120 days to go until the largest tax hikes in US history..

HCICICIC

Potential Star
Registered
120 Days to Go Until the
Largest Tax Hikes in History

From Ryan Ellis on Friday, September 3, 2010 11:10 AM


In just 120 days, the largest tax hikes in the history of America will take effect. They will hit families and small businesses in three great waves on January 1, 2011:

First Wave: Expiration of 2001 and 2003 Tax Relief

In 2001 and 2003, the GOP Congress enacted several tax cuts for investors, small business owners, and families. These will all expire on January 1, 2011:

Personal income tax rates will rise. The top income tax rate will rise from 35 to 39.6 percent (this is also the rate at which two-thirds of small business profits are taxed). The lowest rate will rise from 10 to 15 percent. All the rates in between will also rise. Itemized deductions and personal exemptions will again phase out, which has the same mathematical effect as higher marginal tax rates. The full list of marginal rate hikes is below:

- The 10% bracket rises to an expanded 15%

- The 25% bracket rises to 28%

- The 28% bracket rises to 31%

- The 33% bracket rises to 36%

- The 35% bracket rises to 39.6%

Higher taxes on marriage and family. The “marriage penalty” (narrower tax brackets for married couples) will return from the first dollar of income. The child tax credit will be cut in half from $1000 to $500 per child. The standard deduction will no longer be doubled for married couples relative to the single level. The dependent care tax credit will be cut.

The return of the Death Tax. This year, there is no death tax. For those dying on or after January 1 2011, there is a 55 percent top death tax rate on estates over $1 million. A person leaving behind two homes and a retirement account could easily pass along a death tax bill to their loved ones.

Higher tax rates on savers and investors. The top capital gains tax will rise from 15 percent this year to 20 percent in 2011. The top dividends tax rate will rise from 15 percent this year to 39.6 percent in 2011. These rates will rise another 3.8 percent in 2013.


Second Wave: Obamacare

There are over twenty new or higher taxes in Obamacare. Several will first go into effect on January 1, 2011. They include:

The Tanning Tax. This went into effect on July 1st of this year. It imposes a new, 10% excise tax on getting a tan at a tanning salon. There is no exemption for tanners making less than $250,000 per year.

The “Medicine Cabinet Tax” Thanks to Obamacare, Americans will no longer be able to use health savings account (HSA), flexible spending account (FSA), or health reimbursement (HRA) pre-tax dollars to purchase non-prescription, over-the-counter medicines (except insulin).

The HSA Withdrawal Tax Hike. This provision of Obamacare increases the additional tax on non-medical early withdrawals from an HSA from 10 to 20 percent, disadvantaging them relative to IRAs and other tax-advantaged accounts, which remain at 10 percent.

Brand Name Drug Tax. Starting next year, there will be a multi-billion dollar tax assessment imposed on name-brand drug manufacturers. This tax, like all excise taxes, will raise the price of medicine, hurting everyone.

Economic Substance Doctrine. The IRS is now empowered to disallow perfectly-legal tax deductions and maneuvers merely because it judges that the deduction or action lacks “economic substance.” This is obviously an arbitrary empowerment of IRS agents.

Employer Reporting of Health Insurance Costs on a W-2. This will start for W-2s in the 2011 tax year. While not a tax increase in itself, it makes it very easy for Congress to tax employer-provided healthcare benefits later.


Third Wave: The Alternative Minimum Tax and Employer Tax Hikes

When Americans prepare to file their tax returns in January of 2011, they’ll be in for a nasty surprise—the AMT won’t be held harmless, and many tax relief provisions will have expired. The major items include:

The AMT will ensnare over 28 million families, up from 4 million last year. According to the left-leaning Tax Policy Center, Congress’ failure to index the AMT will lead to an explosion of AMT taxpaying families—rising from 4 million last year to 28.5 million. These families will have to calculate their tax burdens twice, and pay taxes at the higher level. The AMT was created in 1969 to ensnare a handful of taxpayers.

Small business expensing will be slashed and 50% expensing will disappear. Small businesses can normally expense (rather than slowly-deduct, or “depreciate”) equipment purchases up to $250,000. This will be cut all the way down to $25,000. Larger businesses can expense half of their purchases of equipment. In January of 2011, all of it will have to be “depreciated.”

Taxes will be raised on all types of businesses. There are literally scores of tax hikes on business that will take place. The biggest is the loss of the “research and experimentation tax credit,” but there are many, many others. Combining high marginal tax rates with the loss of this tax relief will cost jobs.

Tax Benefits for Education and Teaching Reduced. The deduction for tuition and fees will not be available. Tax credits for education will be limited. Teachers will no longer be able to deduct classroom expenses. Coverdell Education Savings Accounts will be cut. Employer-provided educational assistance is curtailed. The student loan interest deduction will be disallowed for hundreds of thousands of families.

Charitable Contributions from IRAs no longer allowed. Until this year, a retired person with an IRA could contribute up to $100,000 per year directly to a charity from their IRA. This contribution also counts toward an annual “required minimum distribution.” This ability will no longer be there.


Read more: http://www.atr.org/days-thebr-largest-tax-hikes-history-a5370##ixzz0ya8mOxzZ
 
Get the fuck out of here with this Grover Norquist bullshit.

Post something that is wrong about the article, I work for the IRS and can tell you it's all 100% true.

But it doesn't even go into the 1099-K forms that are required next year for any purchase over $600 for all businesses or self-employed people.

irs_form_1099k.jpg


Get ready to have a shit load of these..
 
Fuckwads forgot that during the "W" era we paid NO TAXES to fund his bullshit war on iraq. As a matter of fact, the monkey CUT TAXES. How in the fuck do you niggas think shit gets paid around here?
 
That article is pure bullshit. The author didn't even attempt to hide his partisan hackory. Let alone he didn't back one statement up with any facts.

First of all, he didn't demonstrate how this will become the largest tax hikes in history when the tax rate will be the same under Clinton. The wealthiest paid 39%. Never mind that under Nixon and Eisenhower they paid 75% and 91% respectively. :hmm:

Bunch of far reich-wing knuckledragging shit kickers who watch Faux Nooz will eat this shit up though. They're allergic to facts.
 
Dumbasses talk about Clinton tax rates when the unemployment rate was 5.6%...... Lower under Bush at 4.3% (both are averages)... So, at 9.7% right now, the highest rate since the depression, we raise taxes. Makes sense.:hmm:
 
Dumbasses talk about Clinton tax rates when the unemployment rate was 5.6%...... Lower under Bush at 4.3% (both are averages)... So, at 9.7% right now, the highest rate since the depression, we raise taxes. Makes sense.:hmm:

you are a cot damn jackass troll.
 
Dumbasses talk about Clinton tax rates when the unemployment rate was 5.6%...... Lower under Bush at 4.3% (both are averages)... So, at 9.7% right now, the highest rate since the depression, we raise taxes. Makes sense.:hmm:
:hmm:
It makes just as much sense as to pass tax cuts that ain't paid for while fighting two wars then you wanna cry about the fucking deficit. Yep makes alot of sense. But I digress...
 
And BTW, dumb ass posted about the 90% tax rate under Eisenhour...

Yeah, if you had personal income over 1 million dollars... In 1950's money.. :lol::lol::lol:

He left that point out.. 1 million in 1950 was about 650 million today.
 
Wow anything to defend bullshit as long as the guy doing it is black. Why can't we act this way on an interpersonal level amongst each other? :lol:

Don't put words in my mouth dude. I'm not defending anyone, I'm just saying truth should always speak for itself. Whenever someone uses a lot of embellishments when delivering the "truth" my Spidey senses go off!
 
The tax cut for the upper 2%..The millionaires who put nothing back into the economy costs over 8.5 billion per year in lost revenue.

So to cut the top 2% from 39 to 35 % costs 8.5 billion...you will never hear this from those who talk about deficit and none of Obamas programs are paid for..Well let the tax cut for the rich expire and there is an additional 8.5 billion to pay for shit.
 
Dumbasses talk about Clinton tax rates when the unemployment rate was 5.6%...... Lower under Bush at 4.3% (both are averages)... So, at 9.7% right now, the highest rate since the depression, we raise taxes. Makes sense.:hmm:

I agree that the unemployment level were low at this those times, and I also agree we shouldn't be paying higher taxes at this time in history, but we are feeling the effects left from Bush who continued the plans enacted by Clinton.People should really stop throwing blame when the have no idea about the sources of the blames...the American people allowing this! Now it gets further convoluted by racism and ignorance instead of us banding together to do something about this.
 
:hmm:
It makes just as much sense as to pass tax cuts that ain't paid for while fighting two wars then you wanna cry about the fucking deficit. Yep makes alot of sense. But I digress...

It's funny how the deficit doesn't matter when Republicans are in charge.
The main people complaining about the tax hikes barely make over $50,000
but they are out there with signs talking about tax cuts for the rich. :smh:
 
Post something that is wrong about the article, I work for the IRS and can tell you it's all 100% true.

But it doesn't even go into the 1099-K forms that are required next year for any purchase over $600 for all businesses or self-employed people.

irs_form_1099k.jpg


Get ready to have a shit load of these..

You lying nincompoop. I had to send 1099s when I ran affiliate programs online and through direct mail. This covers almost untraceable credit card transactions i.e. sellers on Ebay/Paypal/third party merchants.
 
That article is pure bullshit. The author didn't even attempt to hide his partisan hackory. Let alone he didn't back one statement up with any facts.

First of all, he didn't demonstrate how this will become the largest tax hikes in history when the tax rate will be the same under Clinton. The wealthiest paid 39%. Never mind that under Nixon and Eisenhower they paid 75% and 91% respectively. :hmm:

Bunch of far reich-wing knuckledragging shit kickers who watch Faux Nooz will eat this shit up though. They're allergic to facts.
:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:
 
It's funny how the deficit doesn't matter when Republicans are in charge.
The main people complaining about the tax hikes barely make over $50,000
but they are out there with signs talking about tax cuts for the rich. :smh:

Everybody's taxes are going up. Plus small business taxes are going up, plus exemptions being cut, plus investment taxes. Wtf are you talking about?
 
Don't put words in my mouth dude. I'm not defending anyone, I'm just saying truth should always speak for itself. Whenever someone uses a lot of embellishments when delivering the "truth" my Spidey senses go off!

It's called a strawman argument.

He's doing the equivalent of "Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain".

 
That article is pure bullshit. The author didn't even attempt to hide his partisan hackory. Let alone he didn't back one statement up with any facts.

First of all, he didn't demonstrate how this will become the largest tax hikes in history when the tax rate will be the same under Clinton. The wealthiest paid 39%. Never mind that under Nixon and Eisenhower they paid 75% and 91% respectively. :hmm:

Bunch of far reich-wing knuckledragging shit kickers who watch Faux Nooz will eat this shit up though. They're allergic to facts.

Cs. :lol:
 
Post something that is wrong about the article, I work for the IRS and can tell you it's all 100% true.

But it doesn't even go into the 1099-K forms that are required next year for any purchase over $600 for all businesses or self-employed people.

irs_form_1099k.jpg


Get ready to have a shit load of these..

You work for the IRS and can't pay $10? Fuck outta here with this Trickle Down Economic tax cut. It's was a total fail. The rich got richer and the poor got poorer. Punk ass GOP crying about Obama not paying for spending. Well here you go. Time to pay bitchz. My shits going up but with dumb asses like you at the IRS I'll sneak all kinds of shit pass.
 
And BTW, dumb ass posted about the 90% tax rate under Eisenhour...

Yeah, if you had personal income over 1 million dollars... In 1950's money.. :lol::lol::lol:

He left that point out.. 1 million in 1950 was about 650 million today.

Dumb mothafucka. I like how you left out Nixon's 1970's tax rates but I'm not going to go back in forth with an intellectually dishonest asshole like you :lol:

I'm starting to think you wrote this article the way you riding the author's dick. Sort of defensive eh buddy? :lol::lol::lol::lol:

My intentions in mentioning Eisenhower and Nixon (forgot Regan) was to point out to your dumb ass that THIS IS NOT THE GREATEST TAX HIKE IN HISTORY like the fucking Far Reich-Wing author wants you to believe but it looks like you too stupid to see that shit. Intellectually dishonest.
 
If the tax cuts were so great for business and the wealthy ... where are the jobs?

Sounds more like we got 120 days for the businesses and the weathly to prove those tax cuts amounted to something by hiring a whole lot of people.

Oh that's right, they can't because the economy must fail so Obama can fail!
 



Again, an "Obama tax hike" that is an expiration of tax cuts passed by Republicans in 2003. Are you really that big of a drone? Next you'll be preaching that Obama was not born in the US. I'm about as unhappy with the current economic and political situation as most, but I won't fall for cheap ploys that make it seem like the GOP is not at all culpable for where we have ended up.
 
That article is pure bullshit. The author didn't even attempt to hide his partisan hackory. Let alone he didn't back one statement up with any facts.

First of all, he didn't demonstrate how this will become the largest tax hikes in history when the tax rate will be the same under Clinton. The wealthiest paid 39%. Never mind that under Nixon and Eisenhower they paid 75% and 91% respectively. :hmm:

Bunch of far reich-wing knuckledragging shit kickers who watch Faux Nooz will eat this shit up though. They're allergic to facts.

:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:
 
If the tax cuts were so great for business and the wealthy ... where are the jobs?

Sounds more like we got 120 days for the businesses and the weathly to prove those tax cuts amounted to something by hiring a whole lot of people.

Oh that's right, they can't because the economy must fail so Obama can fail!

QFT. They are on the clock! :cool:
 
"YOU LIE!" Joe Wilson style!
:angry::angry::angry::angry::angry:

The REPUBLICANS PUT THIS SUNSET DATE in for the TAX CUTS TO EXPIRE, now its Obama who wants to raise taxes??? The only people who benefit from these taxes staying are the richest 2% of ALL AMERICANS since those are the ONLY ONES WHOSE TAX CUTS WILL EXPIRE!!!!! So BE CLEAR, over 95% of ALL AMERICANS WILL KEEP THEIR TAX CUTS!!!

I hate you deceivers! YOU JUST HAD close to 10 years of cut taxes, and still DID NOT put any of that saved money into small business development and JOB CREATION.
If you did we wouldn't have the unemployment crisis you see now! These cock-face Republicans if they get their way, still want to cut everything else JUST TO GIVE MORE TAX CUTS FOR THE RICH. This is a redistribution of wealth, but NOT from rich to poor, but from POOR and MIDDLE CLASS to the RICH!

If you can't win based on the merits of your arguments, you lie,and deceive without any shame. :angry::smh::angry::smh:
 
If the tax cuts were so great for business and the wealthy ... where are the jobs?

Sounds more like we got 120 days for the businesses and the weathly to prove those tax cuts amounted to something by hiring a whole lot of people.

Oh that's right, they can't because the economy must fail so Obama can fail!

corpoarations are taking advantage of the economy by cutting the work force and trying to increase worker productivity with the same pay. Its funny, we bailed out the banks but in return they cancel our credit cards and raised our interest rates.
 
Back
Top