8 Signs She’s A Keeper

I got 7/8. I think.

And lead doesn't mean be a submissive slave. It means u recognize the man as the head of the household. Alot of responsibility is attached to that role so it's not to be taken lightly...
 
the list is great. BUt our reality in these streets is different. Many women grow up with no fathers. that strikes one. Older u get, coulds and marriages r already involved.

when i was single I looked for a sweet girl, who wasn't materialistic and didnt have too many dicks on her resume. I found it and we worked from there with the rest of the issues.
 
It seems you dont understand gender roles.

Man/woman roles to be lived out are different.

One is not more important, they are equally important.

Men are builders & destroyers.women cultivators & nurturiors.

Most times I take the lead, there are times when I know my queen knows best

I allow her to be more of the pro-active force or the spark. It is definitely a partnership.

That's not what he said. That's not what the article said either. My husband had better knowledge in some areas, we had better in some areas. Partnership. You said you and yours do the same. That's not what the article is talking about. Or the poster i quoted. Men can nurture as well btw. My husband nurtured his sons into understanding beings. To seek it. To seek knowledge and use that knowledge for good. They grow things in the garden. and they help people.

I know a woman who's MUCH more into destroying than any other man i know. People can be many things is all i'm saying.

I do believe that i as a woman for the most part i'm a nurturer. I take care of my husband, family.

i cooked, i fed them. I put my energy into them. I love them and shelter my friends. But i also know how to make money and i also have the will to and courage to do what's needed, AND STILL HAVE FOOD and clothes ready for my family. Still have a gentle heart with them

I'm not just this or that, we can be many things, and we can work many ways
 
You're to literal!

I see you dont read with a certain understanding.

You have to be able to read between the lines.

The article is giving an example, not 'law of nature'.


No.
On the contrary; I completely understood the context of the post,
I simply do not agree with this aspect of it. That's all... :dunno:
 
You'd be surprised just how many RorD chicks there are if you treat them right. Too many brothas shit on their women, then expect them to prove their RorD status when shit hits the fan. :dunno:

It don't work like that.
 
You'd be surprised just how many RorD chicks there are if you treat them right. Too many brothas shit on their women, then expect them to prove their RorD status when shit hits the fan. :dunno:

It don't work like that.

:yes: Women will in general do anything for the man who proves he's worth it. To prove he's worth it he's got to abide by some rules himself.
 
Its all shits and giggles until someone makes a comment about men these days but....

Like Ive said before, their is a lot of good women out there but ya'll chose to chase after fast women until ya'll both get burnt out. Men dont like taking their time and growing a relationship because their are so many women that dont care either...they just want that quickie.

Wheres the guy who dumped the girl because she was too nice? :rolleyes:

No disrespect and I tell my wife and sons this. Women don't know nothing about dating women. You'll never know a woman like a real man does.
 
Your view on this is very myopic. I bet you if you asked Beyonce who leads their relationship and she would immediately say Jay Z and she's an icon and makes 50 million in a good year. It's about the masculine and feminine spirit. The masculine spirit leads. You can have two women in a lesbian relationship and one of them will typically have the more "masculine" spirits. You can have a man in a relationship with a woman who takes a more "feminine" role. That's no problem as long as there is balance but it's not typical. It's not even about the gender. It's not even about being subservient. You're lost if you really think that it's about that.

I don't care what Bey and Jay do. They on some other type stuff.

I'm offended you think i give a damn. Jay Z is not the type of man i would ever follow. Holy jeez. That's who you think is worth something?

As having been married to a man and now married to women i think i'm a little better at deciding how my relationship works than you. Your problem is you think can only be 1 way. You don't understand what cooperation and equality and RESPECT is for your spouses. For your soulmates.

Maybe i'm wrong. MAY BE. But by what you wrote you don't seem to get it. My husband never lorded shit over me. Never thought he was better than me and never thought he was my leader. I was/am his WIFE. His MATE from here into the ever after.

And he respected my mind and decisions as i did HIS. You talk about myopia? While you're the 1 not understanding how there's other ways to make things work?
 
I can't believe that yall are still arguing with that troll. males and females in nature (including homo sapiens) have roles that are better suited for specific genders.

women =/= men

men =/= women

take away all of these "laws" and "civilization" and "modern technology" and it will be quickly recognized what gender roles are again.
 
men are not designed to bear children.
men are not designed to produce milk.

women are not designed to protect.
women are not designed to build.

even when I am "out of shape" the best female weightlifter in the world can't bench or squat more than me.

even if I haven't trained in years the best female fighter would have a tremendously difficult time bringing me down.

no matter what I do will never be able to bear a child or produce milk for said child.

women fell in line back in the day not because they did not have a choice but because it was imperative for them to do so in order that they and their offspring could survive.

a man can survive on his own. a woman (especially with kids) is hit.

if the government wasn't subsidizing all of these women of all races right now the divorce rate wouldn't be where it is at and there would be a steep decline in unwed mothers. and the government subsidizes these women in more ways than just monetarily.
 
Back
Top