Black Farmers Follow Up on USDA Grievances

Greed

Star
Registered
Black Farmers Follow Up on USDA Grievances
by Kathy Lohr

All Things Considered, April 25, 2006 · Ten years ago, black farmers began demonstrating in Washington, charging discrimination by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. That led to a class-action lawsuit and a settlement worth millions of dollars. But on Wednesday, demonstrators are coming to Washington to say too many people were left out, and Congress needs to help.

This month, a study by the Government Accountability Office noted problems, but the USDA shows no inclination to revisit the claim. 4 min 4 sec

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5362406
 
Black farmers lawsuit settlement?

http://www.bgol.us/board/showthread.php?t=220176

I've got this older guy at my job that has been telling me about how he got 62,500 from a settlement that the government had with black farmers 2 years ago.

He told me that he never farmed a day in his life but because the records were destroyed there was no way to prove that he never applied for an agricultural loan (lawsuit stated that blacks were discriminated against).

I didn't believe him at first but today I googled what he was saying and it looks like he might be right.

http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5h...EzfmgD8TJOJU00

Also

http://www.blackfarmers.org/ on the front page.

Has anyone heard of this?
 
Re: Black farmers lawsuit settlement?

http://www.bgol.us/board/showthread.php?t=220176

I've got this older guy at my job that has been telling me about how he got 62,500 from a settlement that the government had with black farmers 2 years ago.

He told me that he never farmed a day in his life but because the records were destroyed there was no way to prove that he never applied for an agricultural loan (lawsuit stated that blacks were discriminated against).

I didn't believe him at first but today I googled what he was saying and it looks like he might be right.

http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5h...EzfmgD8TJOJU00

Also

http://www.blackfarmers.org/ on the front page.

Has anyone heard of this?

Oh yeah. This is real old news now. I remember hearing about this because a friend in Alabama has a neighbor who bought a 2 new cars and a boat from the settlement. Broke as hell now though.

-VG
 
Re: Black farmers lawsuit settlement?

I was told they're about to reopen this up for more settlements

Congress just past this big farm bill which probably includes money for setlements. Good news if that's so. Even though they are settling, seems a small compensation when you lose your land to megafarmers.

-VG
 
Re: Black farmers lawsuit settlement?

<font size="5"><center>
U.S. approves settlement for black farmers
</font size><font size="4">

Obama administration announced a $1.25 billion settlement
to resolve charges by thousands of black farmers who
say that for decades the Agriculture Department
discriminated against them in loan programs</font size></center>


PH2010021805897.jpg

As president of the Black Farmers Association, John F.
Boyd Jr. of Baskerville, Va., frequently lobbied members
of Congress. (Melina Mara/the Washington Post)



By Carrie Johnson
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, February 19, 2010

The Obama administration announced a $1.25 billion settlement Thursday to resolve charges by thousands of black farmers who say that for decades the Agriculture Department discriminated against them in loan programs.

Cabinet officials exhorted Congress to approve the deal by setting aside money for the farmers, who have fought through three administrations to secure a measure of justice. In the starkest cases, Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack said, farmers lost their property after local administrators slow-pedaled loan applications, leaving them unable to plant key crops.

The agreement is part of a wider effort by Obama and senior officials to dispense with lawsuits stemming from America's checkered civil rights legacy. In December, the Justice Department led efforts to settle a long-standing case with Native Americans who accuse the federal government of mismanaging royalty payments for natural resources mined on tribal lands. A settlement is awaiting congressional action.

Vilsack and Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. took a personal interest in striking a deal with the black farmers, whose leaders have appeared regularly in the halls of Congress and in the White House. Vilsack predicted that Congress will approve the settlement.

"I'm going to focus all my time and resources on making that happen," he told reporters Thursday. "The president is prepared to indicate that it's a priority not just for his administration but for the country."

In a statement, Obama applauded the Cabinet members for "bringing these long-ignored claims of African American farmers to a rightful conclusion."

The government paid $1 billion to settle a related case with 16,000 black farmers in 1999, but notification and communication errors led to some farmers being omitted from that settlement.

The agreement announced Thursday would provide cash payments and debt relief to farmers who applied too late to participate in the earlier settlement. Authorities say they are not certain how many farmers might apply this time, but analysts following the dispute say the number could be higher than 70,000.

Under the terms of the settlement, which also requires the approval of a federal judge, farmers can walk away if Congress does not act by March 31. Officials involved in the agreement, however, said they think they could secure an extension if necessary.

Farmers can apply through a streamlined process if they wish to submit claims for up to $50,000, or they can complete a more detailed claim that could result in a larger payment. The payout to each farmer would depend on how many people make claims, said Associate Attorney General Thomas J. Perrelli.

John W. Boyd Jr., president of the National Black Farmers Association, which has been lobbying for an agreement, said: "There's a huge trust factor that has been broken. The $50,000 will not put a farmer who has lost his farm back on his land, but it will help them have some comfort in their final years."

Since black farmers first filed the lawsuit, known as the Pigford case, in 1997, Hispanic farmers, women and Native Americans have also sued the government, based on alleged widespread discrimination in awarding agriculture loans and subsidies. Advocates for those farmers are expected to lobby Congress to be included in the new Pigford settlement in the weeks ahead, analysts said.

The USDA's relationship with minorities has been fraught for decades. Nearly eight years ago, black farmers took over a regional office in Brownsville, Tenn., to protest the agency's pace in processing their loan applications. Under the Bush administration, the agriculture secretary appointed a civil rights director, a practice that continues in the Obama era.

Administration officials said Thursday that the outlines of the settlement had met with bipartisan support, particularly from lawmakers from agricultural districts. But House appropriators, who would be the first to act on the measure, said they needed more time to review the settlement before offering solid predictions as to its fate.

Rep. Barbara Lee (D-Calif.), chairman of the Congressional Black Caucus, said she was encouraged by the settlement, which could provide the most help to farmers in Southern communities. "Over the past 20 years, the number of farms operated by black farmers has declined by nearly 50 percent," Lee said. "In part, this decrease was caused by a lack of access to loans and other assistance which were provided to other farmers."

House Majority Whip James E. Clyburn (D-S.C.), also a member of the caucus, said: "This settlement is a case where justice delayed will no longer be justice denied. . . . History has taught us to never give up when fighting for what is right. What happened to these black farmers was wrong, and we now have the opportunity to make it right."


Staff writers Krissah Thompson and Ben Pershing contributed to this report.


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/02/18/AR2010021805893.html
 
Re: Black farmers lawsuit settlement?

c o m m e n t a r y

<font size="5"><center>
President Obama has the chance
to end USDA-approved racism</font size></center>



The Kansas City Star
By Mary Sanchez
March 7k, 2010


<font size="3">When all is said and done, and the record of the Obama administration is written, one big accomplishment is likely to be attributed to the president's race.

The first black president seems determined to make the U.S. government finally settle the claims of an estimated 70,000 black farmers, people whose hopes were crushed by government racism. Obama has championed a $1.25 billion settlement that would put these claims to rest.​

Termed by some "the last plantation," the Department of Agriculture for decades systematically denied loans, crop subsidies and other aid to black farmers, at one point bringing them to near extinction.

In the 1920, blacks operated one of every seven U.S. farms. By 1992, the number had sunk to one in 100.

Meanwhile, many of their white neighbors' farms prospered. But it wasn't always because white farmers were harder workers, smarter with agriculture or luckier with the weather. They got help that was denied to blacks. That's racism.

I rarely use that term, but none other fits so well. Racism is spinning hatred into economic harm. It's using racial spite to take away people's ability to provide for their families, to accumulate wealth, to prosper. Everything else is just prejudice. And that, people can get over.

The Department of Agriculture is guilty of setting up a system to let racism flourish. Farmer applications for government loans and other programs were approved, denied or stifled through committees of elected county commissioners. The commissions became a bastion for white male power, with little federal oversight.

A favored tactic was to grant the black farmer's loan — after planting season. Or to approve part of it, say for seeds, but then deny the money for the equipment to harvest it. Or encourage foreclosures, or press the black farmers to plant less-profitable crops.

This isn't just ancient history. In 1996, only 37 county commissioners in the nation were African-American. That's out of 8,147.

Yes, people complained. For years they complained. They filed grievances and lawsuits. Federal officials fessed up to the system's being racist as early as 1965.

By 1982 things got so dire that the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights decreed that by 2000, black farmers simply wouldn't exist anymore.

And a year later, in 1983, the civil rights division of the Agriculture Department was dismantled. Complaints in some cases were literally tossed into the trash.

Through the Reagan, Clinton and Bush administrations hearings were held and government assessments written. Promises to fix the system were given and then broken.

A class action lawsuit filed in 1997 filtered its way through the courts and allowed settlements to about 16,000 black farmers. But the government bungled even that settlement. Farmers with complaints weren't notified in time; claims were filed late; others were unfairly dismissed on technicalities.

Obama's settlement will need congressional approval, something that hasn't been easy to come by in his first year in office.

To push this settlement carries some risk for the president. No doubt he'd rather make his mark, and launch himself into a second term, by handling problems of health care, the economy and jobs. If he wants praise, he'd probably do better championing issues that benefit all races, and that aren't so laced with national guilt, denial and shame.

But time for justice is running out, as farmers with valid claims are literally dying off, their land in many cases already lost to foreclosure.

And this matter recalls another, infamously neglected promise: 40 acres and a mule. In a word, reparations. That idea, paying black people for the sin of slavery, is not feasible. Not now, not so many generations removed.

But something can be done for the wronged farmers. And it falls to a person who came about at the right time in history.


http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2010/03/...esident-obama-has.html#storylink=omni_popular
 
It wouldn't suprise me if a government agency did this to somebody previously.

It shouldn't take a lawsuit ten years to payout, any legal process that takes ten years to get justice is fraudulent.

:hmm::hmm:
 
Last edited:
Re: Black farmers lawsuit settlement?

While reading that article several thoughts crossed my mind. I was immediately reminded of the MLK clip when he compared the Homestead Act to the Civil Rights movement.
I'm pretty sure that any sort of settlement agreed to under the Obama Administration will be the proof that many are looking for that the President is going to initiate a campaign of reparations and lead to more accusations.
As an American, it was truly embarrassing to read that article. As a black man, it only reminds me that the struggle isn't over. Hell, I still have to go back and forth with Professors over the merits for Affirmative Action.
Whenever any of my classmates of another ethnicity ask me what I consider myself, I say an American but everyday in some form or another, America reminds me that I am a black man.
 
http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsme...herrod_and_the_discrimination_of_black_fa.php

It's also important to understand that Andrew Breitbart's timing of the release of the grossly distorted video of Sherrod, which he admits having had for weeks, may not be entirely random. Congress will soon vote on whether to fund part of a settlement between the USDA and African-American farmers who faced acknowledged discrimination -- farmers like Sherrod and her husband used to be. It's a tiny piece of the upcoming war supplemental bill.

For years, and continuing through the 1990s, the USDA denied loans and grants to scores of farmers simply because they were African-American. Timothy Pigford finally sued the department in 1997; the suit became a class action with 400 additional plaintiffs and 2,000 farmers thought eligible; and the result was what's known as the Pigford settlement, decided in 1999.

But thousands of farmers missed the original Pigford deadline, due to shoddy work by their own lawyers and inadequate promotion, among other reasons. In response to a decades-long movement to re-open the Pigford class, Congress passed another $100 million in the 2008 farm bill to help settle new claims; earlier this year, the Obama administration announced an additional grant -- called Pigford II -- of $1.25 billion.

But the money hasn't been doled out, because Congress hasn't given the okay yet. It missed a March 31 deadline. Then a May 31 deadline. Currently, the money for the new Pigford settlement resides in the war supplemental -- which Majority Leader Harry Reid announced last Friday would be up for a vote some time this week.

Harry Reid's spokesman, Jim Manley, said it "remains unclear" whether the bill could pass with the settlement attached. The money was also included in the unemployment insurance extension; but the Pigford settlement, and other funds, had to be stripped in order to break a filibuster.

Conservatives immediately jumped on the Sherrod video -- issued by Breitbart in the wake of Reid's promise to bring the war supplemental (including the Pigford settlement money) to a vote -- to condemn the Pigford case.

The Washington Times mused that Sherrod resigned because she was afraid the attention would expose "sanctioned conflicts of interest" arising from her own settlement -- though there was zero evidence to that effect. In fact, Vilsack has since acknowledged that her experience as part of the Pigford class makes her uniquely positioned to understand the historical challenges faced by the USDA. Fox News piled on, saying the settlement "thickens the plot."
 
A favored tactic was to grant the black farmer's loan — after planting season. Or to approve part of it, say for seeds, but then deny the money for the equipment to harvest it. Or encourage foreclosures, or press the black farmers to plant less-profitable crops.


Look at this sick shit, it makes you wonder if other tactics are being used in general, such as unemployment and prison, to get a bigger share of the jobs.
 
Last edited:
Black farmers still gettting getting their due

TPMMuckraker
Senate Strips Funding For Legal Settlement To Black Farmers From War Bill
Rachel Slajda | July 26, 2010, 10:27AM206


Five months after President Obama announced a $1.25 billion settlement for black farmers who faced overt discrimination by the USDA in the eighties and nineties -- and several days after the Sherrod case brought the issue up again -- Congress again refused to authorize the money.

On Thursday, the Senate quietly stripped the funding for the Pigford II settlement and several other programs from a supplemental war funding bill. Senators then unanimously passed their version of the bill, which will go back to the House.

Conservative opposition to the settlement came to light last week in the aftermath of the Shirley Sherrod scandal. A farm collective founded by Sherrod and her husband that was forced out of business by the discriminatory practices received a $13 million settlement as part of Pigford last year, just before she was hired by the USDA. Some, including Rep. Steve King (R-IA), have called the settlement a fraud.

Majority Leader Harry Reid blamed Republicans for the failure to pass Pigford.

"I hoped that tonight the Senate could finally right a wrong that has been left unresolved for far too long. But Republicans stood in the way," he said in a statement. "As recent events have reminded us, the fact that justice and fairness were denied to black farmers for so many years continues to have ramifications today. ... Republicans should be held accountable for standing in the way of justice for those affected."

But several Democrats -- including Sens. Evan Bayh (IN) and Tom Carper (DE) -- also voted to block the bill.


Notice that while the Republicans (who should never try to figure out why they can't get more Black support) do their thing, it's two Democrats who stand in the way. How big a majority to Dems have to have to get what they want?
 
Re: Black farmers still gettting getting their due

Okay
I effed up the title. The title was supposed to be

Black farmers still NOT getting their due. Rushing before I go to work.
 
Re: Black farmers still NOT gettting getting their due

The title looks about right to me: in form :D and substance :(.
 
Re: Black farmers still NOT gettting getting their due

The title looks about right to me: in form :D and substance :(.

'Preciate it.

This shows two things: why Republicans will never get any significant Black votes and why Democrats continue to fail.
 
Re: Black farmers still NOT gettting getting their due

'Preciate it.

This shows two things: why Republicans will never get any significant Black votes and why Democrats continue to fail.

Couldn't have said it better.

QueEx
 
Re: Black farmers still NOT gettting getting their due

<font size="5"><center>
Senate votes to fund $4.5B settlements</font size>
<font size="4">

US Senate Approves Billions for Black Farmers, Native Americans </font size></center>


PH2010111906793.jpg



Washington Post
By Krissah Thompson
Washington Post Staff Writer
Saturday, November 20, 2010

After months of hang-ups, the Senate unanimously approved Friday two multibillion-dollar settlements that will rectify long-standing claims against the federal government for discrimination and mismanagement.

The vote essentially brings closure to the two cases, which have each been litigated for more than a decade.

The House, which has twice endorsed the deals, must still do so one more time, an action that is expected after Thanksgiving. Senate approval, however, has been a huge hurdle for Native Americans, who sued the government over poorly handled individual Indians' trust accounts, and black farmers, who were for years unfairly refused loans by the Agriculture Department.

"Black farmers and Native American trust account holders have had to wait a long time for justice, but now it will finally be served," Senate Majority Leader Harry M. Reid (D-Nev.) said in a statement after the vote. "I am heartened that Democrats and Republicans were able to come together to deliver the settlement that these men and women deserve for the discrimination and mismanagement they faced in the past."

Native Americans involved in the land trust lawsuit will get access to a $3.4 billion fund. Black farmers who are a part of a class-action lawsuit against the USDA will receive a $1.15 billion settlement.

"It's long, long overdue," said John Boyd, president of the National Black Farmers Association. "Many farmers have died waiting for justice. Hopefully, we can get this money to those who are living."

Boyd's group has lobbied for years, even staging tractor protests on Capitol Hill, to get Congress to fund the settlement, which is expected to resolve the claims of tens of thousands of black farmers.

The Native American land trust case, whose lead plaintiff is Elouise Cobell, resolves complaints by 300,000 Native Americans who found that the government had grossly mismanaged royalty payments for natural resources mined on tribal lands. The case wound through hundreds of motions, seven trials, dozens of rulings and appeals before a settlement was reached in December.

Cobell's lawyer, Dennis M. Gingold, praised Republicans and Democrats for working together to approve the deal. "No one would have expected this could have been done," Gingold said. "In this environment, with the difficult elections we just had, most people would have thought this would have been impossible."

The Obama administration has put a focus on settling such civil rights issues. Last month, Native American farmers reached a separate settlement with the government over USDA discrimination claims. Hispanic farmers and women farmers, who have similar claims, are still in negotiations with the Justice Department and USDA officials.

USDA Secretary Tom Vilsack called Friday's Senate vote "a major milestone in USDA's efforts to turn the page on a sad chapter in our history. . . . President Obama and I pledged not only to treat all farmers fairly and equally, but to right the wrongs of the past for farmers who faced discrimination."

Interior Secretary Ken Salazar, whose department had been mired in the trust litigation, said the vote was another step toward bringing resolution to the highly contentious land trust lawsuit. "The progress we have made over the last two years in reaching critical Indian country settlements is unprecedented," he said.

The White House issued a statement urging the House to also pass legislation funding the settlements, and Obama said he looks forward to signing them into law.

"While these legislative achievements reflect important progress, they also serve to remind us that much work remains to be done," Obama said. "That is why my administration also continues to work to resolve claims of past discrimination made by women and Hispanic farmers against the USDA."



http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/11/19/AR2010111906790.html
 
Back
Top