<font size="5"><center>
Escaped Ex-Panther Assata Shakur
Still Being Convicted in Print by New York Media</font size></center>
BlackAmericaWeb.com,
By: Gregory Kane
Date: Wednesday, February 21, 2007
,
Media folks are doing it to Assata Shakur again.
This time around, it’s the editors and reporters at the New York Daily News, who, if I recall Shakur’s autobiography correctly, are primarily the ones who did it to her the first time.
In the early 1970s, Shakur -- formerly known as Joanne Chesimard -- was a member of the New York chapter of the Black Panther Party. She left as a result of that beef between Huey P. Newton, co-founder of the party and its minister of defense, and Eldridge Cleaver, who was the party’s minister of information.
What Shakur did after that is in dispute. Some former Panthers who were members of what has been called the “Cleaver faction” of the BPP are reputed to have formed a loose-knit organization called the Black Liberation Army. After a series of robberies and cop shootings that were linked to the BLA, Shakur’s picture popped up in several newspapers above stories that labeled her the “queen of the BLA.”
Shakur says in her autobiography, “Assata,” that she first learned of her link to the robberies and shootings from newspapers. According to her version of events, she was forced to go underground.
In May of 1973, Shakur was in a car with Zayd Shakur (no relation to her) and Sundiata Acoli when New Jersey state troopers stopped them on the New Jersey Turnpike. A shootout ensued. When the bullets stopped and the smoke cleared, Zayd Shakur and trooper Werner Foerster were dead. Assata Shakur was wounded and one of her arms partially paralyzed.
No one knows who fired the first shots in that incident, least of all reporters and editors at the New York Daily News. But that hasn’t stopped them from calling Assata Shakur a “cop killer.” She was convicted of Foerster’s (and Zayd Shakur’s) murder in 1977. She escaped from the Clinton Correctional Facility in New Jersey two years later and surfaced in Cuba sometime later. She still lives on the Caribbean island.
Last December, Shakur’s name was in the news again, after her name was removed from a room at a student center on the City College of New York’s campus. Shakur was a CCNY student when she was a member of the Black Panther Party. In news stories about the controversy, editors and reporters at the New York Daily News were up to their old tricks.
One story -- written by columnist Michael Daly with the headline, “The Monsignor and the Militant” -- violated one of the most cherished principles of good journalism: The one that says reporters and editors aren’t supposed to convict defendants in the media.
In Daly’s story, a Msgr. John Powis claims -- over 30 years after the fact, mind you -- that the picture of Shakur in the New York Daily News from December of 2006 is a photo of the woman who robbed him in the early 1970s.
“When I saw the Daily News today,” Daly quotes Powis, “I said, ‘My God, it looks just like her.'”
Nowhere in Daly’s story does it even hint that eyewitness identifications like the one Powis made have been proven highly unreliable. Nowhere does it suggest that such identifications are even more unreliable as time passes. And nowhere does Daly point out that eyewitness identifications across racial lines -- Powis is white -- are the most unreliable of all.
Skeptical readers who know the pitfalls of eyewitness idenfication and who have access to a computer may have done a Lexis Nexis search and come across these information abstracts from The New York Times, both from 1977.
“Neurosurgeon Dr. Arthur Turner Davidson, testifying at Joanne Chesimard murder trial, says defendant would have had to have both hands raised over her head when wounded by state trooper during May ’73 shootout,” the first one reads.
The second one simply says “Dr. David Spain, testifying at Joanne Chesimard murder trial, says exam of defendant’s bullet scars and X-ray reports support claim that she was shot by trooper as her arms were raised.”
None of this information is in Daly’s column. The fact that both pieces of information come from The New York Times information abstracts and not the New York Daily News bolsters Shakur’s claim that some media outlets had convicted her in the press before she even went to trial.
In Daly’s case, he convicted Shakur of a crime for which she hadn’t even been charged, much less convicted. That’s called reckless journalism, if it can be called journalism at all.
I didn’t get to interview Shakur when I was in Cuba last week. I was dying to know what her reaction was to Daly’s column and the continuing vendetta the editors of the New York Daily News have against her.
But I think I already know what her reaction would be.
http://www.blackamericaweb.com/site.aspx/sayitloud/kane222