10 Reasons Why Apple, Not AT&T, Is to Blame for iPhone Flaws
1. Apple entered into an exclusive contract
It's easy to talk about AT&T as if it's a company that doesn't understand the desires of the user, but it was Apple that decided to enter into an exclusive agreement with the carrier. I'm willing to bet that any carrier would have been happy to offer the iPhone. Apple could have brought it to multiple networks. But AT&T gave Apple a sweetheart deal that Steve Jobs couldn't decline. Since then, we've been forced to deal with AT&T's poor network.
Apple approached multiple networks and even considered leasing bandwidth and becoming their own carrier. You have to remember a lot of the features that are so common on Smartphones these days were nonexistent prior to the iPhone. Their implementation required a lot of SECRECY, R&D, and CONTROL on Apple's part to get it right. All the carriers except AT&T turned Apple down (INCLUDING VERIZON).
2. Apple sets App Store policy
Although AT&T has asked Apple to institute some rules for the company's App Store, it's Apple that has set its App Store policy, not AT&T. So when neat apps get rejected from the store or useless apps make their way into the marketplace, it's Apple's fault. And it's important not to forget that.
The numbers speak for themself. Every other carrier is putting out their own App Stores and they arent reaching not even half the success Apple has made IN ITS FIRST YEAR. This argument is bullshit. And keep in mind its also Apple's fault when GREAT Apps and USEFUL Apps make it to the App Store (which greatly outweigh the shitty ones). Giving AT&T control in this matter would be insane. They are having enough problems with their own fucking network. I can only imagine the endless amounts of fail that would occur if you gave AT&T any type of responsibility in the App Store...
3. The company has never played well with developers
Apple has a long history of having problems with developers. With Mac OS X, Apple still limits third-party involvement, citing concerns over the stability and security of its operating system. That may sound like a prudent policy, but let's face it; the more third-party apps, the richer the experience. Considering third-party developers continue to gripe over the iPhone, should we really blame any other company but Apple for it? I don't think so.
LOL. This dude obviously does not know what he's talking about. OSX is not an open source OS, hence no 3rd party involvement (same with Windows). The only gripes SOME developers have with OSX is that Apple is migrating to more modern API's which means developers who based their Apps on older technology need to, in some cases, rewrite/recompile their apps for them to work on the latest version of OSX. In regards to the iPhone, the App Store approval process is the only issue, and thats mainly related to feedback from Apple during the approval process or rejections (however this area has greatly improved on Apple's part in comparison to how it was initially).
4. Apple makes hardware decisions
Those that wish the iPhone had a physical keyboard can't blame AT&T for that. Those that wanted a camcorder prior to the iPhone 3G S' launch couldn't take AT&T to task. When it comes to hardware problems, it's Apple that deserves to bear the brunt of those criticisms. The company is in full control over the design of the iPhone.
Yet, it still outsells all of its competitors who offer such features. The hardware decisions are based on the cost, performance, and experience provided by the phone. You run a video recording app on the 3G and you'll understand exactly why Apple left the feature out for the next gen hardware revision. If Apple shouldnt be in control of the design of the phone, who should be? AT&T? Fuck outta here. When it comes to design, any other company would beg to have Apple in control. This is by no means a negative...
5. Apple makes software decisions
The same can be said for Apple's software. When users begged for copy and paste, it wasn't AT&T that held it up, it was Apple. The iPhone is littered with software quirks that need to be improved. But that won't happen until Apple decides to update the software with those improvements. No other company can do it.
During the time copy & paste didnt exist, there were multiple companies who offered alternatives. Yet it required participation from other developers for it to take off. Nobody participated, so you had to wait on Apple to get it to work. When Apple was able to pull it off in a simple, easy to use, and secure way... They provided it for FREE along with multiple other features and even new default apps.
6. At any point, Apple can work with other carriers
Let's not forget that there are several other wireless carriers competing against AT&T that would welcome the iPhone. There are also millions of Verizon Wireless subscribers, Sprint subscribers and T-Mobile subscribers that would love the opportunity to use the iPhone. And many AT&T users want to switch. So instead of blaming AT&T for not being able to compete with Verizon Wireless, maybe we should blame Apple for not bringing the iPhone to other carriers
Sure, if Apple wants to get sued. They are in an exclusive contract with AT&T idiot. If you look outside of the US, Apple is working with multiple carriers all over the world and is doing very well.
7. It's Apple's iPhone
In the end, it's important to remember that the iPhone is Apple's product. The device isn't owned by AT&T and it hasn't been modified by the competition. Any issues users may have should be directed to Steve Jobs and Company.
Any negatives should definitely be directed at Apple, just like the positives should be credited to them as well. However, the network issues seem to only happen on AT&T. The iPhone is offered by numerous carriers outside the United States and you dont hear of these issues. Even the people with jailbroken iPhones arent reporting these problems...
8. Steve Jobs isn't infallible
Speaking of Steve Jobs, he isn't infallible. He doesn't always make the best decisions. And in the moments when his decisions impact users, it's too easy to point fingers at AT&T or other companies. If Steve Jobs makes a poor decision, it should be recognized for what it is. And blame should be placed where it belongs: on his shoulders.
Youre gonna include "IF Steve Jobs makes a poor decision" in this list??? Seriously? This can be said about any company. If "ENTER YOUR CEO HERE" makes a poor decision. This was a stupid argument and should have been left out.
9. Apple knew what it was getting with AT&T
When the iPhone hit store shelves in 2007, it was no secret that AT&T wasn't the best carrier in the market. Coverage was a little suspect, 3G data was practically nonexistent. Regardless, Apple decided to form an exclusive partnership with AT&T that, two years removed, has caused many users to wish for an iPhone on other networks.
AT&T was the only carrier willing to jump on board. And Apple in their highest expectations, were hoping to sell 10 million phones. Nobody had any idea how big of a hit the iPhone was gonna be.. HENCE the network issues...
10. Would Verizon make the problems go away?
As we consider where the blame for iPhone flaws can be placed, we need to determine if those flaws will be gone if the iPhone was made available on Verizon Wireless' network, rather than AT&T's. It's a hard sell. A network can't change Apple's App Store policies. A new carrier can't improve the virtual keyboard. A new provider can't even deliver the features iPhone owners are waiting for. We need to keep that in mind. It's easy to blame AT&T. Maybe it's time to point some fingers at Apple too.
Sound like this guy should just get a Pre and shut the fuck up. Moving to a new carrier who is now fully aware of the potential bandwidth usage an iPhone customer base can have... will definately be an improvement. Why? Because they can prepare, and take the necessary steps to avoid the problems AT&T is having.