BCS bullshit....

Atastofu

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
So Texas get's in by the skin of their teeth and after beating a has been Neb team...and TCU has to play Boise St....Here's what I would liked....now we can go back and forth on the playoff shit all we like it's a money thing...therefore it aint gonna happen...but why not let TCU get a shot at Fl or Boise St get a shot at OH State....don't want to take the chance of letting a team outside the regular 8 send Timmy boy out on his last game with a lost...well really it don't matter Pike and them boys from da Natti will get in that ass anyway...there was no way in hell da SEC wouldn't have a team in the National Ch...that was determined at the beginning of the season...and Texas oh Texas...don't let that hardest schedule in the FBS:lol::lol::lol:fool you...we all know they should have lost by 30 to at least 2 of the teams on their schedule:lol::lol::lol: one against two...gtfoh
 
This is what I dont understand about alot of SEC fanboys or Longhorn haters... Texas won a tough game against Nebraska when Colt got sacked 9 times. But people overlook the fact that it took Bama a last second drive to beat Auburn the week before, it took Bama two blocked FGs to beat Tenneessee... Florida got by with the refs help all year, the Arkansas game they would have lost if not for those phantom calls. My point is dont knock Texas for winning close games, when every good team this year has looked shaky at times. Dont have a selective memory about the season.
 
Cincy, Boise State, and TCU had cupcake schedules and that is why they gets no love from the BCS.

I would love to see a playoff system because the game is played on the field and you never know what team is gonna show up for a game.
 
Cincy, Boise State, and TCU had cupcake schedules and that is why they gets no love from the BCS.

I would love to see a playoff system because the game is played on the field and you never know what team is gonna show up for a game.

LOL

url



<font size="3">
ROLL TIDE


</font size>
 
Cincy, Boise State, and TCU had cupcake schedules and that is why they gets no love from the BCS.

I would love to see a playoff system because the game is played on the field and you never know what team is gonna show up for a game.


See this is what I'm talking about we dog out the schedule these teams play, but they can't get games against "the so called good teams" because those teams are afraid of an in season loss. I agree there should be a playoff system, but we all know that won't happen. I'm not dogging AL or Texas...congrats to both....I'm actually a Louisville Cardinal fan....:lol::lol::lol:there I did for you all...but I get tired of folks talking about how hard it is in the PAC 10, SEC, or Big 12...I guess that's why the power teams don't step out of conference to much....don't want to get hurt playing creampuffs...but I'll say this PAC 10, WAC, Big Ten and 3 top 20 at the time teams from the Big East fell to those creampuff schedule Bearcats....just some fun for thought
 
I am tired of the "oh the SEC is so tough" crap when other conferences go through their schedules, too...This year, the SEC had three teams in the top 10 for most of the year, and one did not look like they should have been up there.

About the smaller conferences...They play who is in front of them and that is it. Why scold them for playing their conference when in most cases some of the high profile teams in the conference cannot get a set of games with some of the "Big Six" teams because they won't agree to a home-and-home...And in the midst of news about the Mountain West and Western Athletic conference agreeing to a matchup next year between their champs, it basically happens a year earlier by having Boise State and TCU in the Fiesta Bowl (rematch).

Mt. Yukon said:
This is what I don't understand about alot of SEC fanboys or Longhorn haters... Texas won a tough game against Nebraska when Colt got sacked 9 times. But people overlook the fact that it took Bama a last second drive to beat Auburn the week before, it took Bama two blocked FGs to beat Tennessee... Florida got by with the refs help all year, the Arkansas game they would have lost if not for those phantom calls. My point is dont knock Texas for winning close games, when every good team this year has looked shaky at times. Dont have a selective memory about the season

:yes::yes::yes: thank you...
 
No one has a problem with the teams who are in the BCS championship game. It's the teams that aren't in; Who's to say that they weren't worthy? Nevermind the schedule.

Let them play a playoff-4 team or 8 team. Start in mid to late December & finish during the end of the first week of January as they usually do. More games brings more revenue, so they don't have to worry about losing money.
 
I think they just need to add a legitimate bcs conference personally. Boise State is hurt by being in the WAC. If Boise could find a way to get in the Mountain West, that could be one of the top 3 conferences in the FBS.
 
Alabama (1)

September 5 vs. No. 7 Virginia Tech* W 34-24
September 12 Florida International W 40-14
September 19 North Texas W 53-7
September 26 Arkansas W 35-7
October 3 at Kentucky W 38-20
October 10 at No. 20 Mississippi W 22-3
October 17 No. 22 South Carolina W 20-6
October 24 Tennessee W 12-10
November 7 No. 9 LSU W 24-15
November 14 at Mississippi State W 31-3
November 21 Chattanooga W 45-0
November 27 at Auburn W 26-21
December 5 vs. No. 1 Florida* W 32-13


Texas (2)

September 5 Louisiana-Monroe W 59-20
September 12 at Wyoming W 41-10
September 19 Texas Tech W 34-24
September 26 UTEP W 64-7
October 10 Colorado W 38-14
October 17 vs. No. 20 Oklahoma* W 16-13
October 24 at Missouri W 41-7
October 31 at No. 14 Oklahoma State W 41-14
November 7 UCF W 35-3
November 14 at Baylor W 47-14
November 21 Kansas W 51-20
November 26 at Texas A&M W 49-39
December 5 vs. No. 22 Nebraska* W 13-12


Cincinnati (3)

September 7 at Rutgers W 47-15
September 12 Southeast Missouri State W 70-3
September 19 at Oregon State W 28-18
September 26 Fresno State W 28-20
October 3 at Miami (OH) W 37-13
October 15 at No. 21 South Florida W 34-17
October 24 Louisville W 41-10
October 31 at Syracuse W 28-7
November 7 Connecticut W 47-45
November 13 No.25 West Virginia W 24-21
November 27 Illinois W 49-36
December 5 at No. 15 Pittsburgh W 45-44


TCU (4)

September 12 at Virginia W 30-14
September 19 Texas State W 56-21
September 26 at Clemson W 14-10
October 3 Southern Methodist W 39-14
October 10 at Air Force W 20-17
October 17 Colorado State W 44-6
October 24 at No. 16 Brigham Young W 38-7
October 31 UNLV W 41-0
November 7 at San Diego State W 55-12
November 14 No. 16 Utah W 55-28
November 21 at Wyoming W 45-10
November 28 New Mexico W 51-10


Boise State (6)

September 3 No. 16 Oregon W 19-8
September 12 Miami (OH) W 48-0
September 18 at Fresno State W 51-34
September 26 at Bowling Green W 49-14
October 3 UC Davis W 34-16
October 14 at Tulsa W 28-21
October 24 at Hawaii W 54-9
October 31 San Jose State W 45-7
November 6 at Louisiana Tech W 45-35
November 14 Idaho W 63-25
November 20 at Utah State W 52-21
November 27 Nevada W 44-33
December 5 New Mexico State W 42-7
 
Alabama (1)

September 5 vs. No. 7 Virginia Tech* W 34-24
September 12 Florida International W 40-14
September 19 North Texas W 53-7
September 26 Arkansas W 35-7
October 3 at Kentucky W 38-20
October 10 at No. 20 Mississippi W 22-3
October 17 No. 22 South Carolina W 20-6
October 24 Tennessee W 12-10
November 7 No. 9 LSU W 24-15
November 14 at Mississippi State W 31-3
November 21 Chattanooga W 45-0
November 27 at Auburn W 26-21
December 5 vs. No. 1 Florida* W 32-13


Great post only problem is Mississippi 8-4 this season with blowout wins against SE Louisiana, UAB, and Northern AZ...powerhouse wins well deserving of a top 20 bid...

South Carolina 7-5 this season two of those wins against South Carolina St and Florida Atlantic

Final Ranking this year....no where to be found....:smh::smh::smh

AND AGAIN...I say nothing against the SEC it just seems like their Supporters refuse to believe that the Conference it's self is not God...i guess the same argument will be held come basketball season between ACC and Beast (Big) East fans...
 
Texas (2)

September 5 Louisiana-Monroe W 59-20
September 12 at Wyoming W 41-10
September 19 Texas Tech W 34-24
September 26 UTEP W 64-7
October 10 Colorado W 38-14
October 17 vs. No. 20 Oklahoma* W 16-13
October 24 at Missouri W 41-7
October 31 at No. 14 Oklahoma State W 41-14
November 7 UCF W 35-3
November 14 at Baylor W 47-14
November 21 Kansas W 51-20
November 26 at Texas A&M W 49-39
December 5 vs. No. 22 Nebraska* W 13-12

I wouldnt even put Oklahoma State in the bold due to no defense.........Are they a good team maybe but they is not where near good as Texas and Oklahoma........like I've been saying the two teams that Texas played that had good defense they should of lost.....The fuckin referees game them that Nebraska game.....no way you put one second back on that clock :smh:
 
I wouldnt even put Oklahoma State in the bold due to no defense.........Are they a good team maybe but they is not where near good as Texas and Oklahoma........like I've been saying the two teams that Texas played that had good defense they should of lost.....The fuckin referees game them that Nebraska game.....no way you put one second back on that clock :smh:

... You did see the same replays the refs saw right??? The refs made the right call... Texas should have lost, but not because they put the second back. Nebraska had so many times to pull away, or put the dagger in and twist it. The fact is the Texas D is the strongest part of the team. The offense dinks and dunks for the most part, they cant run the ball, and the Oline stinks, but Muschamp has that D playing tough. Texas shut down Oklahoma, and Nebraska... When the team needed them the most. Yeah they slept walked in some games, but when a stop needed to be made, they made it. But everyone has struggled against good teams, you cant just pin it on Texas. Im not saying Bama wont win, but the Texas D will show up like it has in every big game this year, the offense on the other hand is another story.
 
So . . . them boys from da Natti will get in that ass anyway

AND AGAIN...I say nothing against the SEC it just seems like their Supporters refuse to believe that the Conference it's self is not God...i guess the same argument will be held come basketball season between ACC and Beast (Big) East fans...

Looks like Cincinnati was completely out of its league against Florida and SEC talent. Its showing against Florida seems consistent with its patsy schedule.

QueEx
 
Looks like Cincinnati was completely out of its league against Florida and SEC talent. Its showing against Florida seems consistent with its patsy schedule.

QueEx

I know what the Bearcats went through between the regular season and the bowl game, but that was the DUMBEST game that they have ever played...

it seemed like EVERY play they either got exposed on defense (which was kind of predictable) and just threw the ball for the hell of it on every down...now didn't the Gators just get trampled over by Alabama because they ran the ball down their throats over and over again? I think so...Why didn't Cincy even TRY to do the same thing?! On top of that, when Florida was up by 2 or 3 TDs, did Cincy put in the other QB? NOOOOOO....

That was awful to watch because Cincy did not do shit the whole game and looked like they really didn't give a fuck either :smh::smh::smh:
 
Last edited:
Honestly, it wasn't a pretty game for Cincinnati. I'm sure their coaching problems may have affected their play -- but overall, I just don't think they were equal to Florida and any other upper tier SEC team. You're right about the Tide running the ball down Florida's throat, but again, I just didn't get the feel that Cincinnati had that kind of running game.
 
Honestly, it wasn't a pretty game for Cincinnati. I'm sure their coaching problems may have affected their play -- but overall, I just don't think they were equal to Florida and any other upper tier SEC team. You're right about the Tide running the ball down Florida's throat, but again, I just didn't get the feel that Cincinnati had that kind of running game.

They didn't, but my problem was that they did not even give the Florida defense any other look than a shotgun formation and a short drop back then a pass on every down. As an offense, you have to give the opposing team different looks unless what you are currently doing is effective...If Cincy can't line up in an I-formation and run between the tackles, then mix it up and do some shotgun draws or pitches after the defense blitzes...or better yet, do screens with the halfback/slot/scatback...

I saw nothing for most of three quarters that showed that the Bearcats knew what to do...
 
They didn't, but my problem was that they did not even give the Florida defense any other look than a shotgun formation and a short drop back then a pass on every down. As an offense, you have to give the opposing team different looks unless what you are currently doing is effective...If Cincy can't line up in an I-formation and run between the tackles, then mix it up and do some shotgun draws or pitches after the defense blitzes...or better yet, do screens with the halfback/slot/scatback...

I saw nothing for most of three quarters that showed that the Bearcats knew what to do...

Cinci played their game. They never ran all season.they run that texas tech spread. You cant expect them to change their phlosophy like that
 
Don't know about anything else, all I know is that I was expecting to see a football game on Jan 4 for the national championship and was shocked to see an unbeaten Boise State team playing an unbeaten Oregon team (at least I think it was Oregon). If it wasn't for the internet (google), I would've thought that was the national championship game
:eek:

:confused:Boise State:confused:

In a way, that's a good thing. But in a way, it's not. Starting to think too much emphasis is being played on national championships these days. Maybe being a conference champ should be enough and we go back to the days where the Bowl games were more celebrations of the difference conferences than anything else
 
I've said it before and I'll say it again, the polls all season have been bullshit for the most part.

Cincinnati was clearly outclassed in their bowl, you can blame it on coaching changes but I believe in my heart that part of the reason dude bolted when he did was knowing they were going to get molly-whopped by Florida.

Cincy had a good season but they were over-ranked, same thing with TCU. After Bama, Texas, and UF there was a void in the rankings (mainly because VT fucked up and lost to UNC and Ohio State got caught slipping against Purdue [although I feel Big Ten teams are also consistently over-ranked] ), and the mid-majors benefited from that.

The worse part is that this BCS shit fucks up the whole season by forcing good teams to schedule cupcakes to get their stats up.

What I would like to see is top squads go at each other all season long, no cupcakes. I loved that VT & Bama got at it early, and even Ohio State going at USC, that's how shit needs to be every week.

Folks will scream that's unfair to teams like Boise but here's my proposal. If you dominate your conference every year like that and feel you are ready to play with the big boys, leave ya small pond conference and step up. Nobody would be hurt if Boise State replaced Baylor or TCU replaced Iowa State, would they?
 
Cincy had a good season but they were over-ranked, same thing with TCU.

That's right!! It wasn't Oregon that Boise State beat on 1/4 it was TCU. I remember now because I couldn't believe that TEXAS CHRISTIAN made it to the title game over Texas Tech or A&M!! That was even more perplexing than Boise being there
:eek:
 
Back
Top