A debate that cranrab could appreciate...

Re: A debate that cranrab WOULD NOT appreciate...


i couldn't tolerate more than a couple minutes of the bullshit, so i stopped somewhere in the first page of responses.

1st, it's clear that NONE of the contributors to that thread ever watched julius erving play professionally before the 1980's.

2nd, it's clear that NONE of the contributors to that thread know what he did in college.

3rd, most probably are only old enough to have watched julius erving when the league had literally outgrown him. most of his career was played at the SF, but near the end he was forced to play 2G because of his size.

how absurd that one idiot proclaimed that julius erving was over-rated.

how assinine that another suggested that it was easy to post stats in the ABA. is that why his FG% went UP after joining the NBA? those dumbfucks probably don't realize that julius erving was playing more than 40 minutes per game in the ABA.

:smh:
 
Back
Top