‘Dangerous misogynist’ Andrew Tate removed from Instagram and Facebook
Self-described sexist removed for violating Meta’s policies on ‘dangerous organizations and individuals’
After Kevin Samuels, now they're going after Andrew Tate: permanently banned from Instagram and Facebook
- Thread starter GAMETHEORY
- Start date
WTF.
Dude is basically a comedian playing a sexist character. It aint THAT serious. Why ban him?
Dude is basically a comedian playing a sexist character. It aint THAT serious. Why ban him?
Because these social media platforms are leaning more into being social commerce platforms. And women make up the majority of consumers by far. Tate is bad for business. Trust, they don't gaf what he's saying unless it's gonna potentially get in the way of their bread.
You got Fools who may take him seriously and act on what he says. Corporations aren't trying to be sued over half-assed performance art. He can take that act on the road like Andrew "Dice" Clay. His act was "Misogyny lite" compared to what we see today and caught a raft of shit, but he had the number one Comedy tour and Comedy Album in the US in the late '80s.
So?
Those are private companies and he violated their TOS.
People don't understand the first amendment is to do with the GOVERNMENT suppressing free speech, not individual companies.
Those are private companies and he violated their TOS.
People don't understand the first amendment is to do with the GOVERNMENT suppressing free speech, not individual companies.
I am NOT familiar with this guy is he really that bad?
Oh I just saw this...
We putting on cape for MAGA dudes
if true?
f*ck him then
Tate was a vocal supporter of former president Donald Trump and has appeared on a number of rightwing podcasts, including shows like Infowars, hosted by the conspiracy theorist Alex Jones. More recently Tate has become “impossible to avoid” on social media, and at the time of his ban from Meta platforms he had more than 4.7 million followers on Instagram.
We putting on cape for MAGA dudes
if true?
f*ck him then
Tate was a vocal supporter of former president Donald Trump and has appeared on a number of rightwing podcasts, including shows like Infowars, hosted by the conspiracy theorist Alex Jones. More recently Tate has become “impossible to avoid” on social media, and at the time of his ban from Meta platforms he had more than 4.7 million followers on Instagram.
Don’t know who dude is but……
THE PUSSYFICATION of the west continues…..
THE PUSSYFICATION of the west continues…..
Most of these people are clowns. Fuck’em
Facts tho. That ven diagram would almost last on top of each other.
Naw, he mainly talks about dudes taking back their roles in the world, getting multiple passports, why men and women are different, how western society of today is setting men and women up for failure, how to deal with depression, how to renew your mind, the importance of working out everyday, and more. He was more like Earl Nightingale meets Sharazad Ali meets David Goggins meets IceBurg Slim.
I KNEW he had to have said something about fags..
whenever faggots are involved you get this braindead
kneejerk reaction TO EVERYTHING..
they are going to force your children to want to be genderless
and confused.. like THEY ARE...
the only way fags can be normal is if they make the world ABNORMAL..
dudes calling them out on their psychosis, gets their freedom of speech
shut down on the medias they control, like tv, movies, most social media platforms
on the internet especially google..
If you want to shut a fag up, just remind them sex between men is NOT a Normal
human sex act..
They fuckin HATE the word NORMAL...LOL hey Im just saying..
if you want to be a faggot be a faggot..
but if you support a fuckin faggot agenda that involves grooming innocent children..
We gonna have to have this psychological war, and Truth will always win over
fraud stupid retarded shit.. like making singular pronouns, PLURAL
thats PURE RETARDATION.. and keep that shit in YOUR gay community...
once you accept that fuckin psychosis it wont stop, and pretty soon
pedophilia will be legal..
thats the end game to all this faggot shit!!!
whenever faggots are involved you get this braindead
kneejerk reaction TO EVERYTHING..
they are going to force your children to want to be genderless
and confused.. like THEY ARE...
the only way fags can be normal is if they make the world ABNORMAL..
dudes calling them out on their psychosis, gets their freedom of speech
shut down on the medias they control, like tv, movies, most social media platforms
on the internet especially google..
If you want to shut a fag up, just remind them sex between men is NOT a Normal
human sex act..
They fuckin HATE the word NORMAL...LOL hey Im just saying..
if you want to be a faggot be a faggot..
but if you support a fuckin faggot agenda that involves grooming innocent children..
We gonna have to have this psychological war, and Truth will always win over
fraud stupid retarded shit.. like making singular pronouns, PLURAL
thats PURE RETARDATION.. and keep that shit in YOUR gay community...
once you accept that fuckin psychosis it wont stop, and pretty soon
pedophilia will be legal..
thats the end game to all this faggot shit!!!
Every now and then you drop a gem Freddy...this is one of those times
Realist shit you ever said!
Gender war? Niggas is lost out here beefin' with women... And looking for saviors & martyrs in loss.
Co-sign
good
That is a total misunderstanding on your part
‘Dangerous misogynist’ Andrew Tate removed from Instagram and Facebook
Self-described sexist removed for violating Meta’s policies on ‘dangerous organizations and individuals’www.theguardian.com
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Dog private businesses cannot legally violate your free speech rights, what are you doing here? Sure they can terminate business contracts with some prejudice (the scope is not all encompassing, and there are limitations here as well). However, what you're saying, is not what the first is saying. That is an administrative guideline for the legislature.
I'm not gonna get deep into the weeds with you about this. Frankly, you've already shown by posting the 1st amendment like it was a world beating retort that you don't have the capacity for language and nuance required to understand all the legal jargon designed to confuse and bewilder plebs. But player..... you are way out in front of your skis right now.
Free speech doesn't mean freedom from consequences. It just means the government can't lock you up for saying shit they don't like.
oh so NOW they want to ban him, thats so Unamerican
only FAKE quasi wannabe americans.. agree with
Attacking freedom of speech..
this has nothing to do with tate or orange chimps
and everything to do with controlling Americans
Liberties because unlike the countries most quasi americans
come from..
they aint NEVER been this free in their lives..
but they dont cherish it and dont know how to protect it...
they just do what they are told trying not to get deported
or to keep their agent life style... which is getting more and more
hollow by the minute.. a nice house, with no love is just
a nice house...
I suppose all that must have sounded very erudite, hip, slick, and cool in your head but it doesn't speak to what I said.
So, since you're so learned, let me try again...dog.
I SAID:
So?
Those are private companies and he violated their TOS.
People don't understand the first amendment is to do with the GOVERNMENT suppressing free speech, not individual companies.
Everything I said is true and what you subsequently replied has not one damn thing to do with it. You're inferring an awful lot when my statement was simple and to the point.
Now, you want to argue nuances that's a different story but try really hard to focus on what I said, not what you want it to be.
I know you don’t get it, it's why you keep bringing up the first amendment for whatever reason. Meta can de-platform him but they can't violate his first amendment rights. No business can, all they can do is dissolve contracts. He cannot be interned for his views.
Individual rights were in the other document you maybe neglected to read: 'The Bill of Rights'. Maybe you've heard of it?
So no the first amendment does not give companies the authority to violate your freedom of speech.
Similar threads
