SEC = 12 teams. 10 are bowl eligible now. vandy could be #11

"Star Wars"?????????

"The Empire Strikes Back"????????


Not ringing any bells???????

If not...........tell us about life on Neptune. Do you have Christmas there?

:hmm:

D-Nice 1 (The Nice One)

real talk. i've NEVER seen star wars, the empire strikes back, or any of those movies. i've never watched one single episode of star trek either-just not interested in sci-fi type stuff.

but i do know about capt. kirk, though. that nicca will fuck anything walking. :lol::lol::lol:
 
The SEC has the best conference, and will play for the title...

The SECheat is loaded with OVER-RATED teams with 2-4 losses!

That Bowl eligible shit is over-rated also because D1-A went to a 12 game schedule, but they kept Bowl Eligibility at 6 wins; under an 11 game schedule 6 wins meant YOU HAD TO HAVE A WINNING SEASON TO GO BOWLING, but 6 wins out of a 12 game schedule means that 6-6 or .500 teams are eligible for a BOWL, WHICH REALLY DON'T PROVE SHIT!

Learn SOMETHING ABOUT CFB BEFORE YOU "BUY INTO THE HYPE"!


If LSU plays Oregon, they're gonna get their ILLITERATE "ASSES TORN OUTTA THE FRAME"; LSU needs to be praying for Oklahoma or Kansas to meet them in the BCS Championship Game or else they're gonna get embarrassed like Ohio St. did!
 

The SECheat is loaded with OVER-RATED teams with 2-4 losses!

That Bowl eligible shit is over-rated also because D1-A went to a 12 game schedule, but they kept Bowl Eligibility at 6 wins; under an 11 game schedule 6 wins meant YOU HAD TO HAVE A WINNING SEASON TO GO BOWLING, but 6 wins out of a 12 game schedule means that 6-6 or .500 teams are eligible for a BOWL, WHICH REALLY DON'T PROVE SHIT!

Learn SOMETHING ABOUT CFB BEFORE YOU "BUY INTO THE HYPE"!


If LSU plays Oregon, they're gonna get their ILLITERATE "ASSES TORN OUTTA THE FRAME"; LSU needs to be praying for Oklahoma or Kansas to meet them in the BCS Championship Game or else they're gonna get embarrassed like Ohio St. did!

:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::lol:
 

The SECheat is loaded with OVER-RATED teams with 2-4 losses!

That Bowl eligible shit is over-rated also because D1-A went to a 12 game schedule, but they kept Bowl Eligibility at 6 wins; under an 11 game schedule 6 wins meant YOU HAD TO HAVE A WINNING SEASON TO GO BOWLING, but 6 wins out of a 12 game schedule means that 6-6 or .500 teams are eligible for a BOWL, WHICH REALLY DON'T PROVE SHIT!

Learn SOMETHING ABOUT CFB BEFORE YOU "BUY INTO THE HYPE"!


If LSU plays Oregon, they're gonna get their ILLITERATE "ASSES TORN OUTTA THE FRAME"; LSU needs to be praying for Oklahoma or Kansas to meet them in the BCS Championship Game or else they're gonna get embarrassed like Ohio St. did!

Them some strong words. But the man has a point (except that OU would destroy LSU--the game would be very competitive).....

Here's all the nonconference teams that the SEC has played this year.....South Florida, Kansas State, Tennesee Tech, New Mexico St., Troy *3, Ut-Chat, N. Texas, Florida Int'l, Western Ky, Florida Atl *2, Florida State *2, Oklahoma State, Western Carolina *2, GA Tech, E. Kentucky, Kent State, Louisville, Va. Tech ,Tulane *2, La Tech *2, Midd Tenn State, Memphis, Missouri, Northwestern State, Richmond, E. Michigan, Miami (OH), Wake Forest, Houston, Louisiana Monroe, UAB
, Gardner Webb, W. Virginia, Lousiana Lafayette *2. CLemson, South Carolina St., UNC, Cal, Southern Miss, Arkansas State

As you can see it ain't too hard to come into conference play with four wins and then beat Ole Miss/Miss State/Vandy/Arkanasas to become bowl eligible.....

Again the SEC is a good conference, but it's just a conference like the other BCS conference (Couple great teams/bunch of average teams that'll beat each other/couple of doormats)
 
And who exactly has Oregon played to make you think they'll "tear LSU" out of the frame? Houston? Michigan? Fresno State? Stanford? Cal? Washington State? Washington? An overrated USC? A DEFINITELY overrated Arizona State? Arizona? UCLA? Oregon State? PLEASE!!!!!!!

Oregon hasn't seen a team with LSU's speed on defense this whole year, not even close. And as weak as USC's defense is they pretty much kept Oregon in check....so saying they'd tear LSU out of the frame is just an asinine statement.
 
Them some strong words. But the man has a point (except that OU would destroy LSU--the game would be very competitive).....


As you can see it ain't too hard to come into conference play with four wins and then beat Ole Miss/Miss State/Vandy/Arkanasas to become bowl eligible.....

Again the SEC is a good conference, but it's just a conference like the other BCS conference (Couple great teams/bunch of average teams that'll beat each other/couple of doormats)

all teams have "soft" teams on their schedule in college-all of them. but the difference between the sec and the big 10 is IN CONFERENCE competition.

the "doormats" of the SEC can beat the top teams-if they're not prepared. but can northwestern beat osu this year? can minnesota beat ANYONE this year? the doormats of the big 10 are complete doormats-on sale doormats at wal-mart.

did you say, "ou would destroy lsu?" :lol::lol::lol:
you mean like they were supposed to destroy them a few years ago and got run outta the superdome? :lol::lol::lol:

EVERYONE thought ou would be good competition for lsu in the sugar bowl. everyone. and AS USUAL, OU LAID A BIG COLD EGG on the field during a bowl game. stoops is NOT a "big game" coach-he's proven that FACT over time.

And who exactly has Oregon played to make you think they'll "tear LSU" out of the frame? Houston? Michigan? Fresno State? Stanford? Cal? Washington State? Washington? An overrated USC? A DEFINITELY overrated Arizona State? Arizona? UCLA? Oregon State? PLEASE!!!!!!!

Oregon hasn't seen a team with LSU's speed on defense this whole year, not even close. And as weak as USC's defense is they pretty much kept Oregon in check....so saying they'd tear LSU out of the frame is just an asinine statement.

the pac 10 has speed teams, but they are finesse teams. they've never seen the kind of speed AND power AND depth that lsu can bring.

if lsu loses a D-lineman, another one comes in that's JUST as strong, just as fast, just as mean. an oregon vs lsu matchup would be simple:

oregon throws the ball and scores because honestly, lsu's secondary is NOT the best.

lsu would CONTROL THE CLOCK and their O-line would wear oregon down, down, down-keeping that high powered offense and dixon off the field.

end result: a close game until the 4th quarter when that constant pounding on oregon's d-linemen has them saying, "no mas" as the 5-headed running back crew from lsu piles up the yards and eats-up the clock.

pac 10 = high powered offenses but NO CLOCK CONTROL so their opponents ALWAYS have a chance. and if those opponents can control the clock thru running, they've gotta play a QUICKER catch-up game.
 
all teams have "soft" teams on their schedule in college-all of them. but the difference between the sec and the big 10 is IN CONFERENCE competition.

Bruh, The top two teams of any conference go undefeated or get one or two losses. The middle of the pack teams beat each other up. And here's the thing, the In Conference competition is so great because alot of those teams have piss poor quarterback play, so they all end up looking alike (Defensive struggles)

the "doormats" of the SEC can beat the top teams-if they're not prepared. but can northwestern beat osu this year? can minnesota beat ANYONE this year? the doormats of the big 10 are complete doormats-on sale doormats at wal-mart.

If OSU's unprepared, Northwestern has as much a shot of beating OSU as Ole Miss has of beating LSU

did you say, "ou would destroy lsu?" :lol::lol::lol:
you mean like they were supposed to destroy them a few years ago and got run outta the superdome? :lol::lol::lol:

I thought he meant Oregon, when he said OU, but looking back I can see how the error was made. And I think Kansas State had already exposed OU for the soft team that they were, so it was really no surprise that year.

the pac 10 has speed teams, but they are finesse teams. they've never seen the kind of speed AND power AND depth that lsu can bring.

Just one problem there, LSU has yet to play a team who was competent in just about every facet of the game. The teams that were closest to that (Kentucky and FLorida), they lost one and almost lost the other. And Oregon has a better defense than both of those teams.

if lsu loses a D-lineman, another one comes in that's JUST as strong, just as fast, just as mean. an oregon vs lsu matchup would be simple

If LSU lost both Glen Dorsey and Tyson Jackson THEY WOULD BE FUCKED!

You really don't think LSU's going to be just a tad overconfident going into the Sugar Bowl, with it being a home game, Les Miles last game before he heads to Michigan (Irony here seeing that he's choosing the Big 10 over the SEC), and the whole "We're the best team cuz are conference is so great" schtick?
 
In the SEC, there are NO off weeks. An open date is as good as it gets.

No other conference can say that.

D-Nice 1 (The Nice One)
 
In the SEC, there are NO off weeks. An open date is as good as it gets.

No other conference can say that.

D-Nice 1 (The Nice One)

There is no off week in any conference. Conferences that have a conference championship game are tougher conferences imo. Conferences like Pac 10 and Slow 10 have a easier chance to win it all. Unlike Big 12, Sec, and the Acc.
 
There is no off week in any conference. Conferences that have a conference championship game are tougher conferences imo. Conferences like Pac 10 and Slow 10 have a easier chance to win it all. Unlike Big 12, Sec, and the Acc.

i consider akron, kent state, and youngstown state OFF weeks for osu.

how can you claim to be THE best football school in the nation playing teams like this??? how?

there's no need to play nebraska or tennessee out of conference for osu, but damn, play somebody.

i think they PURPOSELY schedule soft teams like this to "pad" that record before the "run thru the other 8" and gauge themselves for the michigan game.

but both michigan AND osu got their asses handed to them last year in HORRIBLE beatdowns.

Bruh, The top two teams of any conference go undefeated or get one or two losses. The middle of the pack teams beat each other up. And here's the thing, the In Conference competition is so great because alot of those teams have piss poor quarterback play, so they all end up looking alike (Defensive struggles)

If OSU's unprepared, Northwestern has as much a shot of beating OSU as Ole Miss has of beating LSU

comment: ole miss is horrible, but they played florida tough, and they've lost a few close ones this year. now, did northwestern or ANY of the supposed competition in the big 10 even remotely challenge osu?

I thought he meant Oregon, when he said OU, but looking back I can see how the error was made. And I think Kansas State had already exposed OU for the soft team that they were, so it was really no surprise that year.

comment: playing a "soft" schedule and playing the "soft" opponents i the big 10 exposed the hell out of both osu & michigan. to you big 10 fans, it was a surprise when florida ran thru them. to SEC fans, we already knew the deal when osu showed up.

Just one problem there, LSU has yet to play a team who was competent in just about every facet of the game. The teams that were closest to that (Kentucky and FLorida), they lost one and almost lost the other. And Oregon has a better defense than both of those teams.

comment: oregon has a better defense? but who are they playing? i think oregon has yet to face a good hard-nosed, grind it out team like lsu-a PHYSICAL team with team speed at damn near EVERY position.


If LSU lost both Glen Dorsey and Tyson Jackson THEY WOULD BE FUCKED!

comment: they lost glen dorsey and his replacement did a GREAT job in his absence. can oregon or osu afford to lose ANYBODY on either side of the ball? [no hate] if dixon gets hurt, oregon is a 0.500 team. period. [/no hate]

You really don't think LSU's going to be just a tad overconfident going into the Sugar Bowl, with it being a home game, Les Miles last game before he heads to Michigan (Irony here seeing that he's choosing the Big 10 over the SEC), and the whole "We're the best team cuz are conference is so great" schtick?

some folks down here in the south are questioning les miles play-calling and wouldn't mind him leaving for michigan. lsu has been in too many close games to be over-confident about playing anyone.

it seems very evident to me that miles is taking all these risks to FUCK THINGS up before leaving for michigan.

i say, "good riddance," cause even though he's done a great job at coaching so far, THIS year is a very ATYPICAL year for his play-calling and risk-taking almost like he WANTS to lose a damn game.

i say, "fuck les miles AND fuck michigan too. leave. go. bye." one thing's for sure, he won't be getting the same level and abundance of talent when he goes up there, and he's not liked enough to pull recruits from texas, la, miss, alabama, florida, etc. up to michigan.

Not when Miss State beats Alabama and the highest paid coach in Nick Saban. :lol:

miss. state has upset top SEC teams for a few years now. even though they're NOT the powerhouse team of the SEC west, the team AND THE COACH are very well liked and supported by black folks.

and don't think that having a black coach at MS won't pull some of the top recruits to MS cause it will. and when/if croom gets the right players in the right places, these so-called "upsets" will be the norm.

MS and the success of that program has a bigger meaning to some folks here in the deep south; it ain't about MS winning, it's about a black man succeeding in a place where black folks were once unwelcome.

btw, fuck nick saban and his money; he can go back to michigan state and the sorry ass big 10. he can follow les miles up there.

fuck 'em both.
 
Last edited:
i consider akron, kent state, and youngstown state OFF weeks for osu.

how can you claim to be THE best football school in the nation playing teams like this??? how?

there's no need to play nebraska or tennessee out of conference for osu, but damn, play somebody.

i think they PURPOSELY schedule soft teams like this to "pad" that record before the "run thru the other 8" and gauge themselves for the michigan game.

but both michigan AND osu got their asses handed to them last year in HORRIBLE beatdowns.

Every team plays wack teams.
 
i consider akron, kent state, and youngstown state OFF weeks for osu.

how can you claim to be THE best football school in the nation playing teams like this??? how?

there's no need to play nebraska or tennessee out of conference for osu, but damn, play somebody.

Okay, lets try this again....and this time I've removed all the big names from the schedule. I've included S.Florida b/c at the time of scheduling I'm pretty sure Auburn thought they were getting a cake game.

South Florida, Tennesee Tech, New Mexico St., Troy *3, Ut-Chat, N. Texas, Florida Int'l, Western Ky, Florida Atl *2, Western Carolina *2, E. Kentucky, Kent State, Tulane *2, La Tech *2, Midd Tenn State, Memphis, Northwestern State, Richmond, E. Michigan, Miami (OH), Houston, Louisiana Monroe, UAB
, Gardner Webb, Lousiana Lafayette *2., South Carolina St., Southern Miss, Arkansas State.


That's really a murderers row of non conference games there. Seems like a lot of off weeks here.....

mfln130l.jpg


Fuck playing a real team, how bought boarding a plane and flying somewhere above the Mason-Dixon line for once?

BTW I hate the Big 10 with a passion b/c of the elitist attitude that they have carried for so long.....don't aspire to be them!
 
The difference is the SEC's conference schedule is hard enough to allow them to play a cupcake or two per season. When you talk about the Big 10, Pac 10 and Big 12...you play cupcakes in conference AND out with the exception of one or two teams.
 
I went to a big team school. I respect the teams..however, you have to admit that OSU had a cake ass schedule this year..they didn't schedule ANY tough non-conference games... Illinois is MUCH better than people think. I'm not suprised they won...

I hate the SEC fanboys.. BUT I respect the SEC..and you have to admit the truth..you cant take games off in the SEC...and that shit comes back to kick Big Ten schools in the ass SOMETIMES... because they come out Flat because they are not used to playing good teams with speed EVERY WEEK... it creates complacency.

Also..with the exception of games like Mich vs Wisconsin (Mich. did have their starting QB and starting RB out)..if you look at the types of teams that give those two teams problems when they lose... it's teams with TEAM speed...and the SEC is full of those times of teams..

With that being said...Michigan still wins a large majority of their games against SEC teams...especially bowl games against the SEC but I don't think the Michigan program is an ELITE program anymore...

But the problem is this... when you play softer schedules AND your season ends early (not conference championship, etc) you set yourself up to come out flat in bowl games..ESPECIALLY against teams with crazy SPEED... as what happened last year with Mich. vs USC and especially OSU vs FLorida... I think that also had a lot to do with what happened with Ohio St....all those weeks off..combined with playing soft games....against a team that doesn't have the luxury of taking games off (Florida)

but if you look at the schedule of a team like LSU and then look at Ohio St and their schedule..you can't even compare the two...
 
Last edited:
What is the reason for the Big10 and Pac10 not to play a Conference championship game. It almost guarantees the two best teams will settle it on the field. Have they ever gave a reason for this?
 
The difference is the SEC's conference schedule is hard enough to allow them to play a cupcake or two per season. When you talk about the Big 10, Pac 10 and Big 12...you play cupcakes in conference AND out with the exception of one or two teams.

Stop it!:lol:

You've got 3 doormats: Ole Miss/Miss State***/ Vandy
You've got 3 teams with INCOMPTENT QB PLAY: Auburn/Alabama/Arkansas
You've got 1 team that the word defense is foreign: Kentucky
You've got 1 team that is average in all facets: S.Carolina
Two Schitzos: Georgia, Tennesee
Two Legit Players: Florida and LSU

All you've got is a bunch of NAMES!!!!!!! (I was sreaming this shit ten years ago with the big 10)

***Even the sun shines on a doormats ass once in a while
 
What is the reason for the Big10 and Pac10 not to play a Conference championship game. It almost guarantees the two best teams will settle it on the field. Have they ever gave a reason for this?
 
sec is still the best conference out there. even though i think oregon's the best team all these other teams would get slaughtered in our conference.defenses here are on another level.
 
The difference is the SEC's conference schedule is hard enough to allow them to play a cupcake or two per season. When you talk about the Big 10, Pac 10 and Big 12...you play cupcakes in conference AND out with the exception of one or two teams.

what these cats don't understand is that in the SEC, damn near all the games are fierce rivalries. you take a week "off" against vandy or miss state, and you'll get your ass beat.

now, under ANY circumstance, does minnesota, indiana, northwestern, etc. even have a REMOTE chance to beat osu?

i don't think so. btw, i called illinois beating osu a LONG time ago.

I went to a big team school. I respect the teams..however, you have to admit that OSU had a cake ass schedule this year..they didn't schedule ANY tough non-conference games... Illinois is MUCH better than people think. I'm not suprised they won...

I hate the SEC fanboys.. BUT I respect the SEC..and you have to admit the truth..you cant take games off in the SEC...and that shit comes back to kick Big Ten schools in the ass SOMETIMES... because they come out Flat because they are not used to playing good teams with speed EVERY WEEK... it creates complacency.

Also..with the exception of games like Mich vs Wisconsin (Mich. did have their starting QB and starting RB out)..if you look at the types of teams that give those two teams problems when they lose... it's teams with TEAM speed...and the SEC is full of those times of teams..

With that being said...Michigan still wins a large majority of their games against SEC teams...especially bowl games against the SEC but I don't think the Michigan program is an ELITE program anymore...

But the problem is this... when you play softer schedules AND your season ends early (not conference championship, etc) you set yourself up to come out flat in bowl games..ESPECIALLY against teams with crazy SPEED... as what happened last year with Mich. vs USC and especially OSU vs FLorida... I think that also had a lot to do with what happened with Ohio St....all those weeks off..combined with playing soft games....against a team that doesn't have the luxury of taking games off (Florida)

but if you look at the schedule of a team like LSU and then look at Ohio St and their schedule..you can't even compare the two...

co-sign.

there's a difference between team speed at skill positions and overall team speed. the D-linemen from florida and usc won those games against michigan and osu.

y'all were all screaming, "ted ginn, jr." and i was just sitting there like this: :smh::smh::smh: florida is going to unleash HELL on these cats.

finally, you are beginning to see why playing a pussy schedule and NOT having good tough competition week-in/week-out HURTS your team.
 
^^^

MAX,

I said the same shit last year..actually started a thread titled "The Big Ten was overrated"...where you begin to argue with me about the shit despite the thread title and the fact that I posted it...the irony

and Max..I could have sworn you said NO OTHER TEAM had a chance against Ohio St...except Michigan...
 
what these cats don't understand is that in the SEC, damn near all the games are fierce rivalries. you take a week "off" against vandy or miss state, and you'll get your ass beat.

now, under ANY circumstance, does minnesota, indiana, northwestern, etc. even have a REMOTE chance to beat osu?

finally, you are beginning to see why playing a pussy schedule and NOT having good tough competition week-in/week-out HURTS your team.

Does Ole Miss, Arkansas, Miss State, or Vandy have a chance against LSU????? NOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!! None at all. Zero. Zilch. Nada.

If LSU takes a week off they still beat Ole Miss just like OSU beats Northwestern on a Week off. Now if Michigan State/ Alabama/Texas Tech/Wake Forest/Oregon State/Pittsburg take a week off against their respective conference doormat, they just might lose.........

Looking at the current BCS top ten, the only team that would struggle against the mighty SEC this year would be Virginia Tech and MAYBE Ohio State. The rest of those "other schools" (Oregon, Missouri, Kansas, Oklahoma, and Arizona State) would either be undefeated or have one loss (Most losing to LSU or Florida or having a slip up game against UGA). These teams have Good/Great quarterback play, decent defenses, strong offenses, and solid special teams (missouri's punt game is suspect.....the punt return game is strong though)

Oh and if you take close to 6 weeks off between the regular season and the bowl game, the strength of your schedule doesn't really matter. Just who's healthy/academically eligbible/Well Prepared during all the bowl week distractions matter a whole lot more.

And before it begins.....Kansas is really good.
 
^^^

MAX,

I said the same shit last year..actually started a thread titled "The Big Ten was overrated"...where you begin to argue with me about the shit despite the thread title and the fact that I posted it...the irony

and Max..I could have sworn you said NO OTHER TEAM had a chance against Ohio St...except Michigan...

when i first saw illinois play and the athletes that zook had on the field, i said that they could possibly beat osu.

then, after watching them lose a few, i lost faith in them. actually, now i think osu is gonna KILL michigan next weekend trying to prove a point to the pollsters.

i sure hope your wolverines are ready.

btw, i give zook and his recent florida recruits about 2 more years and they'll OWN the big 10.

Does Ole Miss, Arkansas, Miss State, or Vandy have a chance against LSU????? NOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!! None at all. Zero. Zilch. Nada.


If LSU takes a week off they still beat Ole Miss just like OSU beats Northwestern on a Week off. Now if Michigan State/ Alabama/Texas Tech/Wake Forest/Oregon State/Pittsburg take a week off against their respective conference doormat, they just might lose.........

Looking at the current BCS top ten, the only team that would struggle against the mighty SEC this year would be Virginia Tech and MAYBE Ohio State. The rest of those "other schools" (Oregon, Missouri, Kansas, Oklahoma, and Arizona State) would either be undefeated or have one loss (Most losing to LSU or Florida or having a slip up game against UGA). These teams have Good/Great quarterback play, decent defenses, strong offenses, and solid special teams (missouri's punt game is suspect.....the punt return game is strong though)

Oh and if you take close to 6 weeks off between the regular season and the bowl game, the strength of your schedule doesn't really matter. Just who's healthy/academically eligbible/Well Prepared during all the bowl week distractions matter a whole lot more.

And before it begins.....Kansas is really good.

miss state got owned vs lsu. truth. but miss state did win a few good games this year. remember, coach croom is STILL working with the recruits handed to him. he inherited a program in TOTAL chaos.

lsu opened the season against va tech and TOTALLY embarrassed them.

taking those 6 weeks off is NO EXCUSE so STOP using it. i'd respect the big 10 MORE if they were FORCED to play one or two more IN CONFERENCE GAMES and were FORCED to play a conference championship like the SEC, big 12, ACC, etc.

why doesn't the big 10 and pac 10 want to play a championship game? why? no one seems to want to answer that question.

strength of schedule matters a LOT. you don't want your team playing cupcake games all fucking year cause when they lineup against a powerhouse, guess what? ASS-WHOOPING. see florida vs osu and michigan vs usc for GREAT examples. and this year's example is kansas. they have yet to play a team from the top 15 and have to finish the season against missouri & oklahoma. i think oklahoma's team speed and pass rush is gonna FUCK them up big time.

don't break out your pom-poms for kansas yet... leave that kool-aid alone. look at their schedule. they have YET to play a team that's HIGHLY competitive.
 
Last edited:
What is the reason for the Big10 and Pac10 not to play a Conference championship game. It almost guarantees the two best teams will settle it on the field. Have they ever gave a reason for this?

cuz they only have 11 teams in the conference, and you have to have 12 teams in order to have a champ. game. shit, you see how long it took the Big 10 & Pac-10 to have a tourney for the basketball teams.

having said that...GO BLUE!!!
 
If Michigan finally gets a new coach, they will be fine. However, if Carr keeps his job..it will be more of the same...and YEP...Illinois has the potential to be a monster in the future because of their style of play..

Michigan hasnt really looked good all year..AND both Henne and Hart are hurt....the real issue is Hart...seems the offense can't move without Hart.

I would put my money on OSU too...but you never know with Rivalry games...but considering how Trussell has OWNED Carr...even my school allegiance doesn't make me stupid..

However, I want to see LSU vs Oregon in the big game... I'm just not confident in a Big 12 team showing up..they have been laying some goose eggs in bowls lately and they went like 0-17 against ranked non-conference teams last year too
 
Last edited:
Back
Top