Logical fallacy: Appeal to extremes
(also known as: reductio ad absurdum [misuse of], slippery slope fallacy [form of])
Description: Erroneously attempting to make a reasonable argument into an absurd one, by taking the argument to the extremes.
http://www.logicallyfallacious.com/index.php/logical-fallacies/30-appeal-to-extremes
Example #1
Example #2
The goal of success is not to avoid hard work, it is to enjoy the fruits of hard work.
Your argument is another logical fallacy.
successful = avoid hard work
Therefore avoid hard work = success
Circular Reasoning – supporting a premise with the premise rather than a conclusion.
Another logical fallacy: affirming the consequent
Affirming the consequent, sometimes called converse error, is a formal fallacy, committed by reasoning in the form:
If P, then Q.
Q.
Therefore, P.
An argument of this form is invalid, i.e., the conclusion can be false even when statements 1 and 2 are true. Since P was never asserted as the only sufficient condition for Q, other factors could account for Q (while P was false).
Cruise is basically logic deficient.
No one is arguing that hard work is the only ingredient.
Meanwhile Cruise is saying that hard work is NOT required for success.
Cultivating relationships is hard work.
Creating markets for your product is hard work.
Customer development is hard work.
Problem/solution fit is hard work
Execution is hard work.
Is it the ONLY ingredient?
Or course not.
But then no one was arguing that hard work is the only requirement.
Conversely Cruise is saying that avoiding hard work is the key to success.
And that white boy who told you that bullshit has you drunk on the wine of white supremacy.
Do you actually believe him with his bullshit about "I don't know any rich black man in the United States who is not a front for some white boy.
"?
You can't be this gullible man



(also known as: reductio ad absurdum [misuse of], slippery slope fallacy [form of])
Description: Erroneously attempting to make a reasonable argument into an absurd one, by taking the argument to the extremes.
http://www.logicallyfallacious.com/index.php/logical-fallacies/30-appeal-to-extremes
Example #1
all that matters is who you know. Just ask Paris Hilton, Kim Kardashian, Jeffrey Zuckerberg, Bill Gates, and Donald Trump.
I learned this lesson the hard way.
Example #2
This is what I am talking... it's who you know.
I could have the greatest merchandise ever. It could be a wonder and benefit to all who have it. It could be the finest material and superior workmanship. It could satisfy every requirement that a customer would have.
But, because it is not blessed by Obama, some celebrity, or whoever you worship, then all that HARD WORK is meaningless!
However, if I offered total shit, cheap Chinese-made crap that is made in sweatshops or on poorly constructed assembly lines, but Obama blesses it, or Jordan, or some celebrity, magically everyone wants it. It doesn't matter if it's garbage, if it won't last, if it doesn't do the very thing for which it was designed, all that matters is that it has been endorsed.
The idea guys get slaves to do the HARD WORK, while they take all the credit.
That is the way the world works.
The goal of success is not to avoid hard work, it is to enjoy the fruits of hard work.
Your argument is another logical fallacy.
successful = avoid hard work
Therefore avoid hard work = success
Circular Reasoning – supporting a premise with the premise rather than a conclusion.
The whole goal of the successful is to AVOID HARD WORK as much as possible.
Another logical fallacy: affirming the consequent
Affirming the consequent, sometimes called converse error, is a formal fallacy, committed by reasoning in the form:
If P, then Q.
Q.
Therefore, P.
An argument of this form is invalid, i.e., the conclusion can be false even when statements 1 and 2 are true. Since P was never asserted as the only sufficient condition for Q, other factors could account for Q (while P was false).
HARD WORK don't mean shit! Relationships matter most! WHO YOU KNOW!
If you had your own business, I wouldn't have to explain this to you.
Golf clubs, social organizations, fraternities, lodges, guilds, private clubs are all examples of people building relationships so they don't have to do the hard work.
But, you just keep on believing those fairy tales that HARD WORK is what it takes to be successful in business.
That is why you think HARD WORK is all that it takes. Well, dummy, you can work your ass off and still fail, but relationships will carry you through.
That is my free advice for the day.
As one multi-millionaire told me (very established in Detroit, remember Don Barden), I don't know any rich black man in the United States who is not a front for some white boy.
You know the right people and anybody can be "rich" in this country.
The only HARD WORK is finding the right person.
Cruise is basically logic deficient.
No one is arguing that hard work is the only ingredient.
Meanwhile Cruise is saying that hard work is NOT required for success.
Cultivating relationships is hard work.
Creating markets for your product is hard work.
Customer development is hard work.
Problem/solution fit is hard work
Execution is hard work.
Is it the ONLY ingredient?
Or course not.
But then no one was arguing that hard work is the only requirement.
Conversely Cruise is saying that avoiding hard work is the key to success.
And that white boy who told you that bullshit has you drunk on the wine of white supremacy.
Do you actually believe him with his bullshit about "I don't know any rich black man in the United States who is not a front for some white boy.
"?
You can't be this gullible man


