The lower class give a higher percentage of their income to the poor then the rich

Top_Bunk

Support BGOL
Registered
The poor donate more than the rich when it comes to giving at their capacity. A homeless person is more likely to feed another than the richest man in the harshest of economic times.
Virginia Hodgkinson used to be the vice president of research for the Independent Sector, based in Washington. She says that the lowest-income fifth of the population gives beyond their capacity, the next two-fifths at their capacity and those in the highest fifths are capable of giving two to three times what they give to the less fortunate.

According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics' latest survey of consumer expenditure she's right on the money. The poorest households in the United States gave on average 4.3 percent of their income while the richest fifth gave just 2.1 percent of their income.
That figure doesn't add in the amount of money spent home by both legal and illegal immigrants to the United States.

The middle fifth income levels gave away less than 3 percent of their income to charity.

A report, Patterns of Household Charitable Giving by Income Groups, 2005 published by the Center on Philanthropy at Indiana University also supports the idea that the poor give more than the rich. Households that had less than $200,000 in income gave a third of their income to charity while those making over that amount gave less than a third.

Take the case of Tanya Davis. The 40-year-old is struggling after being laid off from her security guard position and still gives $5 to $10 a week to others that need a hand up. She is surviving on $754 a month.

Truthout reports:

"I believe that the more I give, the more I receive, and that God loves a cheerful giver," Davis said. "Plus I've been in their position, and someday I might be again."


Perhaps Herbert Smith, 31, is correct about why the poor give more than the rich Truthout reported. When one is poor they aren't scared of poverty as much as the rich are.

The poorest are more likely to be students, minorities, women and newcomers to the US. The poorest of the US are also more often on welfare, drive used cars or rely on public transportation, be more religious, rent not own and be older than those in the highest income populations.



http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/273664


Do we unrealistically expect rich to give more because they're rich or are they just being selfish?
 
Re: The lower class give a higher percentage of their income to the poor then the ric

interesting read
 
Re: The lower class give a higher percentage of their income to the poor then the ric

Damn, I can't believe this thread is pretty vacant.

It just confirms what I've always known.
 
Re: The lower class give a higher percentage of their income to the poor then the ric

Better to have 5% of a watermelon than 90% of a grape.
 
Re: The lower class give a higher percentage of their income to the poor then the ric

this actually isn't that hard to believe
 
Re: The lower class give a higher percentage of their income to the poor then the ric

Nigga please.

37025945.niggaplease.bmp







NiggaPlease.png






l_4935ae628b026ac335b6a77d32334e2b.jpg









:lol::lol::lol: :lol:
 
Re: The lower class give a higher percentage of their income to the poor then the ric

Makes sense to me
 
Re: The lower class give a higher percentage of their income to the poor then the ric

Makes sense.
 
Re: The lower class give a higher percentage of their income to the poor then the ric

Do we unrealistically expect rich to give more because they're rich or are they just being selfish?
Unrealistic??? Would realism be expecting the poor to give more because they have less???

Of course, they are being selfish...
Better to have 5% of a watermelon than 90% of a grape.

Lesser is the person who keeps 95% of a watermelon than the person who willingly leaves himself only 10% of a grape.
 
Re: The lower class give a higher percentage of their income to the poor then the ric

Damn, I can't believe this thread is pretty vacant.

It just confirms what I've always known.
Eh, it's not that important of a story...

It doesn't seem to jive with the statistic I've heard pushed for the last few years about conservatives being more charitable than liberals, though... Unless that was based on raw amounts, which would be a pretty stupid, unfair, and biased standard-- I'll have to look that up.
 
Re: The lower class give a higher percentage of their income to the poor then the ric

Duh,I thought everyone knew this? I think its what under 75g's you pay a higher % than lets say a donald Trump.
 
Re: The lower class give a higher percentage of their income to the poor then the ric

Duh,I thought everyone knew this? I think its what under 75g's you pay a higher % than lets say a donald Trump.
Duh, its not about taxes, but you didn't read the post.
 
Re: The lower class give a higher percentage of their income to the poor then the ric

Unrealistic??? Would realism be expecting the poor to give more because they have less???

Of course, they are being selfish...


Everyone is selfish. It's just not a tolerable trait in rich/wealthy people.
 
Re: The lower class give a higher percentage of their income to the poor then the ric

Everyone is selfish. It's just not a tolerable trait in rich/wealthy people.
There are degrees of selfishness. The main point of the thread is that selfishness is greater among those who have the greatest capacity to be selfless.
 
Re: The lower class give a higher percentage of their income to the poor then the ric

There are degrees of selfishness. The main point of the thread is that selfishness is greater among those who have the greatest capacity to be selfless.

:cool:
 
Re: The lower class give a higher percentage of their income to the poor then the ric

well it's not hard to believe, but lets keep the true context. if i make 1000 per week and give 10%, i'm giving 100 bucks. if i make 100,000 per week and give 5% i'm giving 5000. the 5000 still feeds more families than the 100 so this report is foolish. :hmm:

you dont understand. With more power comes more responsibilties. You'll learn that one day cuz i'm sure this will go over your head
 
Re: The lower class give a higher percentage of their income to the poor then the ric

Stop feeding the pigeons!
 
Re: The lower class give a higher percentage of their income to the poor then the ric

Unrealistic??? Would realism be expecting the poor to give more because they have less???

Of course, they are being selfish...


Lesser is the person who keeps 95% of a watermelon than the person who willingly leaves himself only 10% of a grape.

I can see the Yahweh character seeping through on some of your replies in this thread! :lol::lol::lol::lol:

It's definitely not news, but it shows you that even if dude wasn't real, that damn Jesus guy knew helluva lot about rich and poor people! :yes: :lol:

Oh, a fucka ten percent tithe...you give what you can and FEEL that you should, not be forced into it.

And as far as the liberals vs. conservatives, I think conservatives count a lot more of their money going to church fundraisers and organizations as "charity". Most of that shit is going straight into the pastor's pocket, some elaborate building, or bribe money...
 
Re: The lower class give a higher percentage of their income to the poor then the ric


I can see the Yahweh character seeping through on some of your replies in this thread! :lol::lol::lol::lol:

It's definitely not news, but it shows you that even if dude wasn't real, that damn Jesus guy knew helluva lot about rich and poor people! :yes: :lol:

Oh, a fucka ten percent tithe...you give what you can and FEEL that you should, not be forced into it.

And as far as the liberals vs. conservatives, I think conservatives count a lot more of their money going to church fundraisers and organizations as "charity". Most of that shit is going straight into the pastor's pocket, some elaborate building, or bribe money...

I damn near broke out the "eye of a needle" line! :lol:

I don't like everything "Jesus" is quoted as saying, but the New Testament is a huge improvement over the Old Testament (Yahweh from the Bible is just as crazy as hell) and I would have to co-sign most of the attitudes in the NT regarding wealth.

The explanation about what conservatives count as charity makes sense.
 
Re: The lower class give a higher percentage of their income to the poor then the ric

huh? :confused: so if you someone out gives you then you are selfish? what kind of logic is that? anyone who gives anything should be considered generous. how can you lable someone selfish just because someone else gave a bigger percentage?

No. I was acknowledging the aptly named poster QuestForWealth's point about selfishness being a trait in all people. Its true and its not necessarily a bad thing-- sometimes you have to think about yourself; most people would starve to death in a cold ditch if they did not.

But saying anyone who gives anything should be considered generous is absurd and renders the word meaningless. The very definition of generosity is "readiness or liberality in giving." Scrooge McDuck throwing a homeless man a penny does not amount to generosity.
 
Re: The lower class give a higher percentage of their income to the poor then the ric

nigga watch your bitch ass mouth. i'm one of the most intelligent, if not the most intelligent on this lame board. it's nobodies responsibility to give shit. people give because they want, not because they have to. you sound like a fucking jackass moron. all that slick talk doesn't equal logic, it's just bullshit just like you.

I cant tell you seem soft as this
PushPops.gif



faggot. If this board is so dam lame get the fuck off it and go to MENSA. . .but you and i both know you're not that smart :rolleyes:


and who the fuck said anything about people having to give? :smh:

You a internet nerd that just can't take the
2001_12_1---Letter-L_web.jpg


Wanna know how i know? cuz you didn't dispute what i said :lol:
 
Re: The lower class give a higher percentage of their income to the poor then the ric

we have different interpretations of the definition. to give is to freely transfer the possession of something. i feel if you willingly give then you are generous.

Many people give just to get... It doesn't matter at all to you who you're giving to or what you have to give?

As I said before, that definition renders the word meaningless. Can you name one person who is not generous by your standard? Everybody gives something at some point...
 
Re: The lower class give a higher percentage of their income to the poor then the ric

we have different interpretations of the definition. to give is to freely transfer the possession of something. i feel if you willingly give then you are generous.

yeah because you're using this one
TMWBikerDictionary.gif
:rolleyes:
 
Re: The lower class give a higher percentage of their income to the poor then the ric

well it's not hard to believe, but lets keep the true context. if i make 1000 per week and give 10%, i'm giving 100 bucks. if i make 100,000 per week and give 5% i'm giving 5000. the 5000 still feeds more families than the 100 so this report is foolish. :hmm:

c/s but most on this board can't or won't see that way.
 
Re: The lower class give a higher percentage of their income to the poor then the ric

That is true, the game is to keep your money. There is no true benefit in giving to the poor, but those which are poor are more sympathetic to another's problems. The rich would rather find ways to make your money make more money, which in the sense of charities, owning the damn charity and use your money.

Hell, even the leading evangelist understand that if you do charity, do it in another country where the donated dollar goes a long way compared to what you can do here.

as one of the aspects.
 
Re: The lower class give a higher percentage of their income to the poor then the ric

we have different interpretations of the definition. to give is to freely transfer the possession of something. i feel if you willingly give then you are generous.

Many people give just to get... It doesn't matter at all to you who you're giving to or what you have to give?

As I said before, that definition renders the word meaningless. Can you name one person who is not generous by your standard? Everybody gives something at some point...

we are getting side tracked. we are talking about the original theme of this thread. anyone who gives to charity is generous regardless of their motives ( tax write off etc). it doesn't matter the percentage that they give. this was the point i was trying to make. the op is an idiot and a ftp. he's going on ignore.
Hold on, defend your point, don't just go back to restating what has already been written.

I asked a simple question: Can you name one person who is not generous by your standard?
 
Re: The lower class give a higher percentage of their income to the poor then the ric

Hold on, defend your point, don't just go back to restating what has already been written.

I asked a simple question: Can you name one person who is not generous by your standard?

How dare you question the most intellegent person on this board :rolleyes:
 
Re: The lower class give a higher percentage of their income to the poor then the ric

^
^
B
U
M
P
 
Re: The lower class give a higher percentage of their income to the poor then the ric

well it's not hard to believe, but lets keep the true context. if i make 1000 per week and give 10%, i'm giving 100 bucks. if i make 100,000 per week and give 5% i'm giving 5000. the 5000 still feeds more families than the 100 so this report is foolish. :hmm:

yea...
but most of the time it doesnt work out like that...especially here in America.
you get tax money based on Clout these days...not need.

Ahhhh..the good ol media.
the good ol battle of the classes.
Divide more and more

I sit here and think about how Obama made, not everyone, but many Americans think $250,000 a year is a lot of money. Then when he taxes some, because it wont be all, people that make $250,000+ a year, to fund a poorly ran government healthcare system, wars, to fill the pockets of crooks that work in Banking etc., theyll just bitch because in reality theyre not making lots of money like the government is making it out to be.

then, due to being dumbfounded about how the America sysytem works, the poor people that actually put billions of dollars into the economy, but never reap the rewards, (visit some of the schools and neighborhoods where poor Black folks live for a few example), wil be angry at the people making $250,000 because they "dont want to give".


The pressure should be put on the people that governs the money, and those people arent the tax payers. A lot, but not all, of the people that govern the all mighty dollar are usually the ones that are not generous to the people that make THEM RICH.

The poor people im concerned about, the Poor Black people, need to demand more as long as theyre being taxed. The millions of illegals worsen this economy more than they help it. The amounts of money they send back to Mexico via western union, money orders, cash, etc is ridiculous. But they still demand that the American government work for them :confused:

But whenever a TAX PAYING, ambitious poor Black person demands something from their government to help fix schools, bring in a stronger police presence, AND OTHER THINGS TAXES ARE SUPPOSE TO PAY FOR, all the non-Black folks and financially secure Black folks, <---a lot post on BGOL, sit and ONLY talk about Black folks taking accountability. Is taking accountability wrong? nope! But as long as we're being taxed, we should still demand from our government. Nationally and Locally. Funny thing is i didnt start seeing all this "take accountability" shit form Black folks until after Obama got into office. Before he got into office, and Blacks were getting raped by their government officials, there were wayyyy more Anti-Government/Politican Blacks. Now that we have our first Coon of a President, thats also crooked & full of BS just like Bush, Clinton, etc, its a completely different story. hilarious!
 
Last edited:
Re: The lower class give a higher percentage of their income to the poor then the ric

Eh, it's not that important of a story...

It doesn't seem to jive with the statistic I've heard pushed for the last few years about conservatives being more charitable than liberals, though... Unless that was based on raw amounts, which would be a pretty stupid, unfair, and biased standard-- I'll have to look that up.

Remember, Conservatives range from the rich Wall-Street jackasses to the poor Kansas trailer park racists, so. . . .

This is talking about sheer percentage of wealth

huh? :confused: so if you someone out gives you then you are selfish? what kind of logic is that? anyone who gives anything should be considered generous. how can you lable someone selfish just because someone else gave a bigger percentage?

Not if they're just giving to make THEMSELVES feel good about giving, which is what rich people do.

The point of giving is to MAKE A DIFFERENCE.

Rich people have an opportunity to make a HUGE difference, but choose not to, because they don't want poor people to get a leg up and become equal. They enjoy the inequality of the society that favors them, but don't want the scorn of being considered "selfish", so they just make a few "gestures" to shut people up and help keep things the way they are.

nigga watch your bitch ass mouth. i'm one of the most intelligent, if not the most intelligent on this lame board. it's nobodies responsibility to give shit. people give because they want, not because they have to. you sound like a fucking jackass moron. all that slick talk doesn't equal logic, it's just bullshit just like you.

I'll ask you the same question I ask Blunt. If you are soooooo smart and everybody else sooooo stupid, then why are you here then?

And what does that make you, if you continue to post on a board full of stupid people?
 
Re: The lower class give a higher percentage of their income to the poor then the ric

this is a random message board with porn as it's main theme. this board isn't a mensa board where real topics are discussed, therefore i'm not here for intelligence. with that said, i will call out ignorance when i see it. for instance, you are an idiot.... :hmm:

i'm starting to really think this guy has personal issues. Like when he was a kid he didn't get enough pat on the backs and he had reason to believe he was dumb so he trys to prove he's smart by. . .announcing he's smart. I've seen people like this before they're really fucked up in the head.

They'll argue something to the death
 
Back
Top