Need A Job? Canada Is Creating MORE New Jobs Than America

thoughtone

Rising Star
Registered
Damn Socialists!

source: Bloomberg Business Week

Canada Job Creation Is Five Times Economist Forecasts

July 09, 2010, 11:53 AM EDT

By Greg Quinn
July 9 (Bloomberg) -- Canada’s job creation was almost five times more than economists expected in June, restoring most of the country’s job losses since 2008 and bolstering the case for the central bank to raise interest rates for a second month.
Employment rose by 93,200 in June, following gains of 24,700 in May a
nd April’s record 108,700, Statistics Canada said today in Ottawa. The jobless rate fell to 7.9 percent, the lowest since January 2009, from 8.1 percent. Economists surveyed by Bloomberg predicted 20,000 new jobs and an unemployment rate of 8.1 percent, according to the median of 23 estimates.

The job market has been one of the strongest parts of a Canadian recovery the International Monetary Fund says will lead advanced economies this year. The Bank of Canada raised its key lending rate from a record low 0.25 percent June 1 after the economy grew at a 6.1 percent annualized pace in the first quarter. The bank said future moves depend on the balance of domestic growth and an uneven global recovery.

“You can’t really argue anything in this report,” said Benjamin Reitzes, an economist at BMO Capital Markets in Toronto. “Businesses are confident in our recovery and are hiring. That should get the ball rolling on growth from a private sector perspective.”

The Canadian dollar appreciated 0.9 percent to C$1.0324 per U.S. dollar at 11:37 a.m. in Toronto, from C$1.0420 yesterday. Earlier it reached C$1.0296, the strongest since June 23. One Canadian dollar purchases 96.85 U.S. cents.

‘More Normal Setting’

The odds of the Bank of Canada raising its interest rate to 0.75 percent at its July 20 decision rose to 96 percent today from 76 percent yesterday, according to a Credit Suisse Group AG calculation derived from overnight index swaps.

“The Bank of Canada has to move rates towards a more normal setting,” said Meny Grauman, a senior economist at Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce in Toronto. He predicts a 1.25 percent benchmark rate at the end of the year.

“Our recovery is definitely more on track than most other countries, especially our neighbors to the south,” Grauman said. The U.S. Labor Department reported July 2 that private employers added fewer workers than economists predicted in June, and a jobless rate of 9.5 percent.

Retail and wholesale companies hired 21,600 workers in June, followed by 20,000 new jobs in business, building and other support services. Overall service-industry employment rose by 103,400, while goods-producing companies dropped 10,200 workers.

Hiring Plans

Full-time employment increased by 48,900 in June, Statistics Canada said, and part-time jobs by 44,200. Average hourly wage growth slowed to 1.7 percent in June from a year ago, compared with 2.4 percent in May.

Payroll employment rose by 67,600 in June, and self- employment rose by 25,600.

Canadian National Railway Co. plans to hire as many as 2,000 people annually over the next five years to replace retiring employees and reduce operating costs, Chief Executive Officer Claude Mongeau said in a July 7 interview in his Montreal office. Canadian National, the country’s largest railroad, had 21,501 employees as of Dec. 31.

Canada has added 403,000 jobs since July 2009, recouping almost all of the jobs lost in a slump that began in the second half of 2008, Statistics Canada said.

Employment rose by 1.4 percent or 226,600 jobs in the second quarter, Statistics Canada said. It was the greatest increase in employment in records dating to 1976, and the largest jump in percentage terms since 1983.

Ontario Gains

Ontario, the country’s most important province for manufacturing, led the June job gain with 60,300 new positions. Canadian factory employment fell by 14,300, and has dropped by 11.9 percent since October 2008.

Linamar Corp., an Ontario-based autom
obile parts maker, is hiring many as 1,300 workers in the province by the end of next year, said Chief Executive Officer Linda Hasenfratz.

“We have got the work” to boost payrolls, she said in a telephone interview today from the company’s headquarters in Guelph. About C$2 billion ($1.94 billion) of business is “under launch” over the next few years, she said.

“Because we have this very significant book of business that we are launching, even if there is another dip down in production, the new work that we have coming online should really help to offset that.”
 
Wow. I heard this from Ed Shultz this morning on XM. Those damn socialists and all that free health care creating jobs. America is all about the Slave Labor. Has been since it's inception.

-VG
 
Wow. I heard this from Ed Shultz this morning on XM. Those damn socialists and all that free health care creating jobs. America is all about the Slave Labor. Has been since it's inception.

-VG


It's the difference of trying with what works or sticking with the same ideological theories.
 
Wow. I heard this from Ed Shultz this morning on XM. Those damn socialists and all that free health care creating jobs. America is all about the Slave Labor. Has been since it's inception.

-VG

Canada is not a real socialist country... Socialism is struggling in Europe!!!
 
Wow. I heard this from Ed Shultz this morning on XM. Those damn socialists and all that free health care creating jobs. America is all about the Slave Labor. Has been since it's inception.

-VG

Once again a leftist is shown to be a fool. Canada's prime minister is Currently Center right, doing what he can to dismantle Canada's single payer health care. Alot of people don't understand that Canada is a mixed economy like most every economy on Earth with the exception of Cuba and North Korea (Maybe a couple of others). Yes it has single payer health care, but the problem with single payer is not that it will destroy a Nations economy (Although the mess that Obama signed just might do that for different reason chief amongst them is the massive weight it will add to the deficit) it will destroy the fucking HEALTHCARE SYSTEM of said country. Believe me, Canadian province governors aren't coming to the U.S and paying hard earned money because are systems sucks. Hospitals aren't set up across the Canadian border to service Canadians because health care sucks. They set em up because there is no health care queue. Health Care is rationed based on who can pay. Now if you want to be charitable provide healthcare subsidies to those who can't pay but don't create a single payer system.
Back on Canada's economy, in Canada you can own private property just like anyone else. And most of Canada's economy is subsidies by the U.S as well. We buy a lot of their goods and vice versa (if you take a look most of canada's population is within a hundred miles of the U.S... to help facilitate the trade of goods). So please get a fucking clue before you spout shit you know nothing about. Thanks. Idiot.


EDIT: And on slave labor, encarta defines slave labor as a
1. work force of enslaved laborers: a work force consisting of people who are forced to work against their will
If you are forced to work against your will, like african americans were in the early part of U.S history, then you are a slave. You are not a slave if you choose to enter into a contract to work for someone or a group of people which you can choose to leave at any time. Just because everyone is not rich does not mean that those who are not rich are enslaved. Quit being a fucking dramatic Commie idiot. Actually making doctors work for less than there market value so they don't cost to much on the single payer health care system is more like Early U.S slavery than the current model. Slaves were compensated (housing, food, and so on) the only thing is they were compensated below market rates (lousy housing and lousy if any food) and they weren't allowed to find work else where.
Again, don't be a fucking idiot.
 
Last edited:
Once again a leftist is shown to be a fool. Canada's prime minister is Currently Center right, doing what he can to dismantle Canada's single payer health care. Alot of people don't understand that Canada is a mixed economy like most every economy on Earth with the exception of Cuba and North Korea (Maybe a couple of others). Yes it has single payer health care, but the problem with single payer is not that it will destroy a Nations economy (Although the mess that Obama signed just might do that for different reason chief amongst them is the massive weight it will add to the deficit) it will destroy the fucking HEALTHCARE SYSTEM of said country. Believe me, Canadian province governors aren't coming to the U.S and paying hard earned money because are systems sucks. Hospitals aren't set up across the Canadian border to service Canadians because health care sucks. They set em up because there is no health care queue. Health Care is rationed based on who can pay. Now if you want to be charitable provide healthcare subsidies to those who can't pay but don't create a single payer system.
Back on Canada's economy, in Canada you can own private property just like anyone else. And most of Canada's economy is subsidies by the U.S as well. We buy a lot of their goods and vice versa (if you take a look most of canada's population is within a hundred miles of the U.S... to help facilitate the trade of goods). So please get a fucking clue before you spout shit you know nothing about. Thanks. Idiot.


EDIT: And on slave labor, encarta defines slave labor as a
1. work force of enslaved laborers: a work force consisting of people who are forced to work against their will
If you are forced to work against your will, like african americans were in the early part of U.S history, then you are a slave. You are not a slave if you choose to enter into a contract to work for someone or a group of people which you can choose to leave at any time. Just because everyone is not rich does not mean that those who are not rich are enslaved. Quit being a fucking dramatic Commie idiot. Actually making doctors work for less than there market value so they don't cost to much on the single payer health care system is more like Early U.S slavery than the current model. Slaves were compensated (housing, food, and so on) the only thing is they were compensated below market rates (lousy housing and lousy if any food) and they weren't allowed to find work else where.
Again, don't be a fucking idiot.


What a bunch of illogical gobbledygook. I don't think Glenn Beck could have made it sound more ridiculous. Long on filibuster, short on facts.
 
Why are Mexicans sneaking across the US boarder and Canadians aren't?

They come across because our currency has more 'purchasing power'. Remember, everyone in the Soviet Union had a job, but they were broke as hell. Whether they get govt assistance or have a job, the standard of living is much greater here

Canada's currency is 'almost' at parity with the dollar
 
They come across because our currency has more 'purchasing power'. Remember, everyone in the Soviet Union had a job, but they were broke as hell. Whether they get govt assistance or have a job, the standard of living is much greater here

Canada's currency is 'almost' at parity with the dollar

Canada's currency is 'almost' at parity with the dollar


...because Canada is socialist?!!!
 
so is the US ! ! ! !

Get rid of NAFTA, CAFTA, WTO, GATT, legalize competing currencies, & STOP GOING TO WAR TO ENFORCE UN MANDATES. We'll leave the rest of the world in the wind, again


So why is Canada's economic growing more than the US? Aren't they subject to the same agreements you posted?
 
So why is Canada's economic growing more than the US? Aren't they subject to the same agreements you posted?

Because the US is squandering its resources in a non-productive manner (More Wars, More Prisons, More Surveillance, More Regulation etc) None of these things contribute to economic growth. As a matter of fact, We're only sacrificing our civil liberties, incurring more debt & unemployment.

Answer this, How is it Canada's $32 billion dollar stimulus package is performing better than our $787 billion dollar package?
 
Because the US is squandering its resources in a non-productive manner (More Wars, More Prisons, More Surveillance, More Regulation etc) None of these things contribute to economic growth. As a matter of fact, We're only sacrificing our civil liberties, incurring more debt & unemployment.

Answer this, How is it Canada's $32 billion dollar stimulus package is performing better than our $787 billion dollar package?

US is squandering its resources in a non-productive manner (More Wars, More Prisons, More Surveillance,

We do agree on this. The former War Department, now named the Defense Department is 50% of our budget. That has been a drag on the US economy since the 1960s.

More Regulation etc

Once again your random generalities to prove your talking points. Canada has more regulations than we do. For example, the Massey Mine disaster are unlikely to occur in Canada. They haven't had a disaster such as that in over 30 years. Their mines are required to have more stringent safety mechanisms than the US. Their off shore oil rigs must have blow out arresters and these requirements are enforced. Their banking system never repealed the regulations of the late 1990s and 2000.

How is it Canada's $32 billion dollar stimulus package is performing better than our $787 billion dollar package?


Canadian stimulus package did not have 1/3 tax cuts. Their is no requirement that tax cuts be used to stimulate the economy. The wealthy just save the money and not put it pack in to the economy, which is exactly what is happening here in the US.

Their stimulus had specific provisions for 100% of the stimulus monies be used on Canadian owned business. When several congressman tried to require that only American owned businesses use stimulus money, corporations such as Caterpillar and Boeing used their lobbying power to prevent this from happening, using the argument of too much regulation. Thus China and Japan benefited from American tax payers stimulus dollars. Also, Canada used their stimulus for 100% public works projects.

So democratic socialism is superior to laissez-faire capitalism.
 
Canadian stimulus package did not have 1/3 tax cuts. Their is no requirement that tax cuts be used to stimulate the economy. The wealthy just save the money and not put it pack in to the economy, which is exactly what is happening here in the US.

Their stimulus had specific provisions for 100% of the stimulus monies be used on Canadian owned business. When several congressman tried to require that only American owned businesses use stimulus money, corporations such as Caterpillar and Boeing used their lobbying power to prevent this from happening, using the argument of too much regulation. Thus China and Japan benefited from American tax payers stimulus dollars. Also, Canada used their stimulus for 100% public works projects..

So let me get this straight: Despite the fact we spent 20 times more than Canada, our stimulus didn’t work as well as Canada's because we implemented tax cuts and allowed the multinational corps to lobby for outsourcing. Not only did China & Japan benefit but GM sent $5 billion American taxpayer dollars to Brazil!

Well that says it all, Could this gross misallocation of resources be because the Dims didn’t fully comprehend the consequences of such reckless legislation?

But I remember you & Krugman felt the stimulus should have been more $$$ :smh:

So democratic socialism is superior to laissez-faire capitalism.

Of course, the logical explanation is to blame capitalism and not the creators of this legislation. (I swear you need to be on stage with this comedy)

Like I said:
Get rid of NAFTA, CAFTA, WTO, GATT, legalize competing currencies, & STOP GOING TO WAR TO ENFORCE UN MANDATES. We'll leave the rest of the world in the wind, again!
 
So let me get this straight: Despite the fact we spent 20 times more than Canada, our stimulus didn’t work as well as Canada's because we implemented tax cuts and allowed the multinational corps to lobby for outsourcing. Not only did China & Japan benefit but GM sent $5 billion American taxpayer dollars to Brazil!

Well that says it all, Could this gross misallocation of resources be because the Dims didn’t fully comprehend the consequences of such reckless legislation?

But I remember you & Krugman felt the stimulus should have been more $$$ :smh:

It's almost like you have your index finger in your ears. Don't you remember congress had a hellva time getting the stimulus passed. The party of no did everything they could to prevent it from coming to a vote and when that didn't happen they did everything they could to water it down. Then when it did create jobs the GOP claimed credit for it. At least you you are now modifying your view, admitting that it did work, but did not work as well as... Should I search the times you, most of all proclaimed that the stimulus would not work. The reason why Canada's economy is not in the dire situation as ours is due to they do not stick to notion that the corporation is omnipotent and government is a burden. They recognize the need for both. They don't have to go through endless cycles of boom and bust to see the obvious. Yes, the stimulus should have been more, like China's, with no tax cuts. Is revisionism passed down through the DNA of the right?

Of course, the logical explanation is to blame capitalism and not the creators of this legislation. (I swear you need to be on stage with this comedy)

Like I said:

Why aren't the cash rich banks, multinationals and newly compensated wealthy trickling down the jobs? What is the flaw in their model?

BTW, why are you giving a pass to the GOP. I have never read your criticism of Dick Armey, Ronald Reagan and Jack Welsch. Haven't we been following Ayn Rand's play book for 30 years?
 
Last edited:
It's almost like you have your index finger in your ears. Don't you remember congress had a hellva time getting the stimulus passed. The party of no did everything they could to prevent it from coming to a vote and when that didn't happen they did everything they could to water it down. Then when it did create jobs the GOP claimed credit for it. At least you you are now modifying your view, admitting that it did work, but did not work as well as... Should I search the times you, most of all proclaimed that the stimulus would not work. The reason why Canada's economy is not in the dire situation as ours is due to they do not stick to notion that the corporation is omnipotent and government is a burden. They recognize the need for both. They don't have to go through endless cycles of boom and bust to see the obvious. Yes, the stimulus should have been more, like China's, with no tax cuts. Is revisionism passed down through the DNA of the right?

The comedy continues! Thought, the title of your thread is: Need A Job? Canada Is Creating MORE New Jobs Than America

How can America spend 20 times more than Canada in the form of a stimulus, and in the same breath, you create a thread praising Canada for creating more jobs, while at the same time, claim our stimulus was a success? :smh:

Tip: If our stimulus was the success you claim, the thread would read - America is Creating More Jobs Than Canada.

Why aren't the cash rich banks, multinationals and newly compensated wealthy trickling down the jobs? What is the flaw in their model?

The multi-nationals are saving $$$ in anticipation for the next downturn legislated by the govt.

The flaw is govt intervention

BTW, why are you giving a pass to the GOP. I have never read your criticism of Dick Armey, Ronald Reagan and Jack Welsch. Haven't we been following Ayn Rand's play book for 30 years?

No pass to the GOP, they also support More Wars, More Prisons & More Surveillance! By the way, did you see THIS
 
Canada's currency is 'almost' at parity with the dollar

Didn't the Canadian dollar reach parity with the US dollar in 2007? I know it was Obama's stimulus fault.

Learn history and it's causes!

Usd_cad_2008.png

source: CTV

CTV.ca News
Date: Fri. Sep. 28 2007 5:53 PM ET

There was another first in three decades for the loonie today. It closed daily trading above the U.S. greenback for the first time since 1976.


The dollar closed the day at $1.0052 US.


The loonie has soared in recent months as the American dollar has weakened because of a crisis in its housing market due to defaults on subprime loans.

George Davis, senior technical analyst at RBC Capital Markets, told the Canadian Press that interest rates also have also helped the loonie climb.

Canada's rates are not expected to change this year. It's a different story in the U.S., however. Analysts there expect the U.S. Federal Reserve to cut rates.

Relatively high oil prices and a strong Canadian economy have also helped the dollar's climb.

The Canadian dollar was given an extra boost by a Statistics Canada report showing that the economy grew by less than expected in July. It grew at the same rate as the June rate of 0.2 per cent.

Davis noted that RBC analysts believe that the loonie could climb to as high as $1.03 US in the fourth quarter.

The dollar equalled the U.S. dollar for the first time in almost 31 years on Sept. 20.
 
Didn't the Canadian dollar reach parity with the US dollar in 2007? I know it was Obama's stimulus fault.

Learn history and it's causes!

Thought, just stop! :yes: Now you're tryin to switch subjects. You might wanna get on FactCheck or somethin cause this thread is NOT helping your credibility.

Back to the obvious:

How can America spend 20 times more than Canada in the form of a stimulus, and in the same breath, you create a thread praising Canada for creating more jobs, while at the same time, claim our stimulus was a success?
 
A few more points to consider

- The corporate influence is not as entrenched in Canada as it is in the US
- Canada also doesnt have the added/continued cost of two wars putting a strain on their economy
- I dont believe the majority of Canada's politicians are up for re-election this year, resulting in political posturing (or in other words "i aint gonna help u with shit, in hopes that you get thrown out! And if I get your seat THEN I'll lend a hand")
 
interesting points

a few more things

-Canada's economy is MUCH smaller the US, so less money can go much feather
-The Canadian dollar reaches real consumer price parity with the US dollar at about 85cents so it has been trading higher then it parity for a while which theoretical is not really good for Canada considering it is a net exporter, but it is worst for the US because it is the largest net inporter in the world
-health care is always going to be a hot topic issue, but I will use a micro-economic/macro-economic example. healthy worker increase profitability through output (less downtown, ect…) therefore healthy worker= healthy business= healthy economy ECO101

Anyways Canada has been a good place to live for a long time, and part of that is because it is next to the USA… it is a few wealthy people’s greed that is wrecking the country not much else
 
Thought, just stop! :yes: Now you're tryin to switch subjects. You might wanna get on FactCheck or somethin cause this thread is NOT helping your credibility.

Back to the obvious:

The answer is their, but it's not the answer he wants.

BTW, have totally funded elections and you will see the changes the majority of Americans want.


A few more points to consider

interesting points

a few more things
 
Last edited:
Back
Top