*** Solar Eclipse Caught On My Satellite Data Feed ***

RoadRage said:
Laser light bending due to refraction.
maxresdefault.jpg
Click to expand...

Even so, the horizon should STILL go down with every inch of ascension. I've posted video of what refraction looks like which btw depends on atmoplanic conditions. It should not extend as you ascend. That happens on a plane, not a ball.

If refraction flattens the curve then why don't we see it in the NASA live stream videos?? Because it's bullshit. When you see a cgi/fish eye curve you scream GLOBE!! But when it's flat, eye level and extending then you wanna holler REFRACTION!!

You can't have it both ways.

200w.gif
 
The only problem for glerfs is that with laser tests across bodies of water, a horizontal side view of the laser proves it's flat. Been proven.

Fuck a globe.
 
cashwhisperer said:
Okay, so that's a tactic? I thought y'all would be interested in actual structured debates where your globe defenders can go ham on the stupid flat earthers......as you would think.

I don't know why yall think I have time to do this all day. I don't make money talking about flat earth, I got shit to do. I ALWAYS have shit to do, which is why if you notice, I don't go as hard as I used to with this shit because I see no point. I'm not changing yall's mind and you're not changing mine. You haven't proved me wrong and according to yall, I haven't proven yall wrong. It's not that serious to me.



And please,

Explain this to me....How is this possible?? Why is this not what we observe in real life? Refraction??

J6H8gyu.gif
Click to expand...
everybody got shit to do big dawg, relax
 
cashwhisperer said:
Even so, the horizon should STILL go down with every inch of ascension. I've posted video of what refraction looks like which btw depends on atmoplanic conditions. It should not extend as you ascend. That happens on a plane, not a ball.

If refraction flattens the curve then why don't we see it in the NASA live stream videos?? Because it's bullshit. When you see a cgi/fish eye curve you scream GLOBE!! But when it's flat, eye level and extending then you wanna holler REFRACTION!!

You can't have it both ways.

200w.gif
Click to expand...
These atmospheric conditions have been quantified already this is how if you can accurately measure the laps rate, you should be able to predict the amount of refraction that should be available. The problem with your flat tards is your claims have no predictive capabilities! In other words, you cannot tell me when or how atmospheric lensing or any of that crap you guys pop, will happen much less how.
You cannot tell me when the bottom of the ships will disappear or when we will be able to see the Chicago skyline or "see" too far. All you guys do is take pictures declaring we see to far without knowing why we are not able to see that shit 99.9 percent of the time. I would be like me declaring a mirage to be the truth and all the other days that the mirage isn't visible to be the outliers.
But then again this is what we expect from stupid people like you.
 
Big Tex said:
Mind posting that flat Earth math while you're at it?
Click to expand...


That's what I want to see. I can describe the Earth using math. What is the weight of Flat Earth? What is the diameter of Flat Earth? Is Flat earth a circle, square, triangle? Does Flat Earth move? Where are their people of math and science to substantiate their claims? I have yet to find one FLERF physicist. I even searched the Deep Web.
 
Lexx Diamond said:
That's what I want to see. I can describe the Earth using math. What is the weight of Flat Earth? What is the diameter of Flat Earth? Is Flat earth a circle, square, triangle? Does Flat Earth move? Where are their people of math and science to substantiate their claims? I have yet to find one FLERF physicist. I even searched the Deep Web.
Click to expand...

How do you describe the earth using math? Break that down.


I don't know the weight of the flat earth.
I'm not sure of the diameter because of the speculation that more land exists.
It's believed that flat earth is a circle. It's also believe that the moon is a topographical reflection of the flat earth which shows more continents.
No, the flat earth doesn't move.
You watch the debatism on Jeran's channel and tell me people of math and science aren't substantiating their claims. And that's just one tiny source.



8 inches per mile squared is globe math, right?
 
cashwhisperer said:
How do you describe the earth using math? Break that down.


I don't know the weight of the flat earth.
I'm not sure of the diameter because of the speculation that more land exists.
It's believed that flat earth is a circle. It's also believe that the moon is a topographical reflection of the flat earth which shows more continents.
No, the flat earth doesn't move.
You watch the debatism on Jeran's channel and tell me people of math and science aren't substantiating their claims. And that's just one tiny source.



8 inches per mile squared is globe math, right?
Click to expand...

The Earth has an equilateral circumference of approximately 24,900 miles. It takes our Earth 24 hours to revolve on her axis. That tells you our Earth is revolving at approximately 1037 miles per hour. Ergo our measurement system we call time. The Earth weighs approximately 6 sextillion tons. There is approximately 57,308,738 square miles of land of Earth and 139,685,000 square miles of water mass. Not to be confused with cubic water mass. Air is 15lbs per cubic foot below water and 14.7lbs per cubic foot above water.

So when I say give me the math on flat Earth. I at least need to have a land mass to refer to in mathematically relatable terms. That flat mass of land must have measurements if it has been proven to truly exist. Cartographers should be able to delineate every square mile of Flat Earth.
 
cashwhisperer said:
How do you describe the earth using math? Break that down.


I don't know the weight of the flat earth.
I'm not sure of the diameter because of the speculation that more land exists.
It's believed that flat earth is a circle. It's also believe that the moon is a topographical reflection of the flat earth which shows more continents.
No, the flat earth doesn't move.
You watch the debatism on Jeran's channel and tell me people of math and science aren't substantiating their claims. And that's just one tiny source.



8 inches per mile squared is globe math, right?
Click to expand...
Did you just say the moon was a topographical reflection of the flat earth?!?!?

Holy shit!
 
cashwhisperer said:
No dummy, you can observe that the laser doesn't bend like you claim by looking at it from the side angle. Which has been done, which proves it's flat.
Click to expand...

Your flerf scam artist is betting that you are too stupid to understand this video, and it looks like they won the jackpot!
Oh, btw @1:40 mark shows exactly what you said is impossible.

Now are you going to show us the math and explain how eclipses are possible on a flat pizza imaginary world?
 
Million Dollar Question, why hasn't one Flat EArter taken up this challenge?




Answer: Because they are lying ass Scam Artists who are scared shitless of testing their outrageous claims, don't believe me go to a flat earther channel posing as a flat earther then ask them to take on this challenge then watch them all BLOCK your ass!
 
RoadRage said:

Your flerf scam artist is betting that you are too stupid to understand this video, and it looks like they won the jackpot!
Oh, btw @1:40 mark shows exactly what you said is impossible.

Now are you going to show us the math and explain how eclipses are possible on a flat pizza imaginary world?
Click to expand...




I'm curious to know, what are the physical dimensions of this flat cartoon pizza, as well

FLERFs will prob cop out with "only God knows" :lol:
 
Last edited:
Lexx Diamond said:
The Earth has an equilateral circumference of approximately 24,900 miles. It takes our Earth 24 hours to revolve on her axis. That tells you our Earth is revolving at approximately 1037 miles per hour. Ergo our measurement system we call time. The Earth weighs approximately 6 sextillion tons. There is approximately 57,308,738 square miles of land of Earth and 139,685,000 square miles of water mass. Not to be confused with cubic water mass. Air is 15lbs per cubic foot below water and 14.7lbs per cubic foot above water.

So when I say give me the math on flat Earth. I at least need to have a land mass to refer to in mathematically relatable terms. That flat mass of land must have measurements if it has been proven to truly exist. Cartographers should be able to delineate every square mile of Flat Earth.
Click to expand...

Okay, I understand that.

Here's a good breakdown on the measurements of the flat earth. I'll answer your points later.




Also, Can you find an encyclopedia before 1958 that says the earth is a globe?
 
cashwhisperer said:
Okay, I understand that.

Here's a good breakdown on the measurements of the flat earth. I'll answer your points later.




Also, Can you find an encyclopedia before 1958 that says the earth is a globe?
Click to expand...

So why are all Flattard scared shitless to test any of these claims by taking up the pilot challenge to fly over the south pole?
 
ghoststrike said:
I'm curious to know, what are the physical dimensions of this flat cartoon pizza, as well

FLERFs will prob cop out with "only God knows" :lol:
Click to expand...
Their horse any pony show only includes how things can't work, without presenting any evidence at all.
It's like concluding Santa must exist, simply because you don't understand how toy factories, store outlets and cargo moving companies are able to keep up with toy demands during the Holidays.
 
4 Dimensional said:
What is this?
Click to expand...

Really??

I guess you wouldn't know because it's something you've never seen because it doesn't exist.

It's what you should see when you ascend in altitude over a sphere. The curve becomes more pronounced the higher you go AND the horizon goes DOWN the further you ascend.

The horizon does NOT rise, extend and remain at eye level like we observe in REAL LIFE.

If the curve is 8 inches per mile squared there is NO WAY that the horizon is going to rise as you ascend. If a boat is going down behind a curve, how in the hell can the horizon rise as you rise?? Refraction?!

It's impossible!!

FLAT!!!
 
cashwhisperer said:
Really??

I guess you wouldn't know because it's something you've never seen because it doesn't exist.

It's what you should see when you ascend in altitude over a sphere. The curve becomes more pronounced the higher you go AND the horizon goes DOWN the further you ascend.

The horizon does NOT rise, extend and remain at eye level like we observe in REAL LIFE.

If the curve is 8 inches per mile squared there is NO WAY that the horizon is going to rise as you ascend. If a boat is going down behind a curve, how in the hell can the horizon rise as you rise?? Refraction?!

It's impossible!!

FLAT!!!
Click to expand...
You just don't understand geometry and topography my guy
 
cashwhisperer said:
Really??

I guess you wouldn't know because it's something you've never seen because it doesn't exist.

It's what you should see when you ascend in altitude over a sphere. The curve becomes more pronounced the higher you go AND the horizon goes DOWN the further you ascend.

The horizon does NOT rise, extend and remain at eye level like we observe in REAL LIFE.

If the curve is 8 inches per mile squared there is NO WAY that the horizon is going to rise as you ascend. If a boat is going down behind a curve, how in the hell can the horizon rise as you rise?? Refraction?!

It's impossible!!

FLAT!!!
Click to expand...
The Earth doesn't curve at 8 miles per square mile, that formula is an parabola approximated shortcut for smaller areas, but you cannot measure drop without first taking into consideration viewer height, target height and refraction conditions. But flat Earthers love throwing around 8 inches per mile because it makes them feel as if they are able to truly understand mathematicians.
 
cashwhisperer said:
Okay, I understand that.

Here's a good breakdown on the measurements of the flat earth. I'll answer your points later.




Also, Can you find an encyclopedia before 1958 that says the earth is a globe?
Click to expand...


Can't you explain it yourself? I didn't need a video someone else made to show you the math of Earth.
 
cashwhisperer said:
Really??

I guess you wouldn't know because it's something you've never seen because it doesn't exist.

It's what you should see when you ascend in altitude over a sphere. The curve becomes more pronounced the higher you go AND the horizon goes DOWN the further you ascend.

The horizon does NOT rise, extend and remain at eye level like we observe in REAL LIFE.

If the curve is 8 inches per mile squared there is NO WAY that the horizon is going to rise as you ascend. If a boat is going down behind a curve, how in the hell can the horizon rise as you rise?? Refraction?!

It's impossible!!

FLAT!!!
Click to expand...

And that gif is the best you got on what we should see? Where did you get that gif from?

J6H8gyu.gif
 
cashwhisperer said:
.
Click to expand...
There isn't enough matter in space to cause much refraction , if you knew science you'd never say something so asinine in public. Btw all my examples of photos of the globe from space were taken with non distorting rectilinear lens with straight edge string references to nidigate against any introduced distortions, something that parlor trick flat earth con men never do
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top