Wonder Woman gets new look, new direction at 69

Al Smith

Rogue Mod
OG Investor
I found this piece on her new costume while reading the online paper..

Code:
http://detnews.com/article/20100630/ENT05/6300395/1361/Wonder-Woman-gets-new-look--new-direction-at-69

Wonder Woman gets new look, new direction at 69

George Gene Gustines / New York Times

Today is a good day for Wonder Woman. This 69-year-old superheroine, published by DC Comics, will don a new -- and less revealing -- costume and enjoy the publication of Issue No. 600 of her monthly series.
The costume ties into an alternative history for the character devised by J. Michael Straczynski, the new writer of the series, and into a quest by DC to shine a critical and creative spotlight on the heroine, who stands with Superman and Batman in its primary triumvirate of superstars, despite her series' modest sales.
In the reimagining of her story, Wonder Woman, instead of growing up on Paradise Island with her mother, Queen Hippolyta, and her Amazon sisters, is smuggled out as a baby when unknown forces destroy her home and slaughter its inhabitants.
<!--startclickprintexclude--> Advertisement
<!-- OAS AD 'ArticleFlex_1' begin --> <script language="JavaScript"> <!-- OAS_AD('ArticleFlex_1'); //--> </script> <!-- OAS AD 'ArticleFlex_1' end -->
<!--endclickprintexclude-->Straczynski, who created the television show "Babylon 5" and wrote the screenplay for "Changeling" in 2008, said in an e-mail message that he wanted to address "the wardrobe issue" as soon as he took the job.
"She's been locked into pretty much the exact same outfit since her debut in 1941," Straczynski wrote. "If you're going to make a statement about bringing Wonder Woman into the 21st century, you need to be bold and you need to make it visual. I wanted to toughen her up, and give her a modern sensibility."
He added, "What woman only wears only one outfit for 60-plus years?"
Given Wonder Woman's pre-eminence as a female character in the largely male superhero pantheon, her looks have always been a matter of more than casual interest, to both fanboys and feminists. In a 2006 interview about her work on the series, the novelist Jodi Picoult said: "One of the first things I did was ask if we could give her breast-reduction surgery, because as a woman, I know you wouldn't fight crime in a bustier. But I was somehow shot down by DC."
The new costume was designed by the artist Jim Lee, who in February was named co-publisher of DC, alongside Dan DiDio. Given the assignment, "my first reaction was, 'Oh my gosh,"' Lee said in an interview. But he welcomed the challenge: "When these characters become so branded that you can't change things, they become ossified."
The new look -- with an understated "W" insignia, a midnight blue jacket and a flinty fusion of black tights and boots -- is darker than the famed swimsuit-style outfit, and aims to be contemporary, functional and, as Tim Gunn of "Project Runway" might say, less costumey.
Given the hope that the character will one day have her own international film franchise (a feature has long been gestating at Warner Entertainment, DC's parent company), one test of the design was to imagine how it would look next to, say, Batman's politically neutral ensemble. "The original costume was the American flag brought to life," Lee said. "This one is a little more universal."
Lee has drawn his share of sexy superheroines (the X-Men's Rogue among them), some in skimpy costumes, and knows what many fans will ask: "Why am I covering up her legs?" Ultimately, he wanted her to look strong "without screaming, 'I'm a superhero.' "
The arrival of Issue 600 is a bit of comic-book sleight of hand, or, as DC calls it, a return to historical numbering. Wonder Woman's first self-titled series, which begin in 1942, ended with No. 329. The character was then overhauled, her previous continuity erased, and she starred in Volume 2 as a heroine new to the world. That incarnation lasted 226 issues. Another new direction spurred a third volume (and, to collectors who care about such things, another Issue No. 1) that ran for 44 issues. Do the math, and what would have been Issue No. 45 is now Volume 1, No. 600.
The new costume will almost certainly be better received than the curveball thrown Wonder Woman in 1968, when she lost her powers, dressed mod and practiced martial arts. It took the attention of no less than Gloria Steinem to protest the change, and to help get the Amazon back into her star-spangled duds. Steinem went on to use Wonder Woman, resplendent in red, white and blue, on the cover of the first issue of Ms. magazine in 1972. A cover line proclaimed, "Wonder Woman for President."
That's the kind of attention Straczynski thinks she deserves: "Wonder Woman is a strong, dynamic, vibrant character who should be selling in the top 20, and I'm going to do all I can to get her there."
 
0630-wonder-woman-pants_full_600.jpg
 
Straczynski's got it wrong. Wonder Woman has had various costumes in her 60-year history. But I do agree the character needs a costume make-over.

I loved the outfit Mike Deodato came up with in the 90s when Diana lost the WW mantle to Artemis.

tumblr_l0z6nhr8T41qzvhk6o1_500.jpg


And I have an affection for those Mike Sekowsky late 60s "mod" outfits.

ww178.jpg


WonderWoman_191_00.jpg


I'm also wished that DC had stayed with the Marv Wolfman/George Perez re-imagining. That was the CLASSIC one. Straczynski's just sounds a bit hollow to me. But I'll pass judgment until it appears.
 
The low cut, rolled up sleeves jacket
neck choker
red leotard
fingerless gloves
belts that go on forever.
stirrup pants
boots with a buckle.

What the fuck is this the 1980's or something?
knowing the artist at DC, they prob. think
"This is a cool, hip, new look for Generation X.
Give's her Street Cred!"


img-thing

+
1472-thumb2.jpg

+
lcp-rrdblk-fullsize.jpg

+
giusz2006712867_p1_v1_m56577569831781526_254x500.jpg

+
Chanel+gold+chain+perfume+bottle+belt

+
stirrup_pants.jpg

+
4751167406_86041a3c75_m.jpg

=
0630-wonder-woman-pants_full_600.jpg
 
All of the DC characters need a modern makeover, but its what fans are used to.

I really don't think so, DC knows the fans will be cool with if it fits in to there continuity but I feel that the marketing team might put up a fight cause they think new readers will not recognize these characters. Ex: why does the superman in the movie look one way and the one in the comic looks different, and all types of question like that. that's why when the new batman and superman movie were coming out you never saw too much of those characters on JLU animated show.
 
After skimming through WW 600, i can tell that Dc's just doing this to generate buzz. I give this shit -6 months.
 
Just like Spider-Man she will go back to her original costume
Comic companies will do anything for any type of buzz these days
 
may be it could work if they lose the jacket but I don't think this is jim choosing more of marketing and the suits idea then anything else
 
may be it could work if they lose the jacket but I don't think this is jim choosing more of marketing and the suits idea then anything else

I see it as some way to make a movie with some bony ass white actress instead of an Amazon. Not many women could fill out the old clothes properly but the jacket will hide the lack of muscles.
 
I see it as some way to make a movie with some bony ass white actress instead of an Amazon. Not many women could fill out the old clothes properly but the jacket will hide the lack of muscles.

:smh: sad but true :smh: slowly counting the days till they revert back to her old costume:hmm:
 
I see it as some way to make a movie with some bony ass white actress instead of an Amazon. Not many women could fill out the old clothes properly but the jacket will hide the lack of muscles.

:smh: sad but true :smh: slowly counting the days till they revert back to her old costume:hmm:

megan-fox-wonder-woman.jpg
I don't mind this look for the big screen!! :yes::yes::yes:
 
Last edited:
Back
Top