Breaking: Mueller Objects to Barr's Description of Russia Investigation's Findings

Barr is smug and very arrogant flat out told Blumenthal NO you can't review the tapes why should you? Wow this whole this is a shit show. I really want to know why (besides re-election) the repubs aren't Patriots as they all say they are, rather are just puppets for Teflon Don.
 
HARRIS: In reaching your conclusion, did you personally review all of the underlying evidence?

BARR: No, we took ...

HARRIS: Did Mr. Rosenstein?

BARR: No. We accepted the statements in the report as factual record. We did not go underneath it to see if it was accurate, we accepted it as accurate.

HARRIS: So, you accepted the report as the evidence.

BARR: Yes.

HARRIS: You did not question or look at the underlying evidence that supports the conclusions in the report?

BARR: No.

HARRIS: Did Mr. Rosenstein review the evidence that underlines and supports the conclusions in the report? To your knowledge.

BARR: Not to my knowledge. We accept the statements in the report and the characterization of the report as true.

HARRIS: Did anyone in your executive office review the evidence supporting the report?

BARR: No.

HARRIS: No. Yet you represented to the American public that the evidence was not, “sufficient to support an obstruction of justice offense.”
 
HARRIS: In reaching your conclusion, did you personally review all of the underlying evidence?

BARR: No, we took ...

HARRIS: Did Mr. Rosenstein?

BARR: No. We accepted the statements in the report as factual record. We did not go underneath it to see if it was accurate, we accepted it as accurate.

HARRIS: So, you accepted the report as the evidence.

BARR: Yes.

HARRIS: You did not question or look at the underlying evidence that supports the conclusions in the report?

BARR: No.

HARRIS: Did Mr. Rosenstein review the evidence that underlines and supports the conclusions in the report? To your knowledge.

BARR: Not to my knowledge. We accept the statements in the report and the characterization of the report as true.

HARRIS: Did anyone in your executive office review the evidence supporting the report?

BARR: No.

HARRIS: No. Yet you represented to the American public that the evidence was not, “sufficient to support an obstruction of justice offense.”

Sonned the fuck out of that fat bitch
 
Under Barr's explanation of exercising power, it's not possible for a POTUS to obstruct justice. That's why he was hired because he literally doesn't believe there is a circumstance where Trump could even commit obstruction.

The lady from Hawaii made that point. He was brought aboard specifically to work for Trump, just like anyone else he recommends.
 
HARRIS: No. Yet you represented to the American public that the evidence was not, “sufficient to support an obstruction of justice offense.”

THIS!!!!!!!!!!

My head is fucking hurting...

Dude is the gawd damn Attorney General.....
 
So dude just declines to testify before the House..

I mean gawd damn...

My man isn't even trying to hide shit. ........

Never seen anything like this in my life and I hope that I never do again.

Man trump is not hiding most of his shit. The sad part is they can subpoena him and if he refuses the subpoena, he’s the one hwo would have to decide whether to criminally charge himself. The only recourse the dems would have would be to dust off the jail in the congress and tell the sargeant at arms to lock him up. Which hasn’t been done in ages.
 
Man trump is not hiding most of his shit. The sad part is they can subpoena him and if he refuses the subpoena, he’s the one hwo would have to decide whether to criminally charge himself. The only recourse the dems would have would be to dust off the jail in the congress and tell the sargeant at arms to lock him up. Which hasn’t been done in ages.

Fuck that fat boss hog ass nigga! Lock him up
 
It's a special thing to see the man in charge of the nations law enforcement agencies come across as more uncooperative, more invasive, and more dishonest than the head of the Mob.
If there's one person that should be impeccable, beyond reproach, and a beacon of what the spirit of fair, impartial, and honest justice should be then it should be this representative.
If you can't trust the man at the very top then how can any citizen trust those under his command, the crucial decision he makes, and this nations enforcement of its foundational laws?

Why can't any goon or anyone else under questing in a court of law or any US authoritative body not act similarly and say as their defense "If it's appropriate for the man at the top to act this way then why can't I?"





 
Last edited:
THIS!!!!!!!!!!

My head is fucking hurting...

Dude is the gawd damn Attorney General.....

It's crazy to think that something this big and this important and this far reaching wouldn't get the due diligence of the highest level of scrutiny possible. If he's willing to half-ass something this important then how can any of us trust him to faithfully and with competence execute with the highest regards duties and responsibilities of his station?
 
HARRIS: In reaching your conclusion, did you personally review all of the underlying evidence?

BARR: No, we took ...

HARRIS: Did Mr. Rosenstein?

BARR: No. We accepted the statements in the report as factual record. We did not go underneath it to see if it was accurate, we accepted it as accurate.

HARRIS: So, you accepted the report as the evidence.

BARR: Yes.

HARRIS: You did not question or look at the underlying evidence that supports the conclusions in the report?

BARR: No.

HARRIS: Did Mr. Rosenstein review the evidence that underlines and supports the conclusions in the report? To your knowledge.

BARR: Not to my knowledge. We accept the statements in the report and the characterization of the report as true.

HARRIS: Did anyone in your executive office review the evidence supporting the report?

BARR: No.

HARRIS: No. Yet you represented to the American public that the evidence was not, “sufficient to support an obstruction of justice offense.”

He evaded and tap danced around every direct question like he was a green and new attorney. He knows damn well what his role is yet mumbles and steps around her questioning. Then he states what Rod Roth’s role was yet still saying he wasn’t the decision maker to bring charges when evidence in the report clearly defines elements of criminal activity. Instead, he acts as biased (not objective) counsel for the fucking President. They need to remove him and I believe Mueller has no choose now but to testify. Also, Barr, you asshole you were questioned under oath so lying when under oath is actually a fucking crime too you incompetent moron :hmm:

 
Back
Top