Leaders from OpenAI, Google DeepMind, Anthropic and other A.I. labs warn that future systems could be as deadly as pandemics and nuclear weapons.
www.nytimes.com
NYC lawyer admits he used ChatGPT to file ‘bogus’ court documents
A lawyer at a respected Tribeca firm admitted last week that a Manhattan federal court filing — which a judge blasted as being littered with “bogus” information — was written with the help of an artificial intelligence chatbot on his behalf.
The shocking admission from Steven Schwartz, an attorney with firm Levidow, Levidow & Oberman, came after he
asked ChatGPT to find cases relevant to his client’s lawsuit — only for the bot to fabricate them entirely, court documents show.
The snafu began after Schwartz’s legal partner Paul LoDuca filed a lawsuit against the Colombian airline Avianca on behalf of Robert Mata, who was allegedly injured when a metal serving cart struck his knee on a flight to New York City.
When the airline’s lawyers asked the court to toss the suit, Schwartz filed a brief that supposedly cited more than a half dozen relevant cases.
There was just one problem: the cases — such as Miller v. United Airlines, Petersen v. Iran Air and Varghese v. China Southern Airlines — were completely made up
by ChatGPT.
Lawyer Steven Schwartz said he used ChatGPT as a legal research source. The chatbots findings were completely made up.
The humiliating legal drama played out at Manhattan’s federal court in connection with a lawsuit against an airline.MGR
“The court is presented with an unprecedented circumstance,” wrote Manhattan federal Judge P. Kevin Castel in a
May 4 document, first reported by
The New York Times on Saturday, calling on Schwartz and LoDucan to appear for a June 8 hearing to face possible sanctions over the eyebrow-raising filing.
“Six of the submitted cases appear to be bogus judicial decisions with bogus quotes and bogus internal citations,” Castel wrote.
In a
sworn affidavit filed last week, Schwartz admitted that he used ChatGPT while compiling the paperwork that Loduca filed, writing he “relied on the legal opinions provided to him by a source that has revealed itself to be unreliable.”
The signed mea culpa went on to say that Schwartz “was unaware of the possibility that its [ChatGPT’s] content could be false.”
Shaboon v. Egyptair, Martinez v. Delta Airlines and Estate of Durden v. KLM Royal Dutch Airlines were among the fake cases generated by the app.REUTERS
The disgraced lawyer also told the judge he “greatly regrets” using AI for the legal “research” and “will never do so in the future without absolute verification of its authenticity.”
Peter Loduca wrote last week in
an affidavit he was not involved in the malfeasance and “had no reason to doubt the authenticity of the case law” fabricated in the document.
Loduca added he had worked with Schwartz for 25 years and never recalled him looking to “mislead” a court.
Steven Schwartz said he tasked ChatGPT with finding cases relevant to his client’s lawsuit, only to have the app fabricate them entirely.
nypost.com
