Aboriginal Historty Month 2021

roots69

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
A few ACTS put into motion since 1790.. **Now remember they hide alot of laws inside these ACT's**

IMMIGRATION HISTORY



TIMELINE
1790
Nationality Act of 1790
This was the first law to define eligibility for
citizenship
by
naturalization
and establish standards and procedures by which immigrants became US citizens. In this early version, Congress limited this important right to “free white persons.”

1798
Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798
Congress enacted
deportation
laws targeting persons deemed political threats to the United States in response to conflicts in Europe.

1803
Ban on “importation” of “any negro, mulatto, or other person of colour” (1803) (effective 1808)
The Haitian revolution led Congress to ban immigration by free blacks to contain anti-slavery campaigners.
1830
Indian Removal Act (1830)
During the presidency of Andrew Jackson, this law authorized the confiscation of land from Native Americans and provided resources for their forced removal west of the Mississippi River.
1848
Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo (1848)
In the settlement of the Mexican-American War, this treaty formalized the United States' annexation of a major portion of northern Mexico, El Norte, and conferred
citizenship
on Mexicans choosing to remain in the territory.

1849
Passenger Cases
The Supreme Court designates the authority to legislate and to enforce immigration restrictions a matter of federal authority rather than a state or local power.
1854
People v. Hall (1854)
This California Supreme Court case ruled that the testimony of a Chinese man who witnessed a murder by a white man was inadmissible, denying Chinese alongside Native and African Americans the status to testify in courts against whites.
1857
Dred Scott v. Sanford (1857)
This Supreme Court ruling established that slaves and free African Americans were not citizens of the U.S. and were not entitled to the rights and privileges of
citizenship
, such as the right to sue in federal courts.

1862
Act to prohibit the “coolie trade” (1862)
During the Civil War, the Republican-controlled Congress sought to prevent southern plantation owners from replacing their enslaved African American workers with unfree contract or "coolie" laborers from China.
1863
Emancipation Proclamation
President Abraham Lincoln's 1863 executive order freeing the slaves held in the Confederate states.
1864
Immigration Act of 1864
This law legalized labor recruitment practices similar to indentured servitude in an attempt to encourage immigration to the United States, but it was quickly repealed.
1868
Burlingame Treaty of 1868
Negotiated during construction of the Transcontinental Railroad which relied heavily on Chinese labor, this international agreement secured US access to Chinese workers by guaranteeing rights of free migration to both Chinese and Americans.
14th Amendment
Ratified in 1868 to secure equal treatment for African Americans after the Civil War, the Fourteenth Amendment guaranteed
birthright

citizenship

for all persons born in the United States. It also provided for equal protections and due process for all legal residents.

1870
Naturalization Act of 1870
The
Naturalization
Act of 1870 explicitly extended naturalization rights already enjoyed by white immigrants to “
aliens
of African nativity and to persons of African descent,” thus denying access to the rights and protections of
citizenship
to other nonwhite
immigrant
groups.

1872
Chinese Educational Mission 1872-1881
This program sent about 120 Chinese students to study in New England and is often cited as a pioneering effort in mutually beneficial systems of international education which promoted the sharing of knowledge and understanding and improved international relations.
1875
Page Law (1875)
This law prohibited the recruitment to the United States of unfree laborers and women for “immoral purposes” but was enforced primarily against Chinese.
Chy Lung v. Freeman (1875)
This Supreme Court decision affirmed that the federal government holds sole authority to regulate immigration.
1880
Angell Treaty of 1880
This treaty updated the 1868 Burlingame Treaty with China, allowing the United Stated to restrict the migration of certain categories of Chinese workers. It moved U.S. immigration policy closer to outright Chinese exclusion.
1882
Chinese Exclusion Act aka “An Act to execute certain treaty stipulations relating to Chinese”
This law was a major shift in U.S. immigration policy toward growing restrictiveness. The law targeted Chinese immigrants for restriction-- the first such group identified by
race
and class for severely limited legal entry and ineligibility for
citizenship
.

Immigration Act of 1882
Legislated a few months after the Chinese Exclusion Law, this immigration legislation expanded the ranks of
excludable

aliens

to include other undesirable persons and attributes such as "convicts," "lunatics," and "those
likely to become a public charge
."

1884
Elk v. Wilkins (1884)
The Supreme Court ruled that the Fourteenth Amendment did not apply to Native Americans who did not automatically gain
citizenship
by birth and could therefore be denied the right to vote.

1885
Foran Act of 1885 (aka Alien Contract Labor Law)
This law banned the recruitment of workers bound by contracts.
1887
The Dawes Allotment Act
Complaints about the reservation system for Native Americans led Congress to authorize the president to allot – or separate into individual landholdings – tribal reservation lands. Native Americans receiving allotments could gain U.S.
citizenship
, but often lost their land.

1888
Scott Act of 1888
Congress extended domestic authority over immigration to improve enforcement of the Chinese exclusion laws. It abolished one of the exempt statuses, returning laborers, stranding about 20,000 Chinese holding Certificates of Return outside the United States.
1889
Chae Chan Ping v. United States (1889) (aka the Chinese Exclusion Case)
This Supreme Court decision affirmed the plenary powers of U.S. federal authorities over immigration matters, in this instance even when changes in U.S. immigration law reversed earlier policy and practice.
1891
Immigration Bureau established (1891)
Congress quickly came to realize the challenges of enforcing immigration exclusions, leading it to authorize and fund a dedicated immigration bureau responsible both for processing legal immigrants and enforcing immigration restrictions.
Immigration Act of 1891
This 1891 immigration law clarified and centralized the immigration enforcement authority of the federal government, extended immigration inspection to land borders, and expanded the list of
excludable
and deportable immigrants.

1892
Geary Act (1892)
Congress renewed the Chinese exclusion laws and expanded enforcement mechanisms by requiring that Chinese prove their lawful presence in the United States by carrying a Certificate of Residence, a precursor of the green card system, or be liable for detention and
deportation
.

Fong Yue Ting v. United States (1892)
This Supreme Court decision ruled as constitutional the 1892 Geary Act's requirement that Chinese residents, and only Chinese residents, carry Certificates of Residence to prove their legal entry to the United States, or be subject to detention and
deportation
.

1894
Immigration Restriction League
Increasing immigration, mainly from southern and eastern European countries, along with a series of economic downturns fueled nativist fears and the founding of the Immigration Restriction League by three influential Harvard graduates.
1896
Wong Wing v. United States (1896)
This Supreme Court decision that detention by immigration authorities does not constitute a criminal punishment, affirming the lesser rights of
excludable

aliens

.

Plessy v. Ferguson (1896)
This Supreme Court case validated racial segregation by ruling that the equal protections principles mandated by the Fourteenth Amendment could be honored with facilities that were "separate but equal."
1898
United States v. Wong Kim Ark (1898)
This Supreme Court case established the precedent that any person born in the United States is a citizen by birth regardless of
race
or parents' status.

1903
Immigration Act of 1903
This law identified anarchists as targets for exclusion and made provision for their removal if detained after entry.
1904
Extension of the Chinese Exclusion Act (1904)
Congress extended the Chinese exclusion laws in perpetuity in response to the Chinese government's efforts to leverage better conditions for Chinese travelers to the United States by abrogating earlier treaties. Chinese communities organized an anti-American boycott in protest.
1905
Anti-American Boycott (1905)
An international coalition of Chinese merchants and students coordinated boycotts of U.S. goods and services in China and some cities in Southeast Asia to protest the Chinese Exclusion laws.
1907
Expatriation Act of 1907
Under the principle that women assumed the
citizenship
of their husbands, this act stripped citizenship from U.S.-born women when they married noncitizen
immigrant
men.

Gentlemen’s Agreement of 1907-1908
Rather than enacting racially discriminatory and offensive immigration laws, President Theodore Roosevelt sought to avoid offending the rising world power of Japan through this negotiated agreement by which the Japanese government limited the immigration of its own citizens.
1911
Dillingham Commission Reports (1911)
Congress funded this high-level commission to research the causes and impact of recent immigration to build support for significant restrictions on European immigration. The commission produced a 41-volume study in 1911.
1913
Alien Land Laws in California (1913 & 1920)
California, along with many other western states, enacted laws that banned "
aliens
ineligible for
citizenship
" from owning or leasing land. The Supreme Court upheld these laws as constitutional.

1917
Immigration Act of 1917 (Barred Zone Act)
Although this law is best known for its creation of a “barred zone” extending from the Middle East to Southeast Asia from which no persons were allowed to enter the United States, its main restriction consisted of a literacy test intended to reduce European immigration.
Jones-Shafroth Act (1917)
This act enacted U.S.
citizenship
for Puerto Ricans after the United States acquired the island as an incorporated territory in 1898.

1918
Wartime Measure of 1918
This act gave the executive branch greater powers to enforce immigration restrictions during World War I. It particularly targeted anarchists and other potential radicals.
1919
The Palmer Raids (1919-1920)
The U.S. Department of Justice conducted a series of raids to round up, arrest, and deport suspected anarchists and left-wing radicals.
1921
Emergency Quota Law (1921)
Fears of increased immigration after the end of World War I and the spread of radicalism propelled Congress to enact this "emergency" measure imposing drastic quantitative caps on immigration.
1922
Cable Act of 1922
After women gained suffrage with the Nineteenth Amendment in 1920, Congress swiftly enacted this law to restore
citizenship
to U.S.-born women who had married noncitizen husbands and thereby lost their citizenship under the Expatriation Act of 1907.

Ozawa v. United States (1922)
The hardening of U.S. isolationism set the stage for the Supreme Court to affirm the 1790 Nationality Act's stipulation that Asians are ineligible for
naturalization
because they are racially not "white" regardless of their demonstrated acculturation and integration.

1923
Thind v. United States (1923)
Contradicting the logic behind its ruling in Ozawa v. U.S., the Supreme Court found that Bhagat Singh Thind was also ineligible for
citizenship
even though as an Asian Indian, who were as caucasians, he was racially white.

1924
Indian Citizenship Act of 1924
This law stipulated that all Native Americans born in the United States were automatically citizens by birth. Native Americans were the last main group to gain this right set forth in the Fourteenth Amendment.
Immigration Act of 1924 (Johnson-Reed Act)
To further limit immigration, this law established extended "national origins" quotas, a highly restrictive and quantitatively discriminatory system. The quota system would remain the primary means of determining immigrants' admissibility to the United States until 1965.
Labor Appropriations Act of 1924
Immigration within the American hemisphere remained uncapped until 1965; however, in 1924 Congress authorized funding for the Border Patrol to regulate crossings occurring between immigration stations.
1929
Mexican Repatriation (1929-1936)
During the economic and political crises of the 1920s and 1930s, the Border Patrol launched several campaigns to detain Mexicans, including some U.S.-born citizens, and expel them across the border.
Undesirable Aliens Act of 1929 (Blease’s Law)
Blease's Law criminalized crossing the border outside an official port of entry. Primarily designed to restrict Mexican immigration, the law made “unlawfully entering the country” a misdemeanor and returning after a
deportation
a felony.

1934
Tydings-McDuffie Act of 1934
Completing the racial exclusion of Asians, Congress imposed immigration restrictions on Filipinos by granting the Philippines eventual independence. Previously, Filipinos could immigrate freely as U.S. nationals from a colony of the United States.
1942
Bracero Agreement (1942-1964)
During World War II, the U.S. government negotiated with the Mexican government to recruit Mexican workers, all men and without their families, to work on short-term contracts on farms and in other war industries. After the war, the program continued in agriculture until 1964.
Executive Order 9066 (1942-1945)
President Franklin Delano Roosevelt signed this war-time executive order authorizing the rounding up and incarceration of Japanese Americans living within 100 miles of the west coast.
1943
Repeal of Chinese Exclusion (1943)
The importance of China as the U.S. government's chief ally in the Pacific war against Japan led Congress to repeal the Chinese Exclusion laws, placing China under the same immigration restrictions as European countries.
1944
Korematsu v. United States (1944)
This Supreme Court decision upheld the federal government's right to set aside civil rights protections in the name of "military necessity" in ruling on Fred Korematsu's challenge to Executive Order 9066, which authorized removal and incarceration of Japanese Americans.
Ex Parte Endo (1944)
In December 1944, the Supreme Court authorized the end of Japanese American incarceration by ruling that "concededly loyal" U.S. citizens could not be held, regardless of the principle of "military necessity."
1945
War Brides Acts (1945 & 1946)
Congress enacted exceptions to the national origins quotas imposed by the Immigration Act of 1924 in order to help World War II soldiers and veterans bring back foreign spouses and fiances they had met while serving in the military.
1946
Luce-Celler Act of 1946
This law further undermined Asian exclusion by extending
naturalization
rights and immigration quotas to Filipinos and Indians as wartime allies.

Fulbright-Hays Act of 1946
Senator Fulbright of Arkansas proposed using proceeds from the sale of war surplus materials to fund programs to improve mutual understanding between the U.S. and the rest of the world through personnel exchanges and international education.
1948
Displaced Persons Act (1948)
In contrast lawmakers' widespread indifference before World War II, after the war, under pressure from the White House and Department of State, Congress authorized admissions for
refugees
from Europe and permitted
asylum
seekers already in the U.S. to regularize their status.

1951
The 1951 Refugee Convention
This UN Refugee Convention set international standards for refugee rights and resettlement work. It is administered by the United Nations High Commission on
Refugees
. Wary of international obligations, President Truman refused to sign the U.S. government on to the convention.

1952
Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (The McCarran-Walter Act)
The McCarran-Walter Act reformed some of the obvious discriminatory provisions in immigration law. While the law provided quotas for all nations and ended racial restrictions on
citizenship
, it expanded immigration enforcement and retained offensive national origins quotas.

H-2 Guestworker Visa Program
The Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) of 1952 authorized a nonimmigrant visa category, known as H-2, permitting the recruitment of foreign farmworkers to the United States on a temporary basis.
1953
Refugee Relief Act (1953)
Dissatisfaction with the 1952 McCarran-Walter Act inspired support for this legislation which provided 214,000
visas
to
refugees
, primarily from Europe but with 5,000 designated for the Far East.

1954
Operation Wetback (1953-1954)
Even as the bracero program continued to recruit temporary workers from Mexico, the Immigration Bureau led round ups of Mexican nationals. The Bureau claimed to have deported one million Mexicans.
1956
Parole of Hungarians (1956-57), Cubans (1959-62), Chinese (1962)
The parole authority granted the attorney-general in the 1952 McCarran-Walter Act was used three times to aid
refugees
fleeing communism. To avoid public outcry, each use of parole was accompanied by extensive publicity campaigns to promote acceptance.

Chinese Confession Program (1956-1965)
The Immigration Bureau and the FBI used this program to try regularize the statuses of the many Chinese Americans who had entered the United States using some form of immigration fraud under the discriminatory Chinese exclusion laws.
1961
Act of September 26, 1961
This law added more exceptions to immigration restriction by national quotas by categorizing international adoption as a form of family reunification.
1962
An Act: To facilitate the entry of alien skilled specialists and certain relatives of United States citizens, and for other purposes (1962)
This law opened the door to immigration by highly skilled workers from countries with low immigration quotas, anticipating the Immigration Act of 1965's emphasis on employment preferences.
1965
Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 (Hart-Celler Act)
This law set the main principles for immigration regulation still enforced today. It applied a system of preferences for family reunification (75 percent), employment (20 percent), and
refugees
(5 percent) and for the first time capped immigration from the within Americas.

1966
Cuban Adjustment Act of 1966
After Fidel Castro's revolution, anti-communist Cubans received preferential immigration conditions because they came from a historically close U.S. neighbor and ally. This law provided them permanent status and resources to help adjustment to life in the U.S.
1967
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees Refugee Protocol
The UNHCR issued this protocol in 1967 to implement the goals of the 1951 Refugee Convention, which set forth the key principle of refoulement, or that persons in flight from persecution and danger cannot be forced to return to places of danger.
1975
Indochina Migration and Refugee Assistance Act (1975)
The United States made provisions to admit about 135,000 Vietnamese and other Southeast Asians in the months following the fall of Saigon, resettle them across the United States with resources to help them establish new lives.
1976
Immigration and Nationality Act Amendments of 1976 and 1978
The 1976 Amendments extended to the Western Hemisphere a per country ceiling of 20,000 and a modified preference system for arrivals. In 1978, the law was further amended to establish a single worldwide annual ceiling of 290,000.
1980
Refugee Act of 1980
While adhering to the UN standard for defining
refugees
, this law made U.S. refugee policy more responsive to changing situations through the implementation of annual admissions quotas that could be adjusted annually after consultation between Congress and the White House.

Mariel Boatlift of 1980
The Mariel boatlift refers to the mass movement of approximately 125,000 Cuban
asylum
seekers to the United States from April to October 1980. It prompted the creation of the Cuban-Haitian Entrant Program.

1982
Plyler v. Doe (1982)
This Supreme Court case ruled that public school districts cannot constitutionally refuse admission to unauthorized
immigrant
children because the harmful effects to the public outweighed the cost savings.

1984
Korematsu v. United States (1984)
The courts vacated the 1944 Supreme Court conviction of Fred Korematsu for violating curfew orders imposed on Japanese Americans after the attack on Pearl Harbor.
1986
Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA) (1986)
To address the problem of unauthorized immigration, Congress implemented through bipartisan agreement a multi-pronged system that provided
amnesty
for established residents, increased border enforcement, enhanced requirements of employers, and expanded guestworker visa programs.

1990
Immigration Act of 1990
Congress revised the Immigration Act of 1965 by implementing the H-1B visa program for skilled temporary workers, with some provisions for conversion to permanent status, and the diversity visa lottery for populations unable to enter through the preference system.
1991
American Baptist Churches (ABC) Settlement Agreement
The regular denial of
asylum
applications from Salvadorans and Guatemalans fleeing violence in their homelands during the 1980s led to this legal challenge which forced changes to U.S. procedures for handling such cases.

1992
Chinese Student Protection Act (1992)
Legislated in response to the brutal Chinese government crackdowns on student protests in Tiananmen in 1989, this law permitted Chinese students living in the United States to gain legal permanent status.
1996
Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act (IIRIRA) (1996)
Building on the steps taken with IRCA in 1986, IIRIRA further empowered federal authorities to enforce immigration restrictions by adding resources for border policing and for verification of employment credentials.
1997
Nicaraguan Adjustment and Central American Relief Act
The Nicaraguan Adjustment and Central American Relief Act (NACARA) allowed certain Salvadorans, Guatemalans, and Nicaraguans who had fled violence and poverty in their homelands in the 1980s to file for
asylum
and remain in the United States.

The Flores Settlement
The Flores settlement resulted from the 1993 Supreme Court case Reno v. Flores, regarding the treatment of unaccompanied minors in immigration detention. The settlement, currently being challenged, set federal standards for the treatment and release of children in detention.
1998
Haitian Refugee Immigrant Fairness Act
Under the Haitian Refugee Immigration Fairness Act (HRIFA), enacted by Congress on Oct. 21, 1998, certain Haitian nationals who had been residing in the United States could become legal permanent residents.
2001
Zadvydas v. Davis (2001)
This Supreme Court case ruled that immigration authorities cannot indefinitely detain
aliens
ordered deported, but for whom no destination can be arranged.

2002
Enhanced Border Security and Visa Entry Reform Act (2002)
After the attacks of September 11th, the U.S. government acted to expand the budget, staffing, and powers of the immigration enforcement bureaucracy.
Homeland Security Act (2002)
The Homeland Security Act created the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) by consolidating 22 diverse agencies and bureaus. The creation of DHS reflected mounting anxieties about immigration in the aftermath of the terrorist attacks of September 11th.
2006
Secure Fence Act (2006)
Passed in October 2006, this law mandated that the Secretary of Homeland Security act quickly to achieve operational control over U.S. international land and maritime borders including an expansion of existing walls, fences, and surveillance.
2012
Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) (2012)
Trying to cope with the long-term residence of millions of unauthorized immigrants, this executive order provided protection from
deportation
and work authorization to persons who arrived as minor children and had lived in the United States since June 15, 2007.

2014
Deferred Action for Parents of Americans and Lawful Permanent Residents (DAPA) and DACA Program expanded
This executive order issued by the Obama White House sought to defer
deportation
and some other protections for unauthorized immigrants whose children were either American citizens or lawful permanent residents.

2017
Muslim Travel Ban
The "Muslim Ban" refers to a series of the Trump administration's executive orders that prohibited travel and refugee resettlement from select predominately Muslim countries. After several legal challenges, the Supreme Court upheld most provisions of a third version of the ban.
2019
Final Rule on “Public Charge Ground of Inadmissibility”
In 2019, the Trump administration's Department of Homeland Security finalized a rule that expanded the list of received benefits and other factors to be considered in determining whether an applicant for admission or adjustment of status is
likely to become a public charge
.
 

roots69

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
This is a long azz read!! I hate to be the one that has to give the bad news.. But the only way were getting outta dream state/trance, is thru reading!! These colonist didnt want our ancestors reading because they wouldve figured out all our shit was stolen from them and they wouldve wanted all our shit back!! Even to this day they are afraid we will snap outta the trance and want our shit back!! Anyway, enjoy the article!!

THE UNTOLD TRUTH OF THE TRAIL OF TEARS



The story of the actual Trail of Tears is pretty simple. Beginning in the 1830s, the Cherokee people were forced from their land by the U.S. government and forced to walk nearly 1,000 miles to a new home in a place they had never seen before. Thousands of people died on the harsh and totally unnecessary journey. It was, quite simply, one of the worst human rights abuses in American history.
But the story around the Trail is incredibly complicated. It involves a decade of buildup, dubious treaties, government legislation, Supreme Court cases, and more. The people involved are equally as fascinating, from real and fake Cherokee chiefs to various presidents to the general in charge of it all. We have gut-wrenching contemporary accounts from Native Americans and soldiers alike. It all comes together to paint a very clear picture of just how something so horrible was allowed to happen. Here are some things you probably didn't learn about the Trail of Tears in school.

IT WAS ALL BECAUSE OF GOLD, OF COURSE

If historians ever put together a list of "Reasons for Terrible Atrocities," right near the top would be gold. Everyone's favorite shiny thing has caused people to straight-up lose their minds for centuries. You can wipe entire societies off the map as long as you get enough of the stuff.
So it was with the very beginnings of the Trail of Tears. In 1829, a Georgia newspaper announced a ton of gold had been found in the state (via New Georgian Encyclopedia). The northern part of Georgia had been set aside for the Cherokee Nation, but that didn't put off prospectors with dollar signs in their eyes. They poured into the area by the thousands. One participant, writing decades later, said people came from every state, many on foot, and that they acted "more like crazy men than anything else." Even at the time it was known as the "Great Intrusion."The Native Americans were in these newcomers' way and they were treated like trash because of it. But so much worse would come as a result: the speculators looking to get rich off their land started demanding the government do something about those pesky natives. Less than a year after gold was discovered, President Andrew Jackson signed the Indian Removal Act, which led directly to the Trail of Tears.
Then at almost the exact time the last Cherokee were removed on the Trail, the gold ran out.

ANDREW JACKSON WAS ABSOLUTELY DESPICABLE

According to the official Cherokee Nation website, Andrew Jackson probably owed his life to 500 Cherokees who came to his aid during a battle in 1814. He would spend the rest of his days being furious about that.
PBS says Jackson called Native Americans "children in need of guidance," and his version of guidance was trying to kill them all. It started in 1814, when he commanded a force against the Creek. Then he attacked the Seminoles in 1818. Over a decade, he was the guy negotiating nine out of 11 treaties with the U.S. that completely screwed the Native Americans over.
As president he pushed through the Indian Removal Act. Then the Supreme Court ruled for the Cherokee in a case, but he just ignored it, because screw checks and balances if it meant being decent to native people. About North Georgia tells us that as rumors of forced removal swirled, a delegation of worried Cherokee came to see him in Washington and he had the gall to tell them, "You shall remain in your ancient land as long as grass grows and water runs."
Even old and out of power he didn't let up. When a small policy change made the second stage of the Trail of Tears a tiny bit less awful for the Indians, he was absolutely furious, but fortunately he wasn't president anymore, so all he could do was yell about it.

THE NATIVE AMERICANS ABSOLUTELY COULD NOT WIN

While the term "Trail of Tears" is generally only used to refer to the forced removal of the Cherokee, they were not the only Native Americans the government evicted during the 1830s. Not by a long shot. According to the Encyclopedia Britannica, about 100,000 people would be kicked out of their homes, and 15,000 of them would die going west. Most of them belonged to the Cherokee, Creek, Chickasaw, Choctaw, and Seminole tribes.
These tribes tried absolutely everything to get the Johnny-come-lately Americans to like them. PBS says they were known as the "Five Civilized Tribes" because they embraced a lot of white people stuff in the hopes of being accepted. This included things like large-scale farming and the Western education style, and some even took up owning slaves. Instead, this made their white neighbors even more pissed off.
Once the Indian Removal Act was signed, these tribes all took different approaches to dealing with it. Some offered to leave their land voluntarily, while others went to war with the U.S. for years in an attempt to stay put. The Cherokee drew up a constitution based on the USA's to prove their rights and even used the Supreme Court to their advantage, winning a major case in their favor. But they never had a chance. No matter what the tribes did, the result was the same, and it culminated in the Trail of Tears.


IT HAD A SHAKY 'LEGAL' BASIS

If you ever find someone who tries to defend the Trail of Tears, they will probably point to the fact that, technically, it was all totally legal. Why, the Cherokee themselves signed a treaty saying they would happily get out of Dodge!
By the mid-1830s, it was clear the government was serious about the Indian Removal Act. Other tribes were already being moved either on their own or by force. The Cherokee were debating what to do. Unfortunately, some random guy basically decided for them.
John Ridge (pictured) was a member of the Cherokee Nation, but he represented himself to the U.S. government as the head honcho when he was far from it. According to Today in Georgia History, he signed the Treaty of New Echota in 1835 which agreed to trade all the Cherokee land for $5 million. History says the actual Cherokee chief, John Ross, wrote to Congress explaining their mistake, saying, "The instrument in question is not the act of our nation. We are not parties to its covenants; it has not received the sanction of our people," but the government didn't care. They had a treaty, and they were sticking to it.
It all came back to bite Ridge in the butt, though. In 1839, after the Trail of Tears was well underway and the Cherokee realized just how epically bad that fake treaty had been for their people, a bunch of Cherokee got together and assassinated him.

NOT EVERYONE WAS HAPPY ABOUT IT

Obviously, the Cherokee were not on board with being ripped from their ancient home and sent on a dangerous journey to the middle of nowhere. After the Treaty of New Echota, over 15,000 of them (virtually the whole nation at that point) signed a petition asking not to be forced to move.
Not all politicians were for forced removal, either. John Quincy Adams (above) had, at best, a mixed record on Native American relations as president, but when he became a Congressman he became seriously uncomfortable with the situation. According to Indian Country Today he called the Trail of Tears "among the heinous sins of this nation." Davy Crockett, Henry Clay, and Daniel Webster all spoke out against it as well. Both the Indian Removal Act and the Treaty of New Echota only barely passed in Congress after bitter debates.
A bunch of random white people were also sympathetic and active against it, especially Quakers and abolitionists. The "ladies of Steubenville, Ohio" petitioned Congress against the practice in 1830, while the poet Ralph Waldo Emerson eloquently appealed to President Van Buren in 1936. According to Sea Coast Online, seven U.S. towns filed "memorials" asking for previous treaties to be honored and Native Americans to stay put. Even many residents of Georgia, specifically the ones who had been around before the gold rush, wanted the Cherokee to stay. While the nation was by no means agreed on the idea, the government wasn't listening.


THE GUY IN CHARGE HAD GOOD INTENTIONS

The lucky guy picked to be in charge of the actual logistics of the forced removal of thousands of people was Winfield Scott. He is widely considered the greatest general of his time: He commanded troops in three major wars and ran for president three times. The giant, embarrassing blot on Scott's resume, that he would definitely not bring up in a job interview, was being in charge of the Trail of Tears.
The journey was never going to be a success, but he really wanted it to go as well as possible, according to Agent of Destiny: The Life and Times of General Winfield Scott. He gave unbelievably detailed instructions to his soldiers about not shooting people who ran away and taking extra care of the ones who were weak or sick. Scott even taught them about some of the high points in Cherokee history so they would have more respect for their prisoners, and guilt-tripped soldiers by saying everyone in America would be pissed at them if they were even a little bit harsh or cruel.
Scott talked with the Cherokee himself and tried to reassure them they would get decent treatment. He listened to the chiefs when they asked him not to travel in the summer due to the ridiculous heat, and encouraged the Native Americans to get vaccinated before setting off. He also sent out messages to settlers along the Trail, asking them to pretty please be nice to the Cherokee as they passed through.


THE BEST LAID PLANS OF MICE AND MEN

Of course, it didn't work out anywhere near as nicely as General Scott envisioned. Contemporary accounts reveal horrific abuses. One Cherokee who was subjected to the horror later wrote about what happened and sent his writing to the U.S. Bureau of Indian Affairs. Even before they started walking on the Trail it was horrible, especially if people didn't go willingly:
"For these soldiers were sent, by Gorgia [sic], and [the Cherokee] were gathered up and driven, at the point of the bayonet, into camp with the others. [T]hey were not allowed to take any of their household stuff, but were compelled to leave as they were, with only the clothes which they had on. One old, very old man, asked the soldiers to allow him time to pray once more, with his family in the dear old home, before he left it forever. The answer was, with a brutal oath, 'No! no time for prayers. Go!' at the same time giving him a rude push toward the door. Indians were evicted, the whites entered, taking full possession of everything left."
Once they got underway things got worse. It was winter and most Cherokee had inadequate clothes and blankets. They were herded like cattle, whipped to go faster, and died by the thousands from exposure, malnutrition, exhaustion, and disease. One soldier who was there called it "the most brutal order in the History of American Warfare," saying, "the sufferings of the Cherokees [on the Trail of Tears] were awful" and that it was straight-up "murder."


THE FORTS WERE EVEN WORSE THAN THE TRAIL

As soon as the Indian Removal Act was signed in 1830, forts were built from Georgia to what is now Oklahoma that would "house" the Indians along their journey. You'll notice this was eight years before the Trail began, and even five years before the Treaty of New Echota. But About North Georgia says that's because the government absolutely knew what was coming, even if they played dumb when the Cherokee actually asked them about it.


These were basically concentration camps, and if anything, life was even worse in them than on the actual Trail itself. According to Inside America's Concentration Camps: Two Centuries of Internment and Torture, they were dangerously overcrowded, with small forts holding hundreds of Cherokees at a time. People died every single day. Thanks to the "primitive conditions" many died from the same disease and malnutrition that was killing people when they were walking, but a lot saw no way out of the horror and committed suicide. Soldiers guarding the forts were epic bastards. As if the Cherokee didn't already have inadequate food, clothes, and blankets, the guards stole what little they did have with them. Many also repeatedly violated women and children, along with making them and the Cherokee men perform absolutely unmentionable "acts of depravity."
One soldier who guarded the forts would later write, "During the Civil War I watched as hundreds of men died, including my own brother, but none of that compares to what we did to the Cherokee Indians."

THE LEGEND OF THE CHEROKEE ROSE

Legend has it that to this day we still have a very visual reminder of just how badly the Cherokee suffered on the Trail of Tears. As child after child died, the mothers were overcome with grief. But the chiefs knew that if the moms gave up hope, everyone was completely screwed. Cherokees of California says one night they all gathered together and prayed to the Heaven Dweller (ga lv la di e hi). They explained that things were not exactly going great. They worried that if too many kids died, the Cherokee Nation was finished.
According to Barbara Shining Woman Warren's retelling, the Heaven Dweller replied, "To let you know how much I care, I will give you a sign. In the morning, tell the women to look back along the trail. Where their tears have fallen, I will cause to grow a plant that will have seven leaves for the seven clans of the Cherokee. Amidst the plant will be a delicate white rose with five petals. In the center of the blossom will be a pile of gold to remind the Cherokee of the white man's greed for the gold found on the Cherokee homeland. This plant will be sturdy and strong with stickers on all the stems. It will defy anything which tries to destroy it."
The next morning the mothers looked, and everywhere they had shed a tear, a beautiful, symbolic rose was growing. And they still flourish along the Trail to this day.


'INDIAN TERRITORY' DIDN'T LAST LONG

The idea at the time was that as horrific a human rights abuse as it was, the Trail of Tears was totally going to be worth it for the Cherokee in the end. According to the University of Minnesota, in exchange for very begrudgingly giving up their land in Georgia so prospectors could make a quick buck, an area called Indian Territory west of the Mississippi would be set aside for their use for all eternity. Of course, we now call that same area Oklahoma, so obviously it didn't work out that way.
That's not what people expected to happen at the time, though. Most citizens thought America would stop at the river, a natural end point to the country. The term "manifest destiny" wasn't even coined until seven years after the Trail of Tears started. But it was a shocking short amount of time before there were issues.
After just two relatively boring decades in their new home, the Civil War divided the Cherokee just like the rest of the U.S. and it led to border disputes in the territory. Then in 1887, when the area of the U.S. was engulfing their nation, an act was passed saying they had to purchase the land they had been given by the government. Then oil was discovered, everyone's second favorite thing after gold, and white people started flooding the place. In 1907, Oklahoma officially became a state and the Cherokee Nation was abolished, less than 70 years after they left their homes on the Trail.
 

roots69

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
Hmmm


mi·nor·i·ty
/məˈnôrədē/

noun
  • 1.the smaller number or part, especially a number that is less than half the whole number:"a minority party"
  • 2.the state or period of being under the age of full legal responsibility:"intrigues between factions striving to make the king their puppet continued throughout his minority"


Who is considered a minority?
  • "Minority" refers to those who are marginalized from the perceived "majority.". Minority status is often determined by race, gender, and sexual orientation. According to recent reports, Hispanics are the biggest minority group in the United States.( the hijack is full motion)
 

roots69

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
When you walkout the front or backdoor everything you see, to the right, to the left, up and down to the ground, is our shit!! This is our land!! But the billions of dollars they spent yearly, for DECADES to deceive our people is in full effect!! But, aint nobody listening!!!
 

roots69

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
There's a method for their madness!! We are the Indigenous( Aboriginal peoples) Copper Color People of these lands or country!! We've been lied to from day 1!!! Who do you or would believe?? Your great grandparents, your grandparents, aunts and uncles or would you believe these teachers, tv celebrities, mcgraw&hill???




Q5nrI4b6_t.jpg
 

Lexx Diamond

Art Lover ❤️ Sex Addict®™
Staff member
RIP.



Last surviving male member of exterminated Brazilian indigenous group dies of Covid

Daniel Capurro
Fri, February 19, 2021, 9:23 AM


A health worker from the Ministry of Health Department for Indigenous Health adminsters a second dose of a COVID-19 vaccine to patient Maria Tereza in Sao Jose IIIÂ do rio Maro, in the Lower Amazon region of the state of Para, near Santarem in Brazil, on February 13, 2021 - Tarso SARRAF/AFP via Getty Images

A health worker from the Ministry of Health Department for Indigenous Health adminsters a second dose of a COVID-19 vaccine to patient Maria Tereza in Sao Jose IIIÂ do rio Maro, in the Lower Amazon region of the state of Para, near Santarem in Brazil, on February 13, 2021 - Tarso SARRAF/AFP via Getty Images
The last surviving man of an exterminated Brazilian indigenous group has died from complications linked to Covid-19.
Aruká Juma, who died on Wednesday aged between 86 and 90, was the last Juma man left from a tribe that once numbered 15,000. Repeated massacres in the 20th century meant that by 2002, just five Juma people were left – Mr Juma, his three daughters and a grandchild.
Brazil’s indigenous groups are particularly vulnerable to Covid-19 because of their isolation, communal way of life and poor healthcare provisions.
At the beginning of the pandemic, many indigenous groups sought to cut themselves off from the outside world by closing roads and turning away visitors. Those efforts failed, however, and the virus is now widespread among indigenous communities, with almost 49,000 cases and 969 deaths and 162 tribes affected, according to Government figures.

Part of the blame may lie with the federal indigenous health service, known as Sesai. According to the Emergencia Indigena campaign, in at least three regions the virus was introduced by infected Sesai workers, while a New York Times investigation last year uncovered over a thousand infections among Sesai officials who were forced to work without adequate protective equipment or access to enough tests.
Indigenous groups, many of whom remain officially “uncontacted”, also face threats from the encroachment of miners and agricultural businesses, which have grown worse under the populist, Right-wing government of president Jair Bolsonaro.
As a teenager in the 1960s, Mr Juma witnessed the worst massacre of his people, when rubber tappers and tropical nut traders intruded on their land. Over 60 Juma are thought to have been killed, with just seven remaining alive.
Over subsequent decades he campaigned for federal recognition for the Jumas’ land, but the effort was complicated by the lack of other Juma men and his family’s decision to move in with another group, the Uru-eu-wau-wau, where his daughters married.
Mr Juma’s eldest daughter, Borehá Juma, said that she intended to follow in her father's footsteps. “I want to become like him now to fight like my father. My father was a warrior. He was chief, I was chief and now the lineage is over ”, she told Amazonia Real.
 

roots69

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
American
AMER'ICAN, adjective Pertaining to America.
AMER'ICAN, noun A native of America; originally applied to the aboriginals, or copper-colored races, found here by the Europeans; but now applied to the descendants of Europeans born in America.




I hope everyone got sum good information from this thread!! Start questioning what you've been told and taught in these so called schools and what you've been feed from the tel a vision!! Start researching your family tree, stay away from those dna test sites those sites are for entertainment only!! Theres noway in hell they can trace your family from a small amount of spit. They would have to dig up every one of your ancestors to trace your family tree!! Anyway, the only way were going to find out our past is to READ & UNPLUG from the TV!! Well, everyone have a good year..


 
Top