Blair: US Govt Can Kill Citizens Overseas as Part of ‘Defined Policy’

Nat_Turner

Potential Star
Registered
OK, this is madness. But with everything else that's gone on after 911 fascism evolving:angry:

Blair: US Govt Can Kill Citizens Overseas as Part of ‘Defined Policy’

Director of National Intelligence Tells Congress Americans Can Be Killed Overseas

by Jason Ditz, February 03, 2010


In testimony before the House Intelligence Committee today, National Intelligence Director Dennis Blair told representatives that American citizens can be assassinated by the US government when they are oveseas.

Blair said the comments were intended to “reassure” Americans that there was a “set of defined policy and legal procedures” in place and that such assassinations are always carried out by the book.

Rep. Pete Hoekstra (R – MI) inquired about the procedures involved, asking what the legal framework was under which Americans could be killed by the intelligence community.

Blair insisted that under no circumstances would Americans be assassinated overseas for criticizing the government, adding “we don’t target people for free speech.” Rather they are subject to assassination when the government decides they are a threat and when they “get specific permission.” Exactly who was giving that permission was unclear.

The question has been increasingly important as the Obama Administration attempts to help the Yemeni government assassinate Anwar al-Awlaki, a US-born cleric who is not accused of any crimes by the US government. The administration maintains that secret evidence exists linking Awlaki to terrorism.

There seems to be a chilling lack of oversight in the procedure behind these killings, however, Blair’s assurances against politically motivated assassinations aside. The US has killed Americans in overseas attacks before, but only as “collateral damage.” It has never admitted to explicitly assassinating an American citizen before, though it seems that the policy is in place and such killings are only a matter of time.
 
`

The article above from antiwar_dot_com is <u>not</u> the primary source for Blair's comments, the Washinton Times is. If you will note, antiwar_dot_com does not quote the Washinton Times, it actually twists the Times story to reach a slightly different conclusion. For example, the first paragraph of the antiwar_dot_com article states:
"In testimony before the House Intelligence Committee today, National Intelligence Director Dennis Blair told representatives that American citizens can be assassinated by the US government when they are oveseas."​

The conservative Washington Times actually said:
"Director of National Intelligence Dennis C. Blair acknowledged Wednesday that government agencies may kill U.S. citizens abroad who are involved in terrorist activities if they are "taking action that threatens Americans."

Do you see a difference between the two articles ? ? ?

Wikipedia says the following about antiwar_dot_com:
Antiwar.com is an English-language website containing news and opinion pieces related to wars throughout the world, from a libertarian, non-interventionist perspective.[1] The site was founded in December 1995, as a response to the Bosnian war. It is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit foundation, operating under the auspices of the Randolph Bourne Institute, based in Atherton, California. In previous years it was affiliated with the Center for Libertarian Studies. Prior to that affiliation they were an independent, ad-supported endeavor. While publishing antiwar writings and perspectives from people of all kinds of political beliefs, antiwar.com openly proclaims a libertarian political affiliation.​

Perphas it should also add that the publication twists shit to fit its self-serving agenda?

QueEx
 
I suppose when cops shoot a black man 41 times for reaching for his wallet, he is a threat to Americans.

I suppose when a country in Africa has oil the US wants and won't give it to them, it is a threat to Americans.

I suppose if an American is not a Christian and promotes independence, it is a threat to Americans.

I suppose if an American is spreading the truth about US war crimes, it is a threat to Americans.

But, of course, we all know the government would never kill US citizens/Americans here or abroad for doing any of these things.

The US military is good. The Federal government is good.

Nothing to see here.
 
You can get killed on US soil, don't be fooled into thinking it is safe here.
 
Back
Top