Billy Dee Williams, "actors ‘should’ be allowed to wear blackface."

arnoldwsimmons

Rising Star
Platinum Member

Billy Dee Williams says actors ‘should’ be allowed to wear blackface​

Star Wars actor says he believes actors should be free to ‘do anything you want to do’, in a discussion about Laurence Olivier’s performance in Othello

Billy Dee Williams has said that actors should be able to perform in blackface, with the Star Wars actor revealing that he believes, “If you’re an actor, you should do anything you want to do”.

Speaking to Bill Maher on the Club Random podcast, the 87-year-old actor recalled laughing while watching the 1965 film Othello, where the titular character played by Laurence Olivier is in blackface. Williams said he thought the performance was “really interesting”.


“When he did Othello, I fell out laughing,” he said. “He stuck his ass out and walked around with his ass, you know, because Black people are supposed to have big asses … I thought it was hysterical. I loved it. I love that kind of stuff.”

Man in black suit sits in armchair
Billy Dee Williams: ‘At this stage in my life, I don’t need to apologise for anything’
Read more
When Maher replied: “Here’s the thing: today, they would never let you do that.” Williams asked, “Why?”

“Blackface?” Maher said, incredulously.

“Why not? You should do it,” Williams said. “If you’re an actor, you should do anything you want to do … As an actor, whatever you think you can do, you should be able to do it.”

When Maher remarked that Williams “actually lived in a period where you couldn’t do that, where you couldn’t play the part you should’ve played”, Williams objected.

“But it didn’t matter. Of course it happened but the fact is, you discuss it. The point is, that you don’t go through life feeling like, ‘I’m a victim,’” Williams said. “I refuse to go through life saying to the world, ‘I’m pissed off.’ I’m not gonna be pissed off 24 hours a day.”

Earlier in the interview, Williams also told Maher: “If I’m going to be creative, let me be creative as an individualist. I don’t want to do anything based on this whole idea that ‘you’re a Black person, you’re a white person’ and things of that nature. I’m an artist. I’m a creative entity in this life.”



Williams is best known for his performance as Lando Calrissian in the Star Wars franchise, and has appeared in more than 100 roles across film, stage and television including Brian’s Song and Batman.

In an interview with the Guardian in February, Williams recalled a film his friend James Baldwin wrote, for which Baldwin wanted Williams to play Malcolm X. He revealed that film studio Columbia Pictures has discussed Marlon Brando playing the Black civil rights activist, which Williams thought was “hysterical but a little bit interesting”.

Asked about how he felt about blackface then, Williams said: “You don’t have to do blackface. There are lots of things you can do. Most people in my mind are very provincial and myopic in their vision of the world. All you have to do is use your imagination and, if you’re good at using your imagination, you can do some really interesting stuff without doing the obvious to achieve whatever it is you’re trying to achieve.
 
200w.gif
 
There are artistic scenarios where I can see blackface being used, or any other racial stereotype/trope, For example tropic thunder. You have to make it make sense and it has to be for a reason, not just straight up blackface for the sake of blackface. same with race/gender swapping historical figures, example He's Not There where a young bob Dylan was played by black actor and a young adult bob was played by a woman
 
I get what he's saying on a level. Basically, people say that they can't say something like it's illegal or a restriction, but the truth they can do it. At the end of the day, you as a performer, creator, etc. have to decide whether you want to do said thing, and whether you want to face the potential consequences for that action.

Basically, the same argument being made here in this clip from The Good Fight:
 
There are artistic scenarios where I can see blackface being used, or any other racial stereotype/trope, For example tropic thunder. You have to make it make sense and it has to be for a reason, not just straight up blackface for the sake of blackface. same with race/gender swapping historical figures, example He's Not There where a young bob Dylan was played by black actor and a young adult bob was played by a woman
No reason for black face

Tropic Thunder didn't have one black writer
Just some cacs
 

Billy Dee Williams says actors ‘should’ be allowed to wear blackface​



Asked about how he felt about blackface then, Williams said: “You don’t have to do blackface. There are lots of things you can do. Most people in my mind are very provincial and myopic in their vision of the world. All you have to do is use your imagination and, if you’re good at using your imagination, you can do some really interesting stuff without doing the obvious to achieve whatever it is you’re trying to achieve.

This part is 100% true. It's sort of like some comedians who can only do shock comedy etc, but you have comedians that can touch on the same topics but put a better more creative spin on it & it's funny.
 
No reason for black face

Tropic Thunder didn't have one black writer
Just some cacs
No reason? What if someone wanted to make a film about the history of black face showing how gross and sick whites have been historically in Hollywood? Or a satirical film like bamboozled?

This part is 100% true. It's sort of like some comedians who can only do shock comedy etc, but you have comedians that can touch on the same topics but put a better more creative spin on it & it's funny.
That's the point I was trying to make, some comedians can do comedy about race and it works, while others do what amounts to racist comedy. If an artist comes up with a concept that uses blackface as a means to make a point or tell a story that's effective then the audience will judge it based on that. Obviously there's no need to have blackface in the avengers or anything like that lol
 
This from the same man who admits to being bisexual,social class of black people of higher standards and some more shit.

Acting isn't just acting,it's an art but if you just allow anybody to just do anything the value of it goes down.....
 
I think the difference and definition of black face needs to be agreed on

this is black face - its a stereotyped imitation of how whites see black people its not specific its a generalization of the group as a whole.
0*lcJAqbd7xr0SHlor.jpg


this is not black face its jimmy kimmel doing an impersonation of a specific black person Shaquille O'Neal

jimmy_kimmel_blackface.jpg


now you can be unhappy about this but this isnt a take on how all black men look and act.
There's a difference between what Olivier did and blackface.
I agree but lets understand that the reason Olivier was playing the character at all was based on racist exclusionary motives.
 
Last edited:
I agree but lets understand that the reason Olivier was playing the character at all was based on racist exclusionary motives.


Bro, Othello was a moorish prince aka arab. Shakespeare would have known them as dark-skinned people. More to the point in the play Othello identifies himself as Black.

So, yeah, skin-darkening makeup (although I don't like it) at the time was perfectly acceptable as opposed to blackface which is totally connected to minstrel shows and all the worst stereotypes of black people.
 
Acting is acting. Fuck all barriers that hinder your craft
Acting is a JOB and a CAREER and people in societies have a nasty history of excluding others to secure jobs and whole industries and fields for themselves...you know, resource hoarding.

the history of stage and film is steeped in exclusionary and discriminatory actions. Going back to Shakespeare times men played womens roles becuz women weren't ALLOWED to be actors.

Hollywood was born in the jim crow era so its not a coincidence that the first major motion picture that laid the foundation for all the movies that would come after it was Birth Of a Nation

s-l600.jpg


A movie that was steeped in political, social and racial commentary and was essentially an informercial for the kkk.

birth_22-1.jpg


this is why when conservative cacs complain that movies shouldnt be political and WOKE...the first feature length film was a racist's WOKE movie... how can I say that?? the fucking president at the time said this about it:

Birth of a Nation was the first film screened at the White House, where President Woodrow Wilson hosted a special premiere with Griffith and novelist Dixon (with whom he was friends). Wilson is said to have remarked of the film: “It is like writing history with lightning, and my only regret is that it is all so terribly true.”

so what do you mean when you say acting is acting??
 
Last edited:
Bro, Othello was a moorish prince aka arab. Shakespeare would have known them as dark-skinned people. More to the point in the play Othello identifies himself as Black.

So, yeah, skin-darkening makeup (although I don't like it) at the time was perfectly acceptable as opposed to blackface which is totally connected to minstrel shows and all the worst stereotypes of black people.
oh I'm not disputing shakespeares concept and protrayals I'm talking about Olivier playing the part in 1965

sddefault.jpg


theres no way a black man would have allowed to play the role for two reasons...one he would be the star over white counterparts and two aint no way cacs wanted to see a black man being romantic with a white bitch. not at THAT time.
 
Billy Dee Williams is an old fool.

When he started saying that victim mentality bullshit, he let you know where he stands.

He should’ve said blackface depends on if the movie has some type of context at the end and not just to be a buffoon.

Soul Man is the perfect example.

 
oh I'm not disputing shakespeares concept and protrayals I'm talking about Olivier playing the part in 1965

sddefault.jpg


theres no way a black man would have allowed to play the role for two reasons...one he would be the star over white counterparts and two aint no way cacs wanted to see a black man being romantic with a white bitch. not at THAT time.

Totally agree. Larry was a hell of an actor and there were Black actors who could and did Othello at the time but not with a white Desdemona. Not to general release. Could you picture that in the south? whitey would have burnt every theatre down.
 
Totally agree. Larry was a hell of an actor and there were Black actors who could and did Othello at the time but not with a white Desdemona. Not to general release. Could you picture that in the south? whitey would have burnt every theatre down.
Sad but true ... shit they shut down telephone lines complaining and threatening when Nat King Cole touched a white woman's hand to thank her for appearing on his show.
 
He may ask do you have a problem with white face that comedians/sketch artist have done?
"White face" does not come with the historical negativity that black face does. Either you are ignorant of this or you know it and are just trying to be a contrarian. There is a mountain of negativity behind the act of black face.
While I agree that as a human, a white person CAN do black face, it doesn't mean that they should.
The real question is why would they want to?
 
Back
Top