KEMETIANS: What Made 'Em Different From Their Fellow Africans?

AMENTA

consider the english word "fair" - it has at least 2 meanings - same thing applies to the egyptian word in question "heq" - it has 2 meanings - now imagine translating from the egyptian into the english - the historians saw the word "heq" and took the shepherd king meaning because as far as historians are concerned its leaders and rulers and kings and queens that matter to their story - historians only write about major players in events of history

theologians on the other hand read the SAME SCROLL (its so important that you understand this portion cos its the crucial part of it all) - they read the same book as the historians did but the theologians took the other meaning of that same word "heq" cos that suited their story better - theologians portray stories of humble families - revering the divine etc - they chose the shepherds in captivity meaning of the same word

the most important gist here is that the history books and the religious books (bible quran torah) were ALL translated from a SINGLE STORY BOOK in earlier languages therefore they're ALL really telling the SAME STORY albeit in their individually distorted ways

AtomAnt we are on the same page. i consider you a brother in this.

but I still have to respectfully disagree on josephus and his 'hyksos'. he was very inaccurate and was shown to be lying in many of his accounts. he is just as much a distortion as the bible or any other holybook of the religions.

and i do not bear witness to it coming from one single story book. thats what religions/new age groups teach. they use a little intellectual prowess but throw belief 'masquerading as reason' in their teachings to the detriment of the student.

hey, its good that we disagree. it develops more learning. keep growing. i won't stop.

and i am not arrogant as you are making me out to be.
 
d23292c008a0d0c22ed8a010._AA240_.L.jpg


Well the Thoth Tablets of Emerald are said to be the oldest books in world history . I haven't bothered to read them but i am told the were revered by the Egyptians and give credit to learning a lot from these books. They give a story that is parallel to the book of enoch and biblical events of a pre flood civilisation that was destroyed. Some people speculate that Thoth was actually one of the fallen angels that was banished from heaven. Though this is not popular information with egytophiles who do not want to believe there is a higher power out there. One thing is clear though there is definately a link between the majority of world civilisations with astronomy , religion and some deities teaching them. There is a lot of proof and truths that are suppressed by People in high places, their behaviour shows that there is some truth in findings of people like Graham Hancock.


I don't know about you but to me....

Fallen Angles = Extraterrestrial biological entities



Nephilim on the other hand I believe existed. Remains of giant skeletons and very large humanoid skulls have been found all across the globe and are tossed aside because they don't fit into Darwins theory of evolution. That theory already has a monopoly going in academia.
 
The Right sided cultures of interior Africa are what gave birth to Kamit. Kamit represents the more developed result of a society erected on a balanced expression of the both the Right & Left hemispheres of the brain. But Egypt could not have developed the technology to balance their development through anything other then the right sided systems of interior Africa.

For contrast white culture is dominated by left brain.
 
I don't know about you but to me....

Fallen Angles = Extraterrestrial biological entities



Nephilim on the other hand I believe existed. Remains of giant skeletons and very large humanoid skulls have been found all across the globe and are tossed aside because they don't fit into Darwins theory of evolution. That theory already has a monopoly going in academia.

And they will return.:D:yes:;)
 
Location.

Egypt was in one of the major trading posts.


Most of the "great" African civilizations were near water/trading routes.

Look at Timbuktu though, they weren't really near water, but was still agreat trading route.


Egypt gets jocked alittle too much by blacks in my opinion, yet Blacks still get 0 credit for having such a great civilization.


But All of Africa is worth studying especially Ancient Nubia & Ethiopia, those spots had everything, the egyptians learned/stole alot from them.


but I guess its glamourous to be into the bigger pyramids, hell they're only that big because that part of the world was the only spot on earth that could sustain such weight, its pyramids in Sudan which go down miles deep. NOW THATS AMAZING.
 
The Right sided cultures of interior Africa are what gave birth to Kamit. Kamit represents the more developed result of a society erected on a balanced expression of the both the Right & Left hemispheres of the brain. But Egypt could not have developed the technology to balance their development through anything other then the right sided systems of interior Africa.

For contrast white culture is dominated by left brain.


In my opinion is one of the main reasons why our educational system is geared more towards the left brain.
 
In my opinion is one of the main reasons why our educational system is geared more towards the left brain.

Yes. On a whole this society is not capable of right sided thinking or the development of right sided curriculum. To much time has been spent belittling and trying to show the inferiority of right sided thinking. part of the whole white supremacist doctrine. the only thing that will save this world is the return to an understanding that both the harmonious input of the right and left are required for their to be proper development of Wo/Man.
 
I don't know about you but to me....

Fallen Angles = Extraterrestrial biological entities

.

I think they are one and the same because if you compare what ancients texts and modern science says for example

1.Scientists say
That aliens came from the stars and mated with earthly women and had children. The starchild skeleton is proof and still buffles scientists at it's DNA that seems to come from a more superior unearthly race

Texts say

Fallen angels called Grigori came down to earth and mated with earthly women to create nephilim, anakim and rephalim.


Scientists say
Aliens used specific points in the universe such as stars and galaxies as navigation. these aliens helped humans built pyramids and other temples that accurately pinpoint certain positions of specific stars

ancient text says
The angels were watchers that occupied the position of the stars and came down to earth to be worshipped by men.


and a whole lot more
 
Location.

Egypt was in one of the major trading posts.


Most of the "great" African civilizations were near water/trading routes.

Look at Timbuktu though, they weren't really near water, but was still agreat trading route.


Egypt gets jocked alittle too much by blacks in my opinion, yet Blacks still get 0 credit for having such a great civilization.


But All of Africa is worth studying especially Ancient Nubia & Ethiopia, those spots had everything, the egyptians learned/stole alot from them.


but I guess its glamourous to be into the bigger pyramids, hell they're only that big because that part of the world was the only spot on earth that could sustain such weight, its pyramids in Sudan which go down miles deep. NOW THATS AMAZING.
but the thread is about how egypt stood out from the rest of the african states in wisdom to the extent that ALL THE OTHER AFRICAN STATES WERE REVERRING THE EGYPTIAN GODS BUT IN THEIR OWN NATIVE TONGUES!!!
 
Yes. On a whole this society is not capable of right sided thinking or the development of right sided curriculum. To much time has been spent belittling and trying to show the inferiority of right sided thinking. part of the whole white supremacist doctrine. the only thing that will save this world is the return to an understanding that both the harmonious input of the right and left are required for their to be proper development of Wo/Man.


You're on point :yes:


balance more than anything is necessary for beneficial growth as a species, psychologically and spiritually. By completely shutting off and trying deter people from accessing both sides of their brain they're inevitably stunting growth and development. I'm more of a right brain person myself, but I try to incorporate both equally.
 
Didn't King James translate the bible? That should answer your question.
:lol: oh my god - king james aka the wisest fool in christendom :D

now its interesting you should mention him because it was his fellow englishman/cousin francis bacon who wrote The New Atlantis
 
I think they are one and the same because if you compare what ancients texts and modern science says for example

1.Scientists say
That aliens came from the stars and mated with earthly women and had children. The starchild skeleton is proof and still buffles scientists at it's DNA that seems to come from a more superior unearthly race

Texts say

Fallen angels called Grigori came down to earth and mated with earthly women to create nephilim, anakim and rephalim.


Scientists say
Aliens used specific points in the universe such as stars and galaxies as navigation. these aliens helped humans built pyramids and other temples that accurately pinpoint certain positions of specific stars

ancient text says
The angels were watchers that occupied the position of the stars and came down to earth to be worshipped by men.


and a whole lot more


Couldn't have said it better myself. The Star child skull could break this whole thing open. I just hope nothing happens to the project.


The more geneticist unlock our genome I think they will realize (if they don't know already) that our supposed junk DNA has a purpose, but at this point and time has not been activated. It is just my personal opinion (and I have read similar things) but when our junk DNA somehow activates I think that will be humankind's next step in evolution.
 
:lol: oh my god - king james aka the wisest fool in christendom :D

now its interesting you should mention him because it was his fellow englishman/cousin francis bacon who wrote The New Atlantis


Wasn't Francis Bacon a Freemason?


Because you know those Masons have in their possession A LOT of esoteric knowledge.
 
Simple. It all boils down to the Egyptian concept of As Above, So Below.

1. Egypt is very flat and has a crystal clear view of the sky. Egyptians over time used the mathematical order of the stars as a conceptual stepping stone for advancing their own understanding of mathematics. Mathematics is the foundation of the Universe and Egypt understood that well.

2. Egyptians were dedicated students of nature and they would make the connection between principles espoused by nature, animals, plants and the heavens, and the application of these principles in the works of men. There is no better teacher than Nature, if you respect her and accept her teachings.

(This have nothing to do with As Above, So Below but...)

3. Egypt was the closest African nation to several other "great" (in terms of centralized authority, cultural and economic reach, etc.) civilizations--Sumeria, India, Akkadia, Persia, etc. and thus had to compete economically and militarily with them.

I was actually being sarcastic
 
Wasn't Francis Bacon a Freemason?


Because you know those Masons have in their possession A LOT of esoteric knowledge.

Yep. So was Dr. John Dee. If you watch the Movie Elizabeth The Golden Age it showed how she consulted those two more than anybody. Both Bacon and Dee were big time occultists. Religion was only given to the masses to pacify them.:smh:
 
Yep. So was Dr. John Dee. If you watch the Movie Elizabeth The Golden Age it showed how she consulted those two more than anybody. Both Bacon and Dee were big time occultists. Religion was only given to the masses to pacify them.:smh:


I might have to check that out now, thanks for the heads up.


The occultism theme seems to echo in all of these secret societies.


Religion in its rawest form has to be the greatest weapon ever manufactured.
 
Very true statement. Usually only the most elite lodges teach this, most everyday lodges are about shooting pool, drinking liquor and driving cabs.:lol:

that is why I laugh hard when these low level Masons on this board beat there chest like they know something fantastic :lol:
 
You're on point :yes:


balance more than anything is necessary for beneficial growth as a species, psychologically and spiritually. By completely shutting off and trying deter people from accessing both sides of their brain they're inevitably stunting growth and development. I'm more of a right brain person myself, but I try to incorporate both equally.


The imbalanced expression of the left far outweighs in destructiveness the right brain. The imbalanced expression of the right results in technological stagnation while the left is responsible for all inhumanity, destruction of the environment in pursuit of money, being vexed by seeming differences - men vs women, old vs young, whites vs non-whites etc.
 
if you look at a modern atlas it is not not hard to see that the continents fit together,,,if you propse that humans started in africa and migrated elsewhere before civilisation,,,it is not hard to postulate that civilisation began in the birthplace of humanity and migrtaed elswhere,,,,if you look at an atlas you can see how this is very possible,,,look at how black people fan out from africa as indigenous people
 
The imbalanced expression of the left far outweighs in destructiveness the right brain. The imbalanced expression of the right results in technological stagnation while the left is responsible for all inhumanity, destruction of the environment in pursuit of money, being vexed by seeming differences - men vs women, old vs young, whites vs non-whites etc.


interesting point


Have you ever heard of the fabled civilization known as Lemuria?


If we took your description and made it applicable to Lemuria and Atlantis, Lemuria was a more right brained society vs. Atlantis who were more left brain (which lead to their destruction).
 
if you look at a modern atlas it is not not hard to see that the continents fit together,,,if you propse that humans started in africa and migrated elsewhere before civilisation,,,it is not hard to postulate that civilisation began in the birthplace of humanity and migrtaed elswhere,,,,if you look at an atlas you can see how this is very possible,,,look at how black people fan out from africa as indigenous people

What you're describing is Pangea, which existed in the Paleozoic era that was 250 million years ago. Conventional science will tell you that man derived from Homo Erectus, and that was around 1.7 million years ago. And the out of Africa theory proposes that modern Humans started migrating out of Africa as early as 100,000 thousand years ago.


Unless you're trying to say that humans were roaming around 250 million years ago than what you're saying doesn't make sense.


Buuuuuuuut if you know Dr. Micheal Cremo's work he says that modern humans have been around for hundreds of millions of years.


there is just too much discrepancy
 
Last edited:
if you look at a modern atlas it is not not hard to see that the continents fit together,,,if you propse that humans started in africa and migrated elsewhere before civilisation,,,it is not hard to postulate that civilisation began in the birthplace of humanity and migrtaed elswhere,,,,if you look at an atlas you can see how this is very possible,,,look at how black people fan out from africa as indigenous people
2wgdje0.gif

400px-Human_mtDNA_migration.png


I thought about that too. I always wonder how the black folk in the solomon islands , bouganville and the rest of the other africans got there. If the out of africa model is true then people must have migrated to all parts of the world on foot or maybe by boat , but were they that advanced?
 
2wgdje0.gif

400px-Human_mtDNA_migration.png


I thought about that too. I always wonder how the black folk in the solomon islands , bouganville and the rest of the other africans got there. If the out of africa model is true then people must have migrated to all parts of the world on foot or maybe by boat , but were they that advanced?

Read my post and tell me what you think.
 
Read my post and tell me what you think.

I think human beings probably existed 250 million years ago. It would be a logical conclusion because unless prehistoric human beings could build ships that could cross sea's to find islands and inhabit them. For people to spread out across the world they must have had some form of gradual land migration.Another idea i think proves that migrations happened when the earth's land mass was still one is animals because they migrate too. from evidence of similar animals found in area's that were attached like lemurs and crocodiles and right down to insects .
 
I think human beings probably existed 250 million years ago. It would be a logical conclusion because unless prehistoric human beings could build ships that could cross sea's to find islands and inhabit them. For people to spread out across the world they must have had some form of gradual land migration.Another idea i think proves that migrations happened when the earth's land mass was still one is animals because they migrate too. from evidence of similar animals found in area's that were attached like lemurs and crocodiles and right down to insects .

You do know what you're suggesting right? That dinosaurs and modern humans coexisted in the same era.
 
Back
Top