I'm all for privacy, but it seems like too many people are getting hung up on details that are meaningless to this particular case.
We're talking about a smartphone belonging to a dead terrorist. Sure it technically belongs to his former employer, but you would think that company would be just as concerned as anyone else regarding what else dude had been up to. Fuck around and find out that everybody in Accounts Receivable is part of a sleeper cell.
There's nothing stopping Apple from unlocking the phone and making the phone's contents available to investigators. They don't have to reveal their methods to the government in order to do this. They don't have to provide the feds with a master key of any sort. Tim Cook's entire argument is just posturing for Apple's consumer base.
Dead terrorists have a right to privacy? FOH.
We're talking about a smartphone belonging to a dead terrorist. Sure it technically belongs to his former employer, but you would think that company would be just as concerned as anyone else regarding what else dude had been up to. Fuck around and find out that everybody in Accounts Receivable is part of a sleeper cell.
There's nothing stopping Apple from unlocking the phone and making the phone's contents available to investigators. They don't have to reveal their methods to the government in order to do this. They don't have to provide the feds with a master key of any sort. Tim Cook's entire argument is just posturing for Apple's consumer base.
Dead terrorists have a right to privacy? FOH.