Make a Contribution to Remove NSFW Ads

UPDATE: Donald Trump Takes Office as the 47th US President

DC_Dude said:
Click to expand...


Polymarket is pump-faking wth that misleading tweet. There is NO new deal.

More context...

JUST IN: Iran’s president reveals “all our money in China has been frozen.”
Readers added context
Iran's president in a Fox News interview described Iran's money in China as blocked, referring to longstanding oil revenues inaccessible due to U.S. sanctions since 2018, not a new Chinese freeze or revelation. borna.news/en/news/6610/p… avash.news/ansarullah-doe… wsj.com/world/middle-e…

 

Curtis Arnold​

4 hours ago ·

No photo description available.
 


Is America’s Strategy in Iran Backfiring? with Robert Pape

start @ 14:16



University of Chicago professor and military strategist Robert Pape argues that the U.S. is facing a strategic defeat or paralysis in the war with Iran because of the "escalation trap" and the "Second Precision Revolution."

The Escalation Trap

  • Tactical vs. Strategic Failure: Pape explains that U.S. tactical successes—such as air strikes, economic blockades, or targeted leadership killings—do not force Iran to surrender. Instead, they trigger intense nationalism and motivate Iran to fight for survival, backfiring strategically on Washington.
  • Loss of Control: Rather than dictating the terms of the conflict, Pape states that the U.S. has lost control of the trajectory of the war, finding itself dragged deeper into a difficult military and economic quagmire without an off-ramp.



    The Second Precision Revolution
    • Cheap Drones and Technology: Pape points out that the era of unchallenged U.S. military dominance (which was cemented by the 1991 Gulf War) has ended due to cheap, mass-produced drones, commercial sensors, and AI.
    • Asymmetric Leverage: Just as weaker actors like Ukraine or the Houthis have utilized these tools, Iran has used them to withstand superior U.S. military might, disrupt vital shipping chokepoints like the Strait of Hormuz, and impose persistent economic costs on the U.S. and global trade.

1. The Economic Contradiction (The Strait of Hormuz)

  • The Claim: "...the closure of the strait is just a pressure point on Iran and the Gulf states, rather than America."
  • The Reality: The Strait of Hormuz is the world's most critical oil transit chokepoint. Closing it does not just hurt Iran and the Gulf states; it triggers an immediate global energy crisis. Even if the U.S. is energy independent, oil is a globally priced commodity. A closure would cause global oil prices to skyrocket, causing massive inflation, stock market shocks, and severe economic pain for American consumers and voters. Therefore, it is a massive pressure point on America.

    2. Misunderstanding Iran's Leverage
    • The Claim: "Irans financial position weakens each day the strait remains closed..."
    • The Reality: If the strait is closed, Iran is likely the one who closed it (via mines, submarines, or missiles) as a desperate asymmetric warfare tactic. Iran expects its financial position to suffer. By closing the strait, Iran's goal is to inflict so much economic pain on the West and the global economy that the U.S. is forced to back down. Assuming Iran will break first ignores their historical willingness to endure extreme economic hardship ("resistance economy") to achieve strategic goals.
    • 3. Misaligned Strategic Objectives
    • The Claim: "...nuclear disarmament remains the key issue..."
    • The Reality: In a scenario where a hot war has broken out and the Strait of Hormuz is closed, "nuclear disarmament" ceases to be the immediate key issue. The immediate issue becomes freedom of navigation, preventing a global economic collapse, and destroying Iran's conventional military capabilities (like their anti-ship missile sites). Disarmament is a diplomatic or long-term goal; it cannot be easily achieved via a naval blockade alone.
  • 4. Overestimating U.S. Insulation
    • The Claim: "The US does not have to give into any of Irans demands."
    • The Reality: While the U.S. military is vastly superior, the U.S. President faces intense domestic political pressure. Prolonged high gas prices, inflation, and the potential loss of U.S. Navy assets to Iranian asymmetric attacks (like drone swarms or smart mines) would create severe domestic political blowback. The U.S. may not "give in," but it would be under immense pressure to find a rapid diplomatic or military exit.

Strategic Defeat and Global Repercussions

  • Erosion of Superpower Status: Pape views the conflict as a bookend to the idea that the U.S. military cannot be beaten, arguing it threatens global alliances, trade stability, and the financial power of the U.S. dollar.
  • Inability to Dictate Terms: According to Pape, Washington is left trying to "squeak out" of a strategic defeat while Iran retains coercive leverage over regional shipping and refuses to concede to U.S. demands.

It's a war about who controls the world. At the moment, it's Iran doing the controlling. It controls the oil flow, the blood that feeds the machine—i.e., world economic growth.



  • Rhetoric and Backlash: In April 2026, U.S. President Donald Trump warned on Truth Social that "a whole civilization will die tonight" if a peace deal over the Strait of Hormuz was not reached. This language shocked lawmakers and international legal experts.
  • Clash of Systems: International commentators, including analyses from CGTN, argue that the conflict reflects a deeper structural divide between Western hegemony and Iran's defense of its Islamic political model and regional sovereignty.
  • Government Limits: Western leaders state that regime change or the destruction of the Iranian people is not the goal of the military action, framing the war around security policy rather than an attack on a culture or civilization itself.


The 2026 Iran War launched by the United States and Israel on February 28, 2026, is officially about dismantling Iran's nuclear and military capabilities, while the idea of a "civilizational war" stems from sharp political rhetoric and deep geopolitical clashes rather than an official goal to destroy Iranian society.

Official Stated Goals

According to reports from the (AJC) and policy groups, the military campaign focuses on specific strategic objectives:

  • Nuclear Program: Stopping Iran from ever building a nuclear weapon.
  • Missiles: Destroying Iran's ballistic missile factories and supplies.
  • Regional Influence: Weakening military groups backed by Iran, such as Hamas and Hezbollah.
  • Naval Power: Dismantling the Iranian Navy to protect shipping.
 
Last edited:
geechiedan said:


Is America’s Strategy in Iran Backfiring? with Robert Pape

start @ 14:16



University of Chicago professor and military strategist Robert Pape argues that the U.S. is facing a strategic defeat or paralysis in the war with Iran because of the "escalation trap" and the "Second Precision Revolution."

The Escalation Trap

  • Tactical vs. Strategic Failure: Pape explains that U.S. tactical successes—such as air strikes, economic blockades, or targeted leadership killings—do not force Iran to surrender. Instead, they trigger intense nationalism and motivate Iran to fight for survival, backfiring strategically on Washington.
  • Loss of Control: Rather than dictating the terms of the conflict, Pape states that the U.S. has lost control of the trajectory of the war, finding itself dragged deeper into a difficult military and economic quagmire without an off-ramp.



    The Second Precision Revolution
    • Cheap Drones and Technology: Pape points out that the era of unchallenged U.S. military dominance (which was cemented by the 1991 Gulf War) has ended due to cheap, mass-produced drones, commercial sensors, and AI.
    • Asymmetric Leverage: Just as weaker actors like Ukraine or the Houthis have utilized these tools, Iran has used them to withstand superior U.S. military might, disrupt vital shipping chokepoints like the Strait of Hormuz, and impose persistent economic costs on the U.S. and global trade.

1. The Economic Contradiction (The Strait of Hormuz)

  • The Claim: "...the closure of the strait is just a pressure point on Iran and the Gulf states, rather than America."
  • The Reality: The Strait of Hormuz is the world's most critical oil transit chokepoint. Closing it does not just hurt Iran and the Gulf states; it triggers an immediate global energy crisis. Even if the U.S. is energy independent, oil is a globally priced commodity. A closure would cause global oil prices to skyrocket, causing massive inflation, stock market shocks, and severe economic pain for American consumers and voters. Therefore, it is a massive pressure point on America.

    2. Misunderstanding Iran's Leverage
    • The Claim: "Irans financial position weakens each day the strait remains closed..."
    • The Reality: If the strait is closed, Iran is likely the one who closed it (via mines, submarines, or missiles) as a desperate asymmetric warfare tactic. Iran expects its financial position to suffer. By closing the strait, Iran's goal is to inflict so much economic pain on the West and the global economy that the U.S. is forced to back down. Assuming Iran will break first ignores their historical willingness to endure extreme economic hardship ("resistance economy") to achieve strategic goals.
    • 3. Misaligned Strategic Objectives
    • The Claim: "...nuclear disarmament remains the key issue..."
    • The Reality: In a scenario where a hot war has broken out and the Strait of Hormuz is closed, "nuclear disarmament" ceases to be the immediate key issue. The immediate issue becomes freedom of navigation, preventing a global economic collapse, and destroying Iran's conventional military capabilities (like their anti-ship missile sites). Disarmament is a diplomatic or long-term goal; it cannot be easily achieved via a naval blockade alone.
  • 4. Overestimating U.S. Insulation
    • The Claim: "The US does not have to give into any of Irans demands."
    • The Reality: While the U.S. military is vastly superior, the U.S. President faces intense domestic political pressure. Prolonged high gas prices, inflation, and the potential loss of U.S. Navy assets to Iranian asymmetric attacks (like drone swarms or smart mines) would create severe domestic political blowback. The U.S. may not "give in," but it would be under immense pressure to find a rapid diplomatic or military exit.

Strategic Defeat and Global Repercussions

  • Erosion of Superpower Status: Pape views the conflict as a bookend to the idea that the U.S. military cannot be beaten, arguing it threatens global alliances, trade stability, and the financial power of the U.S. dollar.
  • Inability to Dictate Terms: According to Pape, Washington is left trying to "squeak out" of a strategic defeat while Iran retains coercive leverage over regional shipping and refuses to concede to U.S. demands.

It's a war about who controls the world. At the moment, it's Iran doing the controlling. It controls the oil flow, the blood that feeds the machine—i.e., world economic growth.



  • Rhetoric and Backlash: In April 2026, U.S. President Donald Trump warned on Truth Social that "a whole civilization will die tonight" if a peace deal over the Strait of Hormuz was not reached. This language shocked lawmakers and international legal experts.
  • Clash of Systems: International commentators, including analyses from CGTN, argue that the conflict reflects a deeper structural divide between Western hegemony and Iran's defense of its Islamic political model and regional sovereignty.
  • Government Limits: Western leaders state that regime change or the destruction of the Iranian people is not the goal of the military action, framing the war around security policy rather than an attack on a culture or civilization itself.


The 2026 Iran War launched by the United States and Israel on February 28, 2026, is officially about dismantling Iran's nuclear and military capabilities, while the idea of a "civilizational war" stems from sharp political rhetoric and deep geopolitical clashes rather than an official goal to destroy Iranian society.

Official Stated Goals

According to reports from the (AJC) and policy groups, the military campaign focuses on specific strategic objectives:

  • Nuclear Program: Stopping Iran from ever building a nuclear weapon.
  • Missiles: Destroying Iran's ballistic missile factories and supplies.
  • Regional Influence: Weakening military groups backed by Iran, such as Hamas and Hezbollah.
  • Naval Power: Dismantling the Iranian Navy to protect shipping.
Click to expand...

How are you superior?

It reminds me of the section of the prologue of Invisible Man where the yokels steps out of time and gives the champion a jab to the kisser. Like Dr. Bledsoe said, “ The race needs disillusioned fighters.”
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

X
Donald Trump eviscerates Alex Jones, Candace Owens, Megyn Kelly and Tucker Carlson
Replies
5
Views
410
Dirtylakerie
Dirtylakerie
MCP
US National Park Service removes free entry on MLK Day and Juneteenth
Replies
0
Views
174
MCP
MCP
MCP
No Kings protests begin as huge anti-Trump rallies sweep across US
Replies
3
Views
312
Da Backshot Champ
Da Backshot Champ
MCP
Wag the Dog 2.0: Trump’s Evasive Control of the News
Replies
0
Views
176
MCP
MCP
MCP
The Likely Consequences of a US War on Venezuela
Replies
6
Views
544
DC_Dude
DC_Dude
Back
Top