Yea - he used to eat every mixtape he was on.
He has to be at least top 5..dude dropped this album at 13 in '96 and i can still listen to it all the way through, till this day.
True - didn't even think about that.
ali vegas should be on there somewhere as well
Yup, no doubt. This thread started out wayyyy off.LLcoolJ or RUN DMC you young bitches
... RUN DMC you young bitches
They were all 18 or over when they signed their first record deal, and were certainly over 18 when they released their first album.
wrong buddy
They were all 18 or over when they signed their first record deal, and were certainly over 18 when they released their first album.
Run and DMC were both born in 1964 and JMJ (RIP) was born in 65.
So they were around 18 or 19 when this first came out.
All were 19 when the album was released, with Run and DMC pushin' 20. Your math is a bit off. (Not really close to being under 18,)
I didn't say they were close to being under 18.
But I gave it to you so give up dog.
You said it was "close." Read your own shit.
I don't need (or want) an idiot like you to "give" me anything. Just take the info (be thankful for it) and go back to your cave.
New info bitch. You got to get your google game up. It's Like That charted in 83 I'm pretty sure it didn't just hop up on the charts.
Which would pull them a little bit closer now don't you think.
He's right on this one although it was close.
Dumbass. Read my original response. I said they were SIGNED in '83 and their album came out in '84. Either way they were over 18. Period.
You're the one who decided to use the album release date in '84 as the barometer, in which case they weren't "close" to being under 18 (which is the topic of this thread).
A phenom for a minute at 16:
Bow Wow? Oh Lord!
ugk
scarface
fakkulty
kb (da kidnappa)
outkast i think
street military