BREAKING: Charlie Kirk shot at an event in Utah


denzel-washington-what-do-you-think.gif
 
What? Twitter was 44 billion dollars if that's what you mean but that's not how it was stolen. Starlink.

Look up ''Russian Tail''
So 44billion for ALL elections, versus the cost for that ONE election. Local elections in every city in every state is almost 2 million per city that cost gets lower when you factor in the amount of elections we have every year. The people he gets elected that get him government contracts, he makes that 44billion back quickly.
 
Israel probably killed him. But like the mafia, Charlie took the money and they offered him more. He didn't want more; however, by that time.....Israel couldn't afford to have him speaking bad about them. He was in too deep.

In_Too_Deep_OST.jpg
I dont see it that way, for one, he did it all for the money ,so I refuse to believe he was offered more but suddenly didn't wanna take more when its easier to take ether $$ & keep the christian nationalist/ Israel combo going
 
$44 billion isn't much for Elon, but we would need to know what the Starlink election interference cost, if it in fact happened, to know which is cheaper.

That said, @0utsyder has a point. Social engineering via social media is a big part of the right-wing/MAGA strategy.
Isnt much for Elon? Lol bruh, stop indulging in fantasy. He needed outside equity in the acquisition. He cannot personally TOUCH $44 billion without destroying one or more of his companies since its all tied up in stock equity. Selling any significant percentage would tank the value.
 
If anything, Kirk wouldn't meet either criteria and I don't care to know the context of what he was saying. Not only that, people should respect his wishes and not show his family any empathy.from what I've seen, Kirk didn't believe in sympathy. He was just too dumb to understand it. Even if you removed the racist shit, he was still a piece of shit. Not saying you are really trying to defend him.

The rest is longer even for me but....



To me, empathy is the ability to understand someone's situation.you can imagine yourself in that situation , maybe had a similar experiencec or can relate to the situation in some way. However, you don't necessarily have any type of emotional experience/expression. You never had to come remotely close to a shared experience; the ability to imagine ( walk in their shoes or view from their perspective) is enough. You aren't likely to actually do anything to help. You recognize something bad happened, but you are highly likely to go about your day. Think seeing a homeless person on the street and walking pass them.

Sympathy is where there is some form of emotion or action attached to the person event and is expressed. You see the homeless person and give them money or an opportunity/help of some sort. If nothing else, you genuinely feel bad for the person; not just recognize the situation is bad.

If someone kid is shot and dies, I can relate because I have kids and I can imagine the pain i would feel if that happened to me. Empathy. However, i don't know that id have an emotional connection to the parents or kids to show Sympathy. I don't know that id try to comfort a stranger going through that. Im not going to say kids or people have to die for the sake of gun rights like Kirk.


Im not going to nitpick how/where underprivileged kids get a meal from and say the country has an obesity problem ( Kirk again). As if they are being taken to a high end restaurant for a steak dinner. Ive never starved, but I've been hungry. I can imagine not regularly eating enough (empathy). Although I wouldn't express it emotionally outwardly,I show sympathy by not bitching about my tax dollars going to programs to give kids food for breakfast and lunch. Possibly even donating for causes around the issue. (sympathy). Saying no one dies from hunger is dumb. That extreme case may be rare, but the situation still impacts society. The student that seems more violent than other students maybe suffers from malnutrition. His body made the decision to keep his heart beating instead of developing the part of the brain to better regulate his emotions. Let's not take it that far. People are more irritable snd less likely to make the best decisions when hungry.

If my 10 year old daughter got raped, im not going to force her to have a child. Even if she physically survived the pregnancy, she'll have a child as a constant reminder of the trauma or guilt for not having the child with her (adaption). The abortion would be me showing sympathy to my daughter. Empathy would be relating to the idea of being raped to begin with and being forced to raise the child. Kirk claimed his kid would have the child of a rapist.

Im not Christian or follow any religion, but apparently im a better person than an alleged child of God. These people aren't even smart enough to understand that starving kids potentially turn into criminals. Or they grow to do other things (sex worker) they consider immoral. You are potentially creating the mindset of someone who will survive by any means. A kid who is hungry can't focus in class. Which increases the likelihood they won't qualify for skilled jobs later in life. The person who was raped and force to carry the child may grow to be ok with taking part in this happing to others or worse assisting in the act.

These types of Conservative's thoughts are counterproductive to the society they claim to want. The idea that the government shouldn't have social programs is idiotic. The government has a responsibility to its citizens in part due to the taxes we pay. A country that doesn't reinvest in its people will die slowly. More importantly, helping others in need and taking care of the community is a pillar of their religion. In my opinion, Charlie Kirk wasn't a Christian to begin with. The same applies to all White nationalist and any minority person that supports the ideals of White nationalist.
Empathy literally has the root empath. What is going on in here? The words have literal definitions you could easily just look up instead of sharing your interpretations, folk.
 
Last edited:
So 44billion for ALL elections, versus the cost for that ONE election. Local elections in every city in every state is almost 2 million per city that cost gets lower when you factor in the amount of elections we have every year. The people he gets elected that get him government contracts, he makes that 44billion back quickly.
IF it cost 2 million dollars per election in EVERY CITY IN AMERICA (which it doesnt) the purchase of Twitter would still have been more expensive by billions of dollars. (19,000 x 2,000,000)
 
$44 billion isn't much for Elon, but we would need to know what the Starlink election interference cost, if it in fact happened, to know which is cheaper.

That said, @0utsyder has a point. Social engineering via social media is a big part of the right-wing/MAGA strategy.
You both have it backwards. Thats not how they commited the crimes, it's how they buried the evidence and silenced all critique.
 
$44 billion isn't much for Elon, but we would need to know what the Starlink election interference cost, if it in fact happened, to know which is cheaper.

That said, @0utsyder has a point. Social engineering via social media is a big part of the right-wing/MAGA strategy.
Bibi literally confirmed this couple days ago on an interview.. they know TikTok & X are their new main weapons
 
Empathy literally has the root empath. What is going on in here? The words have literal definitions you could easily just look up instead of sharing your interpretations, folk.

It's good that you understand what the word means. How you personally interpret and apply the words are of more value. especially in the boarder discussion of Kirk saying he didn't believe in empathy and the claim that his statements on various matters are being taken out of context.

If it were as simple as the definition, you would not see the constant discussions on sympathy vs empathy.there are debates on which is more important.

If you feel it is still being missed/poorly used, feel free to educate. If you feel its not needed, you could simply not engage. For me, even these types of discussions are needed for those who basically attempt to downplay Kirk as just being missunderstood.
 
Bibi literally confirmed this couple days ago on an interview.. they know TikTok & X are their new main weapons
Folks wanna act like they need to be Bond villains in order to steal shyt, when in actuality you just have to do very little!!!
Y2rDX_.gif


"Hey white man, are you gonna let that black man talk to you like that? We were Vikings when he was a slave, but that couldn't have been me!"

How much did that cost?
 
Back
Top