BREAKING: Charlie Kirk shot at an event in Utah

when the ancestry test results say you're 0.01% scandanavian
549828181_10227921130644953_8573938742716952684_n.jpg

Lee Bloomer
1f602.png
1f602.png
thank god I wasn't the only one wondering what the fuck he was smoking ..
1f602.png
1f602.png
 
Crackas are desperately trying to flip history. Just like they do with the Democrats started the KKK bullshit. Knowing damn well the Democrats at that time were far right conservatives with the same beliefs they currently have.

They are trying to flip roles with us. The white is trying to be the historically oppressed group and the victims of horrible historical racism while downplaying everybody else’s struggle as “exaggerated”.

Only white people legitimately achieved success. Everyone else stepped on white people to get any sort of success. In reality this is projection of exactly what those evil rat faced sub human devils did.

The media is going right along with it and not questioning this dead honkies previous inflammatory rhetoric. Completely glossing over all his white nationalism and racism. Shit is completely ridiculous and I’m not sure why it’s not being called out at all.


God damn this the most a nigga ever wrote on here . No Colin
But you are a gay cracka.
 




IS UTAH TRYING TO LOSE THIS CASE?! - UT v Robinson

I just watched Utah Prosecutor Jeff Gray publicly read aloud private text messages, interviews, and alleged confessions during a press conference - BEFORE TRIAL - about UT v. Tyler Robinson (Charlie Kirk Shooting Case)
He even referred to them at the press conference as FACTS. Are you kidding me?

Oversharing inculpatory evidence like this is a HUGE constitutional no-no.

Even the slap on of a vague disclaimer like “we want a fair trial,” the damage is already done.

Also, the statements by Gray of "We will not be speaking to the press during the trial" AFTER READING ACTUAL TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE THAT HAS NOT BEEN VETTED BY THE COURT, is a lame and empty attempt to cover this massive violation of
= due process, 4th Amendment, 5th Amendment, etc
= the presumption of innocence,
= and the integrity of the entire case.

This is not just an error in strategy, this is potentially a legally destructive action.

We will see motions to:
Suppress tainted jury pools
Request sequestration or gag orders
Move for change of venue
Seek exclusion of evidence due to taint or even
Mistrial!
Ultimately, the defense may assert reversible error on appeal if the court fails to act

It is NOT a subject up to interpretation. There is long standing case law on this.

The Supreme Court in Sheppard v. Maxwell, 384 U.S. 333 (1966) reversed Sheppard’s conviction, ruling 7–2 that he was denied a fair trial due to a failure to shield the proceedings from prejudicial media coverage.

Majority Opinion (Justice Clark):
The Court held that while freedom of the press is essential, it must not override a defendant’s right to a fair trial.
 
No shit retard.

This sassy ass faggot response. Your English is as good as an illegal Mexican.
''No shit, i'm just a drooling goofy 'weekend only' ball gargling nut demon, who makes half-baked colorist wise cracks at awkward times in hopes for pats on my head from????:dunno:... Anybody? I JUST NEED LOVE!''

That was me doing you. How'd I do? I bet your name is Leslie or some simp shit like that.
 
''No shit, i'm just a drooling goofy 'weekend only' ball gargling nut demon, who makes half-baked colorist wise cracks at awkward times in hopes for pats on my head from????:dunno:... Anybody? I JUST NEED LOVE!''

That was me doing you. How'd I do? I bet your name is Leslie or some simp shit like that.

What the fuck? Let me go back to ignoring your special part of the school ass.
 

This young man probably has witnessed so many snuff films of people that look like him since Obama entered presidency where people mocked the death of black folks in America.

Him doing what he is doing is most likely a trauma response, like most black folks in this country, and hopefully he does not see any repercussion from his actions.


Edit: They are trying to deem it disrespect, how about all the disrespect he as seen since he was a youngster.
 
Last edited:


This afternoon @RealCandaceO slandered me by accusing me of 'staging an intervention' with Charlie Kirk in which 'threats were made' with respect to his supposed 'evolving stance' on Israel at an event I hosted in the Hamptons. Candace also intimated that I 'blackmail[ed]' Charlie.

On the show, Candace said that she 'would be very happy for me to dispute this narrative.' While it pains me to drive more traffic to her program, I am responding here to clear my name. It saddens me that we live in a society where social media influencers seek to monetize the tragic death of Charlie Kirk.

For the record, at no time have I ever threatened Charlie Kirk, Turning Point or anyone associated with him. I have never blackmailed anyone, let alone Charlie Kirk. I have never offered Charlie or Turning Point any money in an attempt to influence Charlie's opinion on anything. In fact, my interactions with Charlie Kirk have been extremely cordial, albeit limited, regretfully so, as I was very impressed by him and his work and I will sadly never see him again.

In an effort to clear the record, I share the following:

I have followed @charliekirk11 on @X for some time and greatly admired him. While I didn't agree with Charlie on every issue, I had enormous respect for his intelligence, vast knowledge about religion, and his willingness to take on all comers in open mic sessions on campus and otherwise. Periodically, I would repost some of his posts and video clips.

I connected with Charlie when he DM'd me in late May of this year and expressed interest in meeting me. In light of our respective schedules, we were unable to find a time to meet in person so we scheduled a zoom on June 11th.

On the zoom, he explained to me that conservatives, in particular, young conservatives were getting tired of defending Israel, and this was very concerning to him. I asked him how I could learn more, and he suggested that it might be useful to convene a group of young conservative influencers on a host of topics that could include Israel to get a better sense of how the conservative community was thinking about Israel and other relevant issues of concern to young people.

On the zoom, Charlie also said that his open mic conversations on campus were very effective in addressing issues on the minds of students, but he was only one person with limited bandwidth. He suggested that recruiting a group of junior Charlie Kirk's who could host open mic sessions on college campuses would be an effective way to encourage debate on a host of issues, an approach he believed to be worthy of consideration, and better enable students to get to the truth.

I expressed interest in learning more and we thereafter scheduled a series of conference calls and zooms with Charlie, Turning Point staff and members of my team in an effort to assemble a diverse group of influencers who we could convene for a day and a half session. In addition to getting a better sense of what and where young conservatives were on various issues, Charlie thought doing so might enable him to identify potential candidates who could launch their own campus tours and carry forth his approach to dialogue.

We chose the afternoon of August 4th to the afternoon of the 5th for the convening, and Charlie and members of my team worked to put together an invitation list. I offered to host the sessions in Bridgehampton (and cover the costs) so that I could attend some of the sessions as I was working from there at that time.

Charlie sent out the invitations and about 35 or so influencers accepted. Charlie estimated that the influencers who attended collectively had more than 100 million followers.

Charlie and Turning Point put together the agenda for the meeting and the topics were:

The Economic Future of America
The Cultural Landscape of Dating and Marriage
The Convergence of East and West
Mamdani, the New Threat to America

Charlie asked me to moderate the Economic Future discussion which I did, and I thereafter hosted a Q&A session with the participants.

The Convergence of East and West included a discussion of immigration, value systems, the U.S. approach to foreign policy and Israel. While I had wanted to attend the Convergence panel, I had a board meeting that conflicted with this session.

Those that attended this session said that the Israel discussion was similar to the other sessions with the attendees expressing varying points of view as well as explaining the views of their followers. Some participants were critical of Israel and U.S. support for Israel, and others were supportive.

The sessions were punctuated by meals. I attended one group lunch and a group dinner where I sat with Charlie and others.

I found the sessions I attended interesting and I really enjoyed meeting the influencers. It gave me considerable perspective on what is on the mind of young Americans on a wide range of issues.

At the end of the event, I sat with Charlie and members of my team and we discussed the events of the convening. Charlie believed that he had identified a number of potential Turning Point ambassadors who could launch open mic events on campus and that he would follow up with them. We agreed to keep in touch thereafter.

We corresponded by text thereafter over the next few weeks on a range of topics that did not include Israel, and the next thing I knew, he was gone.

In short, this was not an 'intervention' to 'blackmail' Charlie Kirk into adopting certain views on Israel. It was nothing of the sort.
 
Not to say he is innocent, but I personally seen law enforcement charged a individual like this with child porn to screw him. For example if I was him, the FBI would be like he's a regular on BGOL. Oh that one chick in this post looks under 18. We are going to charge him with child porn. They know it takes money and good attorneys to defend yourself against an accusation like this.
 
Last edited:
She is a poor debater and the bigoted white man won that argument. If you are going to interview people have facts to retort lies. Be direct and kill all that passive aggressive "I was just asking" bullshit speech. Their statistics were made up and she just let it slide :smh:
I didn't get the impression she was trying to debate them. It was more of a man-on-street interview. She definitely could've had the real statistics she said Kirk distorted on deck but I believe she was more focused on getting their reasoning behind comparing him to MLK.
 
Back
Top