuggling routes into Gaza) an Iranian ship which had been under surveillance for several days following its departure from the Persia Gulf (which abuts Iran). A search of the ship is said to have revealed weapons bound for Hamas in Gaza hidden in secret compartments.

This story has received little, if any, play in western media, especially not U.S. media.

Fast forward to yesterday, Monday, January 26, 2009: According to an article in the World Tribune the U.S., quietly released the ship to the Egyptians, ironically, not long before President Obama said in the interview with Al-Arabiya, that the U.S. would pursue diplomatic (as well as other) means to deal with Iran, if the Iranians "unclenched their fist."​

Coincidence ? ? ?

QueEx
 
Wake up to the deception, Israel can protect itself! We have no moral authority to demand talks with anyone 'with unclenched fists' as long as we occupy their land. You can't impose democracy at the barrel of a gun, besides, we're broke! Actions overseas only make our economic condition worse. We need to mind our own business.

Its a reason why the Palestinians fight with rocks and shoes (ITS ALL THEY HAVE). Put yourself in the middle of that oppression!

The new boss sounds just like the old boss (American Imperialism, by any means necessary) Unconditional support for Israel
 
<object width="450" height="370"><param name="movie" value="http://www.liveleak.com/e/47f_1233071112"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.liveleak.com/e/47f_1233071112" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="450" height="370"></embed></object>
:yes:President Obama chose an Arabic TV network for his first TV interview as president, in which he told the Muslim world: "Americans are not your enemy". Al Arabiya's Cairo bureau chief Randa Abul Azm told Sky News his message had brought hope to Arabs.
 
Wake up to the deception,
What is the deception ??? Remember, we are the deceived, so please spell out exactly how Mr. Obama is deceiving us.

Israel can protect itself! We have no moral authority to demand talks with anyone 'with unclenched fists' as long as we occupy their land.
Can you see beyond Israel ??? Stop letting that word (Israel) cloud you vision or you ability to think.

The U.S. has had an ongoing row with Iran, independently of Israel, since at least '79. We don't occupy shit belonging to Iran (get your facts straight -- and don't retort with that Israel shit) and we don't need any "moral authority" to tell a mofo to put your fists down if you want us to put our fists down, or, said differently, we don't need any moral authority to tell a som-bitch to put your fists down or we might be forced to take them down for you. But, fuck all of that, its obvious to most "thinking people" that the man is making a long and overdue peace overture. See it for what it is (unless you can clearly demonstrate how its something different).

You can't impose democracy at the barrel of a gun, besides, we're broke! Actions overseas only make our economic condition worse. We need to mind our own business.
Is this what it sound like, when Doves cry . . .

Seems to me, for once, we are "minding our own business".

Its a reason why the Palestinians fight with rocks and shoes (ITS ALL THEY HAVE). Put yourself in the middle of that oppression!
Man please. There is a time and place for everything. You'll get your chance to argue Palestinian whatever; but seems to me right now, Mr. Obama is trying to raise a much larger issue, one which encompasses the larger picture which includes the Palestinians. Put on you "Bigger Picture Glasses" so that you can see the forest, and not just a few trees.

The new boss sounds just like the old boss (American Imperialism, by any means necessary) Unconditional support for Israel

And he will continue to sound like that to those with Anti-Obama blinders on. Like the man said, he won. Are you going to spend the next 4 years casting aspersions before you ever learn the facts ? ? ?

QueEx
 
Wake up to the deception, Israel can protect itself! We have no moral authority to demand talks with anyone 'with unclenched fists' as long as we occupy their land. You can't impose democracy at the barrel of a gun, besides, we're broke! Actions overseas only make our economic condition worse. We need to mind our own business.

Its a reason why the Palestinians fight with rocks and shoes (ITS ALL THEY HAVE). Put yourself in the middle of that oppression!

The new boss sounds just like the old boss (American Imperialism, by any means necessary) Unconditional support for Israel

basically. but don't even bother.... the sheeple will NEVER get it. Vive La Revoluccion!
 
birds of a feather

damn right, if you preach 'peace' you must lead by example. All the Middle East sees is American Imperialism, they could care less who is president because the policy towards the 'brown' people never changes, Do you get it yet, brotha?

That is the deception. More people have figured this out than you care to acknowledge but over time, you can't run from the truth. Maybe this picture will help:

<img src="http://i342.photobucket.com/albums/o427/Kitswain/Obama/Change.jpg"/>
 
damn right, if you preach 'peace' you must lead by example.
Then give peace a damn chance. Why are you popping off at the mouth before you even know the score ???

All the Middle East sees is American Imperialism,
And YOU are qualified to speak for the Middle East ? ? ? gimme a break.


they could care less who is president because the policy towards the 'brown' people never changes, Do you get it yet, brotha?
Yeah I get it; you associate brown with love or kinship -- the same "brown people" who have enslaved your black-ass. That "brown people" who don't love me and who has never endorsed or supported me and mine, doesn't fly here. Get you some mo neo-revolutionary flags to waive.

That is the deception. More people have figured this out than you care to acknowledge but over time, you can't run from the truth. Maybe this picture will help:

<img src="http://i342.photobucket.com/albums/o427/Kitswain/Obama/Change.jpg"/>

Right.

Listen. You completely evaded my questions above. I know, its not like you had to answer them; you weren't compelled to do so as if you were in some kind of class or something. On the other hand, if you wanted to demonstrate your understanding of issues, I would have been happy to read your reply -- is that because you can only express ideas through posting pics ? ? ?

Somebody has some pretty good photoshop skills; is that the way you intend to go through life, photoshopped ? ? ?

QueEx
 
First, let me say I appreciate the oppurtunity to reach out to everybody in the forums. BGOL is tight as far as I'm concerned.

QueEx, we will give peace a chance but at the same time, hold Mr. Obama accountable for his policies the same way we scolded Bush for his.

Am I qualified to speak on the Middle East? As much as anyone else on this board, I do read! It was said that the reason for the 9/11 attacks was because 1) we are on their land, 2) we are stealing their resources, 3) we unconditionally support Israel. Sounds reasonable to me.

No, I don't feel my black azz has been enslaved, but I'm more than capable of critical thinking. I make up my own mind about issues based on values that have been instilled in me.

I'm sorry but when I look at the makeup of the Federal Reserve, I'm led to believe these are the true 'puppetmasters'. So, in my world, the Agenda is still the same no matter who is Prez. I try to appeal to people's intellect because society is so fractured nowadays but I strongly feel that the truth is out there. Spread the message of peace and recognize deception
 
`

Now that you're reasoning . . .

First, let me say I appreciate the oppurtunity to reach out to everybody in the forums. BGOL is tight as far as I'm concerned.
I don't know about tight but I do know that I have invested lots of time promoting realistic debate and discussion of issues in this forum and I certainly appreciate your efforts, in that regard.

QueEx, we will give peace a chance but at the same time, hold Mr. Obama accountable for his policies the same way we scolded Bush for his.
Bro, lets do that; lets hold him accountable. I feel certain he's going to do some things right and he's going to do some things that most people will say is wrong -- so be it. But heretofore, you've been driving your anti-fed-res argument to the point that it appeared to me, at least, that you were allowing your passionate feelings to overcome objectivity on the rest of the myraid of issues. In the process of holding him accountable, lets allow him to make some moves -- BEFORE we let the bricks fly. You seem to be critical, before the fact.

Am I qualified to speak on the Middle East? As much as anyone else on this board, I do read! It was said that the reason for the 9/11 attacks was because 1) we are on their land, 2) we are stealing their resources, 3) we unconditionally support Israel. Sounds reasonable to me.
(1) We were on land at the invitation of the Saudi "government" and people. Al Qaeda IS NEITHER the government nor the people of Saudi Arabia.

(2) As I see it, we've paid for every drop of oil that we purchase from the Saudis, Iraqis (when they were selling), Iran and the rest of the Muslim producers. Paying ain't stealing.

(3) I think if you actually listen (or read the transcript) Mr. Obama was sending a message to the Israelis that our support is in fact, NOT ABSOLUTE. Again, listen/read carefully before you criticize.


QueEx
 
Ok he finally did something I can somewhat agree with.

The sad thing about this is that Iran, Syria, Palestine, and other factions will look at this like a sign of weakness. Sadly, the only way to deal with folks like these is the "punch while you tell them why you mad" approach. We are dealing with people that's not on the same level as us MENTALLY. This approach would work if our enemies were smart.
 
Ok he finally did something I can somewhat agree with.

The sad thing about this is that Iran, Syria, Palestine, and other factions will look at this like a sign of weakness. Sadly, the only way to deal with folks like these is the "punch while you tell them why you mad" approach. We are dealing with people that's not on the same level as us MENTALLY. This approach would work if our enemies were smart.

:lol: u really are an ass. :hmm:

you forget that was the same logic the US used in dealing with native americans.
 
<font size="5"><Center>
Obama should apologise to Iran: Ahmadinejad</font size></center>



AFP
January 28, 2009

TEHRAN (AFP) — Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad demanded on Wednesday that US President Barack Obama apologise for "crimes" committed by the United States against Iran over the past 60 years.

The hardline leader also called on Washington to withdraw its troops from across the world as a proof of Obama's policy of change.

"You were standing against the Iranian people in the past 60 years," Ahmadinejad said during an address in the western region of Khermenshah that was broadcast by state television.

"Those who speak of change must apologise to the Iranian people and try to repair their past bad acts and the crimes they committed against Iran."

As to the troops, he said he expected two kinds of "deep and fundamental" change.

"Meet people, talk to them with respect and put an end to the expansionist policies. If you talk about change it must put an end to the US military presence in the world, withdraw your troops and take them back inside your borders."

Ahmadinejad said the advocates of change must "stop supporting the Zionists, outlaws and criminals."

He called on the United States to "stop interfering in other people's affairs" and said Washington should "let the American people decide their own future ... Stop pressuring them," he added, without saying to what he was referring.

Ahmadinejad said he welcomed change but the "change has to be fundamental."

"If someone wants to talk with us in the language that (George W.) Bush used ... even if he uses new words, our response will be the same that we gave to Bush during the past years," he added.

Tension between Washington and Tehran has been high over the latter's nuclear programme.

Bush refused to hold talks with Iran until it stopped its nuclear work, but on Monday Obama extended a diplomatic hand towards Tehran to break the deadlock.

In an interview with Al-Arabia television, Obama promised to lay a framework for his policy towards Iran.

"As I said in my inauguration speech, if countries like Iran are willing to unclench their fist, they will find an extended hand from us.

"It is very important for us to make sure that we are using all the tools of US power, including diplomacy, in our relationship with Iran."

Also on Monday, Washington's UN ambassador, Susan Rice, pledged "direct" support to Tehran if it halts the nuclear programme.

Ahmadinejad said Tehran would "wait, see and listen to what they (US) say and then consider what they do."

"If there is a real change, we will welcome it."

The five permanent members of the UN Security Council -- Britain, China, France, Russia and the United States -- plus Germany have offered Tehran economic and energy incentives in exchange for halting its uranium enrichment programme.

But Tehran is pressing on with the work, insisting that its nuclear programme is peaceful and solely geared toward electricity generation.

The Security Council has already adopted four resolutions -- three of which included sanctions -- requiring Iran to suspend enrichment.
 
:lol: u really are an ass. :hmm:

you forget that was the same logic the US used in dealing with native americans.

and you see how that worked out....

People tend to forget that WE don't have to extend our hand for shit. We owned the table they have to come and sit at. If we were really this EVIL civilization, why would we even attempt some of the shit we do to help some countries out. Wouldn't it be cheaper to just kill them then try to work with them? If America was soooooooooooo evil, why bullshit around that notion. We could make the holocaust look like a day spa if we wanted too.
 
Wake up to the deception, Israel can protect itself!
We have no moral authority to demand talks with anyone 'with unclenched fists' as long as we occupy their land. You can't impose democracy at the barrel of a gun, besides, we're broke! Actions overseas only make our economic condition worse. We need to mind our own business.

The new boss sounds just like the old boss (American Imperialism, by any means necessary) Unconditional support for Israel


<font size="3">Hmmmm. According to the Village Voice, the right disagrees with your assessment of Obama's support for Israel:</font size>


<font size="5"><Center>Obama Reaches Out to Middle East,
Proving His Allegiance to Islam</font size></center>



The Village Voice
By Roy Edroso
January 27, 2009

<img alt="obamamitchell.jpg" src="http://blogs.villagevoice.com/runninscared/obamamitchell.jpg" width="210" height="155" align="right">George Mitchell has actually achieved something as a peace-maker, helping to effect the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Belfast_Agreement" target="_blank">Good Friday Agreement</a> that virtually ended decades of strife in Northern Ireland, so maybe he can knock some sense into the heads of those crazy Hatfields and McCoys over in the Middle East, to which President Obama has <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/28/washington/28diplo.html?_r=1&hp" target="_blank">dispatched Mitchell as a special envoy</a>. His preliminary eight-day tour will cover Egypt, Israel, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, France and the United Kingdom. One of Mitchell's tasks, says the President, is to "ensure that Palestinians in Gaza are able to get the basic necessities they need." President Obama also <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/28/world/middleeast/28arabiya.html" target="_blank">struck a conciliatory</a> tone in an interview with Arab TV network Al-Arabiya, admitting that "all too often the United States starts by dictating" rather than listening to people in the region.
<P>
Naturally rightbloggers are enraged. "MORE DHIMMITUDE FROM OBAMA," screams <a href="http://astuteblogger.blogspot.com/2009/01/more-dhimmitude-from-obama-first-formal.html" target="_blank">The Astute Bloggers</a>. "There ain't no way that Obama is gonna support Israel when push comes to shove," cries the <a href="http://spectator.org/blog/2009/01/26/this-blowsmymind" target="_blank">American Spectator</a>. <a href="http://macsmind.com/wordpress/2009/01/27/obamas-first-interview-is-with-al-arabiya/" target="_blank">Macsmind</a> agrees that Obama's intention is to "marginalize Israel." "I am starting to develop some serious concerns about the next four years," hilariously assert the longtime Obama haters at <a href="http://www.riehlworldview.com/carnivorous_conservative/2009/01/obama-us-must-listen-not-dictate-to-middleeast.html" target="_blank">Riehl World View</a>.
<P>
<a href="http://blogs.dailymail.com/donsurber/2009/01/26/good-move/" target="_blank">Don Surber</a> actually approves of the interview, but to preserve his conservative cred adds that Obama giving it to Al-Arabiya "cheeses off Katie Couric or Wolf Blitzer." Normal people just hope it works.
<P>

See, http://blogs.villagevoice.com/runninscared/archives/2009/01/post_10.php
 
Presently, you appear to have a point. But the following phrase speaks volumes in regards to my fundamental point. "all too often the United States starts by dictating" rather than listening to people in the region.

Israel can handle their own affairs. We have no business interfering in the politics in the Middle East, we do not have the moral authority.

Like I've said before, as I look at the makeup of the Federal Reserve, the truth will be revealed eventually
 
Last edited:
<font size="5"><center>
Obama to Visit Turkey Next Month</font size></center>



Washington Post
By Anne E. Kornblut
March 8, 2009


Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton announced today that President Obama will visit Turkey next month -- but administration officials were quick to add that Obama has not settled on where or when he will give the speech from a Muslim capital that he promised in his first 100 days.


The Speech

Clinton announced a trip, not a speech by the president, a senior administration official said.

Clinton made the announcement in a press conference in Ankara, where she met with Turkish leaders.

Obama's speech to the Islamic world has become a source of mounting speculation, as Obama has not announced a decision -- which is fraught with security and diplomatic concerns -- and as his calendar is filling up with events and trips. In addition to Turkey, other possible sites for the speech include Morrocco, Egypt and Indonesia.

"Planning for the Turkey visit is just beginning. It will be an important opportunity to visit a NATO ally and discuss shared challenges," a senior administration official said. "It will also provide an opportunity to continue the president's dialogue with the Muslim world, a dialogue he started immediately and intends to maintain throughout his presidency."


http://voices.washingtonpost.com/44...visit_turkey_next_mon.html?hpid=moreheadlines
 
<IFRAME SRC="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7930865.stm" WIDTH=780 HEIGHT=1500>
<A HREF="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7930865.stm">link</A>

</IFRAME>
 
<font size="5"><Center>
US talks in Syria 'constructive' </font size></center>



Al Jazeera
Saturday, March 7, 2009

The US and Syria have held "constructive" talks in Damascus, one of the US delegates has said.

Jeffrey Feltman, acting assistant secretary of state for near eastern affairs, and Dan Shapiro of the White House's National Security Council, met Walid al-Moualem, the Syrian foreign minister, on Saturday.

"We had constructive, comprehensive talks today," Feltman told reporters. "We found a lot of common ground."

However, the US delegation did not meet Bashar al-Assad, Syria's preisdent, during their visit.

Feltman and Shapiro are the first high-level US officials to visit Syria since January 2005, and the trip is in line with the policy of Barack Obama, the US president, of reaching out to all nations in the region.

"The president has said he wants to sustain ... principle engagement with all states in the region and that includes Syria," Feltman said in Beirut before the trip.


Significant visit

Speaking after the talks, Feltman told Al Jazeera that the talks with Syrian officials were an attempt to "achieve results through engagement."

"The president [Obama] believes that talking should not be considered a reward - talking should be the means to achieve objectives," he said.

"I think there are a lot of areas where the US and Syria have overlapping interests or perhaps don't have overlapping interests.

"Let's take the issue of [the Iraq war]. We have heard the Syrians say they want a stable and secure Iraq. You have heard our president announce his plan to what has been called a responsible draw-down [of troops] in accordance with our agreements. Maybe this is an area where we [the US and Syria] can work together.

"I'm not going to try to quantify or describe in detail the ideas we have with the Syrians. We want to talk with the Syrians and listen to the Syrians to see where we might co-operate."

Rula Amin, Al Jazeera's correspondent reporting from Damascus, described the US diplomats' visit as "very significant".

"Before this administration, it was a confrontational policy ... and now this administration seems to think that Syria could be key to resolving many of the hot issues on President Obama's plate."

Those issues include the war in Iraq, moves towards a two-state solution between Israel and the Palestinians, and political instability in Lebanon, where the Iranian- and Syrian-supported Hezbollah maintains an armed wing despite UN security council resolutions calling for it to disarm.

"Syria has been Iran's strongest partner in the region, and that is how Iran extends its influence in the Middle East," she said.

"They think that if they disengage Syria from Iran, that would weaken Iran and make it easier for the US to negotiate with Iran and to impose its terms."


US relationship

Marwan Kabalan, a political analyst at Damascus University, said that the Syrian government may be trying to forge good relations with the US, but is not willing to abandon Iran as an ally.

"I think if the Americans are trying to break the alliance between Syria and Iran, I don't think they are going to succeed in that," he said.

"Damascus is quite unwilling to trade its relations with the US, and the West in general, with that with Iran."

The US withdrew its ambassador from Damascus and stepped up sanctions against Syria after the assassination of Rafiq al-Hariri, a former Lebanese prime minister, in 2005.

Damascus maintained a military presence in Lebanon for 29 years until al-Hariri's death, when Lebanese and international pressure forced their removal.

Syria has never admitted a role in al-Hariri's death but many suspect its involvement.


http://english.aljazeera.net/news/middleeast/2009/03/20093713536371310.html
 
<font size="6"><center>
Obama switches line on Mid-East</font size>
<font size="5">
A radical reversal of Washington's approach to the Middle East </font size></center><font size="4">


The Australian
By Geoff Elliott,
Washington correspondent
March 09, 2009


BARACK Obama has embarked on a radical reversal of Washington's approach to the Middle East in a series of developments over the weekend that add to the ambitious reach of policy changes for the US President.

Following Washington's new stance in Iraq and the decision to withdraw forces from the country by the end of August next year, Mr Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton announced in the space of 48 hours a series of diplomatic shifts to unwind years of the Bush administration's policies towards the region:

  1. <font size="3">Mr Obama flagged negotiations with some of the Taliban tribes in Afghanistan; </font size>

  2. <font size="3">Ms Clinton invited Iran to participate in a regional conference as part of a strategic review of the situation in Afghanistan; </font size>

  3. <font size="3">The US military said last night that 12,000 American troops would leave Iraq by September, marking an acceleration of the timetable for US withdrawal;</font size>

  4. <font size="3">The White House dispatched two envoys to hold talks with Syria yesterday; and</font size>

  5. <font size="3">Ms Clinton opened a broad diplomatic engagement with Russia at a meeting with her counterpart in Geneva as part of Washington's push to try to end Moscow's support for Iran. </font size>

The regional diplomatic effort, which will involve Mr Obama travelling to Turkey early next month -- Ankara has offered some qualified support for Iran's nuclear program -- makes good on his campaign promises.

But it worries Arab and Israeli leaders, who already question whether Mr Obama is making too many concessions to Iran, while eastern Europeans feel the same about the dramatic reversal in tone of the relations between Washington and Moscow.

"We are being extremely vigorous in our outreach because we are testing the waters, we are determining what is possible, we're turning new pages and resetting buttons, and we are doing all kinds of efforts to try to create more partners and fewer adversaries," Ms Clinton said of her talks and travels through the region last week.

Mr Obama told The New York Times yesterday he was open to a reconciliation process in which the US military would reach out to moderate elements of the Taliban, in a similar way to the engagement of US forces with the Sunni militias in Iraq.

Declaring that the US was not winning in Afghanistan, and noting Washington's successful strategy in Iraq to win the support of insurgents there, Mr Obama said: "There may be some comparable opportunities in Afghanistan and in the Pakistani region."

He acknowledged the approach might not yield the same success. "The situation in Afghanistan is, if anything, more complex," he said. "You have a less-governed region, a history of fierce independence among tribes. Those tribes are multiple and sometimes operate at cross-purposes, and so figuring all that out is going to be much more of a challenge."

Iran yesterday responded positively to Ms Clinton's plans to invite Tehran to a likely March 31 meeting on Afghanistan -- the first overture of this kind to Iran from the US in years.

"The US and global powers have realised that the issues in Afghanistan cannot be solved without the presence of the Islamic republic," said Gholam Hossein Elham, a spokesman for the Iranian Government.

Ms Clinton made much at the weekend of hitting the "reset" button with Moscow during meetings with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov.

The two discussed a new arms treaty and how to deal with Iran's nuclear program. While Tehran says this is for civilian purposes, Washington and its allies believe the program is a front for nuclear weapons technology. It remains a foreign policy problem for the Obama administration, as it was for George W.Bush.

Signs of renewed diplomacy were also seen in Damascus yesterday at the first high-level talks between US and Syrian officials in more than four years.

Senior State Department official Jeffrey Feltman and White House national security official Dan Shapiro met Syrian Foreign Minister Walid al-Moualem.

Mr Feltman said the US wanted to see "forward momentum" on peace talks between Syria and Israel, and said Syria could help Middle East stability.

"We found a lot of common ground," Mr Feltman said.

</font size>

http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,25157224-2703,00.html
 
<font size="5"><center>
Obama speaks to Iranian people
in video message</font size></center>




<object width="480" height="295"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/HY_utC-hrjI&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/HY_utC-hrjI&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="295"></embed></object>



McClatchy Newspapers
By Margaret Talev
and Warren P. Strobel
Thursday, March 19, 2009

WASHINGTON — In an unprecedented video message released Friday on the celebration of the Persian new year, President Barack Obama speaks directly to the Iranian people and government, saying his administration "is now committed to diplomacy that addresses the full range of issues before us" and that that the process "will not be advanced by threats."

Obama describes a "common humanity that binds us together" despite three decades of strained relations and calls for "engagement that is honest and grounded in mutual respect."

"Eid-eh Shoma Mobarak," he says — Happy New Year.

While the United States "wants the Islamic Republic of Iran to take its rightful place in the community of nations" Obama says, "That place cannot be reached through terror or arms."

The video was distributed with Farsi subtitles to news outlets with a regional reach, including BBC Persia, Al Jazeera English, the Voice of America and others, but also was to be posted on the White House Web site and You Tube, aides said late Thursday.

The video goes significantly beyond the standard practice of U.S. presidents issuing statements in celebration of Nowruz — and enables Obama to communicate directly to Iranian officials in a way he couldn't in person or in the context of a policy discussion.

The ancient, pre-Islamic celebration is pegged to the start of spring and is the biggest holiday for Iranians.

Obama's message is packed with praise for the contributions of Persian civilization and uses the word "respect."

But its framing also sends a subtle message — that Iran's claim to greatness hinges not on its modern history, its leaders' hostility to Israel or its nuclear program, but on its long history.

"Over many centuries your art, your music, literature and innovation have made the world a better and more beautiful place," Obama says, adding that the society must be measured by what it creates, not by what it can destroy.

Part of Obama's message appeared designed to capitalize on widespread admiration for the United States among ordinary Iranians, as well as unhappiness with their own leaders.

Although he appears favored to win re-election in June, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and his economic policies are widely unpopular with Iranian businessmen, young Iranians and even some Islamic clerics.

The rest of Obama's message was directed towards Iranian leaders, and is part of an emerging U.S. diplomatic approach that even administration officials acknowledge may not succeed.

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is due to attend an international conference on Afghanistan at the end of the month, and Iran also has been invited.

The State Department confirmed on Thursday that it's sending a senior official to another conference in Moscow next week where Iranian officials also will be present.

State Department spokesman Robert Wood said there are no plans for "substantive" U.S.-Iranian meetings in the Russian capital, but the presence of the American envoys sends a clear diplomatic signal nonetheless.

Obama, however, may find that Iran's leaders, headed by supreme religious leader Ali Khamenei, may be unwilling — or unable — to respond to his feelers.

Opposition to the United States and Israel is a central pillar of the Iranian regime's philosophy, and hardliners have repeatedly blocked overtures from Washington. At the same time, the White House's approach could put the fiery Ahmadinejad on the defensive, pressuring him to respond.

The United States and Iran haven't had diplomatic relations since early 1980, when President Jimmy Carter broke off ties several months after Islamic militants seized the U.S. Embassy in Tehran.

Shaul Bakhash, a professor of history and an Iran expert at George Mason University in Fairfax, Va., said that Obama is sending "quite a significant message" that strikes a respectful tone that contrasts with former President George W. Bush's approach. "This is not framed as an attempt to go over the head of the Iranian government to speak to the people."

"The really interesting thing is whether the Iranian government will understand this for what it is meant to convey, which is a reaching out, and to respond appropriately," Bakhash said. "If they don't, it's a great opportunity missed."


http://www.mcclatchydc.com/227/story/64434.html
 
Day by day my respect and reverance grows for this dude. He has mastered the 48 Laws completely and operates within them flawlessly. Dude is the President of the World, busting down barriers. Wouldn't be suprised if he came up with a nifty little approach to N. Korea and Russia.
 
<font size="5"><center>
Obama in Turkey for first visit
to Muslim country</font size></center>



Reuters
Sunday, April 5, 2009


ANKARA (Reuters) - U.S. President Barack Obama arrived in NATO member Turkey on Sunday in his first visit as president to a Muslim country.

Obama's visit, on the last leg of an eight-day trip that marks his debut as president on the world stage, is a recognition of the secular but predominantly Muslim country's growing clout and Washington's desire for its help to solve confrontations and conflicts from Iran to Afghanistan.

U.S.-Turkish relationship suffered badly in 2003 when Ankara opposed the invasion of Iraq. But Obama will seek help from Turkey as he pushes a new regional strategy in Afghanistan and as it prepares to reduce the number of troops in Iraq.

Obama's motorcade got plenty of friendly waves from small groups along a route from the international airport to the city center lined with security personnel. A few people waved tiny Turkish flags. Bush got a mostly indifferent response from the public in visits to the Muslim world.

Turkey will not be the venue for Obama's promised major speech in a Muslim capital, but his April 5-7 trip will be a way to emphasize his message of reaching out to Muslims.

Obama will stress Washington's support for Turkey's bid to join the European Union despite opposition from some member states. Obama urged EU leaders in Prague earlier on Sunday to accept Turkey as a full member of the 27-nation bloc, in <SPAN style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffff00">remarks rejected outright by France and met coolly by Germany.</SPAN>

Turkish entry talks with the EU have been held up by European concerns over human rights, a perceived lack of progress on reforms, and by a long territorial dispute with EU member Cyprus. Turkey has pledged several times to press on with EU reforms, and membership is seen many years off at best.

Obama will meet Turkish Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan and President Abdullah Gul, and will deliver an address to parliament in Ankara on Monday.

In Istanbul, Obama will attend a reception of the United Nations Alliance of Civilizations, co-hosted by Turkey and Spain to bridge the gap between Western and Islamic countries.

(Reporting by Matt Spetalnick; Editing by Alison Williams)

http://www.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idUSTRE5342LP20090405
 
<font size="5"><center>
Obama invites world’s Muslims
to seek 'new beginning'</font size></center>




742-WEBegyptscene.standalone.prod_affiliate.91.jpg

President Barack Obama and his audience at Cairo University in Cairo on
Thursday. About 3,500 invited guests were in the audience.




By Margaret Talev, Dion Nissenbaum and Warren P. Strobel | McClatchy Newspapers
CAIRO, Egypt — Seeking "a new beginning" with an estimated 1.5 billion Muslims worldwide, President Barack Obama on Thursday spoke more bluntly than any U.S. president before him about the chasms dividing the Middle East and the political double talk behind them.

In a 55-minute address from Cairo University, Obama called Israel's settlements in the predominantly Palestinian West Bank illegitimate and said they must stop. He chastised Arabs for crude caricatures of America and conspiracy theories about the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. He also acknowledged that the United States sometimes "acted contrary to our ideals" in its initial response to 9-11.

Asserting that many Muslims privately recognize that Israel won't go away and that many Israelis acknowledge the need for a Palestinian state, he called for peace. "It is time for us to act on what everyone knows to be true," he said.

Obama's speech, beamed to homes and coffeehouses from Morocco to Malaysia, was the capstone of his efforts since he took office to reach out to the Muslim world, and it was clearly meant to close a traumatic era in U.S.-Muslim relations.

"We must say openly the things we hold in our hearts, and that too often are said only behind closed doors," he said. "I have come here to seek a new beginning between the United States and Muslims around the world," he told more than 3,000 invited guests who'd cleared heavy security to enter the main auditorium. In their midst were many Egyptian dissidents, as well as the son of Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak. Mubarak himself didn't attend, but Obama met with him earlier in the day.

The speech also cemented a significant shift in U.S. Middle East policy, away from former President George W. Bush's unstinting advocacy for Israel toward a more balanced approach that casts Washington as mediator between Arabs and Jews.

To be sure, Obama reaffirmed the United States' "unbreakable" bonds with Israel, and with his visit Friday to the former Buchenwald concentration camp in Germany in mind, said that to deny the Holocaust was "baseless, ignorant and hateful." The latter comment was partly a reference to Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who's in the midst of a hotly contested re-election campaign.

In virtually the next breath, however, Obama spoke of Palestinians' suffering under the "daily humiliations" of occupation and in hopeless refugee camps through the Arab world.

"Just as Israel's right to exist cannot be denied, neither can Palestine's," he declared.

Many Muslims and Palestinians, and groups that represented liberal to moderate Jews, received the speech optimistically.

"We had high expectations, and I believe he met our expectations in terms of the vision and how he sees the world," Arab League Secretary General Amr Moussa said. "The balanced approach is the best approach, and the failure of policy is always linked with a biased approach. Now we see a balanced one."

Israeli officials reacted cautiously, deflecting Obama's position on Jewish settlements in the West Bank and focusing instead on portions of the speech more palatable to Israel.

"We welcome the president's commitment to the state of Israel's security and his clear call to accept and integrate her into the region," Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak said in Washington.

Obama's equating of Israeli and Palestinian suffering brought some rebukes back in Washington.

"To propose a moral equivalency to the history of Palestinian and Israeli pursuits is utterly unjustifiable," said Rep. Tom Price, R-Ga., the chairman of the conservative Republican Study Committee.

Now that Obama has fulfilled his campaign promise to give a speech in a major Muslim capital, albeit a few weeks beyond the 100-day timetable he'd pledged, speculation inevitably will turn to whether his high-sounding rhetoric will prompt change.

"If Barack Obama cannot elicit a positive response from Muslim audiences, I don't know what American president can," said veteran analyst David Makovsky, co-author of the forthcoming book "Myths, Illusions and Peace."

For U.S. presidents over six decades, the Middle East often has been maddeningly impervious to change. Bush's attempts to remold the region through wars and democratization resulted in a backlash that handed more power to radical groups such as Hamas, Hezbollah and Egypt’s own Muslim Brotherhood.

In Cairo, some liked Obama's message but were skeptical of its impact. Menna El Massry, 19, a law student who was wearing a rainbow head scarf, said that "a lot of people expect Obama to be the savior," but she thought that any change would come slowly.

"Will there be a state of Palestine in Obama’s administration? I doubt it," she said. "Not because I don’t think there should be a state — I do — but because I don’t think the world is ready for that yet."

Arab leaders, wary of Iran's growing power and their own young, disgruntled populations, seem leery of dramatic moves toward peace with Israel or political openings at home.

Israel is governed by a new, right-wing coalition led by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who hasn't yet said that he's ready to accept the "two-state" solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict that Obama seeks.

On settlements, Israel is offering substantially less than the complete freeze on construction that the White House wants.

"The government of Israel has reiterated to the United States its commitment not to build new settlements, to dismantle all illegal outposts and to fulfill its commitments" under the 2003 "road map" for peace, a senior Israeli official said. However, the official defended the so-called "natural growth" of populations in existing settlements. He requested anonymity to speak more frankly.

Obama trod gently into two areas that would have been the centerpiece of any similar speech by Bush: Iran's suspected quest for a nuclear weapon and the need for more democracy in the Muslim world. Obama devoted only a few paragraphs to each.

He acknowledged U.S. errors and missteps. He called the Iraq war "a war of choice," reiterated his order to close the Guantanamo Bay detention center and recalled the U.S. role in overthrowing Iran's democratically elected prime minister, Mohammed Mossadegh, in 1953.

Obama's criticisms weren't focused solely on Israel and the West, however.

He also spoke in detail about the Holocaust, in language that Arabs and Muslims typically don't hear in speeches aimed at gaining their support. He implored Muslims to see the minority of violent extremists within their ranks as an enemy to themselves as well as the West.

"The Holy Quran teaches that whoever kills an innocent, it is as if he has killed all mankind, and whoever saves a person, it is as if he has saved all mankind," Obama said in one of his biggest applause lines.

He acknowledged support for Hamas among Palestinians, but said that "Palestinians must abandon violence," recalling how black Americans succeeded through the nonviolent civil rights movement.

The Cairo University audience, many listening via headset translation, interrupted more than 30 times to applaud. People cheered when Obama used his own full name, complete with middle name Hussein, and acknowledged his familial connection to Islam.

However, some young Egyptians watching from a balcony in the auditorium rolled their eyes when Obama flubbed the word for head scarf, instead saying "hajib" instead of "hijab."

Egyptian security forces closed off traffic and lined the roads to secure Obama's passage as he zipped from a meeting with Mubarak to a mosque visit, then to the speech and on to see the Pyramids and the Sphinx.

(Strobel reported from Washington.)



http://www.mcclatchydc.com/world/story/69420.html
 
<font size="4">
Full Text of Obama's Cairo speech:</font size>http://www.mcclatchydc.com/homepage/story/69422.html


`[hide]CAIRO, Egypt — Remarks of President Barack Obama as delivered at Cairo University.

A New Beginning

June 4, 2009 (1:10 P.M. Local)

PRESIDENT OBAMA: Thank you very much. Good afternoon. I am honored to be in the timeless city of Cairo, and to be hosted by two remarkable institutions.

For over a thousand years, Al-Azhar has stood as a beacon of Islamic learning; and for over a century, Cairo University has been a source of Egypt's advancement. And together, you represent the harmony between tradition and progress. I'm grateful for your hospitality, and the hospitality of the people of Egypt. And I'm also proud to carry with me the goodwill of the American people, and a greeting of peace from Muslim communities in my country: Assalaamu alaykum. (Applause.)


We meet at a time of great tension between the United States and Muslims around the world — tension rooted in historical forces that go beyond any current policy debate. The relationship between Islam and the West includes centuries of coexistence and cooperation, but also conflict and religious wars. More recently, tension has been fed by colonialism that denied rights and opportunities to many Muslims, and a Cold War in which Muslim-majority countries were too often treated as proxies without regard to their own aspirations. Moreover, the sweeping change brought by modernity and globalization led many Muslims to view the West as hostile to the traditions of Islam.


Violent extremists have exploited these tensions in a small but potent minority of Muslims. The attacks of September 11, 2001 and the continued efforts of these extremists to engage in violence against civilians has led some in my country to view Islam as inevitably hostile not only to America and Western countries, but also to human rights. All this has bred more fear and more mistrust.


So long as our relationship is defined by our differences, we will empower those who sow hatred rather than peace, those who promote conflict rather than the cooperation that can help all of our people achieve justice and prosperity. And this cycle of suspicion and discord must end.


I've come here to Cairo to seek a new beginning between the United States and Muslims around the world, one based on mutual interest and mutual respect, and one based upon the truth that America and Islam are not exclusive and need not be in competition. Instead, they overlap, and share common principles – principles of justice and progress; tolerance and the dignity of all human beings.


I do so recognizing that change cannot happen overnight. I know there's been a lot of publicity about this speech, but no single speech can eradicate years of mistrust, nor can I answer in the time that I have this afternoon all the complex questions that brought us to this point. But I am convinced that in order to move forward, we must say openly to each other the things we hold in our hearts and that too often are said only behind closed doors. There must be a sustained effort to listen to each other; to learn from each other; to respect one another; and to seek common ground. As the Holy Koran tells us, "Be conscious of God and speak always the truth." (Applause.)

That is what I will try to do today – to speak the truth as best I can, humbled by the task before us, and firm in my belief that the interests we share as human beings are far more powerful than the forces that drive us apart.


Now part of this conviction is rooted in my own experience. I'm a Christian, but my father came from a Kenyan family that includes generations of Muslims. As a boy, I spent several years in Indonesia and heard the call of the azaan at the break of dawn and at the fall of dusk. As a young man, I worked in Chicago communities where many found dignity and peace in their Muslim faith.


As a student of history, I also know civilization's debt to Islam. It was Islam – at places like Al-Azhar – that carried the light of learning through so many centuries, paving the way for Europe's Renaissance and Enlightenment. It was innovation in Muslim communities – (applause) – it was innovation in Muslim communities that developed the order of algebra; our magnetic compass and tools of navigation; our mastery of pens and printing; our understanding of how disease spreads and how it can be healed. Islamic culture has given us majestic arches and soaring spires; timeless poetry and cherished music; elegant calligraphy and places of peaceful contemplation. And throughout history, Islam has demonstrated through words and deeds the possibilities of religious tolerance and racial equality. (Applause.)


I also know that Islam has always been a part of America's story. The first nation to recognize my country was Morocco. In signing the Treaty of Tripoli in 1796, our second President, John Adams, wrote, "The United States has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion or tranquility of Muslims." And since our founding, American Muslims have enriched the United States. They have fought in our wars, they have served in our government, they have stood for civil rights, they have started businesses, they have taught at our universities, they've excelled in our sports arenas, they've won Nobel Prizes, built our tallest building, and lit the Olympic Torch. And when the first Muslim American was recently elected to Congress, he took the oath to defend our Constitution using the same Holy Koran that one of our Founding Fathers – Thomas Jefferson – kept in his personal library. (Applause.)


So I have known Islam on three continents before coming to the region where it was first revealed. That experience guides my conviction that partnership between America and Islam must be based on what Islam is, not what it isn't. And I consider it part of my responsibility as President of the United States to fight against negative stereotypes of Islam wherever they appear. (Applause.)


But that same principle must apply to Muslim perceptions of America. (Applause.) Just as Muslims do not fit a crude stereotype, America is not the crude stereotype of a self-interested empire. The United States has been one of the greatest sources of progress that the world has ever known. We were born out of revolution against an empire. We were founded upon the ideal that all are created equal, and we have shed blood and struggled for centuries to give meaning to those words – within our borders, and around the world. We are shaped by every culture, drawn from every end of the Earth, and dedicated to a simple concept: E pluribus unum – "Out of many, one."


Now, much has been made of the fact that an African American with the name Barack Hussein Obama could be elected President. (Applause.) But my personal story is not so unique. The dream of opportunity for all people has not come true for everyone in America, but its promise exists for all who come to our shores -- and that includes nearly 7 million American Muslims in our country today who, by the way, enjoy incomes and educational levels that are higher than the American average. (Applause.)


Moreover, freedom in America is indivisible from the freedom to practice one's religion. That is why there is a mosque in every state in our union, and over 1,200 mosques within our borders. That's why the United States government has gone to court to protect the right of women and girls to wear the hijab and to punish those who would deny it. (Applause.)


So let there be no doubt: Islam is a part of America. And I believe that America holds within her the truth that regardless of race, religion, or station in life, all of us share common aspirations – to live in peace and security; to get an education and to work with dignity; to love our families, our communities, and our God. These things we share. This is the hope of all humanity.


Of course, recognizing our common humanity is only the beginning of our task. Words alone cannot meet the needs of our people. These needs will be met only if we act boldly in the years ahead; and if we understand that the challenges we face are shared, and our failure to meet them will hurt us all.


For we have learned from recent experience that when a financial system weakens in one country, prosperity is hurt everywhere. When a new flu infects one human being, all are at risk. When one nation pursues a nuclear weapon, the risk of nuclear attack rises for all nations. When violent extremists operate in one stretch of mountains, people are endangered across an ocean. When innocents in Bosnia and Darfur are slaughtered, that is a stain on our collective conscience. (Applause.) That is what it means to share this world in the 21st century. That is the responsibility we have to one another as human beings.


And this is a difficult responsibility to embrace. For human history has often been a record of nations and tribes – and, yes, religions – subjugating one another in pursuit of their own interests. Yet in this new age, such attitudes are self-defeating. Given our interdependence, any world order that elevates one nation or group of people over another will inevitably fail. So whatever we think of the past, we must not be prisoners to it. Our problems must be dealt with through partnership; our progress must be shared. (Applause.)


Now, that does not mean we should ignore sources of tension. Indeed, it suggests the opposite: We must face these tensions squarely. And so in that spirit, let me speak as clearly and as plainly as I can about some specific issues that I believe we must finally confront together.


The first issue that we have to confront is violent extremism in all of its forms.


In Ankara, I made clear that America is not – and never will be – at war with Islam. (Applause.) We will, however, relentlessly confront violent extremists who pose a grave threat to our security – because we reject the same thing that people of all faiths reject: the killing of innocent men, women, and children. And it is my first duty as President to protect the American people.


The situation in Afghanistan demonstrates America's goals, and our need to work together. Over seven years ago, the United States pursued al Qaeda and the Taliban with broad international support. We did not go by choice; we went because of necessity. I'm aware that there's still some who would question or even justify the events of 9/11. But let us be clear: Al Qaeda killed nearly 3,000 people on that day. The victims were innocent men, women and children from America and many other nations who had done nothing to harm anybody. And yet al Qaeda chose to ruthlessly murder these people, claimed credit for the attack, and even now states their determination to kill on a massive scale. They have affiliates in many countries and are trying to expand their reach. These are not opinions to be debated; these are facts to be dealt with.


Now, make no mistake: We do not want to keep our troops in Afghanistan. We see no military – we seek no military bases there. It is agonizing for America to lose our young men and women. It is costly and politically difficult to continue this conflict. We would gladly bring every single one of our troops home if we could be confident that there were not violent extremists in Afghanistan and now Pakistan determined to kill as many Americans as they possibly can. But that is not yet the case.


And that's why we're partnering with a coalition of 46 countries. And despite the costs involved, America's commitment will not weaken. Indeed, none of us should tolerate these extremists. They have killed in many countries. They have killed people of different faiths – but more than any other, they have killed Muslims. Their actions are irreconcilable with the rights of human beings, the progress of nations, and with Islam. The Holy Koran teaches that whoever kills an innocent is as -- it is as if he has killed all mankind. (Applause.) And the Holy Koran also says whoever saves a person, it is as if he has saved all mankind. (Applause.) The enduring faith of over a billion people is so much bigger than the narrow hatred of a few. Islam is not part of the problem in combating violent extremism – it is an important part of promoting peace.


Now, we also know that military power alone is not going to solve the problems in Afghanistan and Pakistan. That's why we plan to invest $1.5 billion each year over the next five years to partner with Pakistanis to build schools and hospitals, roads and businesses, and hundreds of millions to help those who've been displaced. That's why we are providing more than $2.8 billion to help Afghans develop their economy and deliver services that people depend on.


Let me also address the issue of Iraq. Unlike Afghanistan, Iraq was a war of choice that provoked strong differences in my country and around the world. Although I believe that the Iraqi people are ultimately better off without the tyranny of Saddam Hussein, I also believe that events in Iraq have reminded America of the need to use diplomacy and build international consensus to resolve our problems whenever possible. (Applause.) Indeed, we can recall the words of Thomas Jefferson, who said: "I hope that our wisdom will grow with our power, and teach us that the less we use our power the greater it will be."


Today, America has a dual responsibility: to help Iraq forge a better future -- and to leave Iraq to Iraqis. And I have made it clear to the Iraqi people – (applause) – I have made it clear to the Iraqi people that we pursue no bases, and no claim on their territory or resources. Iraq's sovereignty is its own. And that's why I ordered the removal of our combat brigades by next August. That is why we will honor our agreement with Iraq's democratically elected government to remove combat troops from Iraqi cities by July, and to remove all of our troops from Iraq by 2012. (Applause.) We will help Iraq train its security forces and develop its economy. But we will support a secure and united Iraq as a partner, and never as a patron.


And finally, just as America can never tolerate violence by extremists, we must never alter or forget our principles. Nine-eleven was an enormous trauma to our country. The fear and anger that it provoked was understandable, but in some cases, it led us to act contrary to our traditions and our ideals. We are taking concrete actions to change course. I have unequivocally prohibited the use of torture by the United States, and I have ordered the prison at Guantanamo Bay closed by early next year. (Applause.)


So America will defend itself, respectful of the sovereignty of nations and the rule of law. And we will do so in partnership with Muslim communities which are also threatened. The sooner the extremists are isolated and unwelcome in Muslim communities, the sooner we will all be safer.


The second major source of tension that we need to discuss is the situation between Israelis, Palestinians and the Arab world.


America's strong bonds with Israel are well known. This bond is unbreakable. It is based upon cultural and historical ties, and the recognition that the aspiration for a Jewish homeland is rooted in a tragic history that cannot be denied.


Around the world, the Jewish people were persecuted for centuries, and anti-Semitism in Europe culminated in an unprecedented Holocaust. Tomorrow, I will visit Buchenwald, which was part of a network of camps where Jews were enslaved, tortured, shot and gassed to death by the Third Reich. Six million Jews were killed – more than the entire Jewish population of Israel today. Denying that fact is baseless, it is ignorant, and it is hateful. Threatening Israel with destruction – or repeating vile stereotypes about Jews – is deeply wrong, and only serves to evoke in the minds of Israelis this most painful of memories while preventing the peace that the people of this region deserve.


On the other hand, it is also undeniable that the Palestinian people – Muslims and Christians – have suffered in pursuit of a homeland. For more than 60 years they've endured the pain of dislocation. Many wait in refugee camps in the West Bank, Gaza, and neighboring lands for a life of peace and security that they have never been able to lead. They endure the daily humiliations – large and small – that come with occupation. So let there be no doubt: The situation for the Palestinian people is intolerable. And America will not turn our backs on the legitimate Palestinian aspiration for dignity, opportunity, and a state of their own. (Applause.)


For decades then, there has been a stalemate: two peoples with legitimate aspirations, each with a painful history that makes compromise elusive. It's easy to point fingers – for Palestinians to point to the displacement brought about by Israel's founding, and for Israelis to point to the constant hostility and attacks throughout its history from within its borders as well as beyond. But if we see this conflict only from one side or the other, then we will be blind to the truth: The only resolution is for the aspirations of both sides to be met through two states, where Israelis and Palestinians each live in peace and security. (Applause.)


That is in Israel's interest, Palestine's interest, America's interest, and the world's interest. And that is why I intend to personally pursue this outcome with all the patience and dedication that the task requires. (Applause.) The obligations -- the obligations that the parties have agreed to under the road map are clear. For peace to come, it is time for them – and all of us – to live up to our responsibilities.


Palestinians must abandon violence. Resistance through violence and killing is wrong and it does not succeed. For centuries, black people in America suffered the lash of the whip as slaves and the humiliation of segregation. But it was not violence that won full and equal rights. It was a peaceful and determined insistence upon the ideals at the center of America's founding. This same story can be told by people from South Africa to South Asia; from Eastern Europe to Indonesia. It's a story with a simple truth: that violence is a dead end. It is a sign neither of courage nor power to shoot rockets at sleeping children, or to blow up old women on a bus. That's not how moral authority is claimed; that's how it is surrendered.


Now is the time for Palestinians to focus on what they can build. The Palestinian Authority must develop its capacity to govern, with institutions that serve the needs of its people. Hamas does have support among some Palestinians, but they also have to recognize they have responsibilities. To play a role in fulfilling Palestinian aspirations, to unify the Palestinian people, Hamas must put an end to violence, recognize past agreements, recognize Israel's right to exist.


At the same time, Israelis must acknowledge that just as Israel's right to exist cannot be denied, neither can Palestine's. The United States does not accept the legitimacy of continued Israeli settlements. (Applause.) This construction violates previous agreements and undermines efforts to achieve peace. It is time for these settlements to stop. (Applause.)


And Israel must also live up to its obligation to ensure that Palestinians can live and work and develop their society. Just as it devastates Palestinian families, the continuing humanitarian crisis in Gaza does not serve Israel's security; neither does the continuing lack of opportunity in the West Bank. Progress in the daily lives of the Palestinian people must be a critical part of a road to peace, and Israel must take concrete steps to enable such progress.


And finally, the Arab states must recognize that the Arab Peace Initiative was an important beginning, but not the end of their responsibilities. The Arab-Israeli conflict should no longer be used to distract the people of Arab nations from other problems. Instead, it must be a cause for action to help the Palestinian people develop the institutions that will sustain their state, to recognize Israel's legitimacy, and to choose progress over a self-defeating focus on the past.


America will align our policies with those who pursue peace, and we will say in public what we say in private to Israelis and Palestinians and Arabs. (Applause.) We cannot impose peace. But privately, many Muslims recognize that Israel will not go away. Likewise, many Israelis recognize the need for a Palestinian state. It is time for us to act on what everyone knows to be true.


Too many tears have been shed. Too much blood has been shed. All of us have a responsibility to work for the day when the mothers of Israelis and Palestinians can see their children grow up without fear; when the Holy Land of the three great faiths is the place of peace that God intended it to be; when Jerusalem is a secure and lasting home for Jews and Christians and Muslims, and a place for all of the children of Abraham to mingle peacefully together as in the story of Isra – (applause) – as in the story of Isra, when Moses, Jesus, and Mohammed, peace be upon them, joined in prayer. (Applause.)


The third source of tension is our shared interest in the rights and responsibilities of nations on nuclear weapons.


This issue has been a source of tension between the United States and the Islamic Republic of Iran. For many years, Iran has defined itself in part by its opposition to my country, and there is in fact a tumultuous history between us. In the middle of the Cold War, the United States played a role in the overthrow of a democratically elected Iranian government. Since the Islamic Revolution, Iran has played a role in acts of hostage-taking and violence against U.S. troops and civilians. This history is well known. Rather than remain trapped in the past, I've made it clear to Iran's leaders and people that my country is prepared to move forward. The question now is not what Iran is against, but rather what future it wants to build.


I recognize it will be hard to overcome decades of mistrust, but we will proceed with courage, rectitude, and resolve. There will be many issues to discuss between our two countries, and we are willing to move forward without preconditions on the basis of mutual respect. But it is clear to all concerned that when it comes to nuclear weapons, we have reached a decisive point. This is not simply about America's interests. It's about preventing a nuclear arms race in the Middle East that could lead this region and the world down a hugely dangerous path.


I understand those who protest that some countries have weapons that others do not. No single nation should pick and choose which nation holds nuclear weapons. And that's why I strongly reaffirmed America's commitment to seek a world in which no nations hold nuclear weapons. (Applause.) And any nation – including Iran – should have the right to access peaceful nuclear power if it complies with its responsibilities under the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. That commitment is at the core of the treaty, and it must be kept for all who fully abide by it. And I'm hopeful that all countries in the region can share in this goal.


The fourth issue that I will address is democracy. (Applause.)


I know – I know there has been controversy about the promotion of democracy in recent years, and much of this controversy is connected to the war in Iraq. So let me be clear: No system of government can or should be imposed by one nation by any other.


That does not lessen my commitment, however, to governments that reflect the will of the people. Each nation gives life to this principle in its own way, grounded in the traditions of its own people. America does not presume to know what is best for everyone, just as we would not presume to pick the outcome of a peaceful election. But I do have an unyielding belief that all people yearn for certain things: the ability to speak your mind and have a say in how you are governed; confidence in the rule of law and the equal administration of justice; government that is transparent and doesn't steal from the people; the freedom to live as you choose. These are not just American ideas; they are human rights. And that is why we will support them everywhere. (Applause.)


Now, there is no straight line to realize this promise. But this much is clear: Governments that protect these rights are ultimately more stable, successful and secure. Suppressing ideas never succeeds in making them go away. America respects the right of all peaceful and law-abiding voices to be heard around the world, even if we disagree with them. And we will welcome all elected, peaceful governments – provided they govern with respect for all their people.


This last point is important because there are some who advocate for democracy only when they're out of power; once in power, they are ruthless in suppressing the rights of others. (Applause.) So no matter where it takes hold, government of the people and by the people sets a single standard for all who would hold power: You must maintain your power through consent, not coercion; you must respect the rights of minorities, and participate with a spirit of tolerance and compromise; you must place the interests of your people and the legitimate workings of the political process above your party. Without these ingredients, elections alone do not make true democracy.


AUDIENCE MEMBER: Barack Obama, we love you!


PRESIDENT OBAMA: Thank you. (Applause.) The fifth issue that we must address together is religious freedom.


Islam has a proud tradition of tolerance. We see it in the history of Andalusia and Cordoba during the Inquisition. I saw it firsthand as a child in Indonesia, where devout Christians worshiped freely in an overwhelmingly Muslim country. That is the spirit we need today. People in every country should be free to choose and live their faith based upon the persuasion of the mind and the heart and the soul. This tolerance is essential for religion to thrive, but it's being challenged in many different ways.


Among some Muslims, there's a disturbing tendency to measure one's own faith by the rejection of somebody else's faith. The richness of religious diversity must be upheld – whether it is for Maronites in Lebanon or the Copts in Egypt. (Applause.) And if we are being honest, fault lines must be closed among Muslims, as well, as the divisions between Sunni and Shia have led to tragic violence, particularly in Iraq.


Freedom of religion is central to the ability of peoples to live together. We must always examine the ways in which we protect it. For instance, in the United States, rules on charitable giving have made it harder for Muslims to fulfill their religious obligation. That's why I'm committed to working with American Muslims to ensure that they can fulfill zakat.


Likewise, it is important for Western countries to avoid impeding Muslim citizens from practicing religion as they see fit – for instance, by dictating what clothes a Muslim woman should wear. We can't disguise hostility towards any religion behind the pretense of liberalism.


In fact, faith should bring us together. And that's why we're forging service projects in America to bring together Christians, Muslims, and Jews. That's why we welcome efforts like Saudi Arabian King Abdullah's interfaith dialogue and Turkey's leadership in the Alliance of Civilizations. Around the world, we can turn dialogue into interfaith service, so bridges between peoples lead to action – whether it is combating malaria in Africa, or providing relief after a natural disaster.


The sixth issue – the sixth issue that I want to address is women's rights. (Applause.) I know – I know – and you can tell from this audience, that there is a healthy debate about this issue. I reject the view of some in the West that a woman who chooses to cover her hair is somehow less equal, but I do believe that a woman who is denied an education is denied equality. (Applause.) And it is no coincidence that countries where women are well educated are far more likely to be prosperous.


Now, let me be clear: Issues of women's equality are by no means simply an issue for Islam. In Turkey, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Indonesia, we've seen Muslim-majority countries elect a woman to lead. Meanwhile, the struggle for women's equality continues in many aspects of American life, and in countries around the world.


I am convinced that our daughters can contribute just as much to society as our sons. (Applause.) Our common prosperity will be advanced by allowing all humanity – men and women – to reach their full potential. I do not believe that women must make the same choices as men in order to be equal, and I respect those women who choose to live their lives in traditional roles. But it should be their choice. And that is why the United States will partner with any Muslim-majority country to support expanded literacy for girls, and to help young women pursue employment through micro-financing that helps people live their dreams. (Applause.)


Finally, I want to discuss economic development and opportunity.


I know that for many, the face of globalization is contradictory. The Internet and television can bring knowledge and information, but also offensive sexuality and mindless violence into the home. Trade can bring new wealth and opportunities, but also huge disruptions and change in communities. In all nations – including America -- this change can bring fear. Fear that because of modernity we lose control over our economic choices, our politics, and most importantly our identities – those things we most cherish about our communities, our families, our traditions, and our faith.


But I also know that human progress cannot be denied. There need not be contradictions between development and tradition. Countries like Japan and South Korea grew their economies enormously while maintaining distinct cultures. The same is true for the astonishing progress within Muslim-majority countries from Kuala Lumpur to Dubai. In ancient times and in our times, Muslim communities have been at the forefront of innovation and education.


And this is important because no development strategy can be based only upon what comes out of the ground, nor can it be sustained while young people are out of work. Many Gulf states have enjoyed great wealth as a consequence of oil, and some are beginning to focus it on broader development. But all of us must recognize that education and innovation will be the currency of the 21st century – (applause) – and in too many Muslim communities, there remains underinvestment in these areas. I'm emphasizing such investment within my own country. And while America in the past has focused on oil and gas when it comes to this part of the world, we now seek a broader engagement.


On education, we will expand exchange programs, and increase scholarships, like the one that brought my father to America. (Applause.) At the same time, we will encourage more Americans to study in Muslim communities. And we will match promising Muslim students with internships in America; invest in online learning for teachers and children around the world; and create a new online network, so a young person in Kansas can communicate instantly with a young person in Cairo.


On economic development, we will create a new corps of business volunteers to partner with counterparts in Muslim-majority countries. And I will host a Summit on Entrepreneurship this year to identify how we can deepen ties between business leaders, foundations and social entrepreneurs in the United States and Muslim communities around the world.


On science and technology, we will launch a new fund to support technological development in Muslim-majority countries, and to help transfer ideas to the marketplace so they can create more jobs. We'll open centers of scientific excellence in Africa, the Middle East and Southeast Asia, and appoint new science envoys to collaborate on programs that develop new sources of energy, create green jobs, digitize records, clean water, grow new crops. Today I'm announcing a new global effort with the Organization of the Islamic Conference to eradicate polio. And we will also expand partnerships with Muslim communities to promote child and maternal health.


All these things must be done in partnership. Americans are ready to join with citizens and governments; community organizations, religious leaders, and businesses in Muslim communities around the world to help our people pursue a better life.


The issues that I have described will not be easy to address. But we have a responsibility to join together on behalf of the world that we seek -- a world where extremists no longer threaten our people, and American troops have come home; a world where Israelis and Palestinians are each secure in a state of their own, and nuclear energy is used for peaceful purposes; a world where governments serve their citizens, and the rights of all God's children are respected. Those are mutual interests. That is the world we seek. But we can only achieve it together.


I know there are many – Muslim and non-Muslim – who question whether we can forge this new beginning. Some are eager to stoke the flames of division, and to stand in the way of progress. Some suggest that it isn't worth the effort – that we are fated to disagree, and civilizations are doomed to clash. Many more are simply skeptical that real change can occur. There's so much fear, so much mistrust that has built up over the years. But if we choose to be bound by the past, we will never move forward. And I want to particularly say this to young people of every faith, in every country – you, more than anyone, have the ability to re-imagine the world, to remake this world.


All of us share this world for but a brief moment in time. The question is whether we spend that time focused on what pushes us apart, or whether we commit ourselves to an effort – a sustained effort – to find common ground, to focus on the future we seek for our children, and to respect the dignity of all human beings.


It's easier to start wars than to end them. It's easier to blame others than to look inward. It's easier to see what is different about someone than to find the things we share. But we should choose the right path, not just the easy path. There's one rule that lies at the heart of every religion – that we do unto others as we would have them do unto us. (Applause.) This truth transcends nations and peoples – a belief that isn't new; that isn't black or white or brown; that isn't Christian or Muslim or Jew. It's a belief that pulsed in the cradle of civilization, and that still beats in the hearts of billions around the world. It's a faith in other people, and it's what brought me here today.


We have the power to make the world we seek, but only if we have the courage to make a new beginning, keeping in mind what has been written.


The Holy Koran tells us: "O mankind! We have created you male and a female; and we have made you into nations and tribes so that you may know one another."


The Talmud tells us: "The whole of the Torah is for the purpose of promoting peace."


The Holy Bible tells us: "Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called sons of God." (Applause.)


The people of the world can live together in peace. We know that is God's vision. Now that must be our work here on Earth.


Thank you. And may God's peace be upon you. Thank you very much. Thank you. (Applause.)


END 2:05 P.M. (Local)
[/hide]
 
<font size="5"><center>
Egypt's Mubarak says Obama
has new approach to Islam</font size></center>



Reuters
June 11, 2009


CAIRO (Reuters) - Barack Obama has presented a fresh understanding of Islam not shown by predecessors, Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak said in his first interview since the U.S. president addressed the Muslim world from Cairo.

Obama called for a "new beginning" in ties between the United States and Muslims, many of whom felt targeted by the "war against terror" launched by former President George W. Bush after the September 11, 2001 attacks, and his wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.

"Under the past administration, there was a feeling that the Islamic world was a group of terrorists, Islam was hated and Muslims should be watched, and that the previous administration was scared of any Muslim," Mubarak said.

"But Obama came and said we will not fight Muslims and Islam. He is a sympathetic man, and says the United States will not fight Islam because Islam is a heavenly religion," he told state television in an interview broadcast late Wednesday.

Obama told Muslims in his June 4 speech that violent extremists had exploited tensions between Muslims and the West and that Islam was not part of the problem.

His speech was welcomed by many Muslims, though some said they wanted him to spell out specific actions to resolve long-running problems like the Palestinian-Israeli conflict.

Mubarak said he discussed the Palestinian issue with the U.S. president after telling Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, on a visit to Egypt prior to Obama's, that Israel needed to stop building settlements.

"Obama understands this issue well," Mubarak said.

"Obama wants to solve the issue (of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict) and wants to do something, but we must help him on how to solve it ... and the Israelis must help him."

In his speech, Obama told both sides they had to declare publicly the realities he said they accept in private, a blunt message for a new U.S. president; his predecessors waited longer in office before tackling the thorny issue of Middle East peace.

Obama also said he would "personally pursue" a drive to set up a Palestinian state alongside Israel, a solution backed by Mubarak and other Arab states but not by Netanyahu.

(Writing by Edmund Blair, Editing by Lin Noueihed)



http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/11/AR2009061101068_pf.html
 
Back
Top