Int'l Crim Court orders arrest of Sudan President Omar Bashir for War Crimes

C'mon Que you can't possibly be defending this guy simply because the indictment orginated in the Hague. You know it wouldn't have happened in Sudan or another other country I can think of. Because the International Criminal Court resides in the Hague why is that a problem? Bashir has the blood of millions of, as you put it, "brown people" on his hands. :hmm:

Forgot to thank you for that point. I just wanted someone, other than myself, to make that point.

Again, thanks.

QueEx
 
<font size="5"><center>
Iran, militant groups support Sudanese president</font size>
<font size="4">

Senior leaders of Iran, Hamas and Hezbollah have offered
support to Sudan's president after he was charged
with war crimes in Darfur, a sign that the bid to
prosecute him could sharply radicalize his regime </font size></center>


The Associated Press
By SARAH EL DEEB
March 6, 2009


KHARTOUM, Sudan (AP) — Senior leaders of Iran, Hamas and Hezbollah offered international support Friday to Sudan's president after he was charged with war crimes in Darfur, a sign that the bid to prosecute him could sharply radicalize his regime.

For a third straight day, President Omar al-Bashir's supporters marched and vowed to defend him against what his government called a "colonial" conspiracy to overthrow him. Hundreds emerged from mosques after Friday prayers, chanting "jihad," or holy war, and shouting, "With our souls and blood, we will sacrifice ourselves for you, al-Bashir."

After the International Criminal Court issued an arrest warrant Wednesday for al-Bashir, Sudan's government responded by expelling 13 of the largest aid organizations in Darfur.

The U.N. human rights office said in Geneva that it was examining whether the expulsion could itself constitute a war crime.

The order opened a giant hole in the safety net that has kept many Darfur civilians alive during six years of war in the vast, arid region of western Sudan. Without the groups, 1.1 million people will be without food, 1.5 million without health care, and more than 1 million without drinking water — and outbreaks of infectious disease are a greater danger, the U.N. said.

"To knowingly and deliberately deprive such a huge group of civilians of means to survive is a deplorable act," said its spokesman, Rupert Colville. "To punish civilians because of a decision by the ICC is a grievous dereliction of the government's duty to protect its own people."

U.S. State Department spokesman Gordon Duguid urged Khartoum to allow the workers back. "The forced departure of these organizations immediately and seriously threatens the lives and well-being of displaced populations," he said.

The quick show of support from Iran and Middle East militant groups underscores the political risk from the warrant: that al-Bashir could turn to a deeper alliance with the region's hard-line, anti-West bloc. If he does, he could become more resistant to any compromise with the West and take a harder line at home.

Jennifer Cooke, head of the Africa program at the Washington-based Center for Strategic and International Studies, said the Western reaction "may drive al-Bashir further to the hard-line radicals."

"He is framing the ICC's decision as yet another Western attempt to undermine the sovereignty of a Muslim developing state," she said. "And realizing he can rally support, whether from the Arab League or more radical elements, and possibly the (African Union), it gives him less incentive to move back on his decisions."

Khartoum's government is dominated by Islamic fundamentalists, it provided a base for al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden in the 1990s, and it has long been close to Iran, Syria and Palestinian militant groups such as Hamas.

At the same time, however, al-Bashir has often shown a pragmatist's willingness to compromise when needed. Under international pressure, he made concessions in Darfur, such as letting in peacekeepers, and took the larger step of signing a 2005 peace deal with his biggest rivals — southern rebels that Khartoum battled for two decades. He has quietly cooperated with Washington on counterterrorism in recent years, even while under U.S. sanctions.

Those shows of flexibility could be shut off if al-Bashir digs in with a harder line. A more radical regime could heighten violence in Darfur and lead to a strain in ties with the southern Sudanese — or even to a collapse of the north-south peace deal.

The visiting delegation included Iranian parliament speaker Ali Larijani, Hamas' deputy leader Moussa Abu Marzouk, and a top official from Lebanon's Hezbollah, as well as Syria's parliament speaker and the leader of the Palestinian Islamic Jihad militant group. Before they met with al-Bashir, Larijani told reporters at the airport that the ICC's arrest warrant is an "insult directed at Muslims."

"This group today indicates a readiness, a will and unified position to support Sudan, its government and people," Larijani said later at a news conference. He said supporters of prosecution "miscalculated" by thinking they "can sit and issue orders to have others behave as they wish. This has changed. They have to play with a new chessboard."

Abu Marzouk accused Washington of double standards. "The leaders who should be tried and criminalized are those who killed the children and women in Gaza ... Iraq, Afghanistan," he said. Hamas supporters held a large march supporting Sudan in Hamas-run Gaza on Friday.

The Hague-based ICC accuses al-Bashir of leading a counterinsurgency against Darfur that involved rapes, killings and other atrocities against civilians. Khartoum has been accused of unleashing Arab militiamen to attack Darfur civilians to put down a revolt by ethnic Africans in the region. Up to 300,000 people have died and 2.7 million driven from their homes in the conflict since 2003, according to the U.N.

Al-Bashir rejects the charges and refuses to deal with the court. Arab and African nations are pressing the U.N. Security Council to defer any prosecution for at least a year, hoping to defuse the crisis.

Last month, al-Bashir's intelligence chief warned that Khartoum could respond to a warrant by turning to a more Islamic fundamentalist line. At Thursday's demonstrations, al-Bashir hinted at moving closer to the region's militants. He saluted Hezbollah and Hamas, then said, "We call for a new front to reject all forms of colonialism. ... We in Sudan will lead this front."

Meanwhile, most staff from the expelled aid agencies have left Darfur, either going to Khartoum or leaving Sudan altogether, aid workers said. The government also ordered the closure of SUDO, the largest Sudanese non-governmental aid organization in Darfur, which was providing food, drilling water wells and operating clinics, said Ibrahim Mudawi, SUDO's head.

Alun McDonald, a Kenya-based official for Oxfam, said its 25 foreign staffers were in Khartoum. He warned that water pumps maintained by Oxfam will run out of fuel in two weeks, affecting 400,000 people who depend on them.

World Health Organization spokeswoman Fadela Chaib warned of the spread of infectious disease without aid workers' monitoring. There is an outbreak of meningitis in Nyala, South Darfur, where one of the expelled groups, Medecins Sans Frontieres-Holland, was to begin vaccinations next week.

Sudanese Foreign Ministry official Mutrif Siddique said the Sudanese Humanitarian Affairs Ministry and other authorities "have made arrangements to avoid a food shortage or a medical crisis." He acknowledged that "there will be a partial effect, and they (authorities) will work to avoid any shortage."

Asked about U.N. comments that the expulsion order could be a war crime, he said only, "Their campaign against us continues."

___

Associated Press writer Frank Jordans in Geneva, Switzerland, contributed to this report.




http://www.syracuse.com/newsflash/i...7/123635124488950.xml&storylist=international
 
A European court is trying an African head-of-state for so-called crimes in his country.

And, this makes sense to some people? :rolleyes:
 
I thought that's how Europeans feel now. So, what's changed? :confused:
Nothing has changed; you are consistent in your absolute hate of anything having a European connection, (i.e., African Americans who might have European heritage, no matter how slight and inspite of the force). Hence, your tacit support of the killing of innocent black Africans simply because some European might see it as wrong, is entirely consistent with your warped sense of identity.

QueEx
 
Nothing has changed; you are consistent in your absolute hate of anything having a European connection, (i.e., African Americans who might have European heritage, no matter how slight and inspite of the force). Hence, your tacit support of the killing of innocent black Africans simply because some European might see it as wrong, is entirely consistent with your warped sense of identity.

QueEx

Are you joking? So, am I to say because you don't have the same hate I do of whites and Europeans that your

tacit support of the killing of innocent black Africans is really at issue.

You see, two can play that game. But, ultimately, there's no winner.

simply because some European might see it as wrong

See, I never believe Europeans care about non-whites, their death, poverty, or suffering. Nothing in their history has shown this to be the case.

Hence, my initial confusion why the International Crime Court (European honkey bureaucracy) would involve itself in the affairs of people who they hold in such contempt. This is especially puzzling when no formal groups from the Sudan, their neighbors, or the African Union asked for their involvement.

They have an angle here, I just haven't figured it out yet.
 
Are you joking? So, am I to say because you don't have the same hate I do of whites and Europeans that your

tacit support of the killing of innocent black Africans is really at issue.

You see, two can play that game. But, ultimately, there's no winner.
I don't give 2 cents whether its the government of Sudan, the ICC or Judge Mathis (damn, looking at him, Judge Mathis might have some Euro roots), if that som bitch Omar Bashir is responsible for the death of innocent people, bring his ass to justice. YOU, on the other hand, would overlook the dead bodies, simply because of your hate of Europeans or black people who have even a tinge of European descent.

In fact, your assinine theory amounts to a new, interesting and twisted phenomena -- "Cruise's One Drop Rule" which holds that any African American having even One Drop of European blood, isn't black. :smh: :smh: :smh: And I'll bet -- that disqualifies you as well. :yes: :yes: :yes:



Cruise said:
See, I never believe Europeans care about non-whites, their death, poverty, or suffering. Nothing in their history has shown this to be the case.
Who gives a fuck what they care about ???

Is this about "care" or "murder" ??? Please know and understand that right and wrong are not care dependent.


Cruise said:
Hence, my initial confusion why the International Crime Court (European honkey bureaucracy) would involve itself in the affairs of people who they hold in such contempt. This is especially puzzling when no formal groups from the Sudan, their neighbors, or the African Union asked for their involvement.

They have an angle here, I just haven't figured it out yet.

I haven't figured it out either. On the other hand, I can't figure out your compelling need to emulate another European, Adolf Hitler, in your misguided attempt to create some mythical master black race, through the exclusion of Black People. :( :( :(


QueEx
 
I don't give 2 cents whether its the government of Sudan, the ICC or Judge Mathis, if that som bitch Omar Bashir is responsible for the death of innocent people, bring his ass to justice. YOU, on the other hand, would overlook the dead bodies, simply because of your hate of Europeans or black people who have even a tinge of European descent.

To take it to a ridiculous extreme...

if the KKK came to your community to try and judge someone they claimed was a murderer of others in your community, that wouldn't strike you as strange?

Let's just say I equate all of Europe as a KKK-like stronghold.

In fact, your assinine theory amounts to a new, interesting and twisted phenomena -- "Cruise's One Drop Rule" which holds that any African American having even One Drop of European blood, isn't black. :smh: :smh: :smh: And I'll bet -- that disqualifies you as well. :yes: :yes: :yes:

I don't believe in the one drop rule. My belief is that white supremacy is a religion. It has its believers, its preachers, and its dogma. When someone claims to be white, they are worshippers of white supremacy.

To me, race does not exist. But, the concept of calling yourself, someone, anyone "white" shows them to be a practitioner of white supremacy.

Since this all started in Europe, it is the source of this worship.

Who gives a fuck what they care about ???

I believe that is absolutely relevant when you are talking about a court, trial, and possible punishment.

Is this about "care" or "murder" ??? Please know and understand that right and wrong are not care dependent.




I haven't figured it out either. On the other hand, I can't figure out your compelling need to emulate another European, Adolf Hitler, in your misguided attempt to create some mythical master black race, through the exclusion of Black People. :( :( :(


QueEx

I do not like to use the words black or white. However, if someone calls me black, that is fine. But, I despise hearing people call themselves "white" and very quickly start to determine how much of an enemy they are.

So, why would these Europeans, who love calling themselves white, want to interfere in the affairs of people they deem not white?

I'll have to do some research.
 
Originally Posted by QueEx

I don't give 2 cents whether its the government of Sudan, the ICC or Judge Mathis, if that som bitch Omar Bashir is responsible for the death of innocent people, bring his ass to justice. YOU, on the other hand, would overlook the dead bodies, simply because of your hate of Europeans or black people who have even a tinge of European descent.

Cruise said:
To take it to a ridiculous extreme...

if the KKK came to your community to try and judge someone they claimed was a murderer of others in your community, that wouldn't strike you as strange?

Let's just say I equate all of Europe as a KKK-like stronghold.

Now, you know damn well (at least I hope you do) that your conclusion that ALL white people are klansmen -- is simply, not true. I'm not defending white people; I'm defending the truth. (BTW, I don't believe that ALL black people are good, either). So, if its not true, it would be irrational for one to make decisions based on untruths.

I can understand if one acts with caution in dealing with white people (I do that in dealing with white and black people). I can understand if one doesn't have the same level of trust in dealing with whites that one "might" have in dealing with one of our own, in a similar circumstance. All of us, (us and them), in varying degrees, bring with us to everyday life the baggage of this country's racially polarized past. But to make decisions based on one's prejudices instead of the truth and facts as best we know them is, in my opinion, unreasonable.

Now, if you have something other than mere conjecture, hunch, guess, itch, or other bias or prejudice to believe that there is at work some sinister or other wrongful motivation or purpose in the ICC's actions towards that accused murderer, then I can understand you being "cautious" of the charges. If you do have something more, please share it.

QueEx
 
Now, you know damn well (at least I hope you do) that your conclusion that ALL white people are klansmen -- is simply, not true. I'm not defending white people; I'm defending the truth. (BTW, I don't believe that ALL black people are good, either). So, if its not true, it would be irrational for one to make decisions based on untruths.

The klan, slavery, Jim Crow, affirmative action, apartheid, redlining, steering, whatever you want to call it...

whites always do this crap. Hence, whites are a proven (and formidable) enemy.

Besides, I never said all non-whites are good. Sometimes, they are the most ardent and devout worshippers of white supremacy.

I can understand if one acts with caution in dealing with white people (I do that in dealing with white and black people). I can understand if one doesn't have the same level of trust in dealing with whites that one "might" have in dealing with one of our own, in a similar circumstance. All of us, (us and them), in varying degrees, bring with us to everyday life the baggage of this country's racially polarized past. But to make decisions based on one's prejudices instead of the truth and facts as best we know them is, in my opinion, unreasonable.

Now, if you have something other than mere conjecture, hunch, guess, itch, or other bias or prejudice to believe that there is at work some sinister or other wrongful motivation or purpose in the ICC's actions towards that accused murderer, then I can understand you being "cautious" of the charges. If you do have something more, please share it.

QueEx

The evidence is there, I just need to find it and post it.
 
Re: The U.S. Can Not Tolerate Bashir Indictment by the ICC

One question: Do you know the difference between mere opinion and fact?
The video clip was totally devoid of "facts". It opined throughout regarding
certain things alleged to be the intent of the British, and others. It did not,
however, provide any factual details that would allow the viewer to make an
assessment of the truth or veracity of the opinions given.

Help.

QueEs
 
How about this?

BTW, is there a way to make that video not autoplay?

Source

EIR July 25, 2008
George Soros Owns the Court Indicting Bashir
by Anton Chaitkin

Billionaire speculator George Soros funds the International Criminal Court (ICC) at The Hague, which is seeking to arrest Sudan’s President Omar al-Bashir. Though the Court is affiliated with the United Nations, Soros largely directed the lobbying campaign that led to the Court’s creation in 2002-03.

The Court’s charge of “genocide” against President Bashir carries the special irony that its sponsor, Soros, once worked for the apparatus of Adolf Eichmann, who was carrying out the extermination of the Jews of Hungary in 1944.

Apart from Soros, the funders of the International Criminal Court are the British empire, through the United Kingdom’s Foreign and Commonwealth Office; and the European Union’s “European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights,” whose initiatives are enmeshed with and co-managed by the Soros apparatus.

See “George Soros: Hit-Man for the British Oligarchy,” EIR, July 4, 2008.
The full dossier is at www.larouchepac.com.
July 25, 2008 EIR International 21

The Soros organization also directly funded another agency at The Hague, the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, which prosecuted Yugoslav President Slobodan Milosevic. He died during his trial, under suspicious circumstances, in 1997.

Soros’s Open Society Institute, on March 19, 2008, published brief accounts of the recipients of its Justice Initiative grant, including the following:

“International Criminal Court: The Justice Initiative works closely with the International Criminal Court (ICC), helping it function as efficiently and effectively as possible. Among other activities, the Justice Initiative assists local human rights advocates in gathering and presenting information of use to the ICC, pursues advocacy and public education with governments to secure support for the ICC, and contributes to building the capacity of ICC staff on a range of issues.”

The ICC’s offices are in the capital of the Kingdom of the Netherlands, by arrangement with the Dutch government and in close cooperation with the Dutch royal family. Princess Mabel of Orange Nassau, daughter-in-law of Queen Beatrix, is a Soros employee, who runs his relations with the European Union.

On Jan. 22, 2007, Princess Mabel told The Hague International Model United Nations assembly, on behalf of the Soros Open Society Institute:

“We pushed for the creation of the International Criminal Court, which is now based in The Hague and turning this city into the international capital for justice. These courts send a clear message to presidents . . . like those in Rwanda and Cambodia and right now in Darfur. . . .”

Soros finances and largely controls the Coalition for the International Criminal Court, which lobbied for the ICC’s creation and now helps direct ICC activities.

Richard Dicker of Soros’s Human Rights Watch group is a founder and permanent steering comittee member of the Coalition. (The Coalition is headed by William Pace, executive director of the Soros funded World Federalism Movement.)

The London Guardian wrote (Feb. 12, 2004) sardonically about the Milosevic trial, “Richard Dicker, the trial’s observer for Human Rights Watch, announced himself ‘impressed’ by the prosecution’s case. Cynics might say that as George Soros, Human Rights Watch’s benefactor, finances the tribunal, Dicker might not be expected to say anything else.”

On Dec. 14, 2005, the Open Society Institute (OSI) brought its ICC prosecutor, Luis Moreno-Ocampo, to New York for a public forum on the Court. Their press release explained:

“Luis Moreno-Ocampo, the International Criminal Court’s Chief Prosecutor, described the role of the Court in preventing atrocities. . . . Moreno-Ocampo’s visit to OSI was part of the Restoring American Leadership roundtable series, a project of OSI and the Security and Peace Initiative, which is a joint initiative of the Center for American Progress and The Century Foundation. . . . Moreno-Ocampo was in New York City to address the United Nations Security Council, where he presented a progress report detailing the latest developments in the Court’s investigations into war crimes in Uganda, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, and Sudan.”

UN/Paulo Filgueiras
Richard Dicker
The LaRouche PAC’s pamphlet “on the man destroying the
Democractic Party.”
Robert Scoble
Princess Mabel of
Orange Nassau
22 International EIR July 25, 2008

Anglo-Dutch Spooks

The European Union’s Democracy and Human Rights Instrument, which funds the administration of the ICC, was begun in 1993 as an imperial covert arm under the title European Democracy Initiative.

The group was founded by British spook Edward McMillan-Scott, who is currently a vice president of the European Parliament, in charge of relations to the EuroMed parliamentary assembly, comprising MPs from the EU, North Africa, and the Middle East.

In his intrigues with respect to Arab countries, McMillan-Scott fancies himself a reincarnation of his relative Lawrence of Arabia, whose photograph graces the McMillan-Scott website.

Following the collapse of the Soviet bloc, McMillan-Scott worked in tandem with George Soros in Eastern Europe and Russia, setting up networks in aid of oligarchs, looters, and regime-changers.

On May 14, 1993, two days after Britain’s Queen Elizabeth II addressed the European Parliament in Strasbourg, that body established a “European Democracy Initiative.” It was to “provide financial aid . . . through parliamentary institutions and to non-governmental organizations . . . for general civic education and to stabilize and reinforce democratic principles in non-EC countries; also, to . . . develop the concept of civil society in countries where human rights, multiparty systems, the rule of law and economic freedom have been lacking. . . .” The Initiative was officially modelled on the U.S. National Endowment for Democracy (NED), then notorious for its central role in the 1980s Iran-Contra adventures.

In an interview with EIR reporter Mark Burdman on May 27, 1993, McMillan-Scott said his brainchild, the Democracy Initiative, would be working with the NED, with Britain’s foreign office-sponsored Westminster Fund for Democracy, and with the U.S.-based George Soros Foundation.

McMillan-Scott now heads the Democracy Caucus within the European Parliament. On his website, he says bluntly that the Caucus “believes Europe needs a ‘European Endowment for Democracy’ . . . to operate as a deniable, expert and flexible agency at arms-length from the EU, although possibly funded by it.”

Death by Diamonds: Africa’s Apocalypse

Anglo-Dutch cartels in oil, strategic minerals, and diamonds, have looted and despoiled Africa for decades, since that continent’s nominal independence from the European empires. They have employed regime-changes and manipulated wars involving the cartels’ private armies, British special forces and other criminal “irregulars.”

In recent years, the destruction has intensified under the cover of a reform movement guided by this same imperial force, aiming to end national sovereignty and erase all resisting African governments.

Headed by George Soros, in open collaboration with the cartels themselves, this movement is leading the continent into chaos, perpetual war, enforced backwardness, unchecked pandemics, and starvation.

One side of this nightmare is the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI). It began when the Soros’s Publish What You Pay group, aided by propaganda from the Soros-funded Global Witness group, demanded that nations with valuable natural resources be compelled to turn over to mutinational cartels and to the British government, all records of their transactions on these resources—so as “to stop bribes”!

In 2002, then-British Prime Minister Tony Blair announced, in Johannesburg, that he had accepted this Soros proposal. In 2003, Blair formed the EITI as a London-based global agency, which would seek to pull in the United States and attempt to enforce open domination over world resources.

Led originally by Anglo-Dutch Shell Oil, DeBeers, and AngloAmerican, EITI’s participating corporations now include include such mining companies as AngloGold Ashanti, Barrick Gold, BHP Billiton, DeBeers, Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold, Gold Fields, Katanga Mining Limited, Newmont, Rio Tinto; and oil companies such as Chevron, ConocoPhilips, Eni, ExxonMobil, Hess, Pemex, and Petrobras.

In 2006, EITI’s governing secretariat was set up in Norway and placed under Soros management, with money from the Open Society Institute, and with EITI board members from Soros agencies such as Publish What You Pay, Revenue Watch Institute, and Global Witness.

“Conflict diamonds” have provided the propaganda power behind the Soros Initiative. As world opinion was revulsed b accounts of genocidal wars over African diamonds, gems used as currency by mafias, mercenaries, and militias, the Soros group Global Witness, in tandem with the top diamond companies, shaped the issue of “blood diamonds” toward London’s objectives.

In 2000, the World Diamond Council was set up in Brussels, led by DeBeers of London and South Africa; by DeBeers agent Maurice Tempelsman, head of the New York-based Lazare Kaplan diamond company; and by Israeli diamond billionaire Dan Gertler and his family. The World Diamond Council’s “reforms” of the industry’s looting are approved by Global Witness and are an integral part of the EITI’s agenda.

Belgian-born Maurice Tempelsman started out in the European Parliament Edward McMillan-Scott former Belgian Congo. He participated in the work-up to the British coup against Ghana’s nationalist President Kwami
Nkruma, and later became the number-one U.S.-based affiliate of DeBeers and London’s world diamond cartel. A power in the post-JFK Democratic Party alongside Felix Rohatyn and George Soros, Tempelsman is a director of the National Democratic Institute component of the NED.

Dan Gertler is the grandson of Moshe Schnitzer, founder of Israel’s diamond industry, and the nephew of Schmuel Schnitzer, vice chairman of the World Diamond Council. In the Bush-Cheney era, Gertler has taken over from Tempelsman the role of unofficial representative of the U.S. government in the Democratic Republic of Congo.

In partnership with other Israeli billionaires and with rightist politicians such as Avigdor Lieberman, Gertler arranged with former Congo President Laurent Kabila to set up a diamond monopoly, in exchange for Israeli arms and military training.

In 2006, Gertler gave arms trafficker John Bredenkamp $60 million for mineral property in Congo, shortly before police raided Bredenkamp’s home and office in England in the (soon aborted) probe of BAE Systems arms-deals corruption in South Africa. The Bredenkamp deal allowed Gertler to become top shareholder in London’s Camec, the copper and cobalt mining giant in Congo.

With this apparatus behind him, George Soros is doing to Africa what he did in his native Hungary in 1944, when he helped the Nazi occupiers in the extermination of the Jews.
 
Last edited:
(1) Maybe you need to download and repost the video as Real.

(2) Why don't just explain the video in your own words instead of posting an article to explain it ??? - thats like asking someone else to explain your points.

QueEx
 
(1) Maybe you need to download and repost the video as Real.

(2) Why don't just explain the video in your own words instead of posting an article to explain it ??? - thats like asking someone else to explain your points.

QueEx

I just put a link instead.

My intent was to provide some background on the ICC and its illegitimacy in dealing in African affairs.

These honkeys have never done anything good for Africa and yet we are supposed to believe they care about the people of the Sudan. Come on, now. I mean, are we really that gullible?

The ICC exists to further the white supremacist agenda and its imperial manifestations in countries throughout Africa. Given the history of whites on the continent, it should be no surprise they mean absolutely zero goodwill to its people in any endeavor they undertake.

Sudan Ambassador Spells Out How Indictment Could Escalate Darfur Conflict

March 5, 2009 (LPAC)--At a press conference today, Sudan's Ambassador to Washington, Dr. Akec K.A. Khoc, of the Sudanese People's Liberation Movement (SPLM), stressed that Sudan does not recognize the ICC, and therefore does not recognize the indictment of President Bashir. Asked if Bashir had committed genocide, he replied, we will not respond because we do not recognize the ICC and its charges.

International Criminal Court Rejects Appeals, As Sudan Makes Agreement with a Rebel Group

February 21, 2009 (LPAC)--Sudan Foreign Minister Deng Alor Kuol told reporters in Cape Town, South Africa today that Sudan wants the International Criminal Court's ongoing efforts to indict Sudan President Omar Hassan al-Bashir for war crimes to be postponed for a year, thereby giving the government time to negotiate a peace deal in Darfur.

ICC Prosecution of Bashir May Destroy Sudan, Says Former U.S. Special Envoy

July 15, 2008 (LPAC)--Former U.S. Special Envoy to Sudan Andrew Natsios, in a web article today, wrote that the International Criminal Court's (ICC) prosecution of Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir, launched today, "may well shut off the last remaining hope for a peaceful settlement for the country.

Without a political settlement, Sudan may go the way of Somalia, pre-genocide Rwanda, or the Democratic Republic of Congo: a real potential for widespread atrocities and bloodshed as those in power seek to keep it at any cost."

A source in the African diplomatic community in Washington told EIR today, with reference to the ICC action, "There are only two options for Sudan at this point: progress toward a political settlement, or else chaos, war, and a failed state."
 
<font size="5"><center>
Wikileaks:
Sudan's President Bashir 'stole billions'</font size>
<font size="4">

Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir has been accused
of siphoning off up to $9bn of his country's funds
and placing it in foreign accounts, according
to leaked US diplomatic cables.</font size></center>


_50480640_006970802-1.jpg

Sudan has denied allegations that Mr Bashir
stole public funds


dark.png

18 December 2010


Diplomats quoted the chief prosecutor of the International Criminal Court (ICC) as saying that much of the money may be stashed in London banks.

The allegations released by the Wikileaks website have been published by the Guardian newspaper.

Sudan has denied the claims.

The cables quoted ICC chief prosecutor Luis Moreno Ocampo as telling US officials that some of the funds may be held by the part-nationalised Lloyds Banking Group. He reportedly said it was time to go public with the scale of Mr Bashir's theft.

"Ocampo suggested if Bashir's stash of money were disclosed (he put the figure at $9bn), it would change Sudanese public opinion from him being a 'crusader' to that of a thief," one report by a senior US official said.

"Ocampo reported Lloyds bank in London may be holding or knowledgeable of the whereabouts of the money," the cable said.

Lloyds has responded by saying it has no evidence of holding funds in Mr Bashir's name.

"We have absolutely no evidence to suggest there is any connection between Lloyds Banking Group and Mr Bashir. The group's policy is to abide by the legal and regulatory obligations in all jurisdictions in which we operate," the bank said.

Correspondents say that if Mr Ocampo's claim about Bashir's fortune is correct, the Sudanese funds being held in London banks amount to one tenth of the country's annual GDP.

Claims 'ludicrous'

Mr Ocampo is said to have discussed evidence of the stash with the Americans just days after issuing an arrest warrant for Mr Bashir in March 2009 - the first issued by the court against a serving head of state.

Mr Bashir was indicted last year for seven counts of war crimes and crimes against humanity in the Darfur region, with a further three counts of genocide added in July.

A spokesperson for the Sudanese government dismissed the claim, describing it as further evidence of the ICC's political agenda in discrediting the Sudanese government.

"To claim that the president can control the treasury and take money to put into his own accounts is ludicrous - it is a laughable claim by the ICC prosecutor," Khalid al-Mubarak, government spokesperson at the Sudanese embassy in London, told the Guardian.

"Ocampo is a maverick, and this is just part of his political agenda. He has failed miserably in all his cases and has refused to investigate Iraq or Gaza - he needs success and he has targeted Bashir to increase his own importance."

"Attempts to smear not only Bashir but Sudan as a whole are well known, and are clearly linked with anti-Arab sentiments and Islamophobia," Mr Mubarak said.


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-12025213
 
Back
Top