BGOL Flat Earth crew - tell us how this is being faked - all woman crew going into space

I knew when the globe heads rejected the math of the earth curve calculator that it was no used debating them anymore.

Niggas saying ain't no such thing as the top of a ball, smh.

If you are standing on a ball, I don't care how big the ball is, the higher you elevate, the lower the horizon gets, 360 degrees around you. It's not gonna rise with you and then drop off at some point and show you a fucking curve.

You mf's been walking and driving around on vast flat surfaces all your life but still think you live on a ball.

That's insane. That is fucking insane.

#StaySleepSheep
 
cashwhisperer said:
I knew when the globe heads rejected the math of the earth curve calculator that it was no used debating them anymore.

Niggas saying ain't no such thing as the top of a ball, smh.

If you are standing on a ball, I don't care how big the ball is, the higher you elevate, the lower the horizon gets, 360 degrees around you. It's not gonna rise with you and then drop off at some point and show you a fucking curve.

You mf's been walking and driving around on vast flat surfaces all your life but still think you live on a ball.

That's insane. That is fucking insane.

#StaySleepSheep
Click to expand...
I have a question
So do you believe all celestial bodies are flat, the sun, moon, planets,and stars?
 
dbluesun said:
I have a question
So do you believe all celestial bodies are flat, the sun, moon, planets,and stars?
Click to expand...
That's not a good question and you Round Earthers like to ask questions but never answer them.

Every other celestial body's round, the only one that has life as we know it on it is flat.

david-blaine-surprise.gif
 
REDLINE said:
That's not a good question and you Round Earthers like to ask questions but never answer them.

Every other celestial body's round, the only one that has life as we know it on it is flat.

david-blaine-surprise.gif
Click to expand...

Let me help you out. Stop saying "round earth". A plate is round and flat. You mean "ball earth" or "spherical" or "globe" earth. The fact that you keep saying "round earth" shows how unequipped you are to even be trying to include yourself in this debate.
 
cashwhisperer said:
I knew when the globe heads rejected the math of the earth curve calculator that it was no used debating them anymore.

Niggas saying ain't no such thing as the top of a ball, smh.

If you are standing on a ball, I don't care how big the ball is, the higher you elevate, the lower the horizon gets, 360 degrees around you. It's not gonna rise with you and then drop off at some point and show you a fucking curve.

You mf's been walking and driving around on vast flat surfaces all your life but still think you live on a ball.

That's insane. That is fucking insane.

#StaySleepSheep
Click to expand...
The same calculator you set the viewer height at zero feet and never account for refraction.
Well, if I were to ignore the obvious bullshit in any old dumb theory, you could then twist it with lies to make anything make sense.
For example, if you take out that reindeer can't fly and it's impossible for Santa to deliver that many gifts to all the kids around the world, then you can say that Santa is also somewhat plausible.
But if we were to do this the intelligent way, where only scientific evidence is allowed (claims that can be falsified with scientific experimentation). When you do refer to your math or experiment, then you should at least post a link so we can properly examine your reference material.
Hint I already explained to you the importance of viewer height, the lapse rate at the time of the measurements, and the instruments used for these measurements, so unless you properly respond to why your curve calculator claim is bogus, you don't have a leg to stand on, in this subject.
 
RoadRage said:
The same calculator you set the viewer height at zero feet and never account for refraction.
Well, if I were to ignore the obvious bullshit in any old dumb theory, you could then twist it with lies to make anything make sense.
For example, if you take out that reindeer can't fly and it's impossible for Santa to deliver that many gifts to all the kids around the world, then you can say that Santa is also somewhat plausible.
But if we were to do this the intelligent way, where only scientific evidence is allowed (claims that can be falsified with scientific experimentation). When you do refer to your math or experiment, then you should at least post a link so we can properly examine your reference material.
Hint I already explained to you the importance of viewer height, the lapse rate at the time of the measurements, and the instruments used for these measurements, so unless you properly respond to why your curve calculator claim is bogus, you don't have a leg to stand on, in this subject.
Click to expand...

Refraction can't move a hill or a building out of the way. I have posted examples of various levels of refraction and your version of it is vastly exaggerated from what it is in REALITY. Atmoplanic conditions don't flatten everything out.
 
cashwhisperer said:
Refraction can't move a hill or a building out of the way. I have posted examples of various levels of refraction and your version of it is vastly exaggerated from what it is in REALITY. Atmoplanic conditions don't flatten everything out.
Click to expand...
Do you have any experiments on refraction, read any literature on refraction that you can sight, or is this just more derp you got from idiots online?
My guess is, it's more derp!
 
cashwhisperer said:
Refraction can't move a hill or a building out of the way. I have posted examples of various levels of refraction and your version of it is vastly exaggerated from what it is in REALITY. Atmoplanic conditions don't flatten everything out.
Click to expand...
Also
that refraction moves buildings or hills is a strawman because the actual claim is that in typical atmospheric conditions where the cold air is below the warmer air, will cause light to bend down, causing things beyond the horizon to rise.
This is why the horizon can be seen clearly undulating and how the distance you see can be accurately predicted once given the proper lapse rate measurements. So not only is it documented, but the amount has been quantified, and to test this theory all you need to do is give me the lapse rate on a particular day and ask me how far should it be to the horizon, and without a doubt that distance will be given to you with accuracy.
On the other hand, I can give you the lapse rate, and on the flat earth model, you will be clueless as to how far the distance will be to the horizon.
The only thing this proves is that once again, the flatties are lacking a working model with predictive capabilities, and that is why no one with a brain takes you guys seriously!

 
cashwhisperer said:
Refraction can't move a hill or a building out of the way. I have posted examples of various levels of refraction and your version of it is vastly exaggerated from what it is in REALITY. Atmoplanic conditions don't flatten everything out.
Click to expand...
If you were actually educated you'd be able to get this video, but something tells me it sounds like bla bla bla to your brain.

 
cashwhisperer said:
Let me help you out. Stop saying "round earth". A plate is round and flat. You mean "ball earth" or "spherical" or "globe" earth. The fact that you keep saying "round earth" shows how unequipped you are to even be trying to include yourself in this debate.
Click to expand...
You're not intelligent enough and will never be intelligent enough for me to ever have conversations with but


roundball-classic.png

MV5BMjEyNzc4OTYyMF5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTgwMDY4NzYyMjE@._V1_.jpg

images

GI_CKomXMAAuult


The word "Round" is used to describe a ball. Such as "Roundball" being used to describe a basketball or the playing of basketball.

A steering wheel is also round, as well as coins. But intelligent people can decipher and dignify the difference when speaking about a round coin and a "Round" Earth.

Only an asshole and a bitch like you who wants to have a conversation will act, and try to act like there's a difference between round and a sphere when speaking about Earth's shaped.

If you were smart, which you aren't. You would've stated that I was right but for the wrong reasons. You should've stated that the Earth was round, but only because it was shaped like plate or a disc prove your stance on its shape.

But you're not smart. You're very dumb, and every post proves exactly how dumb you are. One day hopefully in the near, but most likely far future.

You'll realize how dumb you are.

The fact that these guys actually have conversations with you is saddening. It's really like picking on the slow kid "You" and the playground.

But you're not slow, you're willfully and early dumb for no reason.

Do yourself and me a favor, don't ever quote me again flat Earth faggit.
 
REDLINE said:
You're not intelligent enough and will never be intelligent enough for me to ever have conversations with but


roundball-classic.png

MV5BMjEyNzc4OTYyMF5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTgwMDY4NzYyMjE@._V1_.jpg

images

GI_CKomXMAAuult


The word "Round" is used to describe a ball. Such as "Roundball" being used to describe a basketball or the playing of basketball.

A steering wheel is also round, as well as coins. But intelligent people can decipher and dignify the difference when speaking about a round coin and a "Round" Earth.

Only an asshole and a bitch like you who wants to have a conversation will act, and try to act like there's a difference between round and a sphere when speaking about Earth's shaped.

If you were smart, which you aren't. You would've stated that I was right but for the wrong reasons. You should've stated that the Earth was round, but only because it was shaped like plate or a disc prove your stance on its shape.

But you're not smart. You're very dumb, and every post proves exactly how dumb you are. One day hopefully in the near, but most likely far future.

You'll realize how dumb you are.

The fact that these guys actually have conversations with you is saddening. It's really like picking on the slow kid "You" and the playground.

But you're not slow, you're willfully and early dumb for no reason.

Do yourself and me a favor, don't ever quote me again flat Earth faggit.
Click to expand...

:colin:

:roflmao: :roflmao: :roflmao:
 
RoadRage said:
Based on your "superior" knowledge of refraction and what it can or cannot do. Do you mind explaining to us, in flat eart terms, what is going on in these photos? Please include the working mechanism and where, when, and how you can predict something like this to occur.

0_SWNS_FLOATING_SHIP_001.jpg


evytwlyvkamthnc.jpg



:popcorn::popcorn::popcorn::popcorn::popcorn::popcorn::popcorn::popcorn::popcorn::popcorn:
Click to expand...


3wA3FhN.jpg



I'm on autopilot right now. Really not about to argue to the death with you. Just bout to be posting memes on yo ass from now on.


 
cashwhisperer said:
3wA3FhN.jpg



I'm on autopilot right now. Really not about to argue to the death with you. Just bout to be posting memes on yo ass from now on.


Click to expand...

No need to argue with me, just explain to us how you are able to explain how those phenomenons work on a flat earth while quantifying the values so that we are able to predict when where, and how it occurs.
Please feel free to post as much math as you can,m that explains the quantifiable effects of the measurable lapse rate. I say this because you guys sure like listing phenomena but cannot explain why and how it's happening, and until you can understand this you will remain stuck on stupid and a joke for the world to see.
BTW failure to produce these simple terms will count as an admission to being way out of your league when it comes to the subject at hand!
 
RoadRage said:
Yes the phone was connected to a radio broadcast tower (similar to how people can call up radio stations and have it broadcast in different states) so what's the problem?
But nice try at attempting to change the subject like a typical cult member!
Click to expand...

And how do radio waves work??

:roflmao: :roflmao: :roflmao:
 
YOur act of spamming misinformation that gets debunked when asked for source material is always followed by more spamming of misinformation and then when you get busted you put up the laughing emojis almost to act like you were trolling.
Only for the dust to settle then you do the same dumb shit again.
Your act is so lame and unlike your evidence predictable.
And this is the reason why YOU'RE A FUCKING IDIOT!
 
cashwhisperer said:
I knew when the globe heads rejected the math of the earth curve calculator that it was no used debating them anymore.

Niggas saying ain't no such thing as the top of a ball, smh.

If you are standing on a ball, I don't care how big the ball is, the higher you elevate, the lower the horizon gets, 360 degrees around you. It's not gonna rise with you and then drop off at some point and show you a fucking curve.

You mf's been walking and driving around on vast flat surfaces all your life but still think you live on a ball.

That's insane. That is fucking insane.

#StaySleepSheep
Click to expand...
The earth is shaped like a frisbee

That curve they see is the curve in a frisbee.
 
REDLINE said:
You're not intelligent enough and will never be intelligent enough for me to ever have conversations with but


roundball-classic.png

MV5BMjEyNzc4OTYyMF5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTgwMDY4NzYyMjE@._V1_.jpg

images

GI_CKomXMAAuult


The word "Round" is used to describe a ball. Such as "Roundball" being used to describe a basketball or the playing of basketball.

A steering wheel is also round, as well as coins. But intelligent people can decipher and dignify the difference when speaking about a round coin and a "Round" Earth.

Only an asshole and a bitch like you who wants to have a conversation will act, and try to act like there's a difference between round and a sphere when speaking about Earth's shaped.

If you were smart, which you aren't. You would've stated that I was right but for the wrong reasons. You should've stated that the Earth was round, but only because it was shaped like plate or a disc prove your stance on its shape.

But you're not smart. You're very dumb, and every post proves exactly how dumb you are. One day hopefully in the near, but most likely far future.

You'll realize how dumb you are.

The fact that these guys actually have conversations with you is saddening. It's really like picking on the slow kid "You" and the playground.

But you're not slow, you're willfully and early dumb for no reason.

Do yourself and me a favor, don't ever quote me again flat Earth faggit.
Click to expand...
Why do u let e-personas get u this worked up

U too easy
 
RoadRage said:
YOur act of spamming misinformation that gets debunked when asked for source material is always followed by more spamming of misinformation and then when you get busted you put up the laughing emojis almost to act like you were trolling.
Only for the dust to settle then you do the same dumb shit again.
Your act is so lame and unlike your evidence predictable.
And this is the reason why YOU'RE A FUCKING IDIOT!
Click to expand...

ugly-cry-black-baby-funny-dramatic-hd19oi3a0zotiql9.gif



:roflmao: :roflmao: :roflmao:

Calm down fool. It's Saturday.

Look nigga, I'm not circle arguing with you.

You're talking about I'm posting memes but the mirage shit and the video on curvature actually counters your bullshit refraction theory.

I'm not about to deep dive with your retarded ass. I've BEEN told you where I stand. I don't see why you keep trying to engage me. Crazy ass.
 
cashwhisperer said:
ugly-cry-black-baby-funny-dramatic-hd19oi3a0zotiql9.gif



:roflmao: :roflmao: :roflmao:

Calm down fool. It's Saturday.

Look nigga, I'm not circle arguing with you.

You're talking about I'm posting memes but the mirage shit and the video on curvature actually counters your bullshit refraction theory.

I'm not about to deep dive with your retarded ass. I've BEEN told you where I stand. I don't see why you keep trying to engage me. Crazy ass.
Click to expand...
The only way to combat an actual scientific theory is by presenting a better model with better predictive properties. So post your model (hint models aren't memes or quotes from other idiots).
So Go! You're on the clock! Show the world you're not the idiot we think you are.
 
RoadRage said:
Raido waves travel at the speed of light and are on the on the electromagnetic spectrum just like radar.
Click to expand...

What's the longest long-wave signal that has been detected originating from earth? And what was the name of the transmitter?

:roflmao:

And remember, the moon is 258K miles away.
 
cashwhisperer said:
What's the longest long-wave signal that has been detected originating from earth? And what was the name of the transmitter?

:roflmao:

And remember, the moon is 258K miles away.
Click to expand...
You do realize the differences between sending signals from earth than it is from space. But in case you don't know, let's talk.

First, there is the geometry of the planet, being that it is a globe sending regular signals has its limits based on how tall the antenna or the sendeer and the receiver are, and while it is possible to send longer signals at specific wavelengths to bounce off the ionosphere to travel further, two things you should note, that doesn't work in the flat eart favor.
1- As I mentioned it only works for a specific wavelength, and if there were a firmament all signals would travel this far.
2- And next if light can travel around the firmament causing a bullshit caustic cup effect like some retarded flat earfer asserts.
By that same logic, light should be able to travel all over the flat earth just as long as there isn't anything blocking it, but in so, debunking the false claim that light has a distance limit and is the reason why we cannot see the sun all over the planet at all times.
And if were the case you should be able to pick up phone signals from the middle of the ocean, being that there is nothing there that can block the signal.

The problem is that you flat earthers have no cohesion to your claims, one claim debunks the next, but you guys are too scattered brains to understand how this happens.
But thanks for displaying for us why stupid people are too stupid to know they are stupid.
And after seeing all the people that you quoted in the past get out of flat earth admitting that it is a scam, all that is left if the bottom of the bottom-of-the-barrel idiots like you, A.K.A people who are far too stupid to know you are stupid!

The Scammer


His lick



​

 
cashwhisperer said:
Click to expand...

RoadRage said:
YOur act of spamming misinformation that gets debunked when asked for source material is always followed by more spamming of misinformation and then when you get busted you put up the laughing emojis almost to act like you were trolling.
Only for the dust to settle then you do the same dumb shit again.
Your act is so lame and unlike your evidence predictable.
And this is the reason why YOU'RE A FUCKING IDIOT!
Click to expand...
1374536704000carnacmasterphotonup10812800031307230909_3_4-534x422.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top