Arab world deeply split over Hezbollah

QueEx

Rising Star
Super Moderator
<font size="5"><center>Arab world deeply split over Hezbollah</font size></center>

SALAH NASRAWI
Associated Press
July 21, 2006

CAIRO, Egypt - The fighting between Israel and Hezbollah exposed divisions across the Arab world, not only between Shiites and Sunnis but also between Arab governments and their citizens.

Key Arab allies of the United States, predominantly Sunni countries such as Saudi Arabia, Jordan and Egypt, fear the rising power of Shiites in the region: Hezbollah militants who virtually control southern Lebanon, Iraq's majority Shiite government, and - most worrisome - the Shiite theocracy that has run Iran for decades.

Yet many ordinary people, Sunnis as well as Shiites, are cheering the Lebanese guerrillas because of their willingness to stand up to Israel.

Sitting in the shade as he sold figs in downtown Cairo, Hasan Salem Hasan, a 25-year-old Sunni, summed up a prevailing attitude of the so-called Arab street: "Although Hezbollah is a Shiite party, we are all Muslims, and all Arabs will defiantly support them and fight the Jews."

On the one hand, predominantly Sunni Arab states are tacitly encouraging the destruction of Hezbollah, concerned it could stage attacks and create militant cells outside of Lebanon. There is also fear that militant Sunnis could join with Hezbollah - as the Palestinian militant group Hamas has done - to build a super terrorist network.

"Whenever there is a paramount cause which can bring them together, such as a jihad against the Zionists, they will be united," Gamal Sultan, editor of the Cairo-based Islamic monthly Al Mannar Al Jadid, said of the Sunni and Shiite militants.

Yet on the other hand, Arab governments also fear their own populations will turn on them if they look weak and unable to challenge Israeli aggression against a fellow Arab state.

Saudi Arabia - the bulwark of the Sunni Arab world - has tried to balance both concerns, criticizing Iran and Hezbollah for provoking Israel but also condemning the Jewish state. Israel started bombing south Lebanon, Hezbollah's base, after the guerrillas kidnapped two Israeli soldiers July 12.

The Saudi foreign minister, Saudi Al Faisal, on Tuesday blasted what he called "non-Arab intervention in the Arab world" - a clear reference to Iran, Hezbollah's main backer along with Syria.

Saudi media were even more outspoken.

"We are facing a fierce Iranian offensive against the region. We see that clearly in Iraq where Iran is becoming the major player and in Lebanon through its agent, Hezbollah," columnist Mishari Al Thaydi wrote in the Saudi-owned London-based Asharq Al Awsat newspaper.

Yet on Thursday, Saudi Crown Prince Sultan Bin Abdulaziz Al-Saud lashed out at Israel for its punishing airstrikes.

"We cannot tolerate Israel's playing with the lives of citizens, civilians, women, the elderly and children," he said after meeting with French President Jacques Chirac in Paris.

Other Sunni Arab leaders fear that growing Shiite power in Lebanon and Iraq will awaken Shiite minorities at home.

In April, Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak angered Shiite leaders by saying Shiites across the Middle East were more loyal to Iran than to their own countries.

Former Jordanian information minister Saleh al-Qalab has described Hezbollah as an Iranian "land mine" in the Arab world. And Jordan's King Abdullah II warned of a Shiite crescent forming in the region.

Some blame Washington's Middle East policies for upsetting the region's sectarian balance.

"The whole problem started with the American invasion of Iraq with the cooperation of Shiites," said Mamdouh Ismail, an Islamic activist and lawyer who defends Muslim militants in Egyptian courts. "This will certainly resonate throughout the whole region, in the Gulf ... in Saudi Arabia," he added.

Yet events in Lebanon have further mobilized the Shiites across the Muslim world and, if Hezbollah survives the current Israeli onslaught, the sect stands to become even stronger.

In Iraq, the Hezbollah-Israel conflict has proved a rallying point for Sunnis and Shiites otherwise riven by sectarian violence.

On Thursday, Iraqis staged an anti-Israel protest with banners reading "Shiites and Sunnis unite" in the city of Samarra, where the bombing of a Shiite shrine in February brought the country to the brink of civil war.

Earlier this week, about 4,000 Iraqis answered the call of Shiite clerics to rally in the holy city of Karbala in protest of Israeli attacks, raising Iraqi and Lebanese flags.

In Iraq on Friday, radical Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr urged Sunnis and Shiites to unite so Muslims could defeat Israel - even without weapons. He predicted the Jewish state would collapse just as the World Trade Center did in the Sept. 11 attacks.

"We promise you all that we will not forget our people in Lebanon despite our suffering from the American occupation. I will continue defending my Shiite and Sunni brothers and I tell them that if we unite, we will defeat Israel without the use of weapons," he said.

"I want to remind you of a very important thing. The collapse of the World Trade Center towers in America" was almost five years ago, al-Sadr said. "The same way America's idol collapsed, another idol will fall, and it is called Israel."

Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki - a Shiite - also condemned the Israeli destruction of Lebanon's infrastructure.

"I call on the Arab League foreign ministers meeting in Cairo to take quick action to stop these aggressions. We call on the world to take quick stands to stop the Israeli aggression," he said.

On Tuesday, thousands of Shiites demonstrated in the Gulf kingdom of Bahrain in support of Hezbollah, two days after some 300 prominent Saudi Shiites wrote to the Bahraini government urging support to the Lebanese Shiite group.

Both moves were seen as an assertion of increasing Shiite solidarity across the Arab world.

Adding to the Shiite power base, the sect's faithful share a coherent religious view. Since splitting from their Sunni brethren in the 7th century over who should replace the Prophet Muhammad as Muslim ruler, they have developed distinct concepts of Islamic law and practices.

Shiites account for some 160 million of the Islamic world's population of 1.3 billion people. Shiites account about 90 percent of Iran's population, more than 60 percent of Iraq's, and some 50 percent of the people living in the arc of territory from Lebanon to India.

http://www.thestate.com/mld/thestate/news/nation/15093100.htm
 

QueEx

Rising Star
Super Moderator
<font size="5"><center>Saudi sheik issues fatwa against Hezbollah</font size></center>

United Press International (UPI)
Jul. 21, 2006 at 7:37AM

Saudi Arabian Wahhabi Sheik Abdullah bin Jabreen has declared it illegal for Muslims to join, support, or pray for militant group Hezbollah.

Jabreen declared a fatwa against the group for its actions against Israel, revealing a divide among Sunni Muslims over the issue of the Israel-Hezbollah conflict, the New York Sun reported Friday.

The Wahhabi sects have largely come out against Hezbollah's actions in the region but some Sunni fundamentalist groups, including the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood, have pledged support for the Shiite militant group. The brotherhood was planning a rally Friday to support the militants at Cairo's Al-Azhar mosque.

Sheik Hamid al-Ali, in Kuwait, issued a statement July 13, the day after two Israeli soldiers were abducted by Hezbollah, condemning the organization's actions and describing the conflict as a result of Iran's imperialistic ambitions in Israel.

The governments of Egypt, Jordan and Saudi Arabia have also condemned the actions of Hezbollah.

http://www.washtimes.com/upi/20060721-072851-1816r.htm
 

nittie

Star
Registered
The Arab world should be pissed at Hezbollah. If Hezbollah succeeds at repelling Israel their natural enemy Al Qeada will start making moves in Lebanon, that means a all out civil war in the region at a time when it is just beginning to see dividends from going Democratic or more importantly Capitalistic.
 

mc2

Rising Star
Registered
Israel is the real terrorists in this situation. They have destroyed numerous civilian targets in Lebanon causing a humanitarian crisis for the people. I am ashamed that the US government continues to back Israel.

The correct response would have been to send a team of commandos to get their soldiers back, not destroy Lebanon......

Fuck Israel
 

VegasGuy

Star
OG Investor
What it seems to me about the silence from the arab street is they are watching those who are supporting Humas and the shit they are doing. Namely Iran and Syria. If Humas succeeds in dominating that part of the world, what is to stop them from attacking them. They don't know what to do at this point.

-VG
 

QueEx

Rising Star
Super Moderator
<font size="4">
Some interesting excerpts from an AP news story (url below) which leave me
more convinced that Hezbollah started this conflict, intentionally. These simple comments from Hezbollah leader Sheik Hassan Nasrallah, to me at least, paint an interesting picture:

"I don't want to raise expectations. I never said that the Israelis cannot reach any place in southern Lebanon," ... "Our dogma and strategy is when the Israelis come, they must pay a high price. This is what we promise and this is what we will achieve, God willing." "We love martyrdom," he said on Friday. "But we take precautions to deny the enemy an easy victory."​

In other words, while he would like for Hezbollah to rip the Israelis a new one, he realizes that might not happen and has established a Hezbollah WIN as <u>just facing off with the Isrealis</u>. Since it doesn't appear that the Isrealis were concerned with taking Hezbollah on until the kidnapping & killings and the subsequent rocket volleys into Isreal, Hezbollah gave Israel an invitation. An invitation to what? - whatever fight that ensued, since any fight at all to Hezbollah <u>makes them a winner</u>, damn the outcome, so long as they aren't wiped out and Israel takes losses, the more losses the better. And, any Muslim that takes Isreal on, perhaps, regardless of the result -- is damn near crowned "SMH" Super Muslim Hero, or, Shaking My Head -- because this mofo knew that many Lebanese civilians would die in his self-manufactured war.
</font size>

http://apnews1.iwon.com//article/20060723/D8J1D7KG2.html?PG=home&SEC=news
 
Last edited:

VegasGuy

Star
OG Investor
But if you watch the stories coming out on the local media you'd swear Israel's fault. But this is what happens when you kiss a terrorists ass. Hezbollah was able to form a political party and now run everything. Now they wage war against Israel.

-VG
 

African Herbsman

Star
Registered
Arab support for Hezbollah growing

By DAVID RISING, Associated Press Writer Sat Jul 29, 4:48 PM ET

CAIRO, Egypt - A top Egyptian cleric issued an edict Saturday defending Hezbollah's fight against
Israel, as Arab support for the militant group grew around the region.
ADVERTISEMENT

In widely published comments, Grand Mufti Ali Gomaa described Hezbollah strikes on Israel as "defense of its country and not terrorism," a position many saw as contradicting his country's official position.

"We are all against what is going on in Lebanon," Gomaa said, describing the Israeli attack on Lebanon and the killings of civilians as an "injustice."

The grand mufti issues religious edicts that are binding for Sunni Muslims in Egypt.

Around the Arab world, popular support for the Lebanese people and Hezbollah continued to expand as newspapers and television stations showed graphic images of civilian casualties.

Qatar-based Sheik Youssef el-Qaradawi, one of the Arab world's most prominent Sunni religious scholars, issued a religious edict Thursday saying support for the guerrillas was "a religious duty of every Muslim."

At least 458 Lebanese have been killed in the fighting that broke out after Hezbollah kidnapped two Israeli soldiers and killed eight others July 12 after a cross-border raid. Most casualties have been civilians, and some estimates range as high as 600 dead.

Thirty-three Israeli soldiers have died in the fighting, and Hezbollah rocket attacks on northern Israel have killed 19 civilians, the Israeli army said.

In Kuwait's Al-Qabas daily, columnist Abdel al-Tukhaim wrote that while he was not a "Hezbollah supporter," he now admired the group following the "destructive punishment" Israel dealt Lebanon because of "two soldiers who could have died in a traffic accident."

"In three major wars with Israel ... no Arab country was able to hit deep into Israel or hurt it the way Hezbollah, or the Lebanese resistance did," al-Tukhaim wrote. "They broke the psychological barrier our armies and regimes had and proved to us that the third strongest army in the world was a myth."

The Cairo-based daily al Ahrar commended Hezbollah on its fighting in the towns of Bint Jbail and Maroun al-Ras, sites of some of the fiercest battles since the conflict began.

"Hezbollah fighters have proved what their leader Hassan Nasrallah has already promised that losing a battle doesn't mean losing the war, and that there are other surprises awaiting Israel," the newspaper said.

Meanwhile, political analyst Ayed al-Mannah wrote in Kuwait's Al-Watan daily that Hezbollah "deserves more Arab and Muslim admiration for standing up to the most mighty regional power in the Middle East."

He said Hezbollah and Hamas have proven to be stronger than the Lebanese and Palestinian governments.

"I wonder: Wouldn't it be better for a weak or impotent government to give up its legal rights in favor of those who are more capable of running the country and providing security and justice to the people?" al-Mannah wrote.

Four Dubai-owned television stations said a Friday telethon had raised $13.4 million for the Lebanese people, some 750,000 of whom have been left homeless since fighting broke out.

During the telethon, Jordan's Queen Rania told the Lebanese people: "Your children are our children. Your wounds are our wounds. Your house is our house."

Egyptian President
Hosni Mubarak said in remarks released Friday that Israel's response was "disproportionate, to say the least," though he also has criticized Hezbollah for triggering the crisis.
 

Makkonnen

The Quizatz Haderach
BGOL Investor
looks like everyone forgot why hezbollah acted when it did- one word Gaza

10 yrs ago 100 civilians were killed by Israel in Qana, but I'm sure that stuff like that had nothing to do with Hezbollah's existence, support or attacks. Shebaa Farms doesn't exist anymore either I guess.

The Arab world isn't deeply split. Arab news media might be depending on who funds them but the people aren't.


http://linktv.org/mosaic/streamsArchive/index.php4

^^^^^its worth more than bullshit whitewashed american propaganda

I remember when the news used to try to be objective here in the US.
 

QueEx

Rising Star
Super Moderator
<font size="5"><center>Sunnis Urged to Put Anti-Israel
Campaign Above Rift With Shi'ites</font size></center>


Patrick Goodenough
International Editor

(CNSNews.com) - Sunni Muslims around the world are being pressed to take sides in a dispute among scholars over whether a united Islamic front against Israel should take precedence over historical differences with Shi'ites.

The debate is raging in newspaper columns and on Internet sites, with proponents of both positions citing religious edicts (fatwas), scholars' appeals, and Koranic injunctions to bolster their arguments.

Rancor between Sunnis and Shi'ites, whose schism stems from differences over the rightful successor to Mohammed, has existed for centuries and continues to cause bloodshed in Iraq.

Most Arab countries have Sunni majorities - exceptions include Iraq and Bahrain -- but among Lebanon's collection of minorities, Shi'ites are thought to be the biggest. The Hizballah terrorist organization now at war with Israel is a Shi'ite organization, sponsored by predominantly Shi'ite Iran, as well as by Syria, whose ruling elite are Allawites, an offshoot of Shi'a Islam.

In Saudi Arabia, some top Islamist clerics have ruled that Sunnis should not back Hizballah. Most prominent of these in recent days has been Sheikh Safar al-Hawali, who posted a fatwa online saying that Hizballah (the name means "Army of Allah") is in fact the "army of the devil" and imploring Sunnis: "Don't pray for Hizballah."

Hawali, a scholar formerly at Umm Al-Qura University, was a signatory of a Nov. 2004 communique by 26 Saudi clerics calling for jihad against U.S. forces in Iraq.

Another fatwa circulating on the Internet rejects support for Hizballah. Issued several years ago by another Saudi Islamist cleric, Abdullah bin Jibreen, it declares that Sunnis should not support Hizballah or pray for its victory.

(Bin Jibreen used the derogatory term "rafidi," a word based on the Arabic root for "to reject" or "to abandon," and used by Sunnis who regard Shi'a Islam as heresy.)

Jibreen, who at the time was a member of the Saudi government-appointed Council of Senior Scholars, also issued a decree in 1991 ruling that Shi'ites are "idolaters deserving to be killed."

These calls for Muslims not to support Hizballah have upset many other Sunni religious figures, who believe the jihad against Israel is more important than splits among Muslims.

Sheikh Rashid al-Ghanoushi, the exiled leader of a banned Islamist movement in Tunisia, said those issuing the anti-Hizballah fatwas should be ashamed of themselves for doing so "while the nation is under attack and both Palestinian and Lebanese people are facing genocide."

Influential Egyptian cleric Yusuf al-Qaradawi urged all Muslims to support Hizballah against "the enemy," telling the al-Jazeera television network that sectarianism "hurt the resistance."

The publishers of Islam Online, a website affiliated with Qaradawi, said this was a time for solidarity and unity among Muslims.

"Unfortunately, some Muslims do not share this spirit. 'Why should we help Hizballah when they are not Sunni Muslims?' they wonder. Some prohibit any form of cooperation or support to the Lebanese resistance; they even prohibit du'aa [prayer].

"This is a serious issue indeed. The last things we need in this critical situation are disruption and disunity," said Islam Online.

"True, differences do exist between Sunnis and Shi'ites, but these differences do not exclude the Shi'ites from the fold of Islam, nor do they excuse forsaking them in their struggle against the Israeli aggression."
'Close ranks'

The biggest response to the anti-Hizballah fatwas came from a group of 169 Sunni scholars from Muslim nations stretching from Bosnia to Indonesia, including 28 Saudis, who issued a statement at the weekend trying to undo what they saw as damage to Islamic unity.

Published by Egypt's Muslim Brotherhood on Monday and punctuated with verses from the Koran, the statement called on all Arabs and Muslims to "offer all material and moral support" to the Lebanese and Palestinians, "giving this duty the top priority over all religious duties."

In a clear reference to the Sunni-Shi'ite division, the signatories urged "all of the [Islamic] nation's sects to close ranks in confrontation of its enemy who seeks to eliminate us."

It should not allow the sectarian violence in Iraq to spill over into other places, they said.

"When the nation is at war, we must be fully aware that sectarian feuds can exhaust our strength which opens the door wide for the enemy to impose its hegemony on us."

The scholars also called on Arab and Muslim governments to abandon delusions of peace with Israel.

"We must abide by the fatwa issued by the Muslim scholars who prohibit the recognition of the Zionist state, normalization of relations with it or giving up any inch of the Palestinian land. We should believe in the fact that this criminal enemy does not recognize the rights of others except under the pressures of jihad and resistance."

The scholars also said all Arab and Muslim government should base their relations with other nations, especially the United States, on those countries' stances towards "our issues, topped by Palestine."

'Not terrorism'

In the early days of the latest Israeli-Hizballah conflict, the governments of Jordan, Egypt and Saudi Arabia cautiously criticized the Lebanese group for its "adventurism" which triggered the fighting.

The comments were widely reported, and have frequently been cited as significant by the U.S. State Department and allied governments.

Many Mideast analysts argued that the stance taken by the Sunni trio was driven largely by their concerns about Iran and the emergence of a "Shi'ite crescent" from Iran to Lebanon. Since those early days, the three governments' public criticism of Hizballah has largely been dropped.

The Saudis' weekly cabinet meeting Monday agreed to stand with the Lebanese and Palestinian people and called for a strong and united Arab stance against "Israeli aggression."

In Egypt, the government-appointed mufti, Ali Gomaa, has voiced strong backing for Hizballah.

"Hizballah is defending its country and what it is doing is not terrorism," the state news agency MENA quoted him as saying on Friday.

Asked in a Time magazine interview for his opinion of Hizballah, Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak said "nobody should be allowed to establish a state within a state" but softened his criticism by saying the organization was "part and parcel of the Lebanese people's fabric." He also did not censure Hizballah for triggering the crisis, but condemned Israel for a "disproportionate response."

Iraq has seen the worst violence between Sunnis and Shi'ites. The minority Sunni Ba'athists dominated and oppressed the Shi'ite majority until U.S.-led forces toppled Saddam Hussein in 2003.

The sectarian carnage there has been largely attributed to Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, the leader of al-Qaeda in Iraq who was killed last June.

Zarqawi labeled Iraqi Shi'ites "rafidi" and described them in one published letter as "a sect of treachery and betrayal throughout history and throughout the ages."

The targeting of Shi'ites prompted al-Qaeda second-in-command Ayman al-Zawahiri to send a letter to Zarqawi last October questioning the strategy.

Although "anyone with a knowledge of history" knew that Shi'ites were heretics and had a background of "cooperating with the enemies of Islam," al-Swahili said, many ordinary Muslims may not understand.

"Is the opening of another front now in addition to the front against the Americans and the government a wise decision?" he asked.

Last week, al-Zawahiri issued a videotape message urging all Muslims everywhere to join the jihad against Israel in Lebanon and Gaza.

http://www.crosswalk.com/news/1413984.html
 

GET YOU HOT

Superfly Moderator
BGOL Investor
nittie said:
The Arab world should be pissed at Hezbollah. If Hezbollah succeeds at repelling Israel their natural enemy Al Qeada will start making moves in Lebanon, that means a all out civil war in the region at a time when it is just beginning to see dividends from going Democratic or more importantly Capitalistic.

No,no no....
 

QueEx

Rising Star
Super Moderator
<font size="5"><center>Some in Iran skeptical of Hezbollah</font size>
<font size="4">They say Mideast conflict obscures problems at home</font size></center>

Boston Globe
By Anne Barnard
Globe Staff
July 25, 2006

TEHRAN -- Here in the capital that US officials blame for prodding Hezbollah to attack Israel, city-sponsored posters herald the Lebanese militants as heroes of resistance, and official newspapers portray the bloody Israeli-Lebanese conflict as one of Iran's biggest concerns.

A government think tank yesterday honored a Hezbollah leader as an ally against what it called the West's assault on Islam.

But those sentiments are far from unanimous in the Iranian capital. From the leafy streets of upscale northern Tehran to the poorer southern neighborhoods, a surprising number of young Iranians yesterday shrugged off the two-week old conflict, and Hezbollah's cause, as minor issues compared with inflation, unemployment, and confining social strictures.

``We're up to our ears in our own problems, so we don't care about this stuff," said Nina Kamarzarian, 21, sipping a banana frappe in a northern Tehran café and fretting about the drop in business at her printer repair shop.

``My government, they want to conceal their own problems," she said. ``All the time, they say, `Lebanon, Palestine, Arabs.' They want to conceal the fact that the majority of the people are dissatisfied."

In a scruffy park in southeastern Tehran, Sajad Saifi, 20, a temporary worker in a soda factory, said he hadn't been paid his $200 monthly salary since April. ``Whether Lebanon is on the map or not doesn't change my destiny," he said. ``It doesn't bring any cure for my pain."

Wearing a Hugo Boss knockoff belt and dark denim pants fashionably turned up at the cuffs, he added, ``Honestly, my concern is that if I walk hand in hand with a girl, I will be harassed and stopped by 20 police."

Many Iranians have responded with the fervor the government encourages, and people interviewed in Tehran universally expressed sympathy for Lebanese civilians injured and killed in the war. They differ, though, on whether supporting Hezbollah -- to the tune of at least $100 million annually, according to US estimates -- should be a priority for a country facing high unemployment, especially among the two-thirds of the population that is under 30.

Since Hezbollah launched a volley of rockets into northern Israel and captured two Israeli soldiers in a cross-border raid, sparking an Israeli barrage that has devastated Lebanese infrastructure and left more than 384 Lebanese and 40 Israelis dead, Iran has been at the center of the ensuing international crisis.

US and Israeli officials accuse Iran, which helped create Hezbollah to fight Israel's occupation of southern Lebanon in 1982, of supplying the Shi'ite Islamist militia with long-range missiles that have hit Israeli cities. They argue that Iran fomented the crisis to expand its power across the Middle East and distract international attention from its alleged nuclear weapons program.

Iran has denied any role in the current conflict while backing Hezbollah's demand for a prisoner exchange with Israel and proudly proclaiming that Hezbollah is a partner in checking US and Israeli power.

Iran, a mainly Shi'ite Muslim country that is heir to thousands of years of Persian culture, has long been a rival of the majority-Sunni Arab world. But since Shi'ite clerics overthrew the Shah in 1979 and established Islamic rule, Iran has also sought to export its revolution by supporting Arab Islamist militant groups like Hezbollah and the newly elected Palestinian ruling party, Hamas.

Pan-Islamic unity was on display yesterday at a government-sponsored think tank, where a tinny rendition of the anthem of the Islamic Republic of Iran kicked off a panel discussion grandly billed as a search for ways to counteract what it called ``Psychological Warfare Against the Islamic Resistance."

On a single podium at the Iranian president's Center for Strategic Studies sat representatives of Hezbollah, Hamas, Syria, and Iran, the foursome that the United States and Israel portray as the culprits behind rising Islamist militancy.

The panelists, joined by the Lebanese ambassador, described their groups and countries as the last ones willing to stand up to US efforts to dominate their region.

``The main issue is America, and Israel as a servant of America's goal of a new Middle East," said Hussein Safiadeen, Hezbollah's representative in Iran, declaring that the conflict would be ``the beginning of Israel's defeat."

``The region is silent," complained Syrian ambassador Hamid Hassan, referring to lukewarm support for Hezbollah from Sunni Arab states including Saudi Arabia and Egypt. ``Syria and Iran, we are the two big fortresses against these aggressions."

At the end of the discussion, a green-uniformed commander of Iran's Revolutionary Guards embraced Safiadeen and presented him with a 10-CD set of the Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini's greatest sayings.

Around the city, Iranians expressed a range of views that reflected a complex society facing internal debates about its place in the world, its goals, and the role of Islam.

Across town, Ali Shir Mohammed Ali, 19, selling religious cassettes, pins, and stickers at the Mahestan trading center, a middle-class mall, said Islam demands that Iranians take the lead in supporting Hezbollah.

``Everything that happens in the Middle East affects us," he said. ``If we did not take a leadership role in the Middle East, we would be attacked."

``Some Arabs call us Ajamis," he said, using a word that refers to Iran's Persian heritage. But making ethnic distinctions, he said, is ``ignorant. The Islamic identity is more important."

On the mall's lower floor, which years ago stocked almost exclusively religious paraphernalia but now hawks everything from clothing to electric fireplaces, Javad Karimi, 30, an air-conditioner repairman, said he was more concerned about business, which he pronounced ``terrible."

``I don't have anything to say about politics. We mind our own business," he said.

At the café in north Tehran, Nina Kamarzarian, in a black and silver headscarf that matched her hip-hop sneakers, called the government focus on Hezbollah and the push for nuclear power ``counterproductive. It encourages America to attack us."

Her friend Samin Rafaie, 18, who was drinking an iced latte and a hot chocolate, said she agreed that the government had made ``empty promises" to improve the economy, but disagreed on Hezbollah.

``The Lebanese and the Palestinians are oppressed people," she said. ``We should give them whatever we can afford."

At the park in the south, Sajad Saifi, the soda factory worker, said Iran's biggest problem is a widening gulf between rich and poor -- an economic gap that has forced him to work since he was 14, and a social gap that yawns between poor neighborhoods, where he said police hound men and women walking together, and rich ones, where social freedoms are more tolerated.

His friend Mohammed Navid, 19, said the government focused on Hezbollah ``for its own vested interests."

``Every president, every government says slogans and they come to nothing," he said. ``Of course I feel sorry for people who are killed. But at the end of the day, every country has its oppressed people."

http://www.boston.com/news/world/mi...5/some_in_iran_skeptical_of_hezbollah/?page=1
 

QueEx

Rising Star
Super Moderator
<font size="5"><center>Iran in position to worsen Shiite, Sunni discord</font size></center>

The State
By MARGARET COKER
Cox Newspapers

TEHRAN, Iran — They have been called “liars” and denounced as “the worst creatures under heaven.”

In the Middle East, one might assume that these epithets of hatred and hostility are meant for Israel.

The target of the abuse, however, has been Iran.

The venom characterizes an ancient rivalry: Arab Sunni Muslims vs. the Shiites of Iran — a rivalry that encapsulates sectarian differences as well as secular, national identity.

But now, the rise once again of Iran onto the world stage is changing the balance of the Sunni-Shiite divide.

Iran’s flaunting of its nuclear ambitions, criticism of the West and call for the death of the state of Israel is winning the admiration of Shiite minorities across the Sunni-dominated Middle East.

That Iranian Shiites aren’t Arabs and speak Farsi, not Arabic, doesn’t seem to matter. That they have traditionally hated one another doesn’t seem to matter.

In Afghanistan, Iraq and Lebanon, the rising strength of Iranian-allied players has prompted warnings from influential Arabs of an expanding “Shiite crescent.”

While some traditional, Sunni-led, U.S. allies have stoked fears of a regional sectarian war, many observers see problems more prosaic: a threat to the influence that America and its allies hold in an oil-rich area vital to global stability.

“There is no religious war within Islam either now or in the making. There is a struggle for political power and hegemony,” said Malcolm Rifkind, the former British foreign minister.

“The Iranian state is seeking to become the regional power in the Middle East ... (and) the unambiguous language used (by Arab regimes shows) that it is going to be a bare-knuckled fight.”

Since the United States launched the war on terror after the 9/11 attacks, Iran’s role as a diplomatic, political and military broker has grown dramatically in the same countries where the White House has tried to establish its own brand of order. Shiite militants are on the rise in Iraq. And Iran has close ties to the Shiite Hezbollah movement in Lebanon, making Israel very nervous.

Arab disquiet about Iran’s rise has roots deeper than the modern political geography of the Middle East. It reaches to the very heart of national identity and the deep divide that has always existed between Iranians and Arabs through their separate languages, cultures and Islamic traditions.

Today, there are approximately 1.3 billion Muslims in the world. About 85 percent are Sunnis, while Shiites make up nearly all the rest.

The sects matter on a square-inch level, as the American military can well attest.

In the city of Baghdad for example, American troops have to be aware that there are Shiites in the west of the city, less-than-friendly Sunnis in the south and east, and a mix of the two in the northeastern neighborhoods.

But the divide becomes more complex when it comes to understanding countries’ foreign policies.

Syria is a good example.

President Bashar Assad runs a secular regime, which led a crackdown on Muslim fundamentalists in 1982 that killed thousands. For that reason, Sunni Muslim extremist groups such as al-Qaida despise Assad’s regime.

On the other hand, the United States accuses Assad’s regime of supporting terrorism because it backs Hezbollah and Palestinian militants. Syrian guards’ rapid response during last week’s attack on the American embassy won rare U.S. praise.

ROOTS OF ISLAMIC SECTS

The theological division between Sunnis and Shiites stems from a power struggle after the death of the prophet Muhammad in 632. One group of Muslims elected Abu Bakr, a close companion of the prophet, as the next leader. However, another group believed that the prophet’s son-in-law, Ali, should become the leader.

The groups fought vicious battles about the issue of succession, and as time passed the former became known as Sunnis, from the Arabic word for tradition, and the latter, Shiites, meaning “followers of Ali.”

Despite now-distinct religious traditions, most Shiites and Sunnis are far more alike than different. All recognize the same Five Pillars of Islam — the religious obligations to profess the faith, pray, give to charity, fast and go on pilgrimage to Mecca.

The rhetoric directed at Shiites has come from disparate corners of the Sunni world.

King Abdullah of Jordan, a close U.S. ally, has warned that the emergence of a Shiite-controlled Iraq could signal a new “crescent” of dominant Shiite movements or governments from Iran to Lebanon that could destabilize the region.

Osama bin Laden, a Sunni, and his terrorist cohorts have cursed Shiites as heretics, calling them “the most evil creatures under the heavens.” Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, the leader of al-Qaida in Iraq who was killed in a U.S. air strike in June, decreed that Shiites should be targeted for death, even ahead of “infidels” like the Americans.

Within the realm of politics, however, regional rivalries generally exist for reasons stemming from Shiites’ historic role as the minority.

Outside of modern Iran, Shiites have been economically disadvantaged in places like Lebanon and politically disenfranchised in Iraq under the Sunni-dominated regime of Saddam Hussein. This history has produced stark ethnic and tribal disputes, such as those reflected in a June 4, 2003, conversation between President Bush and Iraqi envoy Paul Bremer.

“Will they be able to run a free country?” Bremer recalled Bush asking, referring to Iraq’s newly tapped Shiite leaders.

“Some of the Sunni leaders doubt it. They say all Shiites are liars,” Bremer told him, as recounted in Middle East scholar Fouad Ajami’s new book on Iraq, “The Foreigner’s Gift.”

IRAN’S ANCIENT GLORY

As home to the majority of the world’s Shiites, Iran takes such slights to heart — just as many of the world’s other Shiites adopt Iran’s political and military side of political disputes as their own.

And many Iranians view what is playing out now as a return to Persia’s natural right as a world power.

“We were home to some of the first civilizations. We are home of ancient culture. The nation has been waiting for its leaders to announce itself again on the world stage,” said Mohammad Atrianfar, editor of Iran’s leading opposition newspaper, Shargh.

Tehran is playing power politics with a strong hand. Iran, with 68 million people, is rich with oil and has the largest economy in the region. It has the technological know-how to produce a nuclear program and the political cards to stabilize or terrorize its neighbors.

And Arab nations are worried about the Iranian giant.

The Bush administration is intent on trying to balance power in Iraq between the majority Shiites and the Sunnis, Kurds and other minorities — not only to form a workable government, but to soothe concerns in the region over Shiite dominance.

Predominantly Sunni countries — and U.S. allies — like Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and Jordan are doing what they can — either through monetary donations or military help — to keep Lebanon’s people and political leaders within their orbit and away from “others,” as Saudi officials have referred to Iran, the patron of the Shiite militia Hezbollah.

Analysts say Arab regimes, particularly in countries like Saudi Arabia and Bahrain, which have sizable Shiite minorities, also will use the threat of a rising Iran to buttress their own rule and curb domestic opposition by warning of the dangers of sectarian violence and Shiite hegemony.

“Clearly, throughout the (Persian) Gulf and beyond, there is an effort on the part of Arab regimes to use this specter of a Shiite crescent for their own purposes,” said Stephen Cook, a Middle East expert at the Council on Foreign Relations in New York.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

http://www.thestate.com/mld/thestate/news/nation/15538854.htm
 

QueEx

Rising Star
Super Moderator
<font size="5"><center>Lebanese Christian rips Hezbollah </font size></center>

Chicago Sun-Times
BY HUSSEIN DAKROUB
September 25, 2006


BEIRUT, Lebanon -- An anti-Syrian Christian leader dismissed Hezbollah's claims of victory in its war with Israel as tens of thousands of his supporters rallied Sunday in a show of strength that highlighted Lebanon's divisions.

The rally north of Beirut came just two days after a massive gathering by the rival Shiite Muslim Hezbollah that attracted hundreds of thousands. The two sides have been at sharp odds over the future of the Lebanese government since this summer's Israeli-Hezbollah war.

Samir Geagea, a notorious former leader of a Christian militia, scoffed at Hezbollah leader Sheik Hassan Nasrallah's declaration that his guerrillas achieved ''a victory'' against Israel.

''I don't feel victory because the majority of the Lebanese people do not feel victory. Rather, they feel that a major catastrophe had befallen them and made their present and future uncertain,'' he said.

Hezbollah's fight with Israel sent its support soaring among Shiites. But a large sector -- particularly among Christians and Sunni Muslims -- opposes Hezbollah and resents it for provoking the monthlong fight by capturing two Israeli soldiers on July 12.

Billions of dollars in damage

The war killed hundreds of Lebanese civilians and left part of the country's infrastructure in ruins, causing billions of dollars in damage to the economy.

Geagea, who served more than a decade in prison on multiple counts of murder dating to the 1975-90 civil war, backs the Western-leaning government of Prime Minister Fuad Saniora. His party is a member of the anti-Syrian parliamentary majority in Lebanon.

http://www.suntimes.com/output/news/cst-nws-leb25.html
 
Top