MAANNNN this was when 24 was rolling strong!!!
Jack was off the fucking hook
had that fool shook with a stare
That was a good season.
Last edited:
MAANNNN this was when 24 was rolling strong!!!
Jack was off the fucking hook
had that fool shook with a stare
I need to PayPal you 20 bucks just for using the term "vanglorious".
Trump and his team = SISSIES.
That was a good season.
Let me say this, I don't know if any old head BGOL kats were even born during Nixon, and I know that I was too young and too uninterested in Clinton's scandal… but this Trump shit looks to beat both of them, by a lot.
Nixon was 61 when he got impeached.My mom and my older people in my family was telling me the same thing that this is almost exactly how Nixon went down The only differences is Russia and the speed of this Scandal


I thought this sounded familiar.........![]()
Nigga stole word for word like it was some logical response to what I said. I post random high thoughts on here mostly. Trust, you DO NOT want to debate. Cite your sources instead of blatantly plagiarizing the National Review.
This, unless he has a recording of Trump and Putin plotting the overthrow of the west his punk ass is about to do some serious fed time.Immunity? That clown has no leverage for immunity
He better negotiate for a lighter sentence![]()
They gonna get Trump
This whole Trump Russia thing is like an episode of 24
Trump is president Logan
![]()
![]()
![]()

It already has.Let me say this, I don't know if any old head BGOL kats were even born during Nixon, and I know that I was too young and too uninterested in Clinton's scandal… but this Trump shit looks to beat both of them, by a lot.
Let me say this, I don't know if any old head BGOL kats were even born during Nixon, and I know that I was too young and too uninterested in Clinton's scandal… but this Trump shit looks to beat both of them, by a lot.

His punk ass has to say something. He simply can't tuck his tail and hide. At this point he is taunting the F.B.I. with his tweeter antics.
The left had their version of breitbart and it's called Raw Story.Did anybody hear Rachel Maddow mention that at the end of all this, theres a possibility that Trump will still be President?
I try not to let my hopes get too high. I still dont believe they have the smoking gun on Trump.
These headlines are sensational, mis-leading and more about getting clicks .
It took two years to get the ball rolling on Nixon. Two years.Nixon was 61 when he got impeached.
Trump is now 70.
If he DOES get impeached.. it may seem relatively quick...
- but considering ALL the dirt he has probably done over ALL the years...
- and ALL the 'sleazy characters' he has done business with, or built Casinos with...
- and ALL the illegal financial activities he probably escaped prosecution for...
- and ALL the lawsuits he probably should have never won...
- and ALL the shady Real-Estate deals....
this is really like 50-60 years or so... 'in the making'... when you stop & think about it.![]()
Wait hold up????
So he was the same muthafucka that
Said just last year...
" if you need immunity means you probably
Committed a crime"
You saying he really uttered those words
And then has the balls to ask for immunity???
This is a fucking joke right??
Much respect,I was around 11 when Watergate happened and remember it like it was yesterday...the characters...Haldeman, Dean, Liddy, etc al..they were in the news everyday. .and this was when there were only 3 networks...and just like now, it was the main story.
This Russia-gate, though, has wayyy more plot twists ....and I'm just referring to the ones we KNOW. I'm hoping Flynn can connect some dots and uncover more dirt. Otherwise, why do they need his testimony?
Somebody mentioned earlier that Trump been doing dirt for years..so this is Hella payback for his AND his dad...for all the time he wouldn't rent to blacks in the buildings they onwed...fuck you..for the brothers in Central Park falsely accused..and he took out a full page ad basically calling for their execution...fuck you..and then never apologizing. ..screw him..
In Watergate, I think 5..or 7 guys did time, and in this deal, I could see A few getting some, too. I got a sneaky suspicion that if Pence survives, he may not pardon Trump. ..talk about an end to a reality TV show...![]()
Wait hold up????
So he was the same muthafucka that
Said just last year...
" if you need immunity means you probably
Committed a crime"
You saying he really uttered those words
And then has the balls to ask for immunity???
This is a fucking joke right??
Tweets always make his situation worse that's why I couldn't be this dude lawyer he talks too muchI knew he couldn't help himself....
It begins
No this is the Republican playbook. These are the same people who believe in Christianity and cutting social programs for the poor. When you have no logical ethics or morals, you can do anything.
https://www.justsecurity.org/39426/explainer-flynns-request-immunity/
Flynn’s Public Offer to Testify for Immunity Suggests He May Have Nothing to Say
By Alex Whiting
Thursday, March 30, 2017 at 9:54 PM
![]()
The Wall Street Journal is reporting that former National Security Advisor Mike Flynn told the FBI and Congress that he is willing to testify in exchange for immunity. But it’s not a serious offer, and it suggests he has nothing to say (or is not willing to say anything that would incriminate others). Although Flynn’s lawyer, Robert Kelner of Covington & Burling, refused to comment for the article, he tweeted out a statement teasing that “General Flynn certainly has a story tell, and he very much wants to tell it, should the circumstances permit.”
As an experienced lawyer, Kelner will know that the Justice Department would never grant immunity for testimony on these terms. Prosecutors would first require that Flynn submit to what’s called a proffer session in which Flynn would agree to tell everything he knows in exchange for the prosecutors agreeing not to use his statement against him. Only after the prosecutors heard what Flynn could offer in terms of evidence against others, and had an opportunity to assess his credibility, would they be willing to discuss any grants of immunity or a cooperation deal. At a minimum, the prosecutors would require Flynn’s lawyer to make a proffer outlining the information that Flynn could provide.
The fact that Flynn and his lawyer have made his offer publicly suggests that he has nothing good to give the prosecutors (either because he cannot incriminate others or is unwilling to do so). If he had something good, Flynn and his lawyer would approach the prosecutors quietly, go through the proffer process in confidence, and reach a deal. Why? Because prosecutors have an interest in keeping their investigation secret, and Flynn’s lawyer knows that. The last thing Flynn’s lawyer would do if he thought he had the goods would be to go public, because that would potentially compromise the criminal inquiry and would certainly irritate the prosecutors, the very people Flynn’s lawyer would be trying to win over.
I suspect that Flynn’s lawyer is really targeting Congress. He is hoping that one of the Congressional committees will take the bait and grant him immunity in exchange for his testimony. If that happened, it would be extremely difficult to prosecute Flynn after he testified. Remember Oliver North? North testified to Congress under a grant of “use immunity,” and even though Independent Counsel Lawrence Walsh took stringent measures to wall off his prosecution staff from any information about North’s immunized testimony, the D.C. Circuit overturned North’s conviction, finding that Walsh could not establish that the witnesses who testified against North had not been tainted by exposure to North’s widely publicized testimony. Flynn’s lawyer appears to be hoping for the same result here: Flynn gets immunity, his testimony in Congress gets aired and reported everywhere, and it becomes virtually impossible for prosecutors to bring a case against him.
It is not going to work. The Justice Department will tell Congress that a grant of immunity at this stage could compromise its ongoing criminal investigation. Already, statements from the Congressional committees suggest no interest in granting immunity to Flynn. Flynn’s lawyer appears to have hoped that publicity, pressure or politics might cause one of the Congressional committees to jump. Flynn’s lawyer may have concluded that at a minimum the public offer would help change the atmospherics around his client, which could help him at a future stage. But the ploy feels desperate, indicating that Flynn may not have much to offer. And the very fact that Flynn’s lawyer is making a play for immunity at this stage suggests that he has some fear that his client faces real criminal exposure.