This statement is just not true for the period of time reflecting the crimes that were charged.
Also waived for this year is the requirement that third, fifth and eighth graders pass the Milestones, which in these grades replaces the Criterion Referenced Competency Test (CRCT), in order to be promoted to the next grade level. Although the scores will not be used for promotion purposes this year, parents and students need to be aware that their test performance will be used to set achievement expectations for the following year.
http://www.fcboe.org/index.php?opti...t-scoring-parameters&catid=103:press-releases
It is standard that defendants waive appeal when taking a deal. Even though they were already convicted, the judge was offering them a way out.....he just wanted them to accept responsibility.
If their lawyers convinced them they would win on appeal, that was probably an injustice. Winning appeals in not common at all. When the best lawyers try cases, fewer mistakes are made so the chance is even less.
I believe the defendants got caught in the hype of it all, with people marching and protesting and figured that shit would save them. It didn't.
I have never, ever ever seen a judge give that many chances...in 25 years as a trial lawyer. Most of the time once that jury is brought in....all deals are off. He sent every warning he could.
Not even close to the same thing. Capital punishment is not in the range of punishment for stealing a pen. I know you don't mean this literally, but the fact is that a defendant is made abundantly aware of the POSSIBLE rang of the punishment they are facing. Not that they will get it, but it IS possible.
Enough with the 20 years already. It was on the table because that is the POSSIBLE range. If you have already agreed that the racketeering statute was designed for 'mob' type activities, then it was on the table because some 'mob' type activities deserve 20 years.
There are also crimes that fall within racketeering that don't deserve 20 years, that is why there is a minimum punishment as well, for example:
Probation was also on the table.
So instead of screaming about 20, talk about what they actually got:
* Donald Bullock:
Witnesses testified that Bullock urged them to change test answers, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution reported.
Five years probation,
six months of weekends behind bars, pay a $5,000 fine and perform 1,500 hours of community service.
* Angela Williamson, a former teacher:
2 years in prison. She was ordered to pay a $5,000 fine and perform 1,500 hours of community service.
* Pamela Cleveland, a former teacher:
1 year home confinement, pay a $1,000 fine and perform 1,000 hours of community service. "I am guilty of the charges against me," Cleveland said in court.
* Michael Pitts, a former schools executive, was a
ccused of telling teachers to cheat and then telling them not to talk to Georgia Bureau of Investigators who were looking into the scandal.
7 years in prison, perform 2,000 hours of community service and pay a $25,000 fine.
* Tamara Cotman, a former schools administrator:
7 years in prison, pay a $25,000 fine and perform 2000 hours of community service.
* Dana Evans, a former principal:
1 year and perform 1,000 hours of community service.
*Tabeeka Jordan, former assistant principal:
2 years in prison, perform 1,500 hours of community service and pay $5,000 fine
* Theresia Copeland, a former test coordinator:
1 year in prison, perform 1,000 hours of community service and pay a $1,000 fine.
* Diane Buckner-Webb, a former teacher:
1 year in prison, perform 1,000 hours of community service and pay a $1,000 fine.