48÷2(9+3) = ????

Your Answer?


  • Total voters
    1,086
Hmm I take full on Calc classes (btw I've aced every math class) I'm not the one to test on this one lol You don't want me to post some moderately difficult calc on here. Listen and you might learn something. The answer is two. That's the bottom line. The example I gave you on how to input it into the calculator is the correct method. I've been doing this for quite some time now.

Here go another John Forbes Nash :lol:
 
Lemme guess...you went to college too right...I bet I know where...



















THE UNIVERSITY OF THE UNITED STATES!!!!

04.jpeg


6a010536a2eb4c970c0134880d95bd970c-800wi
 
You changed the equation if you input it "like this" 48/(2(9+3))

As the op wrote it, the equation is essentially (48/2)*(9+3)

Funny how the most disrespectful person in this thread is the most ignorant.

In math, the way you write it changes an equation without having to change the numbers or even the symbols.

You just said that 48/2(9+3) as written in the OP is 288. So you AGREED.

In your haste to act superior to others you make yourself look like an IDIOT by first AGREEING with me and those who said 288, but then saying they're WRONG! But YOU are the one changing the equation to hide the fact that you initially were INCORRECT!

Fuck that calculator shit man, these are simple ass numbers we're dealing with.

And I agree 48/(2(9+3)) IS 2. I already beat you to that punch as well. If you have me on ignore, then too bad because you'll remain IGNORANT. But I doubt anything could change that.


No "essentially" it's not, this is the point of contention; the equation is poorly written.

I think the equation should be represented as:

48
2(9+3)

I base this on my understanding of how to solve differentials (a process which I admit that I am very rusty at).
 
No "essentially" it's not, this is the point of contention; the equation is poorly written.

I think the equation should be represented as:

48
2(9+3)

I base this on my understanding of how to solve differentials (a process which I admit that I am very rusty at).

its would need to another () around 2(9+3) to make it

48
2(9+3)
 
it doesnt matter how many people realized their mistakes

youre going to fight this one to the end in super retard mode huh?


you take calc classes tho :hmm::hmm::hmm::hmm::hmm:

man unscramble this phrase for me:

UP SHUT THE FUCK

yes, you got it u fucking world class tard!!!

Here's another way of Thinking about it. This might help you learn.

You can use the distributive property.

48÷2(9+3) Step 1: Use the distributive property.
Distribute the 2 to the 9 and the 3. So 2 times 9 then 2 times 3
48÷(18+6) Step 2: Add both products
48÷24 Step 3: Find quotient
=2

There's no arguing this. This is Mathematics, not opinion. If you're too stupid to grasp PEMDAS you can use the distributive property and you will find the same answer... 2.
 
Please excuse my dear aunt sally

I learned this in 80's

Ok, I get it now. The order in "Please excuse my dear aunt sally" isn't concrete. It's Parenthesis then Exponents then EITHER Multiplication or Division (Which ever comes first when moving from left to right). Multiplication does not come before Division if the Division is first when reading the problem from left to right.

Therefore...

48/2(9+3)=
48/2(12)=
24(12)=
288

Thank you BGOL!
 
48÷2(9+3)
= (48/1)*(1/2)*(1/(9+3))
=(48/1)*(1/2)*(12/1)
= 288

Wrong try again. Use the distribute property if you cannot grasp Pemdas. If you Start with Parenthesis, you must finish the parenthesis operations, you can't switch off and divide 48 by 2 that's WRONG. It's an illegal move.
 
Wrong try again. Use the distribute property if you cannot grasp Pemdas. If you Start with Parenthesis, you must finish the parenthesis operations, you can't switch off and divide 48 by 2 that's WRONG. It's an illegal move.

I did already
48/2(9+3)

=

48/2(9) + 48/2(3)

= 432/2 +144/2
=216+72
=288


or

48/(2(9+3))

=48/(2(9) +2(3))
= 48/(18 +6)
=48/24
=2
 
Wrong try again. Use the distribute property if you cannot grasp Pemdas. If you Start with Parenthesis, you must finish the parenthesis operations, you can't switch off and divide 48 by 2 that's WRONG. It's an illegal move.

Once you add the 9+3 isn't the parenthesis operation complete?
 
?? Please don't tell me ur one of the guys who thinks it's 288 :smh:

Ok, I get it now. The order in "Please excuse my dear aunt sally" isn't concrete. It's Parenthesis then Exponents then EITHER Multiplication or Division (Which ever comes first when moving from left to right). Multiplication does not come before Division if the Division is first when reading the problem from left to right.

Therefore...

48/2(9+3)=
48/2(12)=
24(12)=
288

Thank you BGOL!

:yes::yes::yes:
 
Wrong try again. Use the distribute property if you cannot grasp Pemdas. If you Start with Parenthesis, you must finish the parenthesis operations, you can't switch off and divide 48 by 2 that's WRONG. It's an illegal move.

Are you saying 2(12) is still part of the P process just because there a parentheses around 12?

Show me some references on where that is true?

P mean do everything inside of () FIRST and thats it
 
Here's another way of Thinking about it. This might help you learn.

You can use the distributive property.

48÷2(9+3) Step 1: Use the distributive property.
Distribute the 2 to the 9 and the 3. So 2 times 9 then 2 times 3
48÷(18+6) Step 2: Add both products
48÷24 Step 3: Find quotient
=2

There's no arguing this. This is Mathematics, not opinion. If you're too stupid to grasp PEMDAS you can use the distributive property and you will find the same answer... 2.

While distributing the 2, you are doing multiplication. The order of operations state that multiplication and division must be done in order from left to right. You can not multiply by 2 without first dividing 48 by 2.

if 9+3 = x

then
48÷2*x

equals
24*x = 288

not 24/x
 
Here's another way of Thinking about it. This might help you learn.

You can use the distributive property.

48÷2(9+3) Step 1: Use the distributive property.
Distribute the 2 to the 9 and the 3. So 2 times 9 then 2 times 3
48÷(18+6) Step 2: Add both products
48÷24 Step 3: Find quotient
=2

There's no arguing this. This is Mathematics, ... the distributive property and you will find the same answer... 2.

Exactly, I do not understand the logic that is being applied where people are ignoring the 2(9+3) portion. The distributive property necessitates that you multiply (9+3) by 2.

Any counterpoints?
 
I did already
48/2(9+3)

=

48/2(9) + 48/2(3)

= 432/2 +144/2
=216+72
=288


or

48/(2(9+3))

=48/(2(9) +2(3))
= 48/(18 +6)
=48/24
=2

The top part is the correct way to use the distributive property, its 288
Numbers outside of the parentheses are treated as multiplication, that being the reason 48/2 is done first, then 24*12

Damn dudes, i thought ya'll was smart
 
I did already
48/2(9+3)

=

48/2(9) + 48/2(3)

= 432/2 +144/2
=216+72
=288


or

48/(2(9+3))

=48/(2(9) +2(3))
= 48/(18 +6)
=48/24
=2

Dog, distribute the two. OR start with parenthesis. What these people don't understand is, when you start with the parenthesis you must finish the operation. You can't Jump off. So it'd be 9 plus 3 equals 12 times two. Then that operation is complete. Only then can you divide that into 48 so that will give you two. How can you argue MATH lol math is not an opinion on good hair/bad hair or something. It's concrete. You guys are saying 2+2 is 5 basically, then trying to argue about why it must be 5 lol :lol: :smh:
 
Once you add the 9+3 isn't the parenthesis operation complete?

Exactly!

To proceed any further makes the problem (2(9+3)) whereas you solve (9+3) = 12 and then multiply (2(12)) which equals 24 then you would divide 48 by 24 which equals 2.

Once you solve (9+3) you proceed from left to right, just like you read!
 
Last edited:
The top part is the correct way to use the distributive property, its 288
Numbers outside of the parentheses are treated as multiplication, that being the reason 48/2 is done first, then 24*12

Damn dudes, i thought ya'll was smart

Damn you're really stupid. I quit lol. Hopefully none of you take a basic algebra class, you will fail. This is 4th grade math.
 
Dog, distribute the two. OR start with parenthesis. What these people don't understand is, when you start with the parenthesis you must finish the operation. You can't Jump off. So it'd be 9 plus 3 equals 12 times two. Then that operation is complete. Only then can you divide that into 48 so that will give you two. How can you argue MATH lol math is not an opinion on good hair/bad hair or something. It's concrete. You guys are saying 2+2 is 5 basically, then trying to argue about why it must be 5 lol :lol: :smh:

I give you credit dog, you are quite stubborn. Once you do whatever is inside the parenthesis you move to the beginning of the problem.

48/2(9+3)

48/2(12)

48/2 X 12 (happy?)

24 X 12

288
 
48÷2(9+3) = 48÷2*(9+3)

48÷2*12

24*12

288



that is NOT how you distribute.

The three most important things in mathematics are: notation, notation, notation.

48/2(9+3) = 48/2*(9+3)

The order of operations state that grouping symbols come first, then after exponents, you do multiplication AND division from left to right.

so you could do:

48/2(9+3) = 48/2*(9+3)

24*(9+3)

24*9 + 24*3

216+72

288

This is why america lags so far behind other countries when it come to math. People are allowed to graduate without learning it. :smh:
I completely agree.





And the answer is 2. :hmm:
 
Exactly, I do not understand the logic that is being applied where people are ignoring the 2(9+3) portion. The distributive property necessitates that you multiply (9+3) by 2.

Any counterpoints?

the 2(9+3) portion is not being ignored. Putting 2 next to (9+3) simply means that you multiply 2 times the sum when it is time for the multiplication to take place according to the order of operations. Since 48/ 2 is to the left of 2*12, 48 / 2 must be done first. The () only serve to tell you to add 9 to 3 before you start multiplying and dividing.
 
Back
Top