$86 million raised in 2nd quarter for Obama's re-election

thoughtone

Rising Star
Registered
I'm starting to see a pattern here. Whatever you guys are afraid of you attack. (ie Palin, Bachmann, Linbaugh, Fox News). All you do is validate their dominance. Get some balls and some self confidence.

source: Seattle Times


WASHINGTON — President Obama's re-election campaign raked in $86 million in the second quarter of the year, far eclipsing the amounts raised by his Republican opponents and bolstering his accounts for an ongoing clash with well-funded GOP-allied groups.

The haul highlighted the fundraising advantages of incumbency — the entire field of Republican candidates is expected to report raising about $35 million combined.

Details about how Obama and the other candidates have been raising and spending campaign cash will be made public Friday, when the campaigns file reports with the Federal Election Commission. Obama's report alone is expected to be more than 15,000 pages long.

Obama campaign manager Jim Messina noted that the president will not only have to contend with GOP candidates but the better-funded outside groups, which can raise and spend undisclosed amounts of money. In recent months, groups aligned with Republicans have poured tens of millions of dollars into unusually early and expensive ad campaigns aimed against Obama and Democrats.

Obama raised $47 million through his presidential campaign and $38 million jointly with the Democratic National Committee (DNC), which can collect much larger sums. The record for any quarter in a pre-election year is $50 million, achieved by George W. Bush in the third quarter of 2003.

Messina said the campaign received contributions from 550,000 individuals, more than the total number of donors who contributed in all of 2007. The vast majority of contributions — 98 percent — came in the form of donations of $250 or less, Messina said.

But wealthy donors also played a role. In recent months, the campaign has reinforced efforts to court large-dollar donors, organizing a series of events with the DNC.

Obama's closest competitor in the GOP field, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, says he will report $18 million collected during the last three months. In addition, an independent group supporting Romney says it has raised more than $12 million this year.
 
Average donations, depending on whether you're talking about the DNC or the re-election campaign itself: $69 and $80. They also added an additional 200,000 new donors.
So while I'm sure Goldman will get their money in, they do play both sides, there's no evidence that's what happened here. Unless you think they have people on Goldman staff who sit around and write checks for $70.
The Obama people have been working this for a while. I know I got a donation email.
 
Still makin allegations you can't prove.........jive turkey :smh:

This thread aint about Ron Paul, It's about Obama.
So, let me remind you (I included the link for you): Obama got some BP money, didn't he? :yes:

Sen. Obama Voted For 2005 Bush / Cheney Energy Bill

Still makin allegations you can't prove


From your boys:

source: Faux Snooze:


Rep. Ron Paul Defends His Earmarks in Spending Bill

Wednesday, March 11, 2009
foxnews_story.gif



This is a rush transcript from "Your World With Neil Cavuto," March 10, 2009. This copy may not be in its final form and may be updated.

NEIL CAVUTO, HOST: Speaking of a lot of money, the battle about the money they're spending on Capitol Hill and, ironically, this guy is being targeted as maybe spending the most or at least earmarking the most for his constituents. He says it isn't fair.

But we thought it only fair to give him his due and explain what is going on. I'm talking about Texas congressman and former presidential candidate, Ron Paul.

Congressman, the rap is that you're a porker, that — that a lot of pork, $73 million-plus, went to your district. Is that true?

REP. RON PAUL, R-TEXAS: Well, it might be.

But I think you're missing the whole point. I have never voted for an earmark. I voted against all appropriation bills. So, this whole thing about earmarks is totally misunderstood.

Eamarks is the responsibility of the Congress. We should earmark even more. We should earmark every penny. So, that's the principle that we have to follow and the — and the responsibility of the Congress. The whole idea that you vote against an earmark, you don't save a penny. That just goes to the administration and they get to allocate the funds.

.........jive turkey

Damn, I ain't heard that term in 35 years! :lol:

R-1464188-1284146589.jpeg




This thread aint about Ron Paul, It's about Obama.

So i can't change the subject like you do continually.
 
It'll be OBAMA again in 2012 hands down, the banks have their guy

I am beginning to sense, that the banks may not be as all-powerful as they once were.

It would not surprise me at all if the average voter just decided to vote for anyone other than a Republicrat or Democan.

Their is a great anger in this country, that is building against politicians. People haven't figured out a way to voice that to get the results they want, but it is there and growing.

If Obama wins, it may be the end of the United States as we know it (I say good riddance).

If Obama loses, it may buy a little more time.

Personally, I just don't see how Obama wins a 2nd term. The bankers may love him but he is such a huge liability as far as his credibility. (wars, gas prices, deficits, unemployment, militarized police, foreclosures)

I think a white boy wins in 2012. When he fails, the United States will too!

It's time to try a new governmental structure, because the one in place now is not working.
 
I am beginning to sense, that the banks may not be as all-powerful as they once were.

It would not surprise me at all if the average voter just decided to vote for anyone other than a Republicrat or Democan.

Their is a great anger in this country, that is building against politicians. People haven't figured out a way to voice that to get the results they want, but it is there and growing.

If Obama wins, it may be the end of the United States as we know it (I say good riddance).

If Obama loses, it may buy a little more time.

Personally, I just don't see how Obama wins a 2nd term. The bankers may love him but he is such a huge liability as far as his credibility. (wars, gas prices, deficits, unemployment, militarized police, foreclosures)

I think a white boy wins in 2012. When he fails, the United States will too!

It's time to try a new governmental structure, because the one in place now is not working.


If Obama wins, it may be the end of the United States as we know it

No, that happen under GW. The culmination of the Reagan Revolution. Can't you see the shit we are in to now!
 
No, that happen under GW. The culmination of the Reagan Revolution. Can't you see the shit we are in to now!

What I am talking about is the American lifestyle of blissful ignorance that results from untold abundance.

When the blackout/brownouts start happening so regularly you can predict them...

when the gas stations routinely run out of gas...
when the supermarkets have aisles of empty shelves...
when turning on the light switch is no guarantee the lights will shine...
when armed guards stand outside of hospitals...
when fast food joints start crossing off menu items for lack of supplies...
when prices change before you get to the counter...
when people fear the police for a shakedown/extortion/bribes...
when States openly/successfully defy the Federal government/Supreme Court...
when savings/investments/pensions are wiped out from 1 day to the next...

that is the end of the United States as we know it.

I think that will happen under term 2 of Obama, or whoever is elected in 2012.

It won't be pretty if you are hoping for the status quo.
 
When the blackout/brownouts start happening so regularly you can predict them...

when the gas stations routinely run out of gas...
when the supermarkets have aisles of empty shelves...
when turning on the light switch is no guarantee the lights will shine...
when armed guards stand outside of hospitals...
when fast food joints start crossing off menu items for lack of supplies...
when prices change before you get to the counter...
when people fear the police for a shakedown/extortion/bribes...
when States openly/successfully defy the Federal government/Supreme Court...
when savings/investments/pensions are wiped out from 1 day to the next...

this will happen and the cycle will repeat as brothas like Thought1 demand the govt to "fix" the problem. :lol:

The bankers are gonna ride this Obama hype as far as it will take them. Yes, I see a 2nd term. But when the world loses faith in the currency, We'll learn about the Continuity of Govt. plans Ollie North was refering to during the Iran-Contra hearings.

This was planned a looooong time ago
 
Back
Top