Apparent Immunity Gene ‘Cures’ Bay Area Man Of AIDS

  • Thread starter Thread starter kwazdog
  • Start date Start date
Glowing cats shed light on Aids

<IFRAME SRC="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-14882008" WIDTH=780 HEIGHT=1500>
<A HREF="">link</A>

</IFRAME>
 
Re: Glowing cats shed light on Aids


Second baby possibly 'cured' of HIV​
Doctors say a second child born with HIV
appears to be virus-free after antiretroviral treatment​



(CNN) -- The first time, it happened almost by accident.

Just hours after delivery, a baby born with HIV in Mississippi was given high doses of three antiretroviral drugs. More than three years later, doctors say the little girl has no evidence of the life-threatening disease in her blood, despite being off medication for nearly two years.

Now doctors say another child born with the virus appears to be free of HIV after receiving similar treatment. The case report was presented at the annual Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections in Boston this week.


The California baby

The girl was delivered at Miller Children's Hospital in Long Beach, California, last summer to a mother with AIDS. Doctors gave the baby high doses of antiretroviral drugs -- AZT, 3TC and Nevirapine -- four hours after birth. Eleven days later, the virus was undetectable in her body and remained undetectable nine months later.

The California baby is still on antiretroviral treatment, so it's too soon to tell if the child is actually in remission.

"Taking kids off antiretroviral therapy intentionally is not standard of care," said Dr. Deborah Persaud, a virologist with Johns Hopkins Children's Center who has been involved in both cases. "At this time, there is no plan to stop treatment."

While doctors around the world are trying to duplicate the Mississippi case, more research needs to be done before new standards are implemented for treating babies born with HIV.

"This has to be done in a clinical trial setting, because really the only way we can prove that we've accomplished remission in these cases is by taking them off treatment, and that's not without risks," Persaud said during her presentation at the conference.

A clinical trial designed to test the effectiveness of this early treatment technique on infants born with HIV is set to begin in the next couple of months, she said.

The results could be a game changer in the fight against AIDS.


The Mississippi baby

The child in Mississippi was born to a mother who received no prenatal care and was not diagnosed as HIV-positive herself until just before delivery, according to a case report published in October in the New England Journal of Medicine.

Researchers: Toddler cured of HIV

"We didn't have the opportunity to treat the mom during the pregnancy as we would like to be able to do, to prevent transmission to the baby," said Dr. Hannah Gay, a pediatric HIV specialist at the University of Mississippi Medical Center.

Doctors administered the antiretroviral drugs 30 hours after the girl was born in hopes of controlling the virus. Within a couple of days, Gay confirmed the child was HIV-positive. She said the baby had probably been infected in the womb. The child remained on antiretroviral drugs for approximately 15 months. Her mother then stopped administering the drug for some reason, Gay said.

In March 2013, researchers announced that the girl was the first child to be "functionally cured" of HIV. A "functional cure" is when the presence of the virus is so small, lifelong treatment is not necessary and standard clinical tests cannot detect the virus in the blood.

Gay told CNN the timing of intervention -- before the baby's HIV diagnosis -- may deserve "more emphasis than the particular drugs or number of drugs used."

The researchers believe "the very early therapy is blocking the spread of HIV into viral reservoirs that hold the virus for a lifetime," Persaud explained.

High-risk exposure

Researchers have long known that treating HIV-positive mothers early on is important, because they pass antibodies on to their babies.

All HIV-positive moms will pass on those antibodies, but only 30% will transmit the actual virus, said Dr. Katherine Luzuriaga, an immunologist at the University of Massachusetts who worked closely with Gay. And HIV-positive mothers who are given appropriate treatment pass on the virus in less than 2% of cases.

"So all babies are born antibody-positive, but only a fraction of babies born to HIV-positive women will actually get the virus, and that fraction depends on whether the mom and baby are getting antiviral prophylaxis (preventive treatment) or not."

Newborns are considered high-risk if their mothers' HIV infections are not under control or if the mothers are found to be HIV-positive when they're close to delivering.

Usually, these infants would get antiviral drugs at preventive doses for six weeks to prevent infection, then start antiretroviral therapy, or ART, if HIV is diagnosed.

ART is a combination of at least three drugs used to suppress the virus and stop the progression of the disease.

But they do not kill the virus. Tests showed the virus in the Mississippi baby's blood continued to decrease and reached undetectable levels within 29 days of the initial treatment.

HIV may be 'functionally cured' in some


The 'Berlin patient'

Researchers say the only other documented case of an HIV cure is that of Timothy Brown, known as the "Berlin patient." In 2007, Brown, an HIV-positive American living in Germany, was battling both leukemia and HIV when he underwent a bone marrow transplant that cured not only his cancer but his HIV.

In an interview last year, Brown told Dr. Sanjay Gupta, CNN's chief medical correspondent, that he was still HIV-free.

"I've been tested everywhere possible," said Brown, who now lives in San Francisco. "My blood's been tested by many, many agencies. I've had two colonoscopies to test to see if they could find HIV in my colon, and they haven't been able to find any."

But Brown's case is apparently unique.

And the procedure, which is extremely dangerous, won't work in most patients because the bone marrow he received had a special genetic mutation that made the stem cells in it naturally resistant to the virus.

Researchers tell CNN only 1% of Caucasians -- mostly Northern Europeans -- and no African-Americans or Asians have this particular mutation.

In June, five years after he was "cured," reports surfaced that "traces" of the virus had been found in Brown's blood.

Even then, some HIV experts said that doesn't matter, that he's been cured. In fact, many AIDS experts said they believe Brown has experienced what's called a "sterilizing" cure, meaning the virus has been eliminated from the body entirely.

In July, Boston researchers said two HIV patients showed no sign of the virus in their blood following bone marrow transplants. However, researcher Dr. Timothy Henrich said in December that the virus had returned.



SOURCE



 
Re: Glowing cats shed light on Aids


Second baby possibly 'cured' of HIV​
Doctors say a second child born with HIV
appears to be virus-free after antiretroviral treatment​



(CNN) -- The first time, it happened almost by accident.


Just hours after delivery, a baby born with HIV in Mississippi was given high doses of three antiretroviral drugs. More than three years later, doctors say the little girl has no evidence of the life-threatening disease in her blood, despite being off medication for nearly two years.








Girl who was declared 'functionally cured'
of HIV now has active virus




An infant who was seemingly cured of HIV following aggressive drug therapy just hours after her birth was recently discovered to be infected with the virus that causes AIDS after all, doctors announced Thursday..

The so-called Mississippi Baby, now nearly 4 years old, had raised hopes of a potential cure for babies infected with HIV when it was first described at an AIDS conference last year. The girl's case also provided the foundation for an upcoming clinical trial.

The discovery recently that the 46-month-old child had actually carried the virus at undetectable levels for almost two years before it rebounded suddenly came as a blow to health officials and HIV experts.

“It felt very much like a punch to the gut,” said Dr. Hannah Gay, a pediatric HIV specialist at the University of Mississippi Medical Center in Jackson who had treated the girl.

“It was extremely disappointing, both from the scientific standpoint that we had been very hopeful that this would lead to bigger and better things, but mainly for the sake of the child who now is back on medicine and expected to stay on medicine for a very long time,” Gay told reporters during a news conference.

The case of the Mississippi Baby had made international headlines.

Born prematurely to a mother infected with HIV, the infant was given a cocktail of three antiretroviral drugs 30 hours after birth. The baby remained on antiretroviral drugs for 18 months, after which the baby’s mother stopped taking her to see doctors and stopped administering the drugs.

Five months after that, doctors reexamined the child and found that even though antiretroviral treatment had been discontinued, her blood showed no detectable levels of HIV and no HIV-specific antibodies. Details of her case were published in October in the New England Journal of Medicine

The child remained free of drugs and of detectable HIV for two years.

However, during a routine screening this month, doctors detected the virus in her blood, as well as a drop in her immune cells. After sequencing the virus, doctors determined it was identical to the one that had infected her mother -- a finding that confirmed that the baby indeed had HIV at birth.

“There was some doubt as to whether the baby was infected,” said Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, in Bethesda, Md. "The baby clearly was infected."

The case, the only one of its kind documented, has raised many questions about scientists' understanding of the virus and may raise potential ethical issues regarding an upcoming clinical trial. The study is intended to determine whether children born to HIV-infected mothers can safely discontinue drug treatment if they show no signs of infection.

“There can still be persistent virus that can linger in a quiescent state that can come back at any time,” said Dr. Deborah Persaud, a professor of infectious diseases at Johns Hopkins Children’s Center in Baltimore.

“But the duration that this child has been off treatment really needs to be remembered here -- 27 months of retroviral treatment," said Persaud, who also worked on the girl's case. "So there’s really still hope that a very early treatment strategy for perinatal infection can achieve longer remission in other perinatal infected infants.”

The girl was immediately given antiretroviral drugs after the virus was detected, dropping levels of the virus in her blood and increasing immune cell counts. “The child is having excellent response to the therapy that was started,” Gay said.

The case had raised the possibility that children born to infected mothers could be treated aggressively with drugs shortly after birth and taken off antiretroviral medication if the virus couldn’t be detected. In light of this new development in the Mississippi case, some have questioned whether it's now ethical to proceed with a planned clinical trial.

Fauci, one of the physicians involved in the study, said that aspects of it would be reexamined, but that it would proceed.

“I think what would be questionable is if people on their own, without a clinical study, decided they were going to all of a sudden empirically stop therapy just to see if things were OK with the baby,” Fauci said. “That’s a different story than doing it under a very carefully controlled and monitored clinical trial.”



http://www.latimes.com/science/scie...ippi-functional-cure-sick-20140710-story.html


 

Two New Patients Cleared of HIV Infections



July 20, 2014


To date, the only patient that's been "truly" cured of HIV remains Timothy Ray Brown, aka the Berlin Patient. If you'll recall, Brown received a bone marrow transplant in Berlin in 2007, a transplant sourced from a donor with a natural genetic resistance to HIV. The transplant was an effort to cure Brown's leukaemia and it appears to have done so, but it also appears to have eliminated Brown's HIV infection. In the two years since, Brown has abstained from taking the usual regimine of antiretroviral medication, the rather miraculous stuff that keeps the virus at bay in HIV-infected individuals. The virus remains undetectable in his system but, even now, cure remains a fraught term for Brown, and for us.

This is because Brown hasn't been alone among the cured. Two patients, known as the "Boston patients," who underwent a very similar transplant procedure to Brown—albeit without the resistant donor—were also thought cured. After ditching antiretrovirals, HIV remained undetected in the patients' systems for months. But, eventually, has also seen the infection return. After this succession of failures, being the sole HIV patient on planet Earth with an eradicated infection must be a rather anxious position.

Brown appears to have some new company, however. Doctors presenting at the 20th International AIDS Conference this weekend have announced two recent recipients of bone marrow transplants that appear to have also had their HIV infections eliminated. As reported in Nature, the researchers, led by the Kirby Institute's David Cooper, combed through the records of St Vincent’s hospital in Sydney, one of the largest bone marrow centers in Australia. “We went back and looked whether we had transplanted [on] any HIV-positive patients, and found these two,” said Cooper in a press briefing. At least one of the two had recieved bone marrow from an HIV-resistant donor.

An important caveat is that neither of the two Australian patients has stopped taking antiretroviral medication. The "elimination" claim is based on viral loads low enough in both patients such that antiretroviral treatment can't take full credit. It's possible, if not likely, that if the two were to stop ongoing treatment the virus would bounce back. Even if the patients aren't cured, however, the finding is potentially a very big deal and, in any case, bone marrow transplantation with its 10 percent fatality rate has never been a real possibility for HIV treatment in the absence of something much more acutely dire, like chemotherapy-resistant leukemia or lymphoma.

“There is something about bone-marrow transplantation in people with HIV that has an anti-HIV reservoir effect, such that the reservoirs go down to very low levels," Cooper told Nature. "And if we can understand what that is and how that happens, it will really accelerate the field of cure search.”

But again, we're faced with the tricky relationship between HIV and cures in the very first place. As I wrote last December, "Timothy Brown wasn't cured of anything; he had his immune system removed and regenerated. That's a big something else with the convenient side effect of eliminating HIV from the body." The gap between that something else and a functional cure for the 35.3 million humans living with the disease remains incomprehensible, but hopefully "miracles" like the Berlin Patient will at least make it at least a bit less so.



http://motherboard.vice.com/read/two-new-patients-cleared-of-hiv-infections



 
Back
Top