2014 Mid Terms

thoughtone

Rising Star
Registered
Given the turn out of the 2012 General Election by Black folk and women, reasoned by some by the perceived attack on civil rights by this electorate. Will the 2014 Mid Terms produce similar results, due to the political make up of congress and recent SCOTUS rulings?
 


NBC/WSJ poll: 60 percent say fire every member of Congress




October 12, 2013


"Throw the bums out.

That’s the message 60 percent of Americans are sending to Washington in a new NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll, saying if they had the chance to vote to defeat and replace every single member of Congress, <SPAN style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffff00">including their own representative</span>, they would. Just 35 percent say they would not.

The 60 percent figure is the highest-ever in that question recorded in the poll, registered in the wake of the government shutdown and threat of the U.S. defaulting on its debt for the first time in history.

We continue to use this number as a way to sort of understand how much revulsion there is,” said Democratic pollster Peter D. Hart, who conducted the poll with Republican Bill McInturff. “We now have a new high-water mark.”

The numbers reflect a broader trend over the last few years. Americans have traditionally said that while they might not like Congress, they usually like their own representatives. But that sentiment appears to have shifted.

The throw-them-all-out attitude has slowly taken hold over the last three years, coinciding with two things – the rise of the Tea Party caucus in the House and the debt ceiling fight of 2011.

  • In October 2010, a majority of Americans – 50 percent to 47 percent – said they would not fire all congressional members.

  • But by August 2011, 54 percent said they would toss every lawmaker from office;

  • in January 2012, 56 percent said that; and

  • just three months ago, in July, it was 57 percent.

Frustration was evident among poll respondents across the ideological spectrum."




FULL STORY & THE POLL



 


The number of Americans who say they want to fire everyone is fairly consistent among most groups – at around 60 percent – but it spikes among rural voters (70 percent), white independents (70 percent) and those in Republican-held congressional districts (67 percent). Just 52 percent of respondents in Democratic-held districts would vote to fire every lawmaker on Capitol Hill.

In another sign of dissatisfaction with the state of politics, 47 percent of Americans said they do not strongly identify with either party.

The numbers in this poll also reflect a broader anger and pessimism among Americans, especially when it comes to the economy.


SOURCE



 
Don't worry. According to that poll Que posted, the democrats will win in a landslide. We all know that America doesn't like republicans who stands up for themselves. The right suppose to get along with the left because the left is always right, right?
 
1385507_10151915523114255_64719854_n.jpg
 
Senate Democrats to White House: Fix Obamacare

Democratic senators have a warning for the White House: Fix Obamacare’s problems or put Senate seats at risk next year.

In interviews, Democratic senators running in 2014, party elders and Senate leaders said the Obama administration must rescue the law from its rocky start before it emerges as a bigger political liability next year.

Democratic senators from red states — the most vulnerable incumbents up for reelection next year — voted for Obamacare and have been among the law’s biggest champions, believing that voters would embrace it once they experienced its benefits. They could end up being some of the law’s most prominent casualties if its unpopularity continues to grow.

If voters continue experiencing problems like a balky website, canceled policies and higher premiums, the fallout could be brutal next November, Democrats acknowledge.
Senate Democrats to White House: Fix Obamacare
 
Former Obama aide sets sights on Scott’s US Senate seat

Former Obama aide sets sights on Scott’s US Senate seat
BY ANDREW SHAIN
ashain@thestate.com
December 13, 2013

COLUMBIA, SC — Rick Wade, a former U.S. Commerce Department adviser and Cabinet officer under then-Gov. Jim Hodges, will seek the Democratic nomination next year for the U.S. Senate seat held by Republican Tim Scott.

“The people of South Carolina understand that Washington is broken,” the Democratic Lancaster native said in a statement released Friday night. “If we are going to solve the big problems we face and get things done, our representatives must be accountable to their constituents.”

The Senate race stands to make history in South Carolina, where an African-American has not won statewide office since Reconstruction.

Wade and Richland County Councilwoman Joyce Dickerson, an African-American Democrat, are seeking their party’s nomination to unseat Scott, South Carolina’s first black U.S. senator.

Scott, a former 1st District congressman from North Charleston, was appointed to the Senate by Republican Gov. Nikki Haley in January after Republican Jim DeMint resigned.

Former S.C. Democratic Party chairman Dick Harpootlian said Friday that Wade called him last week, seeking support for a run against Scott.

“He’s a mature individual,” said Harpootlian, who agreed to back Wade’s bid. “He’s not going to play Tea Party games.”

Wade has been building his run for the Senate for months. Hodges, South Carolina’s last Democratic governor, and former State Superintendent of Education Inez Tenenbaum, who unsuccessfully opposed DeMint for the Senate, said Friday that Wade had reached out to them for advice on managing a statewide campaign.

Wade, 51, is an attractive candidate because of his state and federal government experience, Democratic Party officials said.

Wade was an adviser to Barack Obama’s 2008 and 2012 presidential campaigns. He also has run for statewide office before, losing the 2002 race for S.C. secretary of state to Republican Mark Hammond.

S.C. Republican party leaders called Wade a “political insider.”

“He spent the last five years in Washington authoring President Obama’s failed $787 billion stimulus bill and sending taxpayer dollars to his political cronies,” S.C. GOP chairman Matt Moore said. “We look forward to Rick Wade explaining that record to regular South Carolinians. They won’t be too impressed.”

Moore also questioned if Wade is a South Carolina resident.

Wade was not available for interviews Friday.

However, a spokeswoman said Wade commutes from South Carolina to Washington, D.C., and Beijing for his work with the Wade Group business consulting firm and GreenTech Automotive, where he heads operations in China.

“Columbia has always been and remains Rick’s main residence,” spokeswoman Candace Sandy said.

Any Democrat who hopes to oust Scott will have to raise cash quickly. The Republican had $2.8 million in his campaign account earlier this fall.

“That’s a formidable amount to go up against,” S.C. Democratic Party chairman Jaime Harrison said.

Scott, who speaks often of his rise from poverty and faith, also is a favorite with the Tea Party-libertarian wing of the GOP. Scott was elected first to the U.S. House in the 2010 Tea Party wave that also launched three other new S.C. congressmen into the Capitol.

But Harrison thinks the Democrats have a chance against Scott, whom he called the senator of the Heritage Foundation, which Tea Party favorite DeMint now runs.

In his statement, Wade said he has started traveling across the state, “listening to South Carolinians about the challenges they face and the hopes they have to build a better future for themselves and their families.”

Because of DeMint’s resignation, S.C. voters will have a rare chance to vote for both U.S. senators who represent the Palmetto State in 2014.

Scott and the Democratic nominee – either Wade or Dickerson – are running to fill the last two years of DeMint’s term, which ends in 2016.

Meanwhile, U.S. Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-Seneca, is seeking a third term. But Graham will have to beat at least four challengers in June’s GOP primary.

http://www.thestate.com/2013/12/13/3158078/former-obama-aide-sets-sights.html
 
Mia Love Is Clear Front-Runner for Matheson Seat

Mia Love Is Clear Front-Runner for Matheson Seat
By Kyle Trygstad
Posted at 5 a.m. on Dec. 18

For an ambitious Republican, there is no more attractive House seat than that of retiring Rep. Jim Matheson, D-Utah — but the congressman’s former foe could be strong enough to hold off a run on the seat.

Matheson’s retirement announcement Tuesday turned a top GOP pickup opportunity into a seat for which national Democrats may not compete for the foreseeable future. No names of potential candidates emerged in the immediate aftermath, but anyone jumping in now would face a truncated timeline and a challenging race for the GOP nomination ahead.

Saratoga Springs Mayor Mia Love, who lost to Matheson by 768 votes in 2012, got a jump on the GOP competition by kicking off her campaign early this cycle. With the state’s top campaign operative on board and nearly $700,000 in the bank by the end of September, there is a sentiment in the state that her head start could be too much to overcome.

“I think Mia Love is too formidable right now,” said Kirk Jowers, director of the University of Utah’s Hinckley Institute of Politics. “She has the name ID, the money and now she has Dave Hansen who is about the most respected campaign manager. So if you’re taking a look at your ability to win, it’s hard to see anybody who doesn’t start out behind in all major campaign considerations.”

Love told CQ Roll Call in March that it was important to ramp up the campaign early so that she’s not starting from behind again — financially and organizationally. That was during an interview at the Conservative Political Action Conference just outside of Washington, D.C., where activists from around the country descend annually.

Still, given the heavy Republican tilt of the district and the lack of perhaps the only Democrat capable of carrying it, the list of candidates will undoubtedly grow. Love’s GOP competition currently includes just one other candidate, businessman Bob Fuehr, but some expect a much longer list of candidates to emerge.

“Well she’s been working it for a long time,” said Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah. “But it’s just a question of how many dozen candidates run.”

Utah Republicans said Love has been aggressively campaigning and fundraising, setting herself up for a strong performance at the April 26 state nominating convention. If she wins 60 percent of the locally elected delegates, Love will emerge with the nomination — as she did last cycle. Otherwise, the top two vote-getters will face off in a June 24 primary.

“I think we may have more that will enter because it’s attractive,” Utah GOP Chairman James Evans said. “But I think also they will factor in that Mia’s been in there for some time, and they may see that it’s not going to be an easy challenge.”

In a statement Tuesday, Love wished Matheson well but said her congressional campaign won’t change much as a result of his retirement. That may be true of the convention fight, but the eventual nominee will now be heavily favored in the general election. That would not have been true with Matheson in the race.

“Congressman Matheson has served our state with passion and has been a dedicated public servant during his tenure in Congress,” Love said. “His announcement today does not change my campaign to represent the people of Utah’s 4th congressional district. I wish Congressman Matheson the very best during his final year as Congressman.”

http://atr.rollcall.com/mia-love-is-clear-frontrunner-for-matheson-seat/
 
Why does an unpopular Congress win re-election? Look in the mirror

Why does an unpopular Congress win re-election? Look in the mirror
Voters to other voters: Blame your congressman, not mine
By Tim Skillern | Yahoo News
3 hrs ago

Just 13 percent of Americans, according to a Gallup poll released on Tuesday, pat Congress on the back and say, “Good job!”

It’ll thus be disgruntling for many voters to see most of the 435 members of the U.S. House of Representatives celebrate their re-election come November. Indeed, historical House re-election rates hover around 90 percent, not dropping below 85 percent since at least 1964.

How can a body so majorly disdained, at least recently, almost assuredly punch its ticket for another two-year term? The answers, political scientists say, are complex. But if you need a simpler reason now, look locally at voters’ perspectives.

For instance:

In Maryland’s 8th District, constituent Charles Ray says his representative, Chris Van Hollen, is “among the few, in an institution that seemed to be cowed by a few loud-mouth bullies, who seemed willing to swim against the tide.”

Meanwhile in Illinois’ 5th, Isa-Lee Wolf says of Mike Quigley, her House delegate: “My congressman gets my support because he's swimming upstream in a river with a non-cooperative current.”

There’s something to that swimming metaphor. Voters across the country see their House member as a fish out of water — a heroic figure in a Sisyphean struggle against an evil entity.

It’s almost Greek in its tragedy.

“There is something of a paradox in that Congress, as an institution, is deeply unpopular,” Peter Hanson, a University of Denver political science professor who studies polarization, tells Yahoo News. “But people tend to like and respect their individual member of Congress.”

To wit, from Facebook:

Blame political homogeny in House districts for the latter: Republicans win conservative districts, and Democrats win liberal ones. No duh, right? Well, it wasn’t always that way. In the mid-20th century, both parties included a healthy number of conservatives and liberals. Hanson notes: “Conflicts were not necessarily partisan conflicts. They were ideological. The conflict didn’t spread neatly along party lines.” Today we’re polarized — but not within our districts — so it’s harder for Congress to get business done.

Get nothing done? Get poor marks.

Voters elect congressional members, Hanson says, to do a fantastic job representing their districts, not the country. “The end result of that effort will be gridlock and frustration with Congress on a national level,” he said. More simply: We perceive House politicians as doing their jobs locally but not nationally.

“That’s simply the design of our system,” Hanson says. “It’s the nature of a legislature to contain a variety of different interests that engage in loud, noisy conflict that, from the outside perspective, looks like nothing but bickering and that frustrates voters.”

How frustrated are they? To capture the canyon-like gap between individual and institutional approval, Yahoo News this month invited constituents to contrast their House representative with Congress and look toward November’s midterm elections. Why do they like their officials but not those across district boundaries? Will they vote for their representative on Nov. 4? Here are some lightly edited excerpts we received from readers, with some Facebook responses woven in:


When five-term Sen. Tom Harkin announced he would not seek re-election in 2014, he listed a variety of reasons for his retirement. He said it just wasn't fun anymore. Congressmen used to lunch together and have a great camaraderie. But today, everyone, Harkin feels, is "so consumed with other things." What other things? Harkin told the Washington Post: "We're not there on Monday, and we're not there on Friday. Tuesday we have our party caucuses. That leaves Wednesday and Thursday — and guess what people are doing then? They're out raising money."

In January, a PowerPoint presentation prepared by the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee for incoming freshmen was leaked. In it, the group recommends that each representative spend four hours a day completing his or her "call time." In a 10-hour workday, that would mean spending 40 percent of one's time in Congress raising money for one's political party.

I never voted for Justin Amash to be my representative in Michigan's 3rd District. I never could. Amash is a Republican, and I think the Democratic and Republican parties act more like criminal cartels. I rarely agree with him. But I'm OK with that. The young representative runs a Facebook page with nearly 79,000 followers. On it, he details every vote that he casts and provides an in-depth description of why he voted the way he did. Anyone that disagrees with his vote is welcome to start a discussion or engage in debate.

You know, something Congress used to do.

— Charles Manley, Grand Rapids, Mich.


The actions and rhetoric of a tiny cabal of tea party zealots during the last nine months of 2013 caused my attitude to plunge to an all-time low.

I still have a lot of admiration of Van Hollen, and I am almost certain to vote for him in 2014. He has been consistent in his support for rational control of firearm ownership in a country that has been plagued with gun violence on a depressingly regular basis, and, unlike many of his colleagues in the House, he has called for an increase in taxes for the wealthiest individuals who control the lion's share of America's money.

There are others in Congress who take their responsibilities seriously. Unfortunately, in a body controlled by malcontents intent upon taking the country back to the bad old days when the rich gave orders and the poor had children, they are few and far between.

— Charles Ray, North Potomac, Md.


Like many Americans, I have a dim view of Congress. However, I like and appreciate my particular representative, John Culberson, a Republican and conservative from Texas’ 7th District. There are various reasons for this dichotomy.

Much of my personal disdain with Congress stems from the fact that it is divided. The House is run by Republicans, my own party affiliation, and the Senate by Democrats. This in turn has caused a pernicious thing called compromise.

Perhaps the best way to fix Congress is to elect more people like Culberson, in both the House and the Senate. I have been pleased to have voted for him for the six elections he has been my congressman, following the advice of the late Clare Boothe Luce that one should look at the candidates, examine the issues, and then vote a straight GOP ticket, which I shall likely do in 2014.

— Mark Whittington, Houston, Texas


My congressman, Rep. Mike Quigley of Illinois' 5th District, is a Democrat in a sea of Republicans who seem to have forgotten the purpose of Congress. He cannot force legislation on those politicians who refuse to legislate.

In case you think it's merely partisan hot air to "blame the Republicans" for the shutdown, check out the list of votes. Every single legislator who refused to fund the government by voting "nay" is a Republican. Not one of them should return to Congress, given the utter disdain for the constitutional process they showed during their attempt to repeal legislation through extra-constitutional means, using our government as a pawn. It's no coincidence that the record approval lows hit after the shutdown. In contrast, Quigley also voted to reopen the government, along with the rest of the Democrats.

— Isa-Lee Wolf, Chicago


Duncan D. Hunter of California’s 50th comes with a perfect political pedigree. He is the son of a career politician who served in Congress from 1981 to 2009. The son should be applauded for his service to the country as a Marine in Iraq and Afghanistan. He continues his service in the Marine Reserve.

To date, Hunter has toed the Republican line. He has voted for the Keep Your Health Plan Act of 2013, Pay Our Guard and Reserve Act and Congressional Pay Freeze and Fiscal Responsibility Act. I am in sync with these.

But I believe the biggest concern for our district and our country in general is the number of terms our politicians are allowed to serve. We hamper their ability to vote with their conscience and not for their voting constituents. As is, our political system is fertile ground for corruption, and re-election is a goal that merits all costs.

I like Hunter, and will vote for him for a third term in November. However, it stops there. If he really wants to improve this country, I would implore him to work for term limits.

— Joe Tuborg, San Diego, Calif.


David Price is one of the few politicians from North Carolina who's not giving my state a bad name.

Unlike pretty much every Republican representative (and many in Price's own Democratic Party), he's a civil servant in the true sense of the term. His website explains how to get coverage on HealthCare.gov and has a lot of helpful resources for his constituents, even if we just want help touring Washington, D.C. He regularly meets with his constituents in North Carolina's 4th District and contacts us through mailings and e-newsletters to draw our attention to those in our state who are going hungry through no fault of their own.

Compare and contrast that with most of the rest of Congress in which, for all of 2013, the big fight was over how much everyone who's not rich ought to be screwed over. This culminated in the Republican-led shutdown, in which they apparently decided they'd rather crash the country into the ground than let one more brown American or unmarried mother have enough to feed their kids. Or survive being unemployed.

So, why aren't there more awesome representatives like mine?

— Taryn Fox, Cary, N.C.

http://news.yahoo.com/congressional-approval-ratings-house-elections-185248987.html
 
Re: Why does an unpopular Congress win re-election? Look in the mirror


Gallup poll suggests 'Congress could be in for a major shake-up'​



McClatchy Washington Bureau
By David Lightman
January 24, 2014



Members of Congress could be in trouble in November.

Seventeen percent of registered voters think most members of Congress deserve re-election, - - far below the approximately 40 percent that, Gallup says, "has historically been associated with major electoral turnover."

As a result, a poll analysis finds, "Congress could be in for a major shake-up."

The 17 percent is a new low, as is another figure: 46 percent say their congressman in their district deserves re-election.

Here's Gallup's analysis of its Jan. 5-8 poll:

"Consistent with abysmally low congressional approval ratings and widespread dissatisfaction with the nation's system of government, the proportion of registered voters saying Congress deserves re-election has hit an all-time low of 17 percent. While Congress as an institution is no stranger to voter disenchantment, American voters are usually more charitable in their assessments of their own representatives in the national legislature. But even this has fallen to a new trough.

"Typically, results like these have presaged significant turnover in Congress, such as in 1994, 2006, and 2010. So Congress could be headed for a major shake-up in its membership this fall.

"However, unlike those three years, when one party controlled both houses of Congress, the beneficiary of the anti-incumbent sentiment is not clear in the current situation, in which one party controls the House and the other, the Senate. Partisans on both sides of the aisle are displeased with Congress. But with so few voters saying they are willing to re-elect their own representative, it suggests that many officeholders will be vulnerable, if not in the general election, then perhaps in the host of competitive primaries soon to take place."​


A record-low percentage of registered voters, 46%, now say the U.S. representative in their own congressional district deserves re-election


Judging by net seats lost in an election as a percentage of the overall number of seats, 2010, 1994, and 2006 register as the top three recent elections. All of these years had election-year averages of 41% or fewer voters saying most of Congress deserved re-election, with the Republican-wave election of 2010 registering the lowest, 30% -- still 13 percentage points higher than the current reading.


Read more here: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2014/01/24/215627/gallup-poll-suggests-congress.html#storylink=cpy




 
Re: Why does an unpopular Congress win re-election? Look in the mirror

<IFRAME SRC="http://www.gallup.com/poll/167024/record-low-say-own-representative-deserves-election.aspx#storylink=relast" WIDTH=780 HEIGHT=1500>
<A HREF="http://www.gallup.com/poll/167024/record-low-say-own-representative-deserves-election.aspx#storylink=relast">link</A>

</IFRAME>
 
Re: The paradox of Democratic politics


GOP Rep. Gary Miller of California
won't seek re-election



Los Angeles Times
By RICHARD SIMON
AND JEAN MERL
February 13, 2014



WASHINGTON - Facing one of the toughest campaigns of any Republican congressman in the country, Rep. Gary Miller announced Wednesday that he would not seek re-election to his California seat, increasing prospects for a Democratic pickup.

His decision sets up a competitive race among at least four Democrats - including an attempted comeback by former Rep. Joe Baca - in a district President Barack Obama won by a wide margin.

Miller, 65, becomes the fifth California congressman to head for the exits, further shaking up a once-stable delegation. Democrats Henry A. Waxman of Beverly Hills and George Miller of Martinez and Republicans Howard "Buck" McKeon of Santa Clarita and John Campbell of Irvine have announced they are retiring when their terms end.

Miller, elected to the House in 1998, was a top Democratic target in a district stretching west from Redlands and San Bernardino to Upland and Rancho Cucamonga. Democrats hold a registration edge over Republicans, 41 percent to 34 percent. And with Latinos making up nearly half the district, Miller's conservative record on immigration was viewed as a further handicap.



Read more here: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2014/02/13/217986/gop-rep-gary-miller-of-california.html#storylink=cpy



 
Re: The paradox of Democratic politics


RNC Chair Priebus predicts​

2014 Republican 'tsunami'




McClatchyDC
by William Douglas
March 18, 2014


Republican National Committee Chair Reince Priebus Tuesday didn't merely predict that 2014 would be a wave election for Republican candidates. He predicted a political tsunami.

Speaking to reporters at a breakfast hosted by The Christian Science Monitor, Priebus said 'I think we're in for a tsunami-type election in 20014' powered largely by Republicans winning six Senate seats to regain control of that chamber.

'My belief is, it's going to be a very big win, especially at the U.S. Senate level, and we may add some seats in congressional races,' he told reporters. 'But I need to and we need to at the RNC level make sure that we can capture the positives and the benefits we've been able to provide in 2014 and build on that to have success in 2016, which is a very different type of election.'

Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, D-Fla., who's the Democratic National Committee chair, scoffed at Priebus's prediction.

'Well, I really hope that my counterpart remains bullish and believes Democrats are in the dumps,' she said Tuesday. 'They were predicting up to hours before the polls closed on election day in 2012 that we would be inaugurating President Mitt Romney, too. So their prediction accuracy isn't exactly on the mark of late.'



Read more here: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2014/03/18/221595/rnc-chair-priebus-predicts-2014.html#storylink=cpy





 
Republican star Mia Love gets second chance to make political history

Republican star Mia Love gets second chance to make political history
By Jennifer Dobner
May 24, 2014 9:07 AM

SALT LAKE CITY (Reuters) - Utah's Mia Love, a Republican darling who could become the first conservative black woman elected to U.S. Congress, is getting a second, and likely better, chance to make history after narrowly losing to a popular incumbent Democrat in 2012.

Love, 39, is a Mormon mother of three who is upending stereotypes about the state and its predominant faith. She locked up her party's nomination to vie for an open seat in Utah's 4th District at a state convention last month with an overwhelming 78 percent of the vote.

The seat became available when Jim Matheson retired after seven terms in Congress as the heavily conservative state's lone Democrat in Washington. Two years ago, the politically savvy son of a beloved Utah governor beat Love by fewer than 800 votes.

If Love wins this time, she would become an unlikely champion in Washington of staunchly conservative views - limited government, fiscal discipline and state's rights. The daughter of Haitian immigrants is pro-life, pro-gun and holds a concealed weapons permit.

She also supports Utah's effort to reclaim public land from federal agency controls, a hot issue in the U.S. West among conservatives, and has said she would vote against regulations she believes would restrict economic development.

"I love the story of David and Goliath, because in that story, David runs toward Goliath. He ran toward a seemingly impossible challenge," Love said during a testy debate this week with her opponent, Doug Owens, a Democrat and first-time candidate.

"That's the type of confidence we need to have as we take on the Goliaths of our debt, out-of-control spending, Obamacare and that Godzilla we call the federal government," she said.

In November, Love will face Owens in a conservative district created after the 2010 Census that encompasses parts of Democratic-leaning Salt Lake City, then runs south along the Wasatch Front into parts of rural Utah that are typically Republican strongholds.

Her competitor, a 50-year-old attorney, is the son of former Utah U.S. Representative Wayne Owens, also a Democrat.

WAR CHEST

Despite her 2012 loss, Love has never left the political scene. The former mayor of Saratoga Springs has continued to speak at state and local Republican and community events, and has been tapped as a conservative commentator by numerous conservative national media programs.

Federal Election Commission records show that, as of April 6, Love had amassed a campaign war chest of more than $2 million. The 2012 Love-Matheson contest, with candidates chalking up more than $10 million in spending, was the most expensive House race in Utah's history.

Her exposure and experience should put Love in a stronger position than previously, said Chris Karpowitz, associate director of the Center for the Study of Elections and Democracy at Brigham Young University.

But Love, who was named one of the Republican party's "Young Guns" to watch and given a speaking slot at the 2012 national convention, appears to have toned down some of the Tea Party-style rhetoric, he said.

"She is in a good position in the sense that she has run already, so people know her name," Karpowitz said. "And she seems to be running a campaign that is a little more focused on the kind of voters that Jim Matheson traditionally won."

A spokeswoman for Love did not respond to questions about how the 2014 campaign would differ from her earlier run.

Owens, viewed as the underdog, told Reuters by email that he believes voters have tired of partisan rancor and extreme viewpoints.

"I will beat Mia Love the same way that Jim Matheson did," said Owens, a self-described pragmatist. "By focusing on the issues that are important to Utahns and not on national partisan ideology."

http://news.yahoo.com/republican-star-mia-love-gets-second-chance-political-130727468.html
 
<iframe width="700" height="1000" src="http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-27629535" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
 
A rising GOP star fights to survive in Oklahoma

A rising GOP star fights to survive in Oklahoma
By SEAN MURPHY
5 hours ago

OKLAHOMA CITY (AP) — It's not easy to get to the right of U.S. Rep. James Lankford, a staunch conservative from a state that prides itself on being "the reddest of the red." The Baptist minister and onetime leader of one of the nation's largest Christian youth camps came to Congress three years ago and has preached a hard-right doctrine heavy on gun rights, abortions and the evils of Obamacare.

Yet Lankford, a rising star in the national GOP, now finds himself fighting for political survival in a primary election for a U.S. Senate seat that may show whether the insurgent shock wave that felled leading Republican Eric Cantor in Virginia extends into this part of the nation's Republican heartland.

Lankford, 46, is being challenged by another conservative, T.W. Shannon, the former speaker of the Oklahoma House of Representatives. The race, which focuses on Lankford's role in GOP leadership positions, has drawn advertising money from national conservative organizations and has left even tea party groups confused over who to support.

National tea party organizations are weighing in for Shannon, but local groups, some of which have backed Lankford in previous races, haven't chosen sides.

"They all go to church, probably donate to charities and help little old ladies cross the street," said Mark Keeling, a truck driver who heads up the local tea party chapter in Chickasha, a semi-rural town of 16,000. "The problem is, you don't really know who these guys are."

Drawing further attention to the race is the challenger's ethnicity: Shannon, 36, was the state's first black speaker of the House and is also Native American, a valuable asset for a party struggling to diversify outside its overwhelmingly white voting bloc.

The election might shed light on whether a tea-party favorite risks his grass-roots credibility if he moves up in the GOP he's pledged to reform. Five other less-funded Republicans will also be on the ballot next week, along with three Democrats, vying to replace retiring Republican Sen. Tom Coburn.

Lankford was a political unknown when he won an open seat in Congress in 2010 from Oklahoma's Republican-leaning capital city.

Thin, with red hair and a preacher's booming voice, he leveraged an army of young evangelicals from his Baptist network to propel his campaign, and he's now counting on them again in a statewide race.

Lankford has been campaigning as he legislates — like a workhorse. The congressman happily delves deep into nuance with voters who ask about complicated federal budget issues or congressional investigations.

But Shannon, a striking presence at 6-foot-4 and impeccably dressed, describes himself as the more conservative and aims to exploit the sliver of room to the right of Lankford, who became House Republican Policy Committee chairman because of his grasp of GOP issues. For some conservatives, that raises the specter of a Washington insider.

"I get that," Lankford said recently. "That's just the dynamic of it."

A particular target of pro-Shannon ads is Lankford's votes to increase the nation's debt limit and to support a bipartisan budget agreement.

"Mr. Lankford: The truth is, these are not our Oklahoma conservative values," says one ad funded by an independent group.

Lankford defended those votes as the result of hard-fought battles with a Democratic Senate and president.

"The issues I'm being attacked on are issues that say, basically, you should close the government," Lankford said.

Shannon, a protege of J.C. Watts, who in the 1990s became the first black Republican congressman from the South since Reconstruction, climbed the leadership ladder in the state legislature by cultivating the party's right wing. As speaker, he created a special committee to hear proposals for defying the federal government.

Shannon, whose father, a school teacher, is black and a Chickasaw and whose mother is African-American, says there should be nothing unusual about a black or Native American conservative.

"I think we're beyond the days where that's a major issue in the race," Shannon said before a candidate forum.

But it's unlikely Shannon will get much support from those traditionally Democratic groups, even in his hometown of Lawton, a rough-and-tumble Army post town.

"The Republican Party has thrown us off the bus, and I'll be doggone if I'm going to vote for a black dude that drives the bus over me," said Jim Floyd, 84, a retired African-American Army officer and Democrat who has lived in Lawton for 50 years.

Shannon's membership in the Chickasaw Nation has been a fundraising asset. The tribe operates the state's largest casino and leaders of several Oklahoma-based tribes are backing him financially.

The fierce attack ads from both sides have drawn a rebuke from Coburn, the hugely popular conservative maverick, who decried politics "in its very worst form with misleading advertisements and allegations against candidates."

http://news.yahoo.com/rising-gop-star-fights-survive-oklahoma-060852608--election.html
 
Black leaders worry about low turnout in November

Black leaders worry about low turnout in November
July 23, 2014 9:30 AM

LAS VEGAS (AP) — Civil rights leaders at the NAACP annual convention in Las Vegas on Tuesday worried that dwindling African-American turnout in November could lead to the expansion of voter-identification laws that make it harder for that community to vote in subsequent contests.

In 2012, blacks turned out at a higher rate than whites for what is believed to be the first time in American history and helped re-elect President Obama. But in the prior midterm election, in 2010, blacks turned out at a much lower rate, and Republicans won control of the House of Representatives and many state and local offices.

Jotaka Eaddy, the NAACP's voting rights director, told a panel on black turnout and voter suppression that "as a result we saw a wave of voter-suppression laws." Eaddy said 22 states passed laws stiffening requirements on the identification needed to vote, a move that disproportionately affects poor and minority voters.

Added the Rev. William Barber, an NAACP board member: "We're in a position to have 2010 all over again unless we do something about it."

Polls have shown that Democrats, including black voters, are far less enthusiastic about the coming midterm elections than Republicans, who could win control of the U.S. Senate. President Obama has said that Democrats have to learn to mobilize voters in non-presidential elections.

One way blacks have been motivated is by warnings of Republican attempts to limit their ability to vote. Republicans say they are only trying to stamp out voter fraud, but Democrats have highlighted the efforts to mobilize black voters. That effort continued Tuesday as speakers noted that the upcoming election will occur as the Voting Rights Act has, in their view, been gutted by a 2013 U.S. Supreme Court ruling.

NAACP President Cornell William Brooks said in an interview that because turnout generally drops among all groups in midterm elections, each vote has an even bigger impact — making voter protections more critical.

"Off-year elections only emphasize the degree to which we need a full and robust Voting Rights Act," Brooks said.

http://news.yahoo.com/black-leaders-worry-low-turnout-november-004954323.html
 
Surly 2014 electorate poised to 'keep the bums in'

Surly 2014 electorate poised to 'keep the bums in'
By DONNA CASSATA
August 31, 2014 8:13 AM

WASHINGTON (AP) — A surly electorate that holds Congress in even lower regard than unpopular President Barack Obama is willing to "keep the bums in," with at least 365 incumbents in the 435-member House and 18 of 28 senators on a glide path to another term when ballots are counted Nov. 4.

With less than 10 weeks to the elections, Republicans and Democrats who assess the midterm contests say the power of incumbency trumps the sour public mood and antipathy toward gridlocked Washington.

"Despite the incredibly low polling, favorable ratings for Congress, it's still an incumbent's world," said Sheila Krumholz, executive director of the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics, which tracks political money.

That leaves many voters angry, not only with the political reality but their inability to change it.

"I can't get over where they say people are going to be able to keep their seats when they're not doing their jobs. I just don't understand it," said retired teacher Pauline Legendre after voting in Minnesota's Democratic primary on Aug. 12.

The voter disgust is palpable, evident in blistering comments at summertime town halls and middling percentages for incumbents in primaries. Yet no sitting senator has lost and only three members of the House got the primary boot. Come Election Day, only a fraction of the electorate will be motivated enough to vote, if history is any guide.

Congressional hopefuls are whipsawed by the two dynamics.

"It's going to be a challenge for any candidate running for Congress to suggest that they have all the answers or that somehow there's something about them that's so inspiring" that voters are going to forget "how disenchanted or disaffected they are with government at the federal level," said one candidate, Ryan Costello. The Republican is seeking an open House seat in southeast Pennsylvania, where just 12 percent of GOP voters turned out in the May primary.

Still, the candidates press ahead.

Republicans are laser-focused on gaining the six seats to grab the Senate majority and control Congress for the remainder of Obama's presidency. Five Democratic retirements give the GOP a clear shot to capture control. So do races in conservative-leaning states such as Louisiana, North Carolina and Arkansas, where white Southern Democrats are rare.

The GOP figures it's halfway to its goal, with a solid advantage in open contests in South Dakota, West Virginia and Montana. Republicans are optimistic about the open seat in Iowa, less so about Michigan and energized by their prospects in Colorado and Alaska. If a GOP wave materializes, it could be in the Senate.

In the House, Republicans are expected to pad their majority, which now is 233-199 with three vacancies. The goal is to match or surpass the 246 seats the GOP held from 1947-49.

Fueling the battle is what's expected to be a record flow of campaign cash. The parties' campaign committees and their allied outside groups are spending at a rate certain to exceed the $3.6 billion price tag of the 2010 midterm elections.

Democrats lost 63 House seats in the 2010 midterms and their majority to Republicans. But the GOP does not expect a comparable sweep in 2014 simply because redistricting reduced the number of opportunities. On that, Democrats agree, though an Obama decision on immigration could change the dynamic.

On the cusp of the fall election season, fewer than two dozen House Democrats and Republicans are in real jeopardy in November.

The GOP is counting on opposition to Obama to motivate its core voters. To counter, Democrats have sent 444 organizers to 48 districts to get out the vote. An additional 250-plus are ready for the September-to-November sprint as the party typically faces a drop-off in midterm voting.

The Democratic Party is using reminder pledge cards that say "1 million votes for 2014," which is the number they say decided 65 competitive House races in 2012. Democrats maintain that they had a shot two years ago, but Obama's miserable performance in his first presidential debate doomed his party's chances.

It's an uphill fight as the president's party typically loses seats in a nonpresidential election year.

At a meeting last month with small business owners and workers at a wood fabricating plant in Quarryville, Pennsylvania, Republican Rep. Joe Pitts got an earful from farmer, Michael Appel, 48, who pressed the nine-term congressman to do more to stop Obama.

"I'm wondering, especially when it comes to Obamacare, how the House is going to start holding the president accountable for making law out of whole cloth?" Appel asked.

"It's not that we wouldn't like to, it's a matter of what we can do," Pitts responded. "You need the House, the Senate and the president. The problem is we don't have those two."

As staff urged the attendees to vote, Appel erupted in frustration: "I voted for Joe Pitts and all he's told me so far up here is he's powerless."

Pitts said in an interview that it's up to lawmakers to educate voters about the limits of divided government.

"I share their frustration," Pitts said. "I understand they're not as involved so they don't understand a lot of it, but they have a responsibility to turn out next time if they're concerned, because there are real consequences to these elections in public policy."

Democratic incumbents have cast themselves as outsiders as they sympathize with hostile voters.

New York Rep. Dan Maffei says "we gotta hold 'em accountable" in his campaign ad. Iowa Rep. Dave Loebsack did not mince words when he told constituents, "Congress is an incredibly dysfunctional mess and everyone knows that," and he blamed the lack of compromise.

In York, Pennsylvania, first-term Republican Rep. Scott Perry insisted that the House had been doing its job by passing bills, but that cooperation was lacking from the Democratic-led Senate and Obama.

One voter asked him whether, if the Senate goes Republican in November, there might be more hope.

"If you're expecting cataclysmic change immediately, I think that's a bit beyond expectations," Perry said.

http://news.yahoo.com/surly-2014-electorate-poised-keep-bums-124822114--election.html
 

Out of touch? Senate candidates
fire for where they live​

Senate candidates in Alaska, Arkansas, Kansas Louisiana, Mississippi,
and New Hampshire are fighting accusations that they are out of touch with their states.
From Kansas Senator Pat Roberts – who does not own a home in Kansas but says he pays
rent at a constituent's house – to Dan Sullivan, who moved back to Alaska in 2009 after working
in DC since 2002, candidates are striving to prove they have ties to the states the want to represent in Congress.



McClatchy Washington Bureau
By David Lightman
and Bryan Lowry
September 10, 2014


WASHINGTON — The elections for control of the Senate could hinge as much on where some candidates live as on how they vote.

Residency controversies are dogging Senate candidates in several pivotal states: Alaska, Arkansas, Kansas, Louisiana, and New Hampshire. Some list Washington, not the states that elect them, as their home addresses. Others moved into their states only recently, prompting criticism that they’re just using the states as a way to get to D.C.

This is at a time when it’s particularly toxic to look too Washington. Congress’ approval ratings are hovering around 14 percent, while roughly 70 percent of voters see the country on the wrong track.

“It’s possible that in a highly nationalized political environment, charges that incumbents have lost touch with their constituents resonate particularly well,” said Sarah Binder, an expert on Congress and legislative politics at Washington’s Brookings Institution. “Voters don’t like to be forgotten, and challengers are eager to find ways to put incumbents on the defensive.”

Already this year, the out-of-touch charge helped topple House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, R-Va., who seemed more interested in Washington than his district and lost a primary this year to little-known professor David Brat. Two years ago, similar controversy helped end the 36-year Senate career of Sen. Richard Lugar, R-Ind.

Sen. Pat Roberts, R-Kan., who faces re-election this year, has struggled to answer questions about where he calls home, telling a radio interviewer he returns to Kansas whenever he gets an opponent.

The senator owns no home in Kansas and was registered to vote at the home of a constituent, where, Roberts said, he paid rent.

The issue surfaced again last week during a debate. “I suspect, senator, I’ve been to Dodge City more times this year than you have,” said challenger Greg Orman, an independent. He said he’d been to Roberts’ hometown four times recently. Well, interrupted Roberts, I’ve been there seven times recently.

Similar controversies have surfaced elsewhere:

– Alaska. Dan Sullivan, the Republican former state attorney general who’s challenging Democratic Sen. Mark Begich, moved to the state 17 years ago. Sullivan went to Washington in 2002 to work for the National Security Council and, later, the State Department. He kept his home in Alaska and returned to the state in 2009.

“Dan’s a Marine whose service to his country has taken him throughout the world, and for Mark Begich to attack him for his service is not only wrong, but it’s a direct affront to the servicemen and women who also call Alaska home,” said campaign spokesman Mike Anderson.


– Arkansas. Republican U.S. Rep. Tom Cotton, who’s in a neck-and-neck battle for the Senate against Democratic incumbent Mark Pryor, doesn’t own property in the state. He does point out his sixth-generation state roots, noting that he lives in a home his father owns. He’s running an ad, filmed in front of that house, where he pledges, “I’ll stay connected to my roots.”

Pryor features his father, David Pryor, a former governor and senator, in an ad to help bolster his state ties.

It could matter in a close race. “It’s a small matter, but something the Pryor people are positioned to take advantage of,” said Arkansas Poll director Janine Parry.


– Louisiana. Democratic Sen. Mary Landrieu is in a close re-election fight and facing criticism for maintaining a posh Capitol Hill home with her husband, listing that address on her statement of candidacy filed Aug. 11 with the Federal Election Commission.

Republicans tried to get her off the ballot, saying she didn’t fulfill residency requirements, but a Louisiana judge dismissed the suit last week. Landrieu said she still lived in Louisiana. She, her siblings and their mother jointly own the family home in New Orleans where she grew up.

“I have lived at my home on Prieur Street most of my life and I live there now, when not fulfilling my duties in Washington or serving constituents across the state,” she said. She’s survived similar charges in past campaigns.


– Mississippi. In his statement of candidacy with the FEC on May 9, Republican Sen. Thad Cochran listed his address as 218-A Maryland Ave. on Capitol Hill in Washington. In February, in a new filing, he listed his address as Oxford, Miss., where he owns a home.

Republican primary challenger Chris McDaniel based his campaign on Cochran being too intimate with Washington. Elect me, McDaniel would say, and I’ll return to the state frequently. Cochran won a runoff, however.

While the issue may have singed Cochran, he fought back by citing the projects, or earmarks, he’d obtained for the state during his four decades in Congress. “That money could be used to build a bridge somewhere so people could cross the creek to get to church,” said Marty Wiseman, a Starkville, Miss., political analyst.


– New Hampshire. Sen. Scott Brown represented Massachusetts in the Senate from 2010 until 2013, but now he’s running for the Senate in neighboring New Hampshire.

Democratic Sen. Jeanne Shaheen, locked in a tight race with Brown, is reminding voters of his background in another state. “This is my home. This is where my kids grew up,” she has said. “My goal has been to serve the people of New Hampshire, not to serve myself.”

Brown might benefit from the influx of Massachusetts residents into the state. Among those who live near that state’s border, he has a 22 percentage-point edge over Shaheen in the latest WMUR Granite State poll.


– Kansas. Roberts spent a total of 97 days from July 2011 to August 2013 in the state, according to his Senate spending records.

Clay Barker, the Kansas Republican Party executive director, said this shouldn’t be an issue for voters. “If you send a guy to Washington, D.C., to work for you there, do you want him always back in Kansas watching TV?” Barker said. “His workplace is D.C.”

The controversy lingers. “I think the residency will haunt him all the way up through Election Day,” said Bob Beatty, a professor of political science at Washburn University in Topeka. “It’s just like a ghost that won’t go away.”

Lowry, who writes for The Wichita Eagle, reported from Kansas



Read more here: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2014/09/...dates.html?sp=/99/104/463/&rh=1#storylink=cpy




 


<iframe src='http://player.theplatform.com/p/2E2eJC/EmbeddedOffSite?guid=n_maddow_2charts_141001' height='500' width='635' scrolling='no' border='no' ></iframe>

 

Out of touch? Senate candidates
draw fire for where they live​

Senate candidates in Alaska, Arkansas, Kansas Louisiana, Mississippi,
and New Hampshire are fighting accusations that they are out of touch with their states.
From Kansas Senator Pat Roberts – who does not own a home in Kansas but says he pays
rent at a constituent's house – to Dan Sullivan, who moved back to Alaska in 2009 after working
in DC since 2002, candidates are striving to prove they have ties to the states the want to represent in Congress.



McClatchy Washington Bureau
By David Lightman
and Bryan Lowry
September 10, 2014


* * *​


Sen. Pat Roberts, R-Kan., who faces re-election this year, has struggled to answer questions about where he calls home, telling a radio interviewer he returns to Kansas whenever he gets an opponent.


– Kansas. Roberts spent a total of 97 days from July 2011 to August 2013 in the state, according to his Senate spending records.

Clay Barker, the Kansas Republican Party executive director, said this shouldn’t be an issue for voters. “If you send a guy to Washington, D.C., to work for you there, do you want him always back in Kansas watching TV?” Barker said. “His workplace is D.C.”

The controversy lingers. “I think the residency will haunt him all the way up through Election Day,” said Bob Beatty, a professor of political science at Washburn University in Topeka. “It’s just like a ghost that won’t go away.”





Orman opens up big lead over Roberts in Kansas​



McClatchy Washington Bureau
By David Lightman
October 5, 2014


Indepedent Greg Orman has opened up a big lead over incumbent Sen. Pat Roberts, a new NBC-Marist poll said Sunday.

The survey also found

  • Republican Joni Ernst slightly ahead of Democratic Rep. Bruce Braley in Iowa,

  • Democratic Sen. Kay Hagan is ahead of Republican Thom Tillis in North Carolina.

    Hagan is benefitting from a gender gap. She’s up 19 among women, while Tillis is up 13 among men. Hagan also polls 84 percent of the black vote. Overall, she leads Tillis, 44 to 40 percent.

Orman has the potential to pull off one of the year’s biggest surprises. Roberts, a Republican, was presumed to have a safe seat in Kansas, which last elected a Democrat to the Senate in 1932.

Thirty-seven percent said they have a positive opinion of Roberts, while 47 percent saw him negatively. Roberts was hurt earlier this year by controversy about his residence.

Roberts is “in a great deal of trouble out there,” Lee Miringoff, director of the Marist Institute for Public Opinion in New York, told NBC. “He’s got high negatives, his intensity of support is low, he’s losing independents by more than two to one. His to-do list is rather large in the remaining time before Election Day.”

Orman, though, “remains relatively undefined,” NBC noted, and Kansas still leans Republican. But in the Sept. 27-Oct. 1 poll, Orman leads, 48 to 38 percent.


In Iowa, Ernst is up by 2 in the race to succeed retiring Sen. Tom Harkin, D-Iowa.



Read more here: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2014/10/05/242197/orman-opens-up-big-lead-over-roberts.html#storylink=cpy



 

Black Women’s Roundtable
rallies midterm voters across the country


<iframe width="560" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/5J5bKudXBXI" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Panel members at Congressional Black Caucus Wednesday called on black women, who vote
in higher rates than any other demographic, to mobilize other members of their com-
munities. (Kate Rooney/Medill News Service) (Medill DC)

Read more here: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2014/09/25/241076_black-womens-roundtable-rallies.html?rh=1#storylink=cpy

 

Battle for Senate “could tip either way,” says NPR poll


McClatchy Washington Bureau
By David Lightman
October 3, 2014



The fight for the U.S. Senate “remains close and could tip either way,” according to a new bipartisan NPR poll released Friday. NPR’s Mara Liasson wrote the analysis.

The poll, conducted by Republican Whit Ayres of Resurgent Republic and Democrat Stan Greenberg of Democracy Corps, found that “there's no sign yet that a big electoral tsunami is coming, the way it did to help Democrats in 2006 or Republicans in 2010.”

“This poll shows an incredibly stable race, but with emerging evidence to explain why Democratic incumbents and candidates are surprising people and keeping so many red-states very much in play,” said a Democracy Corps statement. “The Democratic candidates have achieved a net positive job performance and a positive approval score 4 points above the President.”

Ayes told NPR: "The direction of the country is overwhelmingly perceived to be in the wrong direction. Barack Obama is exceedingly unpopular in the Senate battlegrounds.

"The generic party preference for a Senate candidate favors the Republicans by three points. So the playing field still tilts strongly to Republicans in these 12 battleground states."

Republicans need a net gain of six seats to win control of the Senate. They’re strong favorites to win Democratic-held seats in Montana, West Virginia and South Dakota. Chances are considered decent in several other seats now held by Democrats, including Alaska, Arkansas, Iowa, North Carolina, Louisiana, Colorado and New Hampshire. But Republican-held seats in Georgia, Kentucky and Kansas are also in play.


Read more here: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2014/10/...either.html?sp=/99/104/244/112/#storylink=cpy


 

NEW POLL - Kentucky Senate Race
Grimes takes two-point lead over McConnell


13tsKv.AuSt.79.jpg


Lexington Herald-Leader
October 6, 2014


Democrat Alison Lundergan Grimes has regained a two-point edge over Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell in Kentucky's U.S. Senate Race, according to a new Bluegrass Poll.

Grimes leads McConnell 46 percent to 44 percent in the poll of 632 likely voters, with Libertarian David Patterson claiming 3 percent. Seven percent remain undecided.

A month ago, the Bluegrass Poll showed McConnell with a four-point advantage over Grimes.

The latest poll was conducted Sept. 29-Oct.2 by SurveyUSA for the Herald-Leader and WKYT-TV in Lexington and The Courier-Journal and WHAS-TV in Louisville. It has a margin of error of plus or minus 4 percentage points.

The poll shows Grimes making huge strides over the last month in rural parts of the state, where she trailed by more than 20 points in late August. In the latest poll, her deficits in Eastern Kentucky and Western Kentucky shrunk to 11 points and 15 points, respectively.

Meanwhile, her lead in the state's largest city expanded. In the Louisville region, her margin over McConnell expanded from 7 points in August to 16 points last week. Her lead in north-central Kentucky, which includes Lexington and much of Northern Kentucky, shrunk slightly, from 9 points to 7 points.

On the question of which political party should control the Senate, registered Kentucky voters chose Republicans over Democrats, 47 percent to 42 percent, with 11 percent not sure.

McConnell's favorable rating remains dismal, with 35 percent saying they view him favorably and 48 percent unfavorably. That compares to 26 percent favorable and 46 percent unfavorable last month.

Grimes is viewed favorably by 40 percent of voters and unfavorably by 39 percent. Last month, 38 percent viewed her favorably and 37 percent unfavorably.

The poll also tested how respondents view the core campaign messages of Grimes and McConnell. Grimes has portrayed McConnell as an out-of-touch incumbent who has been in Washington too long, while McConnell has portrayed Grimes as a rubber stamp for the agenda of President Barack Obama. (Obama remains wildly unpopular in Kentucky, with a 29 percent favorable rating and 55 percent unfavorable rating.)

When asked whether they agree or disagree that "Mitch McConnell has been in office for 30 years and its time for him to be replaced by someone else," 57 percent of respondents said they agreed. Thirty percent disagreed and 13 percent weren't sure.

When asked whether they agree or disagree that "Alison Lundergan Grimes will simply vote for President Barack Obama's agenda and Kentucky needs someone who would stand up to the president," 49 percent agreed. Thirty-seven percent disagreed and 14 percent weren't sure.


Read more here: http://www.kentucky.com/2014/10/06/3466233_bluegrass-poll-grimes-rebounds.html?rh=1#storylink=cpy




 
Money swamp: Billions spent in battle for US Congress

Money swamp: Billions spent in battle for US Congress
By Michael Mathes
September 26, 2014 10:53 PM

Washington (AFP) - Huge individual donations, aggressive party spending and untraceable "dark money" are flooding this year's mid-term campaigns, fueling concerns that the financial impact on America's congressional elections is spiraling out of control.

Take Alaska. The far-western state is remote and its few residents fiercely independent.

Yet an eye-popping $30 million has already been spent in the state's race between incumbent Senator Mark Begich and challenger Dan Sullivan, according to the Center for Responsive Politics, a campaign-money tracker.

That figure may well double before voters troop to polls November 4, experts warn, sending costs of that campaign north of $120 per eligible voter.

And Alaska is merely the cycle's seventh costliest race, well behind North Carolina where $46 million has already been spent on the Senate battle there.

All signs point to this mid-term campaign as being the priciest ever, surpassing the estimated $3.6 billion spent on the 2010 midterms and the $3.7 billion of 2012.

Republicans are going all out with their bid to retake the Senate, but President Barack Obama's Democrats are not giving up without a massive financial fight.

With 39 days before the election, Democrats, normally first to bemoan the astronomical amounts of cash in politics, have actually seen their party committees outraise Republican counterparts, reports to the Federal Election Commission show.

Corporations are also ramping up electoral giving, funneling millions in efforts that help their preferred candidates.

So are billionaires like Charles and David Koch, conservative industrialists whom Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid has repeatedly accused of attempting to "buy our democracy."

But Democrats are turning to mega-donors as well. Liberal former hedge fund manager Tom Steyer in August wrote a $15 million check to his own super PAC, NextGen Climate Action.

Unlike political parties, such groups can contribute unlimited funds towards a political agenda, but they can not coordinate directly with campaigns or contribute to candidates.

And some political non-profits are not required to disclose their donors or provide detailed reports of their finances, leading to unknown amounts of so-called dark money swept into campaign efforts.

"It's gone completely haywire," Joe Trippi, a top Democratic strategist credited with helping pioneer online campaigning, told AFP.

Trippi has worked on several presidential campaigns and served as Howard Dean's campaign manager a decade ago when he revolutionized online politicking.

"I remember those really inspiring days of 2003 and look at where we are in 2014, and it's a monster," he added. "The whole thing is not anything I thought it would be."

- Koch brothers -

The landscape was fundamentally altered in 2010 by a key Supreme Court decision which essentially removed the ceiling to how much corporations, unions or individuals can inject into US elections.

Such deregulation proved to be a godsend to the Kochs, whose vast political network was estimated to have spent a staggering $400 million in a failed bid to block Obama's 2012 re-election.

Their advocacy group Americans For Prosperity has already spent some $50 million this year in support of Republican candidates, according to Politico, which quoted a confidential March memo to donors saying the group, which does not disclose its donors, plans a $125 million spending spree.

One particularly visible effect of this bipartisan funding tsunami is on TV advertising. Within 60 days of an election, candidates take priority over traditional advertisers broadcasting on local airwaves.

According to the Center for Public Integrity, 33,000 political TV ads aired September 16-22 in markets of the nine most competitive Senate races.

Who is funding the ads is not often clear. One third of the spots that aired from August 29 to September 11 were paid for by groups that do not disclose their donors, Wesleyan Media Project said in its analysis of Kantar Media/CMAG data.

Lawmakers made clear this month that election season was no time to tinker with campaign finance reformm, as Senate Republicans blocked efforts to limit financial influence of corporations and wealthy Americans on elections.

Trippi said White House contenders can glean an important lesson: "Anyone thinking about running for president in 2016 should consider speed-dating billionaires."

http://news.yahoo.com/money-swamp-billions-spent-battle-us-congress-025358749.html
 
Re: Money swamp: Billions spent in battle for US Congress


Rock The Vote Presents: #TURNOUTFORWHAT


<iframe width="560" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/rijpU5yD55I" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>


 
Record number of black candidates seeking office

Record number of black candidates seeking office
By JESSE J. HOLLAND
3 hours ago

WASHINGTON (AP) — More than 100 black candidates will be on the ballot in statewide and congressional races next month, a post-Reconstruction record that some observers say is a byproduct of President Barack Obama's historic presidency.

At least 83 black Republicans and Democrats are running for the U.S. House, an all-time high for the modern era, according to political scientist David Bositis, who has tracked black politicians for years. They include Mia Love in Utah, who is trying to become the first black Republican woman to be elected to Congress.

Four other black women — Bonnie Watson Coleman in New Jersey, Brenda Lawrence in Michigan, Alma Adams in North Carolina and Stacey Plaskett in the Virgin Islands — are expected to win seats as Democrats, Bositis said. If they all win, and no black female incumbents lose, there should be 20 black women among House members, an all-time high, Bositis said.

There are at least 25 African-Americans running for statewide offices, including U.S. senator, governor or lieutenant governor, also a record number.

The previous record for black candidates seeking House seats was 72 in 2012, the year Obama, the nation's first black president, was re-elected to a second term. The previous record for statewide contests was 17 in 2002, said Bositis, formerly of the Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies, a think tank in Washington that focuses primarily on issues affecting African-Americans.

Those statewide numbers include Democrat Cory Booker of New Jersey and Republican Tim Scott of South Carolina, the U.S. Senate's only black members.

Booker is seeking a full term next month, having won a special election last year to replace the deceased Sen. Frank Lautenberg. Scott, appointed last year, is seeking to finish out the two years remaining in the term of former Sen. Jim DeMint, who resigned from the Senate in 2013.

An Obama "coattails effect" is partly responsible for this large candidate pool because it spurred blacks to vote, and encouraged them to pursue offices they might not have sought in the past, said political science professor Fredrick C. Harris, director of Columbia University's Center on African-American Politics and Society. America's blacks voted at a higher rate than other minority groups in 2012 and by most measures surpassed the white turnout for the first time, according to the U.S. Census Bureau.

"It may be that this is a reflection of political opportunity," Harris said. He noted a similar increase in black candidacies in 1988, when Jesse Jackson made a second, unsuccessful run for the Democratic presidential nomination.

Bositis said the increase may also be a result of changing political demographics in regions like the South. "The fact is that many of the increases are occurring in states (especially in the South) where most whites are withdrawing from Democratic Party politics — leaving black candidates the nominations by default," Bositis said.

Republicans have been heavily courting minorities, spending millions to woo black voters and to recruit women and minorities to run for state and local office. "If elected, these candidates will be great representatives for all their constituents and will continue to play a major role in the party's efforts to expand the electorate," said Republican National Committee spokesman Orlando Brown.

While the GOP is building up its numbers, the Democrats have a record number of African-Americans running for statewide and congressional offices, according to Bositis. There are at least 65 Democratic nominees, surpassing the previous high of 59 in 2012.

"The historic number of black Democrats running for office at all levels this year once again confirms that the Democratic Party is a broad coalition of Americans from diverse ethnic and professional backgrounds, focused on expanding opportunity for all and building ladders to the middle class," said Kiara Pesante, Democratic National Committee spokeswoman.

http://news.yahoo.com/record-number-black-candidates-seeking-office-070949074--election.html
 
Re: Record number of black candidates seeking office


Southern Evangelicals Are Dwindling
and Taking the GOP Edge With Them​

Why are Democrats keeping it close in five key Senate races?
Look at changing demographics.​


lead.jpg


Midterm elections are all about turning out base constituencies. Over the last few decades, there have been few more reliable voters for Republicans than white evangelical Protestants. This year, however, GOP candidates may be getting less help from this group—not because white evangelical Protestants are becoming less supportive or less motivated, but simply because they are declining as a proportion of the population, even in Southern states.​


White evangelical Protestants have remained a steadfast Republican constituency in both presidential and midterm congressional elections ever since the Reagan presidency, which marked what political scientists Merle and Earl Black dubbed “the great white switch.” In 2008 and 2012, roughly three-quarters of white born-again Christians supported GOP nominees John McCain (73 percent) and Mitt Romney (78 percent). In the 2010 midterm election, similar numbers of white born-again Christians (77 percent) supported the GOP House candidate in their districts.

During the heady days of evangelical prominence in the 1980s and 1990s, white evangelical Protestant leaders frequently noted the decline of their more liberal mainline Protestant cousins, but now white evangelicals are seeing their own populations shrink. In recent years, for example, the Southern Baptist Convention, the largest evangelical denomination in the country, has reported steady declines in membership and new baptisms. Since 2007, the number of white evangelical Protestants nationwide has slipped from 22 percent in 2007 to 18 percent today.

A look at generational differences demonstrates that this is only the beginnings of a major shift away from a robust white evangelical presence and influence in the country. While white evangelical Protestants constitute roughly three in 10 (29 percent) seniors (age 65 and older), they account for only one in 10 (10 percent) members of the Millennial generation (age 18-29). In the last few national elections, however, because of high levels of voter turnout, white evangelical Protestants have managed to maintain an outsized presence at the ballot box according to national exit polls, representing roughly one-quarter of voters.

But the fact that there are currently five Southern states—Arkansas, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, and North Carolina— where polling shows that the Senate race margins are less than five percentage points indicates that 2014 may be the year that the underlying demographic trends finally exert enough force to make themselves felt. These changes are evident in analysis based on the American Values Atlas, a massive interactive online map of demographic and religious diversity in America based on 45,000 interviews conducted throughout 2013, created by the Public Religion Research Institute in partnership with Social Science Research Solutions.

White Evangelical Protestant Decline in Five Key Southern States (2007-2013)​


93f982505.png

Differences marked with an asterisk are not statistically significant
at the 90 percent level of confidence. (PRRI/SSRS, American Values
Atlas, 2013; Pew Research Center, Religious Landscape Survey, 2007)



Compared to 2007, just after the 2006 midterm elections, the five southern states where there are tight Senate races have one thing in common: the proportion of white evangelical Protestants has dropped significantly.

  1. In Arkansas, where Republican and freshman Representative Tom Cotton is locked in a tight race with two-term Democratic Senator Mark Pryor, the white evangelical Protestant proportion of the population has dropped from 43 percent to 36 percent.

  2. In Georgia, where Democratic candidate Michelle Nunn is battling Republican candidate David Perdue for retiring Senator Saxby Chambliss’s seat, white evangelical Protestants made up 30 percent of the population in 2007 but that number is currently down to 24 percent.

  3. The proportion of white evangelicals in Kentucky has plunged 11 points, from 43 percent to 32 percent; here Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell faces the Democratic Alison Grimes, the secretary of state.

  4. In Louisiana, where Republican Representative Bill Cassidy is up against three-term Democrat Mary Landrieu, white evangelicals have slipped from being 24 percent of the population to 19 percent.

  5. Likewise, North Carolina has seen a dip in the white evangelical proportion of its population, from 37 percent to 30 percent; here incumbent Democrat Kay Hagan battles Republican Speaker of the North Carolina House Thom Tillis.

Arkansas and Georgia have also witnessed significant declines in the numbers of white mainline Protestants, who also lean toward supporting Republican candidates in the South.

Two forces account for the declining proportions of white evangelical and mainline Protestants: the growth of non-black ethnic minorities and, perhaps surprisingly, the growth of the religiously unaffiliated across the South. Notably, each of these growing constituencies leans decidedly toward Democratic candidates.

For example, in 2007, the religiously unaffiliated constituted 12 percent each of the populations of Kentucky and North Carolina. By 2013, the percentage of unaffiliated Kentuckians had jumped nine points to 21 percent, and the percentage of unaffiliated North Carolinians had jumped to 17 percent. While increases in the proportions of the religiously unaffiliated in Arkansas, Georgia, and Louisiana fall short of statistical significance, the patterns all point in the same direction.

So what does this mean for the 2014 elections? Certainly, events on the ground are still paramount; the campaign machines and peculiarities of candidates matter. And in low-turnout elections such as the midterms, the real weight of these demographic and religious shifts will not yet be fully felt at the ballot box. White evangelical Protestants have a strong turnout record, while non-black ethnic minorities and particularly the religiously unaffiliated are much less likely to vote. PRRI’s pre-election American Values Survey found that while two-thirds (65 percent) of white evangelical Protestants report that they were absolutely certain to vote in the November elections, less than half (45 percent) of the religiously unaffiliated report this kind of certainty. But the underlying trends indicate that at least one reason why there are a number of close elections across the South is the declining dominance of white evangelical Protestants, the most stalwart of GOP supporters.




http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2014/10/the-shriking-evangelical-voter-pool/381560/



 
Back
Top