Night of the Living Dead - in the BIBLE????
- Thread starter malaki
- Start date
Thats because Galactus took away is surfboard during the time of Gabriel and he was unable to go back in time. However after Thor stole back the board and gave it back to Satan, he was able to go back in time, to fool us! I just had a vision of this, so there it must be true! Laugh all you want but five hundred years some archeologist is gonna dig up this text and swear he found the new gospels of RoadRage.Satan traveled back to fool us but can't travel back to save his ass from Archangel Michael and Gabriel?
imo "Aliens" are part two of this sick comedy
People bitch about paying $10 but the comedy on this board is priceless
I agree too. That shit is priceless. Can't find that kind of comedy elsewhere
LOL This is what Christians all say when then get exposed, they start question the validity to everything.
As if to try to sucker you into another argument about nothing, in order to change the subject about their faith. It is sort of like how a porcupine balls up and poke out their quills after being startled. Look nobody says we have all the answers, what we are saying is that there is a ton of evidence that suggest that the bible is nothing but a big, fat fraud!
A better example would have been Michael Jackson, how many generations as his talent influenced. Now that he is gone, does those who write about his era make them less credible because he is dead ?
Last edited:
If they were to write about him 40 years after his death, and there not be a single shred of evidence or writing on him, previously, you whould have to scratch your head!
A lot of truth in the Bible.
A lot of truth in the Bible.
The truths are based on the moral meanings of the "stories" not the fales historical accounts of them. But then again the same can be said about most fairy tales.
I hear ya.
You speak like a European, your thought process as become like theirs. So if its not written down it as no credence is that what your saying. Oral traditions have no value now ?
Nah... he would run back to his pastor & tell him that he was touched by the divine. Then he would start praying to... RAPTOR JESUS!!!!!
Raptor Jesus!!!
No Im saying there is detailed information about everything that was going down in Bethlehem back at the time of Jesus, the Romans were very strict record keepers, and yet there is zilch of any of the accounts of Jesus. Not only that the gospels all differ so much with each other, on key details of Jesus. Plus you must take in to account that the whole story has been plagiarized from other savior stories that proceed that of biblical Jesus.
Yes the Roman's did keep records, but Jesus was not the figure you think he was in his day. He would not have been recognized as a great leader or some great figure. To the Roman's he was just a man who stirred up religious fervor in the surrounding areas of Judea. Another revolutionary amongst many to be put down. He was no one of importance at the time. Its like an artist or musician, many do not achieve notoriety till after their death, the same could be said of this figure Jesus.
To say they made no record of him so he did not exist is, so because I don't see you on tv, you don't exist or your not in any newspaper roadrage, so your non-existent. So if the right people don't record you, you don't matter is that what your saying ?
Im not saying a man named Joshua during the time of Christ never existed, but I will say, there is not a shred of evidence that the biblical Jesus Christ ever existed and the story of the Christ existed thousands of years before the historical Joshua was said to exist.
You Da Man! I believe the bible and science are on the same plane. However man keeps wanting to change it for personal benefit . "The church says its ok to steal when necessary".
Do you know how popular the name Joshua, Yeshua was at the time of Christ ?. You think the Roman's kept the meticulous records we keep in our present day.
To say he never existed, all i can say is there is often no smoke without fire.
As for the story of Christ existing prior, well of course this is correct. The actual messianic message prospered all throughout Africa and the so called middle east. The bible itself attest's to that, so what your saying should come as no real shock. Like the cinderella story, only one woman's feet really fit the shoe. So with the Messiah, only one truly fulfilled its prophecies.
I'm not saying he never existed, no one with any right brains talks in absolutes, however I am saying that there is no evidence of him existing, plus there is strong evidence that the story of Jesus, is nothing but a made up lie. That evidence of course, is the story of Jesus the Savior has been around thousands of years before Jesus supposedly existed. Bottom line, the chance of the Biblical Jesus existing is around the same chance of Hercules existing!
dude, i quoted modern day Egyptologists who stated empirically that there was ZERO connections between the Bliblical account of Jesus and the Egyptian lore of Horus. there were only TWO similarities: they were both of royal birth and there were the targets of death threats.
that's IT.
the entire Horus=Jesus myth is just THAT, a MYTH. you are believing stuff people JUST MADE UP, and we even KNOW WHO made it up! but you're doing EXACTLY what you're accusing Christians of doing, TOTALLY RELYING on FAITH. and your faith is based on OBVIOUS BS.
Toolman2003, I agree with you. This has gotten way off topic and for the record...both truth and lie coexist. People have been lied to for thousands of years, and are still being lied to, so why argue over something that is not validated?
You can't use the bible to prove anything in the bible, and the time traveling Devil story is ridiculous. I heard that one once.
I know for a fact there is a GOD, but can I prove it? No. So I don't try.
That there were those who performed miraculous deeds...look at all religious texts, lore and myths.
I see no need to bash Christianity and hope people can find comfort wherever they can; I am just unable to find comfort while search for the truth. Once you uncover a truth, you find out that there is more to discover.
If you really want to know the truth, I can point you in the only direction to find it. It has many parts, but is one journey. look within to see without, and important key piece of the puzzle, no problem can be resolved at the level it was created. Those who have understanding will know, others... look at porn. Hell, I am going to look at porn.
You can't use the bible to prove anything in the bible, and the time traveling Devil story is ridiculous. I heard that one once.
I know for a fact there is a GOD, but can I prove it? No. So I don't try.
That there were those who performed miraculous deeds...look at all religious texts, lore and myths.
I see no need to bash Christianity and hope people can find comfort wherever they can; I am just unable to find comfort while search for the truth. Once you uncover a truth, you find out that there is more to discover.
If you really want to know the truth, I can point you in the only direction to find it. It has many parts, but is one journey. look within to see without, and important key piece of the puzzle, no problem can be resolved at the level it was created. Those who have understanding will know, others... look at porn. Hell, I am going to look at porn.
Their only authority is Archarya S's infamous book which is now a joke after scholars ripped it to pieces and the youtube armchair keyboard scholars phenomenom ZEITGEIST.
Why is it that you Bible thumpers love to refer to scholars and evidence when you feel they are in your favor, yet choose to ignore the tons of evidence that exposes you guys bullshit? That selected logic just cracks me up!
Why is it that you Bible thumpers love to refer to scholars and evidence when you feel they are in your favor, yet choose to ignore the tons of evidence that exposes you guys bullshit? That selected logic just cracks me up!
me ignoring evidence
try your evidence with me young man, and don't dare go into ancient egypt and claim it's the original when thats been ripped to pieces by the Ubaid period
Instead of going round in circles why not show us the supposed evidence of saviours that match Yeshua and give us some real comedy
me ignoring evidence
try your evidence with me young man, and don't dare go into ancient egypt and claim it's the original when thats been ripped to pieces by the Ubaid period
Instead of going round in circles why not show us the supposed evidence of saviours that match Yeshua and give us some real comedy
Ok so I guess you belive that the earth is six thousand years old and there was actually a great flood! Oh I forgot, aren't you the kat with the great ground water theory that was debunked here, not to long ago?
This is so easy to understand it is almost frightening when people can't. Scary that they use logic in every other aspect of life but want to suspend it for THEIR mythological figure.
Notice how I said THEIR figure. What of the other thousands of figures? They laugh at Medusa. They laugh at Harpies. Do they believe in Isis? The story of Thor is fiction to them. Think they even bother to look at the similarities between their Jesus and other man-gods of the region?
It's not their fault. Not many people have the power to escape brainwashing they have been subjected to since birth.
People want to make it like their myth is somehow superior to the thousands of others. Just as they dismiss the other man god myths, we dismiss theirs.
Maybe they think they won the mythological make belief jackpot.Ok so I guess you belive that the earth is six thousand years old and there was actually a great flood! Oh I forgot, aren't you the kat with the great ground water theory that was debunked here, not to long ago?
The bible doesn't say the earth is 6000 years old James USSHER DID
Secondly The flood did take place The BLACK SEA DELUGE theory supports this
Shift your goal posts again
The bible doesn't say the earth is 6000 years old James USSHER DID
Secondly The flood did take place The BLACK SEA DELUGE theory supports this
Shift your goal posts again
Where did the water go again, and being that the planet was once a water planet, what exactly did the plant eaters eat, being that all the vegitation was dead, and there's that problem you have with some deserts not showing any evidence of water for millions of years, and the stupid crystal caves thorn in the side, that could not exist if the world was flooded out, being that they took million of years of undisturbed enviorment for millions of years,how can you explain all the stalactites growing in caves, that would have surely been destroyed by the formation of a water planet.
Then you have the problem of where all that water went, 'ice caps', yeah right, what kind of freeze could have froze that much water that quickly, 'underground water' ha, enough to hide over a ocean worth of water, 'evaporation', please what is this Venus? With that much atmospheric water in the air, the earth air pressure would have been so heavy that it would have crush all life on earth! Have any more wako theories?
The bible doesn't say the earth is 6000 years old James USSHER DID
Secondly The flood did take place The BLACK SEA DELUGE theory supports this
Shift your goal posts again
Regional flood.
It is no wonder so many people had flood stories since people tended to live by the fucking water for obvious purposes.
Plants do not die in floods, secondly most deserts like the sahara have seen water, ever heard of lake chad in the sahara Water didn't go anywhere it was a hydrologic cycle
Could be but how do you explain flood recorded at the same time in places like The Congo river, meditarranean region and the far east. What kind of regional flood affects a large area of the world.
Similar threads
