15 Marines seized by Iran

3rd Day Resurrection said:
:lol:
mr. trufiction, are you really a millionaire?
or were you just talking shit?
if you are, then how exactly do you spell millionaire?
have you found a publisher for your book?
if so, when can bgol and the fam expect the release of this book?

do you have a name for the book yet?
you do know keeping the book-title secret is not
the best marketing strategy? :rolleyes:

are you upset at me because im 14 years younger than you,
and have already achieved more than you?

... are you mad coz im stylin on ya?

MAN WHY DONT YOU START A THREAD TO BEEF WITH ME IN INSTEAD OF FUCKIN UP EVERY THREAD I POST IN
FOLLOWING ME AROUND BGOL LIKE A LOST PUPPY
GET A LIFE SON

YOU HAVE SOMTHING TO PROVE ?
GO AHEAD AND DO IT SO WE CAN GET ON WITH MORE IMPORTANT SHIT.

YOU A SILLY LIL FUCKER.:smh:
 
Hey, If ya'll wanna play big bank, take little bank, Beef, etc. I'll * MERGE * ya'll posts, and threads!!!!

:D :lol: :dance: :dance: :hmm: :hmm: :hmm:
 
tekktron said:
UN resolutions, protocol, etc is a moot point considering that the US invasion of a sovereign nation(Iraq) is against international law(the UN),,,that alone speaks volumes of how insignificant the UN is regarding foreign policy of 1st world nations,,,violation of UN resolutions are only addressed when its convenient, ask our beloved president :rolleyes:

Essentially, the apprehension of British marines was to send a message that covert/reconnaissance operations in Iran wont be a cake walk


I agree with you playa, but the issue is whether they have the right to seize soldiers who were lawfully inspecting ships in Iraq waters. Shane says they have the right, and i say they don't because it violated UN laws, just as the Iraq War did.

Iraq War = Wrong
Iran Seizing 15 Britons carrying out inspections = Wrong
 
shanebp1978 said:
Hey, If ya'll wanna play big bank, take little bank, Beef, etc. I'll * MERGE * ya'll posts, and threads!!!!

:D :lol: :dance: :dance: :hmm: :hmm: :hmm:

MAN FUCK THAT SISSY
HE LIVE IN A CARD BOARD BOX.:lol:
 
3rd Day Resurrection said:
trufiction needs to stop acting like a child.
nigga still holding grudges from last year.
i guess i fucked his head up
:lol:

THE ONLY THING FUCKED UP IS
YOU KEEP ACTING LIKE A LIL BITCH.
GROW UP:hmm:
 
gene cisco said:
UN resolutions???

Sean hannity loves to talk about iraq violating UN resolutions but leaves out america violating them. :lol:

We also forget israel is the biggest violator of UN rules on the planet and america always backs it when the UN wants to do something about it.

The iranians have a right to do WTF they want, got all these fucking white folks running rampant around their borders and they cant do shit?

America and england mad cause iran does this, yet let iran be camped on their borders and they would be going apeshit.

The obvious double standards makes these countries look more and more like imperial pigs.

The only redeeming quality of Sean Hannity is the joy of seeing him go into shuddering spasms when a guest verbally backs him into a corner because his spin tactics can't save him :lol:

Maximumtrini said:

I agree with you playa, but the issue is whether they have the right to seize soldiers who were lawfully inspecting ships in Iraq waters. Shane says they have the right, and i say they don't because it violated UN laws, just as the Iraq War did.

Iraq War = Wrong
Iran Seizing 15 Britons carrying out inspections = Wrong

Its not stated in the particular article posted, but, how do we know those marines weren't performing additional tasks such as recon, covert ops, etc of both Iraq and Iran?,,,especially considering that marines are usually capable of a lot more that just inspections and make-shift security :hmm:

Two "wrongs" don't make a right, however, considering the US(possible future invader or Iran) doesn't adhere to UN laws, is it really fair or even feasible to expect Iran to honor all UN resolutions when engaged in tit-for-tat with the US and Britain?

It will be interesting to see how this plays out
 
British sailors 'admit entering Iran waters'...

Fifteen British sailors and marines detained off Iraq by the Iranian navy have admitted illegally entering Iranian waters, senior Iranian commander General Alireza Afshar said Saturday. "They are currently being questioned and have admitted to violating the territorial waters of the Islamic repubic," Afshar, the official spokesman of the army chief of staff, told the semi-official Fars news agency.

He told the Arabic language service of state television: "We have solid evidence that they were detained in our territorial waters. They themselves have confessed and admitted their mistake."


Entry A 'Suspicious Act'

http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,30000-1257356,00.html
 
Iranians interrogate captured Royal Marines


The 15 Royal Marines and sailors captured by Iran are being "interrogated", officials in Tehran said today.

Amid fears that the 14 men and one woman face a show trial, Iranian television reported that the country did not want to exchange the Britons for five Iranians arrested in northern Iraq two months ago.



HMSCornwallPA_228x153.jpg



hostagesES2303_468x269.jpg


Flashback: British hostages paraded in Iran on TV in 2004

The claim came as the Foreign Office said the prisoners were "fit and well" and said it was doing "everything possible" to secure their release. Iran's foreign ministry told British ambassador Geoffrey Adams that it was working to resolve the situation as soon as possible.

A Foreign Office spokesman described today's hour-long meeting as "business-like", with the ambassador pressing for details of where the detainees were being held.

Defence Secretary Des Browne told MPs today that his thoughts were with the crew members of HMS Cornwall being detained, their friends in theatre and the families in the UK.

He said: "We are doing everything possible to secure their release."

But there were still fears that the captured patrol could face a show trial as Iran's president Mahmoud Ahmedinejad sought to exploit their arrest in his battle with the UN over the country's nuclear programme.

This morning's meeting with Mr Adams was the second in two days and follows Tehran's suggestion that the Britons could face prosecution for "illegally" entering Iranian waters.

The group was seized at gunpoint by Iranian forces on Friday in the Shatt al Arab waterway, which divides Iran and Iraq.



The eight sailors and seven Royal Marines from HMS Cornwall had just finished searching a vessel which they suspected of smuggling. The diplomatic row is over whether or not their two patrol craft strayed into Iranian waters.



armyDM2603_468x289.jpg


War zone: British marines patrolling aboard an inflatable off Basra

The country's foreign minister Manouchehr Mottaki said that there were "legal issues" surrounding the alleged incursion over the country's borders - remarks interpreted as a signal that a trial could happen.

Iran's armed forces spokesman General Ali Reza Afshar said the crew had "confessed" to straying into Iranian waters.

Dr Ali Palaman, editor of the only free newspaper in Iran, told the BBC that he was convinced the threat of a show trial was being used as a bargaining chip.

http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/article-23390295-details/Iran+admits+to+'interrogating'+captured+Marines+as+fears+grow+over+show+trial/article.do
 
max-dawg said:
the usa is officially losing the "oil currency" war.

iran is refusing to switch back to the petro-dollar. this shit will keep going on & on & on until iran either says, "fuck it, let's fight," or "OK, we'll switch back with the following demands."

either way, the euro basis for oil is murdering and will continue to murder the value of the dollar and the british pound.

wars are fought over money.

Do we really need Iran to switch back to the petro-dollar since we now control Iraq?

I was under the impression that if we control the majority of the worlds oil that the dollar was safe.
 
Back
Top