Don't trust Obama to lead because he has not been in jail - WTF?!?!?

i dont expect you to...

the point is, if he's the best candidate still running, say that...i'm inclined to at least believe that

he's the best left...people are making it seem like he was the best..period

my gripe has always been, there were better qualified candidates in the pool who couldn't get support because people are focused on the wrong things. they continue to be.
 
HE IS A DISGRACE TO ALL BLACK CHURCHES!! THE SIGN SAID "JESUS IS LOVE", SO WHAT I'M HEARING "HATE" FROM HIM??!!

:smh::smh::smh::angry::angry::angry::(:(:(
 
i dont expect you to...

the point is, if he's the best candidate still running, say that...i'm inclined to at least believe that

he's the best left...people are making it seem like he was the best..period

my gripe has always been, there were better qualified candidates in the pool who couldn't get support because people are focused on the wrong things. they continue to be.

It's like asking is the fastest dude in the race. There is ALWAYS somebody faster, even if you don't know who it is. You sound like you are waiting on a Messiah or something. No such thing as perfect in politics, there is effective and there is bad, we've had BAD for seven years, now folks are ready for effective again.

There were better qualified candidates in the field, but politics is as much image and money as it is qualifications. Those candidates either didn't run, or lacked the charisma to get elected, so you can't really count them. I think MOST people felt like Edwards had it over Obama AND Hillary at one point, but he has shown TWICE that he just doesn't have the skill to get his message out effectively, that's HIS fault, doesn't mean people are sheep.

The media CHOSE Hillary as our next president in 2004 (almost as soon as Bush was declared winner), now they jock Obama because he upset the apple cart. No need to be mad at bruh for it, he stepped out on faith and managed not to get mowed down by a bulldozer. I don't see why cats can't just enjoy the fact that the process is sorta working and we are actually involved in CHOOSING OUR OWN PRESIDENT instead of being mad at Obama for being competitive.
 
It's like asking is the fastest dude in the race. There is ALWAYS somebody faster, even if you don't know who it is. You sound like you are waiting on a Messiah or something. No such thing as perfect in politics, there is effective and there is bad, we've had BAD for seven years, now folks are ready for effective again.

There were better qualified candidates in the field, but politics is as much image and money as it is qualifications. Those candidates either didn't run, or lacked the charisma to get elected, so you can't really count them. I think MOST people felt like Edwards had it over Obama AND Hillary at one point, but he has shown TWICE that he just doesn't have the skill to get his message out effectively, that's HIS fault, doesn't mean people are sheep.

The media CHOSE Hillary as our next president in 2004 (almost as soon as Bush was declared winner), now they jock Obama because he upset the apple cart. No need to be mad at bruh for it, he stepped out on faith and managed not to get mowed down by a bulldozer. I don't see why cats can't just enjoy the fact that the process is sorta working and we are actually involved in CHOOSING OUR OWN PRESIDENT instead of being mad at Obama for being competitive.


PREACH!


For a user name like ZERO u battin' 1000 with that reply!:yes:
 
he's speakin spiritually....the point he's tryna make is that....
barak is tryna get int he white house a lil easy and he thinks something is fishy because hes cool wit the white people....they could be using obama as a tool....and he could be down wit the sercet goverment.....hey u never know

Don't even try to rationalize what that bafoon is saying. And then niggas wonder why I hate older black "negros" and don't go to church. Perfect example right there in that video.
 
It's like asking is the fastest dude in the race. There is ALWAYS somebody faster, even if you don't know who it is. You sound like you are waiting on a Messiah or something. No such thing as perfect in politics, there is effective and there is bad, we've had BAD for seven years, now folks are ready for effective again.

There were better qualified candidates in the field, but politics is as much image and money as it is qualifications. Those candidates either didn't run, or lacked the charisma to get elected, so you can't really count them. I think MOST people felt like Edwards had it over Obama AND Hillary at one point, but he has shown TWICE that he just doesn't have the skill to get his message out effectively, that's HIS fault, doesn't mean people are sheep.

The media CHOSE Hillary as our next president in 2004 (almost as soon as Bush was declared winner), now they jock Obama because he upset the apple cart. No need to be mad at bruh for it, he stepped out on faith and managed not to get mowed down by a bulldozer. I don't see why cats can't just enjoy the fact that the process is sorta working and we are actually involved in CHOOSING OUR OWN PRESIDENT instead of being mad at Obama for being competitive.

what the fuck does any of that have to do with choosing the leader of the free world? how charismatic he/she is? are you serious???

you've just eliminated yourself from the rational debate, congrats!!
 
Because

AUDIO SYNDICATE!!!
SYNDICATE!!!
SYNDICATE!!!
SYNDICATE!!!

is The Decider as to who is in the rational debate and who ain't. :hmm:

Your ego is out of control, dawg. Dont sweat yourself.
 
:lol: you're not even serious

is obama the best candidate or the best candidate still running? answer that



Just like a republican, switch the damn topic when exposed. I answered your question, addressed you point by point and then you shift the debate.:hmm: F*** the Jedi mind trick S***! You have been formally refuted and rebutted. That is all you get.

Now if you can tell me why you, and this lame A$$ preacher, still think that an educated black man, siphoning off the support of an established, well connected politician has got to be labeled as a "good Negro" for his efforts I will continue. UNTIL then this discussion is over.:hmm:
 
what the fuck does any of that have to do with choosing the leader of the free world? how charismatic he/she is? are you serious???

you've just eliminated yourself from the rational debate, congrats!!
















Dude you need to check yourself.....Charisma has a lot to do with it....hell I don't even like it but thats the way it is.....


Somebody Please post the Bush Oprah Kiss.....that shit says it all!:smh:
 
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

This. Both Roosevelts, Kennedy, Clinton, Eisenhower...completely about charisma.
 
wait, you actually didn't do any of that. i guess in your mind you did, but...seriously you didn't..good try??

i just didn't see the need to even bother with your post, but if you insist...fine..

1. jfk and rfk were both revered for thier..wait for it..civil rights ambitions
2. that pastor wasn't saying it was a measure of a good presidential candidate, he was saying purposeful black people are always taken down for their causes. in his view.
3. his parishoners have the right to listen to his sermon or ignore as do you, in your opinion it's a farse, in their opinion it may be valid. i don't personally go to extremes like he does.
4. this is the FIRST TIME THIS HAS HAPPEND according to you and others, that a black man has the chance of winning the presidency, sharpton wasn't scrutinized? jackson wasn't scrutinized? maybe you're not old enough to remember those campaigns, but let me tell you son, they were indeed scrutinized, it's not some new scrutiny, NO ONE SHOULD GET A PASS!

barack is both safe and accepted, because he's seen as someone beyond a black man, i've said it in previous post, he's america's black friend. everything you underlined is as ridiculous as the notion of jail being a measure of competency in that case.

so you're both wrong....taking a lesser job makes him a hero? community activism makes him a hero?

see, this is as bad as people thinking you should get props for being a father to your children....you aren't supposed to do things for your community? you aren't supposed to step up to the plate when its called for?

why are these things seen as the exception? oh wait..i forgot this board is anti-cosby. so to you new negroes, this is all amazing and spectacular..sorry
 
uncle ruckus, what have you done for the black community?

relax youngin :cool:


If you only knew....thankz for the compliment tho' I'm told I don't look older than 29....:yes:

realtalk you've been kinda getting some real ownage in this thread so to keep it fair and balanced like a fox....

Do you support B. Obama for prez?

and Do you think the preacher Wells or W.E.T.F. his name's philosphy as a valid teaching?

realtalk again i will be open minded and mature if you are willing to reply with realtalk.:rolleyes:
 
wait, you actually didn't do any of that. i guess in your mind you did, but...seriously you didn't..good try??

i just didn't see the need to even bother with your post, but if you insist...fine..

I know Im not allowed to engage you in dialogue per your post in the other thread sire...

...but if you will forgive me...

We're clear on the fact that you think Obama is hype and phoney.

What candidate are you in support of then? Who meets the AudSyn standard?
 
what the fuck does any of that have to do with choosing the leader of the free world? how charismatic he/she is? are you serious???

you've just eliminated yourself from the rational debate, congrats!!

Charisma has a LOT to do with a candidate. Have you not noticed that our current Pres LACKS charisma and has made more than half the planet our enemy as a result? It's not like dude just has to learn how long the fries stay in the grease, it takes a PERSONALITY to be leader of the free world. Your argument makes no sense, no matter WHO is president, it's going to be likeability that gets he or she elected.

Bill Clinton, Kennedy, Reagan and damn near every other effective president were damn near 100% charisma, it's the ONLY reason they got much of shit done.

Now look at the recent presidents that DID NOT have charisma and what they accomplished...

Ford, Carter, Nixon, Bush Sr., Bush Jr.

See a pattern?
 
realtalk you've been kinda getting some real ownage in this thread so to keep it fair and balanced like a fox....

fans and fans alike, i've not gotten "owned" in ANY thread, "real talk" :smh:

at current, i don't support the obama candidacy, it's not that i think its fake or phony as someone else mentioned. it's all come together too well, too fast for it to be an independent minded movement without the hand of someone pushing it forward and for what reason?

i think the missing link for some of you to understand where i'm coming from is to take race out of the equation for a moment. if someone comes from nowhere is propelled to the highest position in the land, with virtually no dues paid and is fully accepted and vested by the establishment to be THEIR leader...that seems to make sense to you??? not without a price it doesn't..

so what's the price? what's the catch? i have a feeling what the price is, but apparently i'm naive and misguided for it :rolleyes: i just know that in washington politics, you get what you paid for and the good brother for Illinois ain't paid up yet.

i'm following the debates carefully though...and having many discussions about what's going on...who knows, i may support obama, i may not. it's very early
 
fans and fans alike, i've not gotten "owned" in ANY thread, "real talk" :smh:

at current, i don't support the obama candidacy, it's not that i think its fake or phony as someone else mentioned. it's all come together too well, too fast for it to be an independent minded movement without the hand of someone pushing it forward and for what reason?

i think the missing link for some of you to understand where i'm coming from is to take race out of the equation for a moment. if someone comes from nowhere is propelled to the highest position in the land, with virtually no dues paid and is fully accepted and vested by the establishment to be THEIR leader...that seems to make sense to you??? not without a price it doesn't..

so what's the price? what's the catch? i have a feeling what the price is, but apparently i'm naive and misguided for it :rolleyes: i just know that in washington politics, you get what you paid for and the good brother for Illinois ain't paid up yet.

i'm following the debates carefully though...and having many discussions about what's going on...who knows, i may support obama, i may not. it's very early

I don't know how old you are, but I would challenge ANYBODY to actually tell me HONESTLY that they knew who the hell Bill Clinton was before 1991 (outside of the ArkLaTex region of the U.S.). Same phenomenon as Obama and he did OK.
 
I swear we are our own worst enemy. :smh::smh:
I can't believe what I'm watching.

This is coming from a preacher who worships JESUS, a white-washed religious mythical figure who has been used to control, manipulate, and subjugate the minds of Blacks all over.

FUCK HIM AND HIS SERMON!
 
I don't know how old you are, but I would challenge ANYBODY to actually tell me HONESTLY that they knew who the hell Bill Clinton was before 1991 (outside of the ArkLaTex region of the U.S.). Same phenomenon as Obama and he did OK.

it's not the same at all, clinton was an accomplished governor, scandaled but accomplished who was in charge of a state government....

i've said all along i want to see a candidate who's been a governor, if you can handle that successfully, its a great indicator of the ability to run a nation in my own personal opinion.
 
it's not the same at all, clinton was an accomplished governor, scandaled but accomplished who was in charge of a state government....

i've said all along i want to see a candidate who's been a governor, if you can handle that successfully, its a great indicator of the ability to run a nation in my own personal opinion.

Well thats not on the table.

And your response is what--shit on the black senator because he doesnt meet your standard?

You DO know that Hillary is not more accomplished than Obama and had no charge over a govt?

Doesnt it trouble you that the person you choose to consistently lash out at is the black candidate?

That's fuckin deep. Kenneth Clark (Brown v BOE) would have a field day with that.
 
As I post in some of these threads I am seeing A LOT of attention whores posting nonsensical ramblings just to either: A. be included or B. just to say something to incite the group. I didn't know if I should just blow it off as sophomoric and juvenile F***ery or to really be saddened for the mental limitations that are leading them to such flawed views.

After reading the retorts in this post it is clear that I should do both...:hmm:
 
it's not the same at all, clinton was an accomplished governor, scandaled but accomplished who was in charge of a state government....

i've said all along i want to see a candidate who's been a governor, if you can handle that successfully, its a great indicator of the ability to run a nation in my own personal opinion.

Our current president was a governor he didn't work out to well.:smh:
 
Back
Top