Double standards of the so called "black activists"

xxxxxxxxxllllllllllllll

Star
Registered
Black activists can get thousands to march on Jena, but you never hear of them getting thousands to march on Baltimore or Compton where daily you hear of blacks being victimized by other blacks. It is as though the infrequent white on black attacks are all that troubles the black community rather than an epidemic of black on black crime. One can not really blame Sharpton or Jesse Jackson as the media are obsessed with only certain aspects of the black community, mostly when they are victims of whites. But those thousands who march have to then have to head home and hide behind locked doors and you can be sure the doors are locked not because they fear cops or Lacrosse players. It is a sick situation that boggles the mind.
 
You sound real white.....right about now...


Jesse and Al should march on your fuckin' hard drive and stomp that shit out...

1.So by stating the obvious l am now a white person ? This reminds me of Russia were anybody who criticizes the Kremlin is labeled a traitor


2. The black community will continue to suffer until we are brave enough to confront our own problems. You know the problems l am not going to waste my time stating them.

3. Jesse and AL have overstayed their welcome. It is high time they pass the baton to another generation which is capable of waging an effective offensive against the problems facing black America.
 
Black activists can get thousands to march on Jena, but you never hear of them getting thousands to march on Baltimore or Compton where daily you hear of blacks being victimized by other blacks. It is as though the infrequent white on black attacks are all that troubles the black community rather than an epidemic of black on black crime. One can not really blame Sharpton or Jesse Jackson as the media are obsessed with only certain aspects of the black community, mostly when they are victims of whites. But those thousands who march have to then have to head home and hide behind locked doors and you can be sure the doors are locked not because they fear cops or Lacrosse players. It is a sick situation that boggles the mind.

What exactly do you want a March in these cities to accomplish?

We've had marches in our communities after the killing of an innocent young boy or girl by some thugs who decided to spray the whole neighborhood with bullets. What did these marches accomplish? The next day people were back to shooting again.

To solve these problems its going to take sacrifice, vision, and struggle. Are you willing to sacrifice your time and energy? Are you willing to struggle and place your life on the line?

When it all comes down to it, very few of us are willing to do what it takes to move forward. Its ony a few, that are willing to do it, that is why I admire the Black Panther Party and all there social activities, protecting the elderly, free employment resources, free breakfast programs, free ambulance service, etc.
 
1.So by stating the obvious l am now a white person ? This reminds me of Russia were anybody who criticizes the Kremlin is labeled a traitor


2. The black community will continue to suffer until we are brave enough to confront our own problems. You know the problems l am not going to waste my time stating them.

3. Jesse and AL have overstayed their welcome. It is high time they pass the baton to another generation which is capable of waging an effective offensive against the problems facing black America.

You can't bring every horse to the pond and let 'em drink
I'd rather keep my eyes wide open instead of blink - Cassidy
 
What about all the whites who say they are NOT racist?

When do they get their turn to march against the other racist whites?


:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:
 
What exactly do you want a March in these cities to accomplish?

We've had marches in our communities after the killing of an innocent young boy or girl by some thugs who decided to spray the whole neighborhood with bullets. What did these marches accomplish? The next day people were back to shooting again.

To solve these problems its going to take sacrifice, vision, and struggle. Are you willing to sacrifice your time and energy? Are you willing to struggle and place your life on the line?

When it all comes down to it, very few of us are willing to do what it takes to move forward. Its ony a few, that are willing to do it, that is why I admire the Black Panther Party and all there social activities, protecting the elderly, free employment resources, free breakfast programs, free ambulance service, etc.


My problem with the black community is that we are willing to take down "whitey" anytime but when it comes to problems concerning the black community we develop cold feet. If thousands can march in support of the Jena 6 [criminals in their own right] how come we can't get tens of thousands to march against the "no snitching" mantra ?


The problems facing the black community will be solved if we understand that the greatest danger to the black people is not "whitey" but black people themselves. Of late we have been in a self-destruct mode.
 
My problem with the black community is that we are willing to take down "whitey" anytime but when it comes to problems concerning the black community we develop cold feet. If thousands can march in support of the Jena 6 [criminals in their own right] how come we can't get tens of thousands to march against the "no snitching" mantra ?


The problems facing the black community will be solved if we understand that the greatest danger to the black people is not "whitey" but black people themselves. Of late we have been in a self-destruct mode.

Hood kats are a problem in the community to put it pc. Pookie getting up at noon everyday is cool. He sits on the block in his car watching the neighborhood he knows everything that goes on. A robbery goes down to Upstanding Black folks in the community. Pookie wants to keep it real and not tell. This is why I'm greatful for genetrification. Move the riff raff out.
 
1.So by stating the obvious l am now a white person ? This reminds me of Russia were anybody who criticizes the Kremlin is labeled a traitor


2. The black community will continue to suffer until we are brave enough to confront our own problems. You know the problems l am not going to waste my time stating them.

3. Jesse and AL have overstayed their welcome. It is high time they pass the baton to another generation which is capable of waging an effective offensive against the problems facing black America.

Welcome to the black "community". The unwritten rule is that we all have to agree or cooperate and think with one mind....or else. Infact I shouldn't have even wrote that myself, hopefully the black gestopo wont see it.
 
My problem with the black community is that we are willing to take down "whitey" anytime but when it comes to problems concerning the black community we develop cold feet. If thousands can march in support of the Jena 6 [criminals in their own right] how come we can't get tens of thousands to march against the "no snitching" mantra ?


The problems facing the black community will be solved if we understand that the greatest danger to the black people is not "whitey" but black people themselves. Of late we have been in a self-destruct mode.




limbo.jpg
 
The problem with you guys is that you are in a state of denial. You can't even notice that you are in self-destruct mode. Talking about Rush won't help solve the high teen pregnancy rate affecting the black community ! Will it ?

and still look like the standard of morality to "minorities"..........:smh::smh::smh:




CHILD ABUSE AND VICTIMIZATION

In 2003, an estimated 906,000 children were determined to be victims of child abuse or neglect.

During 2003, 60.9 percent of victims experienced neglect,
18.9 percent were physically abused, 9.9 percent were sexually abused, 4.9 percent were emotionally or psychologically maltreated, and 2.3 percent were medically neglected. An additional 16.9 percent of victims experienced such “other” types of maltreatment as “abandonment,” “threats of harm to the child,” and “congenital drug addiction.”
An estimated 1,500 children died as a result of abuse or neglect in 2003. More than threequarters (78.7 percent) of children who were killed were younger than four years of age.

In 2003, 51.7 percent of victimized children were girls and
48.3 percent were boys. The racial breakdown of child victims was 53.6 percent white; 25.5 percent African American; 11.5 percent Hispanic; 1.7 percent American Indian or Alaskan Natives; 0.6 percent Asian; and 0.2 percent Pacific Islanders.

The direct cost of child abuse and neglect in the United States totals more than $24 billion annually. (This figure includes law enforcement, judicial system, child welfare, and mental and physical health costs.) When factoring in indirect costs (special education, mental health and health care, juvenile delinquency, lost productivity, and adult criminality), the figure rises to more than $94 billion annually.




CRIME AND VICTIMIZATION


There were an estimated 501,820 robberies, 1,030,080 aggravated assaults and 3,440,880 simple assaults in 2004. (Ibid.)
There were an estimated 209,880 rapes, attempted rapes and sexual assaults to people age 12 and older in 2004, an increase from 198,850 in 2003.

African Americans experienced more overall violence and simple assault in 2004 than whites or persons of other races. (Ibid.)
During 2004, 22 percent of all violent crime incidents were committed by an armed offender, and six percent by an offender with a firearm. (Ibid.)
The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) reported that there were 16,503 criminal homicides in 2003. The number of murders increased by 1.7 percent in 2003, increasing in cities with 100,000 to 249,999 inhabitants by 6.8 percent and increasing in towns under 10,000 by 20 percent.

Law enforcement made an estimated 597,026 arrests for violent crime in the United States in 2003. Whites accounted for 60.5 percent of violent crime arrestees and African Americans accounted for 37.2 percent.



CYBERCRIME VICTIMIZATION



Lawenforcement agencies nationally made an estimated
1,713 arrests for Internet related crimes involving the
possession of child pornography during the 12 months
beginning July 1, 2000.

Almost all arrested child pornography possessors were male; 91 percent were white; and 86 percent were older than 25.

Most arrested child pornography possessors (83 percent) had images of prepubescent children, and 80 percent had images graphically depicting sexual penetration. (Ibid.)

Approximately one in five arrested child pornography possessors (21 percent) had images depicting sexual violence to children such as bondage, rape and torture. (Ibid.)

Forty percent of arrested child pornography possessors were “dual offenders,” who sexually victimized children and possessed child pornography, with both crimes discovered in the same investigation. An additional 15 percent were dual offenders who attempted to sexually victimize children by soliciting undercover investigators who posed online as minors. (

A survey of the cyberstalked victims reporting to WHOA in 2004 reveals that 78 percent were Caucasian; 69 percent were women; and 48 percent were between the ages of 18 and 30 years old. (Ibid.)
In 2004, 52.5 percent of the cyberstalkers reported to WHOA were male, 23.5 percent were female, and in 24 percent of the cases, the gender of the harasser was unknown. (Ibid.)
In 2004, 40.5 percent of the cyberstalking victims received threats of offline harassment.

Link: http://www.ojp.gov/ovc/ncvrw/2006/pdf/statistical_overviews.pdf


Dedicated to all the "brothers" who think white poeple shit don't stink and have problems proving it..............:yes:


:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:
 
The problem with you guys is that you are in a state of denial. You can't even notice that you are in self-destruct mode. Talking about Rush won't help solve the high teen pregnancy rate affecting the black community ! Will it ?

Nope but if they stop talking about the boogeyman they'd actually have to do something.
 
Black activists can get thousands to march on Jena, but you never hear of them getting thousands to march on Baltimore or Compton where daily you hear of blacks being victimized by other blacks. It is as though the infrequent white on black attacks are all that troubles the black community rather than an epidemic of black on black crime. One can not really blame Sharpton or Jesse Jackson as the media are obsessed with only certain aspects of the black community, mostly when they are victims of whites. But those thousands who march have to then have to head home and hide behind locked doors and you can be sure the doors are locked not because they fear cops or Lacrosse players. It is a sick situation that boggles the mind.

LEARN FROM TIM WISE~~~~ A FELLOW WHITE MAN WHO GETS IT


Race to Our Credit:

Denial, Privilege and Life as a Majority

By Tim Wise

Published as a ZNet Commentary, 1/06/05

Sometimes it can be difficult, having a conversation with those whose political views are so diametrically opposed to one's own.

But even more challenging, is having a discussion with someone who simply refuses to accept even the most basic elements of your worldview. At that point, disagreement is less about the specifics of one or another policy option, and more about the nature of social reality itself.

This is what it can be like sometimes, when trying to discuss the issue of white privilege with white people. Despite being an obvious institutionalized phenomenon to people of color and even some whites, white privilege is typically denied, and strongly, by most of us.

Usually, this denial plays out in one of two ways: either we seek to shift the focus of discussion to our status as members of some other group that isn't socially dominant (so, for example, whites who are poor or working class will insist that because of their economic marginalization, they effectively enjoy no racial privilege at all), or we retreat to the tired but popular notion that all have an equal opportunity in this, our colorblind meritocracy.

Denying one's privileges is, of course, nothing if not logical. To admit that you receive such things is to acknowledge that you are, at some level, implicated in the process by which others are oppressed or discriminated against. It makes fairly moot the oft-heard defense that "I wasn't around back then, and I never owned slaves, or killed any Indians," or whatever.

If one has reaped the benefits of those past injustices (to say nothing of ongoing discrimination in the present) by being elevated, politically, economically and socially above persons of color, for example -- which whites as a group surely have been thanks to enslavement, Indian genocide and Jim Crow -- then whether or not one did the deed becomes largely a matter of irrelevance.

Of course, what is ultimately overlooked is that denial of one's privilege itself manifests a form of privilege: namely, the privilege of being able to deny another person's reality (a reality to which they speak regularly) and suffer no social consequence as a result.

Whites pay no price, in other words, for dismissing the claims of racism so regularly launched by persons of color, seeing as how the latter have no power to punish such disbelievers at the polls, or in the office suites, or in the schools in most cases.

On the other hand, people of color who refuse to buy into white reality -- the "reality" of the U.S. as a "shining city on a hill," or the "reality" of never-ending progress, or the "reality" of advancement by merit -- often pay a heavy toll: they are marginalized, called "professional victims," or accused of playing the race card.

Consider the common charge of conspiratorial paranoia hurled at any person of color, for example, who dared to point out the racially-disparate voter purging that took place in Florida in 2000, or in various places in 2004. White reality is privileged at every turn, so that if whites say something is a problem, it is, and if whites insist it isn't, then it isn't.

Those of us who are white remain thought of as sober-minded, and never as given to underestimating the extent of racism, making a molehill out of what is, in fact, often a mountain, or playing our own race card (the denial card), which far and away trumps whatever version people of color may occasionally find in their own decks.

In other words, privilege is not merely about money and wealth. It is not merely something that attaches when one is born with the proverbial silver spoon in one's mouth. Rather it is the daily psychological advantage of knowing that one's perceptions of the world are the ones that stick, that define the norm for everyone else, and that are taken seriously in the mainstream.

Whiteness is so privileged in everyday dialogue that one need look no further than our nation's post-election discourse to see how it operates.

So, for example, one after another commentator in the wake of election night pontificated, without hesitation, that the outcome had been a referendum on "moral values," and the result of high turnout amongst evangelical Christians, who overwhelmingly voted for President Bush.

Yet what this analysis ignored is that it was only some evangelicals who overwhelmingly chose to re-elect the President, while others voted to do exactly the opposite. Indeed, black evangelicals voted at least four to one against Bush, meaning that the mainstream talking heads, as usual were privileging the white perspective, and universalizing the particular behavior of white folks, as if it were the standard for everyone.

So too with the so-called "red state, blue state" divide. Fact is, the divide is less one of geography than race: a slight majority of whites in the blue states (including California, Illinois and New York) voted for Bush on election day, while the vast majority of blacks and the majority of other persons of color in the red states voted against him.

But part of white privilege is never having to examine the peculiarity of white behavior (or even acknowledge that there is such a thing as white group behavior at all), and so naturally, this racial aspect of electoral division remains unexamined, and the more comforting perspective (for whites at least) that there is merely a split based on residence remains largely unchallenged.

But it's more than that. Even more important as an example of white privilege -- the kind that adheres to all whites, not just the rich -- is the ability to avoid being stigmatized by the actions of others who just so happen to fall within the same racial group as you.

While people of color bear the burden of disproving negative stereotypes regularly -- when interviewing for a job, taking a standardized test, or merely driving in the "wrong" neighborhood, where they are presumed not to belong -- whites rarely if ever have to worry that the actions of others like us, no matter how horrible, will stick to us or force us to prove that we are somehow different.

For example, whites can screw up on the job, run entire corporations into the ground, rip off the Savings and Loans to the tune of hundreds of billions of dollars, cut corners on occupational safety and health in the workplace, or scam millions from employee pension funds, without the rest of us having to worry that such incompetence or outright dishonesty will result in whites being viewed suspiciously every time we seek to climb to the top of the corporate ladder.

White men in Lexuses (or is it Lexi?) will not need to fear being pulled over by police on suspicion of transporting documents confirming their latest fiscal shenanigans.

When Martha Stewart conspires to cover up a stock dumping scam, white women across America do not cower in fear that somehow they will be viewed as dishonest and predatory as a result. Nor white men thanks to Ken Lay.

If the President of the United States mispronounces every fifth word out of his mouth, none of us white folks have to worry that someone will ascribe his verbal incompetence to some general white illiteracy. But honestly, do we think that if this President were black, or Latino or Asian Pacific American, or indigenous, and mangled the English language with the regularity of the actual President, that no one would make the leap from individual to group defect?

Why is it that when the white President of the University of Tennessee overspends his expense account by tens of thousands of dollars, using public funds for expensive rugs, home furnishings and lavish chartered plane trips, no one suggests that perhaps it's time for the school to pick a black or brown chief executive, but when the black President of historically black Tennessee State University is seen as mismanaging that school's resources, voices all across my hometown of Nashville began to whisper (or even say quite loudly) that perhaps it was time for TSU to get a white President?

For those reading this who are white, ask yourselves, when was the last time you felt the need to stand up and apologize for a crime committed by another white person? Better yet, when was the last time you felt the need to do this for fear that if you didn't, your community would come to be viewed as inherently violent and dangerous, and perhaps be attacked as a result? And when was the last time someone suggested that our failure to openly condemn white criminals implicated us in their wrongdoing?

Yet what of the recent murders in Wisconsin by a Hmong immigrant, who killed six white hunters when they confronted him in a private deer stand? Not only did bumper stickers crop up within days reading, "Save a deer, shoot a Hmong," implying that the shooter was somehow representative of a larger group evil, but more to the point, the Hmong and larger Southeast Asian communities in Wisconsin and Minnesota (where the shooter was from) rushed to distance themselves from him.

This distancing was, of course, only made necessary because to not do so would put others like them at risk, in a way no white person has ever been put at risk because some of our number occasionally kills folks.

Likewise, nearly a decade ago, when a Hmong woman in the Twin Cities murdered her six children, her status as a racial and ethnic minority was front and center in discussion of the crime -- anger on talk radio was pointed at the Hmong as a group, or Asians more broadly, for example -- but a few years back, when Andrea Yates killed her five kids in Texas, or when Susan Smith drowned her two boys in a South Carolina lake, no one attacked them as examples of what's wrong with white folks these days.

Even when some white teenager commits a racially-motivated hate crime, as happened recently in Simi Valley, California where four white youths beat two black kids to a pulp, the white response is one that seeks to demonstrate that their town is not racist (as if geography alone ever commits an aggravated assault), rather than hoping to prove that all whites aren't that way. The latter possibility would never enter their minds, and why?

It's why in the aftermath of 9/11, you could hear one after another white person demanding to know (and being treated as reasonable for asking it), "where are the moderate voices in the Arab Muslim community prepared to condemn terrorism," all because nineteen out of 1.5 billion Muslims on Planet Earth flew planes into buildings. Yet one cannot fathom anyone being taken seriously if they were to ask, "where are the moderate white Christians," in the aftermath of Oklahoma City or any of a number of abortion clinic bombings.

It's why whenever this issue is raised, white folks rush to insist that we're "just individuals," and want to be thought of as such, rather than as whites. Indeed, we often believe that to even point out our racial identity is racist, as it groups us unfairly and diminishes our "humanness," or "Americanness."

Of course, the irony in such a position is that it is only members of the dominant group in a society who could ever have the luxury of viewing ourselves, or expecting to be viewed by others as "individuals."

That's the point: no one else has ever been able to assume they would be viewed that way, because at no point have they been, nor do they get to be so viewed today, as the aforementioned examples demonstrate all too clearly.

To even say that our group status is irrelevant or should be is to suggest that one has enjoyed the privilege of experiencing the world that way (or rather, believing that one was). In other words, it is the result of a particular social arrangement, whereby some and not others have been seen as individuals no matter the actions of others within their group. There is, of course a phrase for this arrangement.

White privilege.

And until it is eradicated, dug up and discarded root and branch, there can be no legitimate discussion of "colorblindness" or simple individualism. Nor can we be taken seriously as a nation when we hold ourselves up as an example to other nations of what freedom and democracy are supposed to look like.


http://www.timwise.org/
http://www.lipmagazine.org/~timwise/RaceToOurCredit.html
 
So who is to blame for the problems facing the black community especially in the inner cities ?




Why reduce a complex problem to such a simplistic framwork called "blame"

:confused::confused::confused:


These are social problem facing people in poverty around the world.

Who is to blame for the high rates of teenage pregnancy in inner cities in Sweden?

Who is to blame for the high rates of teenage pregnancy in inner cities in Norway?

Who is to blame for the high rates of teenage pregnancy in inner cities in India?

Who is to blame for the high rates of teenage pregnancy in inner cities in Australia?


See how dumb that question is?


You have been conditioned by racism to see eveything through a prism of race..............




:cool:
 
Why reduce a complex problem to such a simplistic framwork called "blame"

:confused::confused::confused:


These are social problem facing people in poverty around the world.

Who is to blame for the high rates of teenage pregnancy in inner cities in Sweden?

Who is to blame for the high rates of teenage pregnancy in inner cities in Norway?

Who is to blame for the high rates of teenage pregnancy in inner cities in India?

Who is to blame for the high rates of teenage pregnancy in inner cities in Australia?


See how dumb that question is?


You have been conditioned by racism to see eveything through a prism of race..............




:cool:

Why should l care about the high teenage pregnacy rate in India ? I am not Indian so l don't give a fuck !

You guys just don't want to acknowledge that you are in self-destruct mode. You don't want to take the responsibility of cleaning the mess in the black community so you try to divert our attention by pointing out "whiteys" flaws.
 
Why should l care about the high teenage pregnacy rate in India ? I am not Indian so l don't give a fuck !

You guys just don't want to acknowledge that you are in self-destruct mode. You don't want to take the responsibility of cleaning the mess in the black community so you try to divert our attention by pointing out "whiteys" flaws.



Because maybe it it NOT a race thing.

Are you saying that high tenage pregnancy is a function of a person's race?



:confused::confused::confused:
 

Originally Posted by kayanation
and still look like the standard of morality to "minorities"..........




CHILD ABUSE AND VICTIMIZATION

In 2003, an estimated 906,000 children were determined to be victims of child abuse or neglect.

During 2003, 60.9 percent of victims experienced neglect,
18.9 percent were physically abused, 9.9 percent were sexually abused, 4.9 percent were emotionally or psychologically maltreated, and 2.3 percent were medically neglected. An additional 16.9 percent of victims experienced such “other” types of maltreatment as “abandonment,” “threats of harm to the child,” and “congenital drug addiction.”
An estimated 1,500 children died as a result of abuse or neglect in 2003. More than threequarters (78.7 percent) of children who were killed were younger than four years of age.

In 2003, 51.7 percent of victimized children were girls and
48.3 percent were boys. The racial breakdown of child victims was 53.6 percent white; 25.5 percent African American; 11.5 percent Hispanic; 1.7 percent American Indian or Alaskan Natives; 0.6 percent Asian; and 0.2 percent Pacific Islanders.

The direct cost of child abuse and neglect in the United States totals more than $24 billion annually. (This figure includes law enforcement, judicial system, child welfare, and mental and physical health costs.) When factoring in indirect costs (special education, mental health and health care, juvenile delinquency, lost productivity, and adult criminality), the figure rises to more than $94 billion annually.




CRIME AND VICTIMIZATION

There were an estimated 501,820 robberies, 1,030,080 aggravated assaults and 3,440,880 simple assaults in 2004. (Ibid.)
There were an estimated 209,880 rapes, attempted rapes and sexual assaults to people age 12 and older in 2004, an increase from 198,850 in 2003.

African Americans experienced more overall violence and simple assault in 2004 than whites or persons of other races. (Ibid.)
During 2004, 22 percent of all violent crime incidents were committed by an armed offender, and six percent by an offender with a firearm. (Ibid.)
The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) reported that there were 16,503 criminal homicides in 2003. The number of murders increased by 1.7 percent in 2003, increasing in cities with 100,000 to 249,999 inhabitants by 6.8 percent and increasing in towns under 10,000 by 20 percent.

Law enforcement made an estimated 597,026 arrests for violent crime in the United States in 2003. Whites accounted for 60.5 percent of violent crime arrestees and African Americans accounted for 37.2 percent.



CYBERCRIME VICTIMIZATION


Lawenforcement agencies nationally made an estimated
1,713 arrests for Internet related crimes involving the
possession of child pornography during the 12 months
beginning July 1, 2000.

Almost all arrested child pornography possessors were male; 91 percent were white; and 86 percent were older than 25.

Most arrested child pornography possessors (83 percent) had images of prepubescent children, and 80 percent had images graphically depicting sexual penetration. (Ibid.)

Approximately one in five arrested child pornography possessors (21 percent) had images depicting sexual violence to children such as bondage, rape and torture. (Ibid.)

Forty percent of arrested child pornography possessors were “dual offenders,” who sexually victimized children and possessed child pornography, with both crimes discovered in the same investigation. An additional 15 percent were dual offenders who attempted to sexually victimize children by soliciting undercover investigators who posed online as minors. (

A survey of the cyberstalked victims reporting to WHOA in 2004 reveals that 78 percent were Caucasian; 69 percent were women; and 48 percent were between the ages of 18 and 30 years old. (Ibid.)
In 2004, 52.5 percent of the cyberstalkers reported to WHOA were male, 23.5 percent were female, and in 24 percent of the cases, the gender of the harasser was unknown. (Ibid.)
In 2004, 40.5 percent of the cyberstalking victims received threats of offline harassment.

Link: http://www.ojp.gov/ovc/ncvrw/2006/pdf/statistical_overviews.pdf


Dedicated to all the "brothers" who think white poeple shit don't stink and have problems proving it..............

114408-004-8d7ba926.jpg

Who is in denial?

Were the fuck is Blunt?
 
Then how do you explain this?


9zvvj7.jpg



What now......


:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:



One hard, unforgiving fact is that 70% of black children are born today to single mothers. This is at the heart of the breakdown of the black family, the cornerstone of black life for generations. Some of these children without two parents may turn out just fine, but most add stress to the lives of their grandparents, neighbors, police and teachers who have to take up the slack for absent or bad parents.

It is easier to attack me than to deal with the hard fact of a dropout rate now at about 50% nationwide for black and Latino students. The average black student who gets a high school diploma today is reading and doing math at an eighth-grade level. Even with a diploma, that young person is ill-prepared to compete for entry-level jobs or for a college degree.’

And what about the tragic fact of a 25% poverty rate among black Americans? That's more than twice the 12% national poverty rate and more than triple the poverty rate among whites.

My critics are busy blaming racism for all this poverty. But that tactic is losing its punch because so many people of color, including black people from Africa and the Caribbean, arrive in this country and outperform native-born black people in educational achievement and income. And it is hard to make the old "racism is the whole problem" argument when the other 75% of black America is taking advantage of 50 years of new opportunities — since Brown vs. Board of Education and the Civil Rights Act — to create the largest black middle class in history, with unprecedented wealth and political power.

The core group of black people trapped in poverty today is not defined by lack of opportunity as much as by bad choices. Black youth culture is boiling over with nihilism. It embraces failure and frustration, including random crime and jail time, as the authentic expression of black life. "Keeping it real" and "street cred" in that destructive world require gunshot victims, the "N-word" and treating women as "bitches" and "hos." There is no arguing that this is a sick mind-set.

Here are some more facts: 44% of the nation's prison population is made up of black people, and blacks account for 37% of violent crimes, although black Americans are only 13% of the population. Who can make the case that this is anything but a social disaster?

Yet I'm condemned for asking why today's prominent civil rights leaders, such as Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton and Maxine Waters, are not dealing with these problems. They prefer to call for more government programs and more white guilt.

And yet a poll done by the Pew Research Center a week after Hurricane Katrina found that two-thirds of black Americans agree with 75% of white Americans who say that too many poor people are overly dependent on government programs. In other words, a clear majority of the nation, including most black people, are saying that the poor need to look in the mirror and halt self-defeating behavior.

Source: Juan Williams
 
I said how do "YOU" explain this based on your race theory?


Can't process shit , huh?



:smh::smh::smh:

9zvvj7.jpg



:cool:


I don't know much about these countries so it would be useless for me to start explaining the dimensions of the communities. This is like me asking you to explain to me why Zimbabwe has a high HIV and Aids infection rate. You know nothing about Zimbabwe so you can't answer this question with the much needed intellectual rigor
 
Back
Top