They have Atmos
They have Atmos
But that doesn't have anything to do with the picture quality Dolby Vision brings.
Yup, Dolby vision came after HDR, I can't really tell which one Is actually better they both look great. As for atmos, I really don't like It from TV's and sound bars because It's simulated. You need to have ceiling speakers for true Atmos.
.
I have atmos speakers that fire the sound at the ceiling and then bounce down to me. As far as my ears are concerned, the sound is coming from above.
I think the key is to have 4 Atmos speakers instead of 2.
For Dolby Vision, the movie/show has to do it right to see a difference. Braveheart with HDR10 looks like an upscaled bluray, Braveheart with Dolby Vision has the colors pop off of the screen.
A lot of them dont implement dolby vision correctly so for some sets HDR is actually better....newer OLEDs have DV implemented better...Samsung has HDR10+ which is dynamic like DV...most say its better than HDR but a step below DVYup, Dolby vision came after HDR, I can't really tell which one Is actually better they both look great. As for atmos, I really don't like It from TV's and sound bars because It's simulated. You need to have ceiling speakers for true Atmos.
.
I have a 5.2.4 setup with 4 In ceiling b&w speakers, when I listen to atmos encoded material the sound Is amazing. Before I used to have upward firing elacs that sat on top of the front left and right speakers, they where supposed to fire upward and reflect off the walls but I got no sense of sound from above (my basement might have been to big for those speakers). So I just opted for inceiling speakers ....way better.
I have a 5.2.4 setup with 4 In ceiling b&w speakers, when I listen to atmos encoded material the sound Is amazing. Before I used to have upward firing elacs that sat on top of the front left and right speakers, they where supposed to fire upward and reflect off the walls but I got no sense of sound from above (my basement might have been to big for those speakers). So I just opted for inceiling speakers ....way better.
I thought I was doing big things work my sonos arch setup. 
LG now has a pixel conditioner that runs after so many hours of screen timeI have a 6-year-old LG OLED. The picture always was incredible and it rivaled the quality of my old Panasonic Plasma but now it's starting to give me burn-in problems. I'm looking to upgrade to a 65, maybe 77-inch OLED for my living room
What you wanna know?bump
Lg does make good oled tvs
I agree..but BETTER? Samsung and Sony Oled TV's ALWAYS cost more than a LG Oled..and for good reasonLg does make good oled tvs
Sony doesn't make their own panels, either Sammy or LG (or allegedly now VIZIO) make panels for all their TVs.I agree..but BETTER? Samsung and Sony Oled TV's ALWAYS cost more than a LG Oled..and for good reason
Copped an LG oled TV… holy sheeeet game changer once you get over the headaches lol
All Sony does is add the video processing/ encoding you say? ALL SONY DOES? Thats a damn LOT!! what would ANY good TV be WITHOUT IT?Sony doesn't make their own panels, either Sammy or LG (or allegedly now VIZIO) make panels for all their TVs.
All Sony does is add the video processing/ encoding behind the scenes.....
(I'm Sony owner btw)
Those LG C series are getting rave reviews.....
![]()
Samsung S90C OLED vs LG C3 OLED Side-by-Side TV Comparison
The LG C3 OLED and the Samsung S90C OLED are similar TVs occupying the same market position. Of the two, the Samsung is the better gaming TV and slightly better overall TV, while the LG is the better TV for movie fans. The Samsung has a wider color gamut and gets brighter than the LG, especially...www.rtings.com
Did you miss the part where I said I own a Sony TV?All Sony does is add the video processing/ encoding you say? ALL SONY DOES? Thats a damn LOT!! what would ANY good TV be WITHOUT IT?![]()
wait they are not?Sucks that a lot of ppl got misled into believing QLED is on par with OLED back when LG was the only brand making OLED tvs. Salespeople & Samsung marketing made a killing off of that
please explain? can i feed it 4k uhd rips and get the value?I have the 77" Sony A80j. Love it.
Although I'll say if you're not feeding it a good signal, don't spend the extra for an OLED. If you're a firestick IPTV person just get an LCD and call it a day.
Very comparable technologies, but nowadays Oled has higher contrasts and slightly better vivid colors according to rting.comwait they are not?
I have the 77" Sony A80j. Love it.
Although I'll say if you're not feeding it a good signal, don't spend the extra for an OLED. If you're a firestick IPTV person just get an LCD and call it a day.
ok.. there is a lot of cross information in this thread. I'm genuine curious about OLED. Before I go and ball out are there any recommendations of a 40-55inch good starter OLED tv I should consider? and oh yeah, what are the things I should or should not consider when buying an OLED TV?
4k UHD rips will look lovely on an OLED especially if they're uncompressed. Just make sure your room is not TOO bright. OLEDS in general don't get as bright as LED TVs.please explain? can i feed it 4k uhd rips and get the value?
well since I am tv'd out (tv's in all my rooms) and was not planning on upgrading no time soon. I was good until I ran across this thread and now I'm genuine intrigue to see what im missing, so I figured if I just got a smaller one to see what's the hype then I would go out and get the big boy. So for now id like to stick with a smaller tv to see if I can tell the difference in quality.At that size range 40-55" you don't need to "ball out" on a top of the line OLED.
Save that for 60"+
Will this be a main room or frequently used TV?
Consider refresh rate, number / type of connections and compatibility/ features that will fit your needs.
Copped an LG oled TV… holy sheeeet game changer once you get over the headaches lol