25% of the World's Prison Population

SPECTRE1

SE for CI, Terrorism, Revenge, Extortion
Registered
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/23/world/americas/23iht-23prison.12253738.html?pagewanted=all

The United States has less than 5 percent of the world's population. But it has almost a quarter of the world's prisoners.

Indeed, the United States leads the world in producing prisoners, a reflection of a relatively recent and now entirely distinctive American approach to crime and punishment. Americans are locked up for crimes — from writing bad checks to using drugs — that would rarely produce prison sentences in other countries. And in particular they are kept incarcerated far longer than prisoners in other nations.

Criminologists and legal scholars in other industrialized nations say they are mystified and appalled by the number and length of American prison sentences.

The United States has, for instance, 2.3 million criminals behind bars, more than any other nation, according to data maintained by the International Center for Prison Studies at King's College London.

China, which is four times more populous than the United States, is a distant second, with 1.6 million people in prison. (That number excludes hundreds of thousands of people held in administrative detention, most of them in China's extrajudicial system of re-education through labor, which often singles out political activists who have not committed crimes.)

San Marino, with a population of about 30,000, is at the end of the long list of 218 countries compiled by the center. It has a single prisoner.

The United States comes in first, too, on a more meaningful list from the prison studies center, the one ranked in order of the incarceration rates. It has 751 people in prison or jail for every 100,000 in population. (If you count only adults, one in 100 Americans is locked up.)

The only other major industrialized nation that even comes close is Russia, with 627 prisoners for every 100,000 people. The others have much lower rates. England's rate is 151; Germany's is 88; and Japan's is 63.

The median among all nations is about 125, roughly a sixth of the American rate.

There is little question that the high incarceration rate here has helped drive down crime, though there is debate about how much.

Criminologists and legal experts here and abroad point to a tangle of factors to explain America's extraordinary incarceration rate: higher levels of violent crime, harsher sentencing laws, a legacy of racial turmoil, a special fervor in combating illegal drugs, the American temperament, and the lack of a social safety net. Even democracy plays a role, as judges — many of whom are elected, another American anomaly — yield to populist demands for tough justice.

Whatever the reason, the gap between American justice and that of the rest of the world is enormous and growing.

It used to be that Europeans came to the United States to study its prison systems. They came away impressed.

"In no country is criminal justice administered with more mildness than in the United States," Alexis de Tocqueville, who toured American penitentiaries in 1831, wrote in "Democracy in America."

No more.

"Far from serving as a model for the world, contemporary America is viewed with horror," James Whitman, a specialist in comparative law at Yale, wrote last year in Social Research. "Certainly there are no European governments sending delegations to learn from us about how to manage prisons."

Prison sentences here have become "vastly harsher than in any other country to which the United States would ordinarily be compared," Michael Tonry, a leading authority on crime policy, wrote in "The Handbook of Crime and Punishment."
 
16073896-574.jpg"




Read the book THE NEW JIM CROW


It will explain how & why the US prison population has exploded since the late 1970's

jbiwlJ5Htzjffs.jpg


<img src="http://k.minus.com/jk20eGkqM5L49.jpg" width="300">
Author Michelle Alexander

Download and read the book, then buy a copy so the author can get paid.


Code:
http://www65.zippyshare.com/v/FVUsJsLg/file.html



 
Last edited:
First you are steered into criminal activity with poverty and wealth inequality plus targeted law enforcement activity (stop and frisk). There could also be the abundance of cheap drugs that appear out of nowhere that is pumped into your community:

Bundesarchiv_Bild_101I-680-8285A-08%2C_Budapest%2C_Festnahme_von_Juden.jpg


Evidence that wealth inequality can cause high imprisonment rates. You can achieve wealth inequality by moving low skill production jobs overseas that frequently hire minorities or reducing unionization as advocated by the GOP.

imprisonment.gif


When you lock a person up with harsher sentences, you reduce future generations intentionally since a person is doing their cell mate now. This is what happens to the future generation (millions) that would have been born had it been not for the concentration camp/prison industrial system:

Einsatzgruppen_Killing.jpg


The trifecta that is achieved with incarcerating minorities: lose substantial income during and after incarceration, block voting, create a wealth transfer from one racial group to another, gain a non-discriminatory reason not to hire you after you are released, and impact the number of children of that racial group (different way of reducing a population than Hitler's approach). Although it looks like it is the persons fault, a system was designed to steer a person towards those roles; obfuscating the organizer culpability in your demise.

Thomas Jefferson, Abraham Lincoln, and many prominent American leader expressed desires of relocating free slaves back to Africa (reducing the African population), is this a continuation of their ideas? American Colonization Society, was created before WWII, and expressed many of the ideas of Neo-Nazi groups today- existed until 1964! President Lincoln was a prominent member, yet the group was unsuccessful in relocating freed slaves due to the lack of interest by tribes and costs. Is this a new way to achieve their goals?

Based on the past history, there should be more oversight of the International Criminal Court and United Nations due to past history. If you are as a governor, president, or mayor; adopting policies to increase incarceration rates of a racial group, you should be tried for crimes against humanity at the ICC, along with Saddam, Milosevic, and Himler. Most of this activity takes place at the local or state level, so having a bi-racial president or electing Herman Cain won't impact the process!!! Ask Troy Davis if that made any difference...
 
Last edited:


First you are steered into criminal activity


Funny thing; not a single person in the pictures you posted were black :hmm:

Before you miss my point, without question there is a problem and its getting worse. But the analogies you used aren't applicable of fitting. This is one where you don't have to go off into the wild to demostrate the point. Is it ???
 
Targeting Racial Groups for Incarceration

Do you ever see on TV an epidemic of cocaine, marijuana, PCP, or other drugs? Maybe because the primary users are white...

If I was a sick mentally ill racist, this is what I do to other ethnic groups- Save our Land!!!

You become elected as a politician, you are silent about your racist views towards other groups. Second, after being elected you go on TV and hype up the dangers of Marijuana - hold a evidence bag of Marijuana, you establish that people are dying and becoming addicted. You focus on how evil drugs are to a person, running ads on TV. Once you got everybody scared, you change the laws at the federal and state level to increase the prison sentence for users significantly. Politicians will be afraid to resist out of fear of being supporters of drug use. There is also significant grant money given out for law enforcement to staff up, something antithetical to the core beliefs of your political party. You also abandon your policy of personal responsibility and self-determination, the drug dealers do not actively promote drug use or force users to inject/smoke the drug.

The police and federal officer, possibly unaware of the true intent begin to arrest one ethnic group significantly, stuffing them into prison because they are users. These people are given high mandatory minimum sentences. You stack the drug sentences towards the users, the less drugs they have, the longer the prison sentence they get, instead of assigning equal blame. There is also involvement of the CIA in bringing Marijuana into the country to allegedly fund some anti-Communist group.

The people do not realize a silent holocaust is being waged against them, accept their plight, believing they are guilty of their crimes. Their population growth begins to decline because of the high incarceration rate, AIDS begins to spread because of the unprotected homosexual sex in prison. The world is unaware that you have conducted the largest mass genocide of a racial group since Hitler.
 
Last edited:
Why would a political party that stands for limited government and personal freedoms push for harsh prison sentences? The crack versus cocaine fair sentencing laws are going into effect today, time to reflect upon the past.

In the past or currently, did the United States commit genocide to reduce their minority population through their prison industrial complex?

Three Strikes and your Out-Implemented under Republican Governship
Hiring Excessive Number of Police in a Community
War on Drugs-Republican
Sentencing 'Guidelines'-Republican
Stop and Frisk-Republican
High Mandatory Minimum Sentences-Republican
Tough on Crime
Crack Cocaine Sentencing Disparity-Repubican

Coded Language for minority population disruption and reduction, concentration camps to prevent minority births pushed by the GOP such as Ashcroft. Why kill a person like Hitler, isolate your undesirables and put them in a cell for 10 years for stealing water, prevent them from reproducing and/or get AIDS that spreads when they get released...

<iframe width="480" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/b8zGIakh2QU" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

<iframe width="480" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/EzyCjlRSc4Y" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Voter ID Laws pushed by Republicans to make it harder for the poor to vote, is a another prevention strategy. You disguise your true intent under the ruse of pursuing some type of crime such as fraud.

The Voter ID law pushed in Wisconsin would prevent half a million people from voting. However, the number of voter fraud cases are so small, that it is laughable.


<iframe width="480" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/dRvMAoHV7Io" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

About 10.4% of the entire African-American male population in the United States aged 25 to 29 was incarcerated,

black-slavery-prison-privatization.jpg


John Ashcroft-GOP

John Ashcroft has advocated an escalation of the drug war that if enacted could launch the nation's incarcerated population even further above the two million mark than it stands at already.

In an interview given to Larry King Live on February 7th, Ashcroft stated, "I want to escalate the war on drugs. I want to renew it... refresh it, re-launch it..." Pressed by King for specifics, however, the Attorney General declined to provide them, other than a "Parent Drug Corps" idea proposed by the new administration.

If you want to be tough on crime, be tough with every race, not just minority groups.

David Duke - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Duke - Former Grand Wizard, that openly ran and won as a Republican in Louisiana, a state with a prison population that is 70% black.
 
Last edited:
This has got to be fake.

What news paper would print this?

It isn't a fake, the newspaper can print what you said.

You can go to StormFront and read the comments on there also.

http://law.jrank.org/pages/11809/Cocaine.html

http://www.plu.edu/~renfrodg/doc/srebeckett.pdf
We even came across records of cases in which undercover officers were offered heroin and powder cocaine by street dealers (both black and white) and refused to purchase those substances, saying they only wanted crack. Thus, while it is difficult to determine whether racially disparate arrest outcomes are a consequence of law enforcement’s focus on blacks or its focus on crack, it is clear that the police focus on crack is an important cause of racially disparate drug possession arrest rates in Seattle. Why, then, does law enforcement focus on crack cocaine?


The major problem is the difference in sentences on the supply and demand side. If you induce somebody to distribute drugs to you, you should face the same sentences as the person smuggling across the border. It is a game of inducing people with money to distribute drugs because of poverty who get substantial sentences, and the person using the drug walks away with a fine.
 
Last edited:
Different issue but ties into the silent Holocaust waged by sick racists trying to disrupt and eliminate minority populations like Hitler. The funds to pay the settlement approved by the court was sat on by Republicans.

http://www.blackfarmers.org/html/032410.html
In 1920, one in every seven U.S. farms was owned by an African American. By the turn of this century, African Americans owned only 1 in 100 farms, with institutionalized racism a major factor in the decline, according to a 2004 study by the Environmental Working Group.

After Pigford filed his suit, thousands of farmers came forward to say that they, too, had been denied loans to buy land or pay for operating expenses, or had been approved for loans only when it was too late to plant. Many lost their land. Pigford lost his home.

Investigations into the claims showed that black farmers often had to wait more than twice as long as their white counterparts to get answers about loans; that their loans were denied or the amounts slashed more often than loans for whites; and that they were foreclosed upon faster. It is simple, no farm, no minorities in your area, plus you can pickup the bankrupt farm for cheap.

That occurred in the past, What is going on in 2011?

Imprisonment rates are still high, targeted arrest of minorities are still going on mostly at the State Level using the ruse of being tough on crime, and access to capital is severely restricted. Low skill jobs that don't require much education that would attract minorities to a community is being moved overseas. Corporate headquarters are being moved to Europe under the ruse of high taxes that they never pay in the first place. High interest rates home loans are given out freely to reduce the discretionary income of minorities and enrich the majority.

However surveillance has been stepped significantly, everybody is online using the internet posting comments that is watched by their employer, backdoor access to watch what you type, have a GPS chip in their phone that can track them, bank account information that can see even the tiniest purchases and their location in real time. There is definitely large scale surveillance operation to suppress wages, disrupt certain people from getting jobs, and massive databases that keep minute details about you. The surveillance is also used to detect criminal activity so police will know when to pull you over at the right time

You are no longer facing a guy in white sheets or dealing with whites only signs, you are facing something much worse than your ancestors. There are some people doing unspeakable things to ensure their culture and race does not become a minority in America, electing a political party who will use coded language to assure them of this. Of course they will showcase a few black or hispanics to establish they are not a racist, however, their main goal is to keep a 70-80% percentage of the population.

:hmm::hmm:
 
Last edited:
16073896-574.jpg"




Read the book THE NEW JIM CROW


It will explain how & why the US prison population has exploded since the late 1970's

jbiwlJ5Htzjffs.jpg


<img src="http://k.minus.com/jk20eGkqM5L49.jpg" width="300">
Author Michelle Alexander

Download and read the book, then buy a copy so the author can get paid.


Code:
http://www.rapidshare.com/files/2557167297/NJCROW.rar
:cool: Will read.
 
Only a devil can create a devil. And only a god can create a god. We have become carbon copies of these devils. But we will never be as big of devils as they are. That is why they sit in offices behind desks and command the death of hundreds of thousands of people and get billions of dollars for it. And nothing can be done about it either. People like bush, botha, king leopold, etc. Will kill hundreds of thousands of people and live like a king because of it.
They just made a movie called the devil's double. A good movie to try to justify some of the reason why they have done some of the things they have done.
If no one breaks or overcome the brain washing or mind control they have over us. Then we all are doomed soon.
Jim jones followers followed him 300 miles into a jungle where escape was impossible. Right now we are following america into a position where escape is almost impossible.
 
I was watching some white cop on TV using some bait car placed in the hood picking up mostly minorities right and left. These fools were taking the car and joy riding; however, they will be charged with auto theft, a serious crime with many years in prison; counting as a strike.

A $60,000 car placed in a poor area with the door open and keys in the ignition. If Hitler saw this, he might have changed up his tactics to eliminate Jews. If you want to catch a person, stealing a car, put a tracking device on the vehicle, with the door shut and no keys.

Police are resorting to baiting poor people into crime instead of catching hardcore car thieves that break into a car, jump it, and take it to a chop shop for money.

<iframe width="480" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/RSc_6oiTpVc" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
 
Last edited:
Im not surprised at any of this.

From the time I saw the movie Roots as a child I knew this shit was rigged.

Mothafuckas not paying attention are the ones to get caught up.

You would have to be dumb and blind not to see all of the traps these devils have set up.

There are many more on the way.
 
http://www.cnn.com/video/?hpt=hp_t2#/video/us/2011/11/29/dnt-kkk-fliers.wcsc

The KKK passing out fliers, save our land...

Today, the sheets over the head is being intentionally silent on their racist views and practices, appearing tolerant in public while engaging in covert operations to destroy other racial groups...

Setting up a concentration camp with the prison industrial complex and hiding behind the white sheets of pursuing crime.

Some people could give a rat ass if you have access to medical care to stay alive. They know 45,000 people die every year from the lack of health insurance and doesn't bother them. However, for some strange reason they become overly concern about drugs in the community - Just Say No. They support policies to expand the role of the government, specifically law enforcement, something antithetical to their core beliefs. Why?

<iframe width="480" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/jGfTMBKynsI" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
<iframe width="480" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/bUIdDZVe_kk" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

358rs6g.jpg
 
Last edited:
Media Propaganda Programmed Fear Of Black Men In The US

<div id="kadoo_video_container_16305165-6c3"><object height="360" width="560" id="video_detector_16305165-6c3"><param value="http://divshare.com/flash/video_flash_detector.php?data=YTo2OntzOjU6ImFwaUlkIjtzOjE6IjQiO3M6NjoiZmlsZUlkIjtpOjE2MzA1MTY1O3M6NDoiY29kZSI7czoxMjoiMTYzMDUxNjUtNmMzIjtzOjY6InVzZXJJZCI7czo3OiIxMzE0NjMzIjtzOjQ6InRpbWUiO2k6MTMyMjg4MDMxMTtzOjEyOiJleHRlcm5hbENhbGwiO2k6MTt9&autoplay=default&id=16305165-6c3" name="movie"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><param name="wmode" value="opaque"></param><embed wmode="opaque" height="360" width="560" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" src="http://divshare.com/flash/video_flash_detector.php?data=YTo2OntzOjU6ImFwaUlkIjtzOjE6IjQiO3M6NjoiZmlsZUlkIjtpOjE2MzA1MTY1O3M6NDoiY29kZSI7czoxMjoiMTYzMDUxNjUtNmMzIjtzOjY6InVzZXJJZCI7czo3OiIxMzE0NjMzIjtzOjQ6InRpbWUiO2k6MTMyMjg4MDMxMTtzOjEyOiJleHRlcm5hbENhbGwiO2k6MTt9&autoplay=default&autoplay=default&id=16305165-6c3"></embed></object></div>

<hr noshade color=#"ff0000" size="8"></hr>

j61dXsY4hZdt7.jpg

<img src="http://k.minus.com/jQ1psvq6gkhZ7.jpg" width="400">


CrimeLine.jpg
 
Last edited:
Genocide is a long gradual process. This website provides a checklist for people to be aware of the process that occurs. The United States is at Stage 6...

Stage 6 of 8 stages of Genocide: PREPARATION: Victims are identified and separated out because of their ethnic or religious identity. Death lists are drawn up. Members of victim groups are forced to wear identifying symbols. Their property is expropriated. They are often segregated into ghettoes, deported into concentration camps (prison), or confined to a famine-struck region and starved. At this stage, a Genocide Emergency must be declared. If the political will of the great powers, regional alliances, or the U.N. Security Council can be mobilized, armed international intervention should be prepared, or heavy assistance provided to the victim group to prepare for its self-defense. Otherwise, at least humanitarian assistance should be organized by the U.N. and private relief groups for the inevitable tide of refugees to come.

8. DENIAL is the eighth stage that always follows a genocide. It is among the surest indicators of further genocidal massacres. The perpetrators of genocide dig up the mass graves, burn the bodies, try to cover up the evidence and intimidate the witnesses. They deny that they committed any crimes, and often blame what happened on the victims. They block investigations of the crimes, and continue to govern until driven from power by force, when they flee into exile. There they remain with impunity, like Pol Pot or Idi Amin, unless they are captured and a tribunal is established to try them. The response to denial is punishment by an international tribunal or national courts. There the evidence can be heard, and the perpetrators punished. Tribunals like the Yugoslav or Rwanda Tribunals, or an international tribunal to try the Khmer Rouge in Cambodia, or an International Criminal Court may not deter the worst genocidal killers. But with the political will to arrest and prosecute them, some may be brought to justice.

Why Should Genocide be Redefined?
Under the UN Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide adopted in 1948, genocide was defined in Article 2 as:
...any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or
religious group, as such:
(a) Killing members of the group;
(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;


http://www.genocidewatch.org/genocide/8stagesofgenocide.html

<iframe width="640" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/ueUpawbfJuw" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Whites are claiming genocide in South Africa that are under going the same conditions as blacks in this country. Maybe people should start filing complaints in a similar manner. However, I doubt some of the genocide claims, some whites moved to South Africa because it was run by whites, but now want to leave and need to claim asylum to speed up the process for citizenship in other countries and don't want to state racists reasons. They have also loss their ability to get well paying jobs based on their race, making the country less desirable.

It is laughable since somebody living under apartheid would not have been able to claim political asylum in the United States, Canada, or Europe.
 
Last edited:
I caught this website and see many similarities in America that occurred in the past and present. I always thought of genocide as what occurred in Nazi Germany, but it can occur in other ways as defined by this organization that deals with genocide.

http://www.genocidewatch.org/genocide/whatisit.html

1. Deliberately inflicting conditions of life calculated to destroy a group includes the deliberate deprivation of resources needed for the group's physical survival, such as clean water, food, clothing, shelter or medical services. Deprivation of the means to sustain life can be imposed through confiscation of harvests, blockade of foodstuffs, detention in camps, forcible relocation or expulsion into deserts.

2. Prevention of births includes involuntary sterilization, forced abortion, prohibition of marriage, and long-term separation of men and women intended to prevent procreation. (prison)

3. Genocidal acts need not kill or cause the death of members of a group. Causing serious bodily or mental harm, prevention of births and transfer of children are acts of genocide when committed as part of a policy to destroy a group's existence:

Evidence:

1. High Unemployment, Deprivation of Resources (Intentional and Excessive De-industrialization to other Countries), Starvation
2. Deliberate Acts to Prevent Self-Sufficiency, Sabotage of Economic Activity (Black Farmers),
3. High Interest Rate Loans targeting Racial Groups to Destroy Wealth (CountryWide- Ghetto Loans, Mud people)
4. High Imprisonment Rates
5. Targeted Law Enforcement
6. Passage of Laws Targeting Racial Groups (Voting Rights)
7. Illegal Surveillance
8. Prevention of Births
9. Propaganda De-Humanization
10. Denial, Blaming Racial Groups for their Problems
11. Lack of Access to Medical Care, Food, Shelter, and Water
12. Lack of Access to Capital
13. Mental and Physical Harassment

Guilty!!!


It looks like genocide and not racism was or is continuing in the United States...
 
Last edited:
White supremacy and mass incarceration

White supremacy and mass incarceration
Republicans join the Left in calls for American prison reform but ignore the relevance of racism and social justice.
Last Modified: 22 Jan 2013 09:31

In a 2011 opinion piece in the Washington Post, Newt Gingrich said, “There is an urgent need to address the astronomical growth in the prison population, with its huge costs in dollars and lost human potential…The criminal justice system is broken, and conservatives must lead the way in fixing it.” An advocacy group called Right on Crime is spearheading Republican efforts to “demand more cost effective approaches that enhance public safety.” Signatories to its statement of principles include, in addition to Gingrich, other notable Republicans like Jeb Bush and Grover Norquist. A recent Washington Monthly article celebrated the right’s new focus on crime claiming it would “put the nation on a path to a more rational and humane correctional system.”

But by focusing on achieving “a cost effective middle ground,” Republican reform strategies end up eschewing the relevance of social justice and largely ignoring racial disparities and the disruptive social costs created by mass incarceration.

Justice and white supremacy

The travesty of mass incarceration and its devastating social effects and of the malfeasance of American jurisprudence cannot be measured purely in terms of economic rationality. It is an issue deeply entwined with long histories of racial oppression and white supremacy. True reform will require grappling with this larger problem.

A 1987 Supreme Court case illustrates what I mean when I say that the justice system is saturated with racism. In McCleskey v. Kemp, the Court declined to define the death penalty as racially discriminatory. The case involved the appeal of the death sentence for Warren McCleskey, a Georgia man convicted of armed robbery and the murder of a white policeman. In his appeal McCleskey cited research analysing 2000 Georgia homicides over an eight year period beginning in 1972 that found black defendants were nearly twice as likely to be sentenced to death as white defendants.

The research, described as the “most sophisticated study of the criminal justice system in the 20th century,” also found that the death sentence was applied 4.3 times more often when the murder victim was white. McCleskey’s appeal (based upon the 14th Amendment guarantee of equal protection and the 8th Amendment prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment), argued that the death sentence was racially biased. Justice Powell, in the majority opinion, accepted the general validity of the data and the likelihood that race was a factor in death penalty cases, but wrote that in the specific case of Warren McCleskey there was no proof of “the existence of purposeful discrimination.”

In the analysis of Bryan Stevenson, Executive Director of the Equal Justice Initiative (EJI), the Supreme Court’s decision in McCleskey upholds the constitutionality of the Georgia death penalty, even while it validates the data showing clear racial bias. Stevenson summed up the case by arguing that in McCleskey v. Kemp the Supreme Court viewed the problem of racial bias as “too big” to confront.

Indeed, in the majority opinion Justice Powell wrote that “if we accepted McCleskey's claim that racial bias has impermissibly tainted the capital sentencing decision, we could soon be faced with similar claims as to other types of penalty… ince McCleskey's claim relates to the race of his victim, other claims could apply with equally logical force to statistical disparities that correlate with the race or sex of other actors in the criminal justice system, such as defence attorneys or judges.”

In effect, the Court declined to recognise that racism and white supremacy were factors in the administration of justice. “The Court,” Stevenson argued, “said if we recognise disparities based on race in the administration of the death penalty it’s going to be just a matter of time before lawyers begin complaining about race disparities for other kinds of criminal offences…”

McCleskey v. Kemp powerfully reinforced white supremacy in the administration of justice by obscuring a long American history of systematic racial violence and oppression, and normalising racial bias and racial disparities in sentencing. Although the decision was a specific deliberation on racial bias and the death penalty, its logic clearly ramifies throughout the entire criminal justice system.

Race, class and incarceration

The US incarceration rate began increasing in the mid-1970s, but exploded dramatically after passage of the 1986 Anti-Drug Abuse Act. Between 1970 and 2005 the prison population rose 700 per cent. The US comprises only 5per cent of the world’s population, but contains 25per cent of the world’s incarcerated people. Over seven million Americans are entangled with the criminal justice system through parole, probation or other forms of correctional supervision, while 2.3 million are behind bars. At 730 per 100,000 the US prison rate is 4-7 times higher than other western nations and up to 32 times higher than countries with the lowest rates like Nepal, Nigeria and India.

Racial disparities among the incarcerated are glaring: one in every 36 Latino man and one in every 15 black man is a prisoner compared with one in every 106 white man. Four percent of Native American adults are under correctional control. Data comparing apartheid era black incarceration rates in South African with current black male incarceration rates in the US provides a jarring perspective. According to the Prison Policy Institute, in 1993, during the apartheid era in South Africa, black men were incarcerated at a rate of 853 per 100,000 total black male population. In 2010, under the Obama administration, US black men were incarcerated at a rate of 3,074 per 100,000. As the law of the land, McCleskey v. Kemp became an alibi for the racialised logic of mass incarceration, obstructing recognition and elimination of blatant racism in the criminal justice system.

Featured in the December issue of the Smithsonian Magazine, Stevenson was described as “the most important advocate for death row inmates in the US,” having successfully argued cases before the Supreme Court that banned mandatory life sentences without parole for minors. Stevenson is an eloquent, soulful man who sees the world through the eyes of imprisoned children and equates the incarceration of African Americans in the post-Civil Rights era with the enslavement of Africans in the US.

Mass incarceration, he argues, has radically changed society. He speaks of urban communities, like Philadelphia, Los Angeles and Washington, where 50 percent of young black men are in prison, on parole or probation and where the disenfranchisement of convicted felons “has horrific implications for the political aspirations of people of colour.” In Alabama, Stevenson said, 34 per cent of black men have permanently lost the right to vote and within the next 10 years the level of disenfranchisement will be higher than it has been since passage of the Voting Rights Act in 1965.

Stevenson points to the consequences of the 1996 Welfare Reform Law which denied drug offenders eligibility for public housing, food stamps and other benefits, and that has had a disastrous impact on black women and children. Black women comprise half of the female prison population, although they are only 12 percent of the total population. Between 1986 and 1991the number of black women incarcerated for drug offences soared by 828 percent.

It’s not just racism in Stevenson’s analysis that drives the shame of mass incarceration. A class system defined by gross wealth and income inequality and entrenched poverty also subverts the achievement of justice. “We have a system of justice in this country,” he said, “that treats you much better if you’re rich and guilty than if you’re poor and innocent.” A racially biased war on drugs, poverty and political disenfranchisement combine, Stevenson argues, to create “a new class of untouchables, 1 million strong,” who cannot be reached by the public health or welfare systems and are “marginalised in ways from which there is no recovery.”

Using the institution of slavery as a lens through which to analyse the hugely disproportionate incarceration of African Americans men, women and children, Stevenson challenges us to question the logic of a justice system based on the rule of McCleskey v. Kemp. Why are blacks more likely to receive mandatory minimum sentences than whites? Why are two-thirds of those sentenced to life African Americans? Why, according to the US Bureau of Justice Statistics, does a black boy have a 32 per cent chance of going to gaol, compared with a 6 per cent chance for a white boy?

Mass incarceration is a legacy of slavery

Stevenson and the EJI are prompting a discussion on justice, on American racial history, and on slavery and the racism as foundational to the criminal justice system. “America,” Stevenson argued, “… became a society where slavery was a proxy for caste, and value, and worth. So when you ended slavery, you didn't end the presumptions about black inferiority. All those things carried on… Until we have a conversation about that, we are going to continue to replicate those dynamics.” For Stevenson, it is clear that the justice system is based upon both the myth of black inferiority and on the delusion of white supremacy.

In a recent interview Stevenson described white supremacy as a tragedy because “… generations of people … were raised and taught … that they were better than other people because of the colour of their skin… There is nothing more abusive that you can do to a child or to a community than to persuade them that their worldview should be shaped by a lie, and that they should … interpret everything through that lie. And because we haven't talked about that lie, a lot of what we say and what we do reflects an identity that is complicated and compromised by this history.”

It is crucial for us to reflect on Stevenson’s analysis that slavery and mass incarceration are part of a continuum, part of a history of racial oppression and white supremacy that remain entrenched in the legal system. This analysis is especially critical at a time when Republicans are attempting to redefine our carceral state without considering the role of race and racism in criminal justice and American history. This nation’s inability to face a past that includes slavery and the lie of white supremacy severely constricts the possibility of justice in the present and the future.

Follow Wende Marshall on Twitter @WendeEMarshall

Wende Marshall is a cultural anthropologist working on issues of race, healing and social change and is the author of Potent Mana: Lessons in Power and Healing.

http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2013/01/201311782939161836.html
 
Report: Ohio courts illegally jailing the poor

Report: Ohio courts illegally jailing the poor
ACLU report alleges some Ohio courts illegally jailing people for failure to pay fines
By Andrew Welsh-Huggins,
AP Legal Affairs Writer | Associated Press – Fri, Apr 5, 2013

COLUMBUS, Ohio (AP) -- Several courts in Ohio are illegally jailing people because they are too poor to pay their debts and often deny defendants a hearing to determine if they're financially capable of paying what they owe, according to an investigation released Thursday by the Ohio chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union.

The ACLU likens the problem to modern-day debtors' prisons. Jailing people for debt pushes poor defendants farther into poverty and costs counties more than the actual debt because of the cost of arresting and incarcerating individuals, the report said.

"The use of debtors' prison is an outdated and destructive practice that has wreaked havoc upon the lives of those profiled in this report and thousands of others throughout Ohio," the report said.

Chief Justice Maureen O'Connor of the Ohio Supreme Court, responding to the ACLU's request to take action, promised to review the findings. O'Connor told the group in a letter Wednesday: "you do cite a matter that can and must receive further attention."
The report says courts in Huron, Cuyahoga, and Erie counties are among the worst offenders.

Among the report's findings:

— In the second half of last year, more than one in every five of all bookings in the Huron County jail — originating from Norwalk Municipal Court cases — involved a failure to pay fines.
— In suburban Cleveland, Parma Municipal Court jailed at least 45 defendants for failure to pay fines and costs between July 15 and August 31, 2012.
— During the same period, Sandusky Municipal Court jailed at least 75 people for similar charges.

Judge Deanna O'Donnell of Parma Municipal Court said Thursday the court was unaware of the issue until contacted earlier this week by the ACLU. She said officials were examining the 45 cases in question.

"If there's an issue here, a problem, we're going to correct it," O'Donnell said.

Messages left for Norwalk and Sandusky municipal court officials Thursday weren't immediately returned. The ACLU also sent letters to officials at Bryan, Richland County and Hamilton County municipal courts and Springboro Mayor's Court.

ACLU spokesman Mike Brickner said the group believes the practice is widespread in Ohio.

The report is a follow-up to a national 2010 report that focused on Georgia, Louisiana, Michigan, Ohio and Washington.

That report determined that many courts are violating a 1983 U.S. Supreme Court decision that courts had to hold a hearing to determine why people are unable to pay before sentencing them to incarceration.

"The report shows how, day after day, indigent defendants are imprisoned for failing to pay legal debts they can never hope to manage," according to the 2010 report, 'In For a Penny: The Rise of America's New Debtors' Prisons.'

"In many cases, poor men and women end up jailed or threatened with jail though they have no lawyer representing them," the report said.

A similar 2010 report by New York University's Brennan Center for Justice looked at the growth of court fees in Florida. It concluded, in part, that the "current fee system creates a self-perpetuating cycle of debt for persons re-entering society after incarceration."

Courts are breaking the law by holding defendants in contempt of court for failing to pay fines without proper notice or allowing an attorney to be present, the report said. Courts are also issuing arrests warrants for people who fail to show up and pay their fines and jailing defendants who are too poor to pay, according to the report.

Court costs should be recovered through civil lawsuits, not jail time, the report said.

http://news.yahoo.com/report-ohio-courts-illegally-jailing-124942197.html
 
people going to jail for using the computer, doing jobs, not paying taxes, child support ect. ect. not real crimes
 
I wish I could see that stage 6 Genocide.

http://oneblacknation.webs.com/

http://blacknation.vpweb.com/default.html
blacknation.jpg


Only a devil can create a devil, and only a God can create a God. Until things change either you a loser for the devil or you are a winner. The same old me's and you's. More and more people are losing to satan. 2 things we should know that are true. We will never be free as long as our mouth is in the white man's kitchen. And if we keep following white people, we will follow them straight to hell. They will kill themselves and us. Jonestown should have been a wake up call.
 
Last edited:
I guess this article or post got out into the media and they tried to backpedal the high incarceration rate with the problem of private prisons. The profit motive was the real reason for the high incarceration rate that is going to be the excuse. However somebody would have known that providing a financial incentive to incarcerate minorities would increase the problem.

Based on my review of white supremacist websites and right-wing networks such as Fox/Cops they frequently try to associate African-Americans with criminal activity. Minorities are frequently chased by the police on Cops. This is a common theme throughout their propaganda and material. This is why I am leaning towards the high incarceration rate for minorities as being a deliberate act.

Nobody knows or has definitive proof of what is occurring. The United States inspired Nazi Germany with our eugenics program, it is wise to be aware of this possibility. Attempts at genocide occur frequently around the world and has occurred in America's past.
 
Federal judge accused of saying minorities predisposed to commit violent crime

Federal judge accused of saying minorities predisposed to commit violent crime
By Liz Goodwin, Yahoo! News | The Ticket
4 hrs ago

A federal appeals judge in Texas is accused of saying minorities are more apt than other groups to commit crime and that complaints of racial bias in death sentencing are a "red herring."

Civil rights organizations filed a complaint against 5th Circuit Judge Edith Jones this week for remarks they say she made at a February speech to the Federalist Society at the University of Pennsylvania Law School about racial bias in death row sentencing.
The groups say the comments are prejudiced and call into question Jones' ability to be an impartial and fair judge.

Jones' law office in Houston said the judge declines to comment on the case.

According to several people present who signed affidavits for the complaint, Jones said:

adly some groups seem to commit more heinous crimes than others.” When asked to explain her remarks, she stated that there was “no arguing” that “Blacks and Hispanics” outnumber “Anglos” on death row and “sadly” it was a “statistical fact” that people “from these racial groups get involved in more violent crime.” By way of example, she asserted as a “fact” that “a lot of Hispanic people [are] involved in drug trafficking,” which itself “involved a lot of violent crime.”


The judge said "certain racial groups" are "prone" to violence, according to the complaint. Jones, a Reagan appointee, also defended the use of the death penalty because “a killer is only likely to make peace with God and the victim’s family in that moment when the killer faces imminent execution, recognizing that he or she is about to face God’s judgment,” according to the complaint.

No transcript or recording exists of the speech, according to the Federalist Society.

The 5th Circuit's chief judge, Carl E. Stewart, will decide whether to dismiss or pursue the complaint, according to The New York Times.

The law school's Federalist Society says Jones' remarks are being misconstrued. "Rest assured the Federalist Society does not host or harbor racist speakers," Penn's Federalist Society posted in a brief statement on its Facebook page. "We're disappointed that constructive dialogue about federal habeas relief is being misrepresented like this." (Federal habeas relief refers to the appeals process for prisoners.) The group did not return a request for further comment.

The issue of racial bias in sentencing made headlines in Texas in 2000 when Texas' then-Attorney General John Cornyn identified five cases in which he thought the race of a defendant was used improperly in testimony. Jones joined her colleagues on the 5th Circuit in rejecting the stay execution request of one of these prisoners, Duane Buck, in 2011. Buck argued that his sentence should be thrown out since an expert witness psychologist, Walter Quijano, suggested during his trail that Buck's race could make him more likely to commit another crime in the future.

Jones, who was believed to be on President George H.W. Bush's short list for the Supreme Court, has been an outspoken critic of the Supreme Court and judges who do not adhere to a constructionist view of the law.

In 2001, she told University of Texas law students that people who suspect they are fired because of racial bias or their gender should "take a better second job instead of bringing suit" because they were almost always wrong about the cause of their firing.

Jones also criticized the Supreme Court for allowing pornography and for decriminalizing the use of profanity in public places in a 2005 interview with The American Enterprise.

http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/...ies-predisposed-commit-violent-184459813.html
 
2. Prevention of births includes involuntary sterilization, forced abortion, prohibition of marriage, and long-term separation of men and women intended to prevent procreation. (prison)

It looks like genocide and not racism was or is continuing in the United States...

After my wife had her second child she was offered the depo shot. For those that don't know the depo shot is a an injectable contraceptive that lasts up to four months. The main side effects include postpartum depression and increased irregular vaginal bleeding.

None of these risks were explained to my wife and I. They offered her the shot despite the fact that she had sickle cell anemia, had undergone three surgeries in the past week, and had a 17 cm open wound on her abdomen.
They also waited until she was heavily sedated. Unfortunately she took the shot.

Two months later when our baby died of SIDS she went to the doctor's for depression. They gave her a box of condoms, a neuvo ring and a lecture on not having more babies.

speaking of SIDS black babies are twice as likely to die as white babies even though the risk factors are not racially specific. This can't just be a coincidence.

http://www.cjsids.org/resource-center/sids-statistics.html
 
Ohio police department using fake drug checkpoints

Ohio police department using fake drug checkpoints
Associated Press
Sun, Jun 30, 2013

MAYFIELD HEIGHTS, Ohio (AP) — Police in the Cleveland suburb of Mayfield Heights know they're not allowed to use checkpoints to search drivers and their cars for drugs.
So they're trying the next best thing: fake drug checkpoints.

Police in the city of 19,000 recently posted large yellow signs along Interstate 271 that warned drivers that there was a drug checkpoint ahead, to be prepared to stop and that there was a drug-sniffing police dog in use.

There was no such checkpoint, just police officers waiting to see if any drivers would react suspiciously after seeing the signs.

Authorities say that four people were stopped, with some arrests and drugs seized. They declined to be more specific.

The Plain Dealer in Cleveland reports (http://bit.ly/12tIqGq) that some civil rights leaders and at least one person pulled over by police are questioning the tactic, wondering if it could violate the Fourth Amendment against unlawful searches and seizures.

"I don't think it accomplishes any public safety goals," said Terry Gilbert, a prominent Cleveland civil rights attorney. "I don't think it's good to mislead the population for any reason if you're a government agency."

Nick Worner, a spokesman for the Cleveland office of the American Civil Liberties Union, said his office will be looking further into the fake checkpoints to determine whether anyone's rights may be being violated.

Dominic Vitantonio, a Mayfield Heights assistant prosecutor, said the fake checkpoints are legal and a legitimate effort in the war on drugs.

"We should be applauded for doing this," Dominic Vitantonio said. "It's a good thing."

A 2000 U.S. Supreme Court ruling said actual drug checkpoints are not legal and that police can randomly stop cars for just two reasons: to prevent immigrants without legal permission to be in the U.S. and contraband from entering the country and to get drunk drivers off the road.

It's unclear how that ruling would apply to a fake drug checkpoint or whether any other police department in the nation has used similar tactics.

Bill Peters, one of the four drivers pulled over as a result of the fake checkpoint, said he wonders if he was targeted because he has long, unkempt hair.

Peters, of Medina, said he was driving on the interstate when he missed his exit. He pulled over to check his phone for directions, then pulled back onto the freeway when his phone disconnected from the charger, causing him to pull over again to reconnect it, he said.

Soon after returning to the freeway, police pulled him over.

Peters said the officer asked him what kind of drugs he had in the car, saying it would be much easier to confess before other officers and a drug-sniffing dog arrived. Peters insisted he had no drugs. As promised, other officers and the dog were summoned, and Peters agreed to allow his car to be searched.

No drugs were found.

"The last time I checked, it is not against the law to pull over to the side of the road to check directions," said Peters, who added that the officer who stopped him commended him for being safety conscious.

"I see what they're doing, but I think it's kind of dangerous," Peters said. "It's one thing to do this on a 25 mph road; it's another on a busy interstate. I think it's a violation to just be pulled over and searched."

http://news.yahoo.com/ohio-police-department-using-fake-drug-checkpoints-155714038.html
 
man that shit is sooo outta control, they had to send a fuckin judge to jail for just sending disenfranchised (mostly Kemetic boys) to military like jail schools because he got a kickback for each one he sent...

the jail business got the judicial system by the balls, like big pharm got the medical establishment on the corner selling dat ass!!
 
Back
Top