4 Things That Were Supposed To Happen By 2015 Because Obama Was Reelected

thoughtone

Rising Star
Registered
source: Think Progress


shutterstock_182041511-638x432.jpg


It’s now 2015, nearly two years after Obama took the oath of office for the second time. A few years ago, prognosticators were very confident about what would happen to America by now because of Obama’s reelection. Let’s check in and see how their predictions turned out:


1. Gas was supposed to cost $5.45 per gallon.

In March 2012, on the floor of the United States Senate, Mike Lee (R-UT) predicted that if Obama was reelected gas would cost $5.45 per gallon by the start 2015. Lee said that gas prices would rise 5 cents for every month Obama was in office, ultimately reaching $6.60 per gallon.

<iframe allowfullscreen="" src="https://archive.org/embed/CSPAN2_20120307_140000_U.S._Senate?start=5667.8&end=5727.8" webkitallowfullscreen="true" mozallowfullscreen="true" frameborder="0" height="480" width="640"></iframe>

Lee was not alone. Newt Gingrich, running for the GOP nomination, predicted that if Obama was reelected he would push gas to “$10 a gallon.” Gingrich said he would reduce gas prices dramatically by reversing Obama’s energy policies. Gingrich flanked himself with campaign signs promising $2.50 gas if he was elected.

gingrich-638x336.jpg


Today, the nationwide average for a gallon of gas is $2.24.

A lot of the reasons for the decline in gas prices are well beyond Obama’s control — including weak international demand and OPEC’s failure to reduce supply. But the policies that Lee, Gingrich and others criticized — the failure to approve the Keystone XL pipeline, more EPA regulation and limiting drilling on public land — have not gotten in the way of historically low prices.


2. Unemployment was supposed to be stuck at over 8%

In September 2012, Mitt Romney predicted that if Obama is reelected “you’re going to see chronic high unemployment continue four years or longer.” At the time, the unemployment rate was 8.1% and had been between 8.1% and 8.3% for the entire year.

What would breaking out of “chronic high unemployment” look like in a Romney presidency? Romney pledged that, if elected, he could bring the unemployment rate down to 6% by January 2017.

The unemployment rate currently stands at 5.8% and has been under 6% since September 2014. Since January 2013, the economy has created nearly 5 million new jobs.

3. The stock market was supposed to crash

Immediately after Obama won reelection in November 2012, many commenters predicted that the stock market was toast.

Charles Bilderman, the author of the “Intelligent Investing” column at Forbes, wrote that the “market selloff after Obama’s re-election [was] no accident,” predicting “stocks are dropping with no bottom in sight.” Bilderman said that the policies the Obama administration would pursue in his second term would “crash stocks.”

On Bloomberg TV, investor Marc Faber predicted that, because of Obama’s reelection, the stock market would drop at least 20%. According to Faber, “Republicans understand the problem of excessive debt better than Mr. Obama who basically doesn’t care about piling up debt.” Faber joked that investors seeking to protect their assets should “buy themselves a machine gun.”

The Dow Jones Industrial Average currently stands at 17,823 and is up over 35% since Obama was reelected.

4. The entire U.S. economy was supposed to collapse

Rush Limbaugh predicted that “the country’s economy is going to collapse if Obama is re-elected.” Limbaugh was confident in his prediction: “There’s no if about this. And it’s gonna be ugly. It’s gonna be gut wrenching, but it will happen.”

The economic freefall would begin, according to Limbaugh, because “California is going to declare bankruptcy” and Obama would force states like Texas to “bail them out.” California currently has a $4 billion budget surplus.

Limbaugh added, “I know mathematics, and I know economics. I know history. I know socialism, statism, Marxism, I know where it goes. I know what happens at the end of it.”

He did fudge, however, on the exact timing of the economic apocolypse. Limbaugh said it could take “a year and a half, two years, three years.” It’s been two years and two months since Limbaugh’s prediction, so he still technically has another 10 months to be proven right.

The U.S. economy grew at a robust 5% in the 3rd quarter of 2014, following 4.6% growth in the second quarter.

Although these dire economic predictions have proven false, it doesn’t mean there aren’t real, persistent problems with the U.S. economy. Most critically, wage growth for American workers remains stagnant. That’s why, although many economic indicators are strong, a lot of Americans aren’t yet feeling the impact.
 
source: Roll Call

Reid Touts 2009 ‘Cash For Clunkers’ Program

reid_092_0501314-445x297.jpg

Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid, in a photo from last May. (Photo By Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call)

Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid on Friday gave a plug for the 2009 “cash for clunkers” program, arguing that it had helped revive a faltering economy.

“Think where the economy would be if we didn’t have programs like cash for clunkers,” Reid said.

“And what about the bailout of Detroit [auto makers]? Our automobile industry was going down, down, down. Now since that time, hundreds of thousands of jobs have been created. And the Republicans opposed all those measures.”

Reid made his comments during an interview with National Public Radio station KNPR in Nevada.

According to a 2010 study by two economists, Atif Mian at the University of California, Berkeley and Amir Sufi at the University of Chicago Booth School of Business, the $2.85 billion program consisted of payments to car dealers of up to $4,500 for each older, less fuel-efficient vehicle traded in by people who purchased a newer, more fuel-efficient vehicle.

The economists said the incentives “induced a large increase in automobile purchases during the two months of the program.”

They estimated that 360,000 cars were purchased under the program during July and August 2009 that would otherwise not have been purchased.

But they also found that “most vehicle purchases induced by the program were borrowed from purchases that would have otherwise occurred in the very near future.”

And they said the net impact of the program “is far smaller than initial gains in auto purchases suggest.”

They also concluded that the effect of cash for clunkers on employment in the automobile industry “is difficult to separate from the federal bailouts of General Motors and Chrysler in early 2009.”

In his NPR comments Friday, Reid also touted his relationship with Tesla’s Elon Musk as a factor in that company’s decision to locate its new factory to build lithium ion batteries in Nevada.

He added, “I also give Gov. [Brian] Sandoval credit for being so easy to work with, as far as I was concerned, on Tesla.” Some political observers see Sandoval as Reid’s possible Republican opponent in the 2016 Senate race.
 
source: TPM

Harry Reid Mocks McConnell For Taking Credit For The Economy


upvwwwztvnyp8l0g7prw.jpg


On Friday, Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) laughed at his Republican counterpart's attempt to link the improving economy to the GOP takeover of the Senate.

Calling into KNPR radio, Reid told the host it was a "gross understatement" that he disagrees with Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY).

"They [Republicans] have worked for six years to do what they said they'd do — that is, make sure [President] Obama was not reelected. They failed there. The next thing they said they'd do ... is oppose everything he did," he said.

McConnell said on Wednesday that "the uptick [in economic data] appears to coincide with the biggest political change of the Obama administration's long tenure in Washington: the expectation of a new Republican Congress."

The Democratic leader said "we're satisfied" with economic improvements, but he argued that Republicans "have done things that have hurt the economy."

"If they had cooperated with us even a little bit the economy would be stronger than it is now," he said. "Think where the economy would be if we didn't have a program like Cash For Clunkers ... and what about the bailout of Detroit? Our auto industry was going down, down, down. ... The Republicans opposed all those measures, every one of them."
 
Back
Top