Alphabet surpasses Apple as the world’s most valuable company

GAMETHEORY

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
alphabet-google-apple.jpg

By Adam Berry/Getty Images.
For now, there’s a new sheriff in Silicon Valley.
BY

How is this for word soup: Google’s parent company, Alphabet, has, at least for now, conquered Apple.

Unjumbled: the iKing was dethroned, for now, by the search giant Thursday in after-hours trading.

The surge followed Google’s reported fourth-quarter earnings, which handily surpassed analyst expectations, driving its stock up more than 8 percent after the bell. At that level, Alphabet is poised to open at an all-time high on Tuesday, swiftly overtaking Apple’s market cap.

The results, the first since the company reorganized itself last summer to separate its core business from its moonshot ventures on driverless cars, health-care research, and smart homes, were bolstered by strong online ad sales and a tighter leash on costs. This meant that investors, for the first time Monday, were able to weed out the costlier, farther-flung investments that don’t have immediate returns from Google’s bottom line. What they saw was a robust core business, which buoyed hope and bumped up the stock price.

Apple is suffering the opposite fate. While the company reported a record quarterly profit last week, it also posted its slowest growth in iPhone sales since the smartphone came to market nearly a decade ago. Its stock is down roughly 10 percent so far in 2016, and about 30 percent from its all-time high.

What it comes down to is confidences in cores—whether investors believe Apple’s is rotten, or if they think Google’s can continue to strengthen and plant seeds in industries of the future. Google has not managed to out-seat Apple as the most valuable company since 2010, according to CNBC, when Apple’s biggest product line was still the Mac. It had not even released the iPad at that point. Apple eventually took the crown with its newer iPhones and more products, but now the tide feels as though it is turning again.

For now, the heart of Apple's business isn't beating like Alphabet's. And, by the way Apple’s C.E.O. expressed concern over the global economic climate in his earnings call last week, it seems as though they will be out of sync for the foreseeable future. It's a moment ripe for Alphabet to ascend, and investors seem hungry for the new regime.
http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2016...lds-most-valuable-company?mbid=social_twitter
 
apple wont be growing much unless they can come out with something big, it's about time they start allowing osx to be installed on pc parts without the hassle of doing a hackingtosh.
 
apple wont be growing much unless they can come out with something big, it's about time they start allowing osx to be installed on pc parts without the hassle of doing a hackingtosh.
Yeah man I've been dreaming of that since 2005. I finally sold my Hackintosh and went back to a regular mac.
 
OS X is just a operating system, if you make a hackintosh with parts you bought from bestbuy, you could do the exact same shit that you can on a macbook.

What does that have to do with the overall purpose of OS X? It's serves as a platform for developers.
 
OS X is just a operating system, if you make a hackintosh with parts you bought from bestbuy, you could do the exact same shit that you can on a macbook.

Must humanoids can't be bothered with all that shit. Apple knows this and will continue to make things selective. It's how they make money.
 
Do you have any facts to point out or are you just going to name call like a bitch?

stupid assed kneegro.....

Both Apple and Google make popular mobile operating systems.
Apple packages its operating system, iOS, with hardware, the iPhone, and sells the whole thing for ~$600. This business has created huge profits for Apple, and now the company has a $500 billion market cap.
You would think that Google would see this success and copy it.
But it does not.
Google gives away its operating system, Android, for free to hardware makers.
Why does Google do this?
One reason: The company believes giving Android away for free increases the size of the world's Web-connected population. The company believes that increasing the Web-connected population will inevitably lead to more Google searches — which Google can monetize with search ads.
Is Google's theory correct?
There is some new evidence to suggest the answer is yes.
Horace Dediu of Asymco
has a chart that proves there is at least a correlation between the size of the world's Internet population and Google revenues.

chart-of-the-day-google-revenue.jpg
 
stupid assed kneegro.....

Both Apple and Google make popular mobile operating systems.
Apple packages its operating system, iOS, with hardware, the iPhone, and sells the whole thing for ~$600. This business has created huge profits for Apple, and now the company has a $500 billion market cap.
You would think that Google would see this success and copy it.
But it does not.
Google gives away its operating system, Android, for free to hardware makers.
Why does Google do this?
One reason: The company believes giving Android away for free increases the size of the world's Web-connected population. The company believes that increasing the Web-connected population will inevitably lead to more Google searches — which Google can monetize with search ads.
Is Google's theory correct?
There is some new evidence to suggest the answer is yes.
Horace Dediu of Asymco
has a chart that proves there is at least a correlation between the size of the world's Internet population and Google revenues.

chart-of-the-day-google-revenue.jpg

Dumbass did you even read the article?

"The results, the first since the company reorganized itself last summer to separate its core business from its moonshot ventures on driverless cars, health-care research, and smart homes, were bolstered by strong online ad sales and a tighter leash on costs".

Google needed to find different means of creating ad-revenue to make up for the decrease in their market share of "web-connected" services.
 
Google has a parent company?

:eek2::eek2::eek2::eek2: mind blown!

i did not know that shit
I remember someone posted a real good article about Google a while back on here. It basically talked about how powerful they are and how they're aiming to really lock shit down in the future.
 
Google re-structured it's company last year after their Android profits tanked. Notice Android was never mentioned in the article.
Profits tanked but they are still the more valuable company?
 
Dumbass did you even read the article?

"The results, the first since the company reorganized itself last summer to separate its core business from its moonshot ventures on driverless cars, health-care research, and smart homes, were bolstered by strong online ad sales and a tighter leash on costs".

Google needed to find different means of creating ad-revenue to make up for the decrease in their market share of "web-connected" services.

stop spouting jibberish little boy... the results were bolstered by strong online ad sales ..which were helped by getting google into as many purses and pockets as possible..
 
stop spouting jibberish little boy... the results were bolstered by strong online ad sales ..which were helped by getting google into as many purses and pockets as possible..

Peep this dumbass:

"What is less well known is Alphabet's dependence on Apple for search-based revenue. Last year, a New York Times article cited a 2014 Goldman Sachs' study that found Google collected nearly $12 billion in mobile search ads that year. The most-interesting disclosure from Goldman was that 75% of Alphabet's mobile-search revenue came from ads on iPhones and iPads".
http://www.msn.com/en-us/money/topstories/alphabet-wisely-cut-apple-a-huge-check/ar-BBoGuNO



Do you think it was just a coincidence that Google restructured its business model at the same time it was hemorrhaging loses in market share on it's own mobile platform?

That study was done in 2014. Probably before the financial impact Apple's larger phones would have on the market. If Android web-connected services were struggling then, no doubt they would be even worse now.

Alphabet was a PR move focused on re-branding its business model because of the loses/failures of their own mobile platform.

They just made up those losses by re-focusing their core ad business.That's why you don't see Android mentioned in any of the hit pieces that were published today.
 
Peep this dumbass:

"What is less well known is Alphabet's dependence on Apple for search-based revenue. Last year, a New York Times article cited a 2014 Goldman Sachs' study that found Google collected nearly $12 billion in mobile search ads that year. The most-interesting disclosure from Goldman was that 75% of Alphabet's mobile-search revenue came from ads on iPhones and iPads".
http://www.msn.com/en-us/money/topstories/alphabet-wisely-cut-apple-a-huge-check/ar-BBoGuNO



Do you think it was just a coincidence that Google restructured its business model at the same time it was hemorrhaging loses in market share on it's own mobile platform?

That study was done in 2014. Probably before the financial impact Apple's larger phones would have on the market. If Android web-connected services were struggling then, no doubt they would be even worse now.

Alphabet was a PR move focused on re-branding its business model because of the loses/failures of their own mobile platform.

They just made up those losses by re-focusing their core ad business.That's why you don't see Android mentioned in any of the hit pieces that were published today.
boy you hate android huh , it aint goin nowhere playa let it go, google dont give a shit about android like apple gives a shit about ios
 
Google has a parent company?

:eek2::eek2::eek2::eek2: mind blown!

i did not know that shit

Same shit i said.,,, then i remembered a few months ago people was talking about google and alphabet and i didn't bother to read the shit,,, but here it is,,, Google was not purchased or anything they just combined all their business under one umbrella.



Alphabet Investor Relations
2015 Update from the CEO


G is for Google.

As Sergey and I wrote in the original founders letter 11 years ago, “Google is not a conventional company. We do not intend to become one.” As part of that, we also said that you could expect us to make “smaller bets in areas that might seem very speculative or even strange when compared to our current businesses.” From the start, we’ve always strived to do more, and to do important and meaningful things with the resources we have.

We did a lot of things that seemed crazy at the time. Many of those crazy things now have over a billion users, like Google Maps, YouTube, Chrome, and Android. And we haven’t stopped there. We are still trying to do things other people think are crazy but we are super excited about.

We’ve long believed that over time companies tend to get comfortable doing the same thing, just making incremental changes. But in the technology industry, where revolutionary ideas drive the next big growth areas, you need to be a bit uncomfortable to stay relevant.

Our company is operating well today, but we think we can make it cleaner and more accountable. So we are creating a new company, called Alphabet. I am really excited to be running Alphabet as CEO with help from my capable partner, Sergey, as President.

What is Alphabet? Alphabet is mostly a collection of companies. The largest of which, of course, is Google. This newer Google is a bit slimmed down, with the companies that are pretty far afield of our main internet products contained in Alphabet instead. What do we mean by far afield? Good examples are our health efforts: Life Sciences (that works on the glucose-sensing contact lens), and Calico (focused on longevity). Fundamentally, we believe this allows us more management scale, as we can run things independently that aren’t very related.

Alphabet is about businesses prospering through strong leaders and independence. In general, our model is to have a strong CEO who runs each business, with Sergey and me in service to them as needed. We will rigorously handle capital allocation and work to make sure each business is executing well. We’ll also make sure we have a great CEO for each business, and we’ll determine their compensation. In addition, with this new structure we plan to implement segment reporting for our Q4 results, where Google financials will be provided separately than those for the rest of Alphabet businesses as a whole.

This new structure will allow us to keep tremendous focus on the extraordinary opportunities we have inside of Google. A key part of this is Sundar Pichai. Sundar has been saying the things I would have said (and sometimes better!) for quite some time now, and I’ve been tremendously enjoying our work together. He has really stepped up since October of last year, when he took on product and engineering responsibility for our internet businesses. Sergey and I have been super excited about his progress and dedication to the company. And it is clear to us and our board that it is time for Sundar to be CEO of Google. I feel very fortunate to have someone as talented as he is to run the slightly slimmed down Google and this frees up time for me to continue to scale our aspirations. I have been spending quite a bit of time with Sundar, helping him and the company in any way I can, and I will of course continue to do that. Google itself is also making all sorts of new products, and I know Sundar will always be focused on innovation—continuing to stretch boundaries. I know he deeply cares that we can continue to make big strides on our core mission to organize the world’s information. Recent launches like Google Photos and Google Now using machine learning are amazing progress. Google also has some services that are run with their own identity, like YouTube. Susan is doing a great job as CEO, running a strong brand and driving incredible growth.

Sergey and I are seriously in the business of starting new things. Alphabet will also include our X lab, which incubates new efforts like Wing, our drone delivery effort. We are also stoked about growing our investment arms, Ventures and Capital, as part of this new structure.

Alphabet Inc. will replace Google Inc. as the publicly-traded entity and all shares of Google will automatically convert into the same number of shares of Alphabet, with all of the same rights. Google will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of Alphabet. Our two classes of shares will continue to trade on Nasdaq as GOOGL and GOOG.

For Sergey and me this is a very exciting new chapter in the life of Google—the birth of Alphabet. We liked the name Alphabet because it means a collection of letters that represent language, one of humanity’s most important innovations, and is the core of how we index with Google search! We also like that it means alpha‑bet (Alpha is investment return above benchmark), which we strive for! I should add that we are not intending for this to be a big consumer brand with related products—the whole point is that Alphabet companies should have independence and develop their own brands.

We are excited about...

  • Getting more ambitious things done.
  • Taking the long-term view.
  • Empowering great entrepreneurs and companies to flourish.
  • Investing at the scale of the opportunities and resources we see.
  • Improving the transparency and oversight of what we’re doing.
  • Making Google even better through greater focus.
  • And hopefully... as a result of all this, improving the lives of as many people as we can.
What could be better? No wonder we are excited to get to work with everyone in the Alphabet family. Don’t worry, we’re still getting used to the name too!


Larry Page
CEO, Alphabet
 
Profits tanked but they are still the more valuable company?

boy you hate android huh , it aint goin nowhere playa let it go, google dont give a shit about android like apple gives a shit about ios
Welp, it looks like the hype lasted about TWO months (actually less than that).

Where were all the hit piece articles when things went back to the way they were for the past 3+ years?

This is just a glimpse of the click-bait bitchassness google has infiltrated the internet with, and fanboys sucking the hype without question.
 
Last edited:
Welp, it looks like the hype lasted about TWO months (actually less than that).

Where were all the hit piece articles when things went back to the way they were for the past 3+ years?

This is just a glimpse of the click-bait bitchassness google has infiltrated the internet with, and fanboys sucking the hype without question.
What are you talking about? You quote me two months later?
 
This was inevitable. Google simple has their hand in more things we use everyday than Apple (and pretty much everyone else). Internet (search, social media, broadband, etc.), applications, marketing, cars, etc. Their plans in the medical field and automous vehicles will only expand their lead over Apple.
 
apple wont be growing much unless they can come out with something big, it's about time they start allowing osx to be installed on pc parts without the hassle of doing a hackingtosh.

Makes no sense for Apple to do this. They are the only company that controls the hardware and software.

The next iPhone will fix their problems.
 
Welp, it looks like the hype lasted about TWO months (actually less than that).

Where were all the hit piece articles when things went back to the way they were for the past 3+ years?

This is just a glimpse of the click-bait bitchassness google has infiltrated the internet with, and fanboys sucking the hype without question.
seek professional help my nigga.... why do you care enough about this to dig up an old thread like this? :dunno:
 
Damn some of you dues are so anti Google yall just spout shit:

More on Google
Putting aside the bottom-line drag of Other Bets, Google over the past year boasted a solid operating margin of 31.4%, up from 28.9% in 2014. In part, that's thanks to steadily falling capital expenditures, and remains in line with Porat's encouraging assertion two quarters agothat the company will focus on "developing big opportunities [...] with great care regarding resource allocation."

As a reminder, the Google segment includes collective results from Search, Android, Maps, Chrome, YouTube, Google Play, and Gmail -- all seven of which individually boasted over one billion users during the quarter -- as well as Ads, Commerce, Apps, and Cloud and hardware products.

But the one thing many of Google's products have in common is advertising, revenue from which climbed 17% year over year to $19.08 billion. That's good for 90.1% of Alphabet's total revenue, up from 89.9% last quarter and down from 90.6% in the same year-ago period.

Within that, revenue from Google's own websites climbed 20% to $14.94 billion, and revenue from Google Network Members' sites rose 7% to $4.14 billion.

Aggregate paid clicks rose 31% year over year, driven by 40% growth in paid clicks on Google websites and a 2% increase in paid clicks on Google Network Members' sites. Aggregate cost-per-click -- which measures how much Google makes per ad -- fell 13%, including a 16% decline on Google sites and a 8% decrease from Google Network Members' sites. But to Google's credit, this is partly due to strong growth in YouTube viewership, where the platform's TrueView ads reach consumers earlier in the purchase funnel, so tend to monetize at lower rates than traditional web-based ad impressions. Still, it's an enviable problem given YouTube's superior growth.

Finally, revenue from non-advertising sources within the Google segment climbed 24% year over year to $2.1 billion, driven by strong growth from Play, Cloud, and Apps.

http://www.fool.com/investing/gener...nc-shows-just-how-profitable-google-real.aspx


Android is profitable because of the searches that come from Android phones. Its also profitable from people purchasing on Google Play.

Here is another article that breaks it all down:

http://www.businessinsider.com/alphabet-google-q4-2015-earnings-2016-2
 
Back
Top