Arum on Drug Testing, Peterson and Berto Positive Cases

Alaskanredman

Star
Registered
During a conference call to promote the upcoming fight between Manny Pacquiao and Timothy Bradley, Top Rank's CEO Bob Arum, in response to a question, gave his opinion on recent wave of positive drug tests that have killed two major rematches in Andre Berto-Victor Ortiz II and Lamont Peterson vs. Amir Khan II.

Both Berto and Peterson requested Voluntary Anti-Doping Association (VADA) testing and both men tested positive for different substances. Berto tested positive for ultra-traces of nandrolone, a powerful yet outdated PED. Peterson tested positive for synthetic testosterone which he claims was due to a testosterone pellet he was injected with by Dr. John A. Thompson of the Desert Oasis Clinic in Las Vegas, NV.

While the Peterson-Khan II fight was called off, costing Golden Boy Promotions an estimated one million dollars, the Ortiz card was saved and will go on as planned, only with Ortiz facing Josesito Lopez.

Arum's company has yet to participate in drug testing beyond the limited parameters of the local commissions. Golden Boy Promotions has now promoted 7 cards with extra testing.

“My position is, is that unless everyone sits down and works this out without rhetoric we will have chaos,” stated Arum. “Personally, I don’t believe Lamont Peterson is a cheater. I don’t think Andre Berto is a cheater. I think that with this sophisticated testing they got caught up in positive tests which doesn’t to me indicate to me the existence of performance enhancing drugs. We have to hear out Lamont Peterson and get his story and we have to hear out Andre Berto and get his story before we jump to conclusions."

“Secondly,” Arum continued. “I don’t believe that anybody would say Peterson had any advantage over Khan or that Berto got any advantage over Victor Ortiz based on the stuff that was found or allegedly found in their urine samples.

Arum is wrong here. While it is true both men deserve to have their cases heard, Peterson was caught with a drug named synthetic testosterone. It is categorically a performance enhancer. It helps with recovery, speed, and strength. In his positive samples, Peterson’s T/E ratio (testosterone to epitestosterone) was found to be 3.77:1. The average is 1:1. Just an opinion, but if Peterson or any boxer’s T/E ratio is nearly four times the limit and the other fighter is 1:1, that’s a distinct performance advantage.

As for Berto, it is true that he had such trace amounts [low] in his system, it is likely he took a supplement that was tainted somehow.

“That being the case, why were those fights called off?” asked Arum? “Why not determine after the fight, if that is what they found, that there performance wouldn’t be enhanced, why not let the fight go on? Maybe fine them for being careless, using certain vitamins that have a trace of steroids. Because you know, if you buy vitamins from the wrong manufacturer who illegally manufactures steroids and some gets on the equipment and gets on the vitamins, it taints the vitamins. That’s not going to enhance performance but it’s enough to come up on a test.”

Arum is correct that nandrolone contamination can occur in that fashion. And perhaps the sport does need to address how to handle positive tests and their results in a fashion quick enough to keep major fights going if no malfeasance on the part of the fighter is determined in time. But boxing is not there yet. Peterson and Berto are the growing pains of a sport that badly needs to be cleaned up.

“So I think that everybody who doesn’t know about this, including myself, should shut the hell up until there is an exploration of what the issues are, what’s happening, and then we can better determine how we can go ahead in the future,” said Arum

In the meantime, while promoters and politicians sit still and wonder about testing, it’s protocols and how to keep from losing money on fighters who test positive for banned substances, everyone should get out of the way and let the drug testers do their work. Just an opinion.

http://www.boxingscene.com/arum-on-drug-testing-peterson-berto-positive-cases--53144
 
Arum: Contingency Plan Necessary With Random Testing

Top Rank's CEO Bob Arum spoke in further detail, exclusively with BoxingScene.com, regarding the recent controversies to hit boxing, with two of the sport's well respected athletes involving themselves in random drug testing protocols - and then testing positive for banned substances.

In the last few weeks, two highly anticipated rematches - Amir Khan vs. Lamont Peterson and Andre Berto vs. Victor Ortiz - were canceled when Peterson and Berto tested positive for banned substances. VADA [Voluntary Anti-Drug Administration] administered the random drug tests for both events.

Berto tested positive for ultra-traces of nandrolone, Peterson tested positive for synthetic testosterone which he claims was due to a testosterone pellet he was injected with by Dr. John A. Thompson of the Desert Oasis Clinic in Las Vegas.

Arum feels a contingency plan should have been in place to deal with the possibility of a boxer testing positive. If companies like VADA and/or USADA are used, there should be a contingency plan between the promoter, the drug testing organization and the local commission, says Arum.

"You are dealing with athletes who have a limited life. It's not like you're dealing with people who can be productive until they are 80 or 85 and have a long career. Athletes have a limited number of years to practice their trade," Arum told BoxingScene.com.

Peterson has alleged that his doctor misinformed him with respect to the testosterone procedure. While Peterson failed a random drug which he took in March, he passed the following tests which were given in April. In Berto's case, the trace of nandrolone was so minor that it heavily points to Berto taking a contaminated supplement, and not in the direction of intentional use of a performance enhancing substance. Arum feels the rematches should have been allowed to go forward, and then the issues should have been dealt with in the aftermath.

"The way I was brought up, you protect first the individual. In Lamont's case, first he could have got a therapeutic use exemption from the Washington commission in two seconds [for the first Khan fight]. [Peterson's manager] Barry Hunter had never heard of that, so he didn't do it. Technical problems. But at the time he was tested [in April], there was no advantage at all with fighting Amir Khan [in the rematch]. They should have let that fight go on and then explore the issues in a logical way afterwards," Arum said.

"And certainly in Berto s case, where there is a trace amount of a steroid that is no longer used by anybody...a trace amount and there is no evidence that it would enhance his performance - you let the fight go on and then bring back everybody and discuss what happened, etc. But you don't f*** with the lives of the athletes."

"I think in boxing, everything exists for a good, fair fight to happen. And that should be the primary determination and everything should blow from that. Again, there is no proof or evidence that when Peterson had tested positive for something that he had taken months before, [that it would have enhanced his performance in the rematch]. And the statement he made, the doctor told him it wasn't steroids, it wasn't testosterone.......something where he could have gotten a therapeutic use exemption, certainly more reason to give him that than the mixed martial arts guy [the Nevada State Athletic Commssion] just gave a therapeutic use exemption, who shoots up twice a week."

"What should have been done, they should have let the fights go on and then bring them in and explore the whole situation. Berto at worst, at worst, in making the mistake...apparently of going and buying vitamins which were not up to standard should get a slap on the wrist and then a fine. If those are the facts. Lamont Peterson, at worst, should get a fine. But they should have been allowed to fight."

http://www.boxingscene.com/arum-contingency-plan-necessary-with-random-testing--53148
 
So far both cases involved gbp fighters. Both fighters have somewhat suspect shit involved with their results. Interesting stuff. Neither fighter caught are household names. So I am interested how this is all handled.
 
So far both cases involved gbp fighters. Both fighters have somewhat suspect shit involved with their results. Interesting stuff. Neither fighter caught are household names. So I am interested how this is all handled.

More telling is that it involved fighters taking random testing. If these two guys, who asked for the testing, came up dirty (under seemingly different circumstances) how many other fighters are just like them?
 
More telling is that it involved fighters taking random testing. If these two guys, who asked for the testing, came up dirty (under seemingly different circumstances) how many other fighters are just like them?

That's the avoided point.

Sent from my T-Mobile G2 using Tapatalk 2
 
Back
Top